Wait. So Chicago is not the globe? Texas heat wave may have set record for nation’s hottest winter temp ever recorded

[Anomalism]

Typical from someone who cannot debate the issue and cannot refute.


If you aren't parroting like me, you are crazy!!!

I have debated it across hundreds of responses. Even people on your side of the argument think you're crazy. Lol

 

[EMH]

Even people on your side of the argument think you're crazy

LMFAO!!!

The taxpayer funded "CO2 FRAUD faux skeptics" don't want CO2 FRAUD busted, they make money and get on TV because it isn't busted. That's why they hate the truth I post that you and they cannot refute...

 

[Anomalism]

LMFAO!!!

The taxpayer funded "CO2 FRAUD faux skeptics" don't want CO2 FRAUD busted, they make money and get on TV because it isn't busted. That's why they hate the truth I post that you and they cannot refute...

Is there a conspiracy theory you don't believe? You seem like the kind of guy that would believe in lizard people and a flat Earth.

 

[EMH]

Is there a conspiracy theory you don't believe? You seem like the kind of guy that would believe in lizard people and a flat Earth.

Is there one thing about climate change I've posted that you can refute?

NO

 

[Anomalism]

Is there one thing about climate change I've posted that you can refute?

NO

You don't listen to any scientific explanation. You've made your position unfalsifiable in your mind through circular logic.

 

[EMH]

You don't listen to any scientific explanation.

Rather, I refute what you parrot.


Can you find one piece of land on Earth within 600 miles to a pole not in ice age? No
Can you find one piece of land on Earth outside of 600 miles to a pole in ice age? No

and that's why you resort to card tossing etc...

 

[Anomalism]

Rather, I refute what you parrot.


Can you find one piece of land on Earth within 600 miles to a pole not in ice age? No
Can you find one piece of land on Earth outside of 600 miles to a pole in ice age? No

and that's why you resort to card tossing etc...

Your observations don't mean what you think they mean and I've explained why. Very little of what you believe tracks with reality. That's why even your own team has abandoned you. Lol

You're nuts.

 

[EMH]

^^^^

Given an actual scientific question, said parrot resorts to card tossing...

 

[Anomalism]

^^^^

Given an actual scientific question, said parrot resorts to card tossing...

You don't listen to scientific explanations. I've tried. Anybody on this subforum can see that. Anything that contradicts you gets called a lie. That's not scientific thinking. It's insulated circular reasoning from a delusional conspiracy theorist.

 

[EMH]

You don't listen to scientific explanations

I refute them.

You and CO2 FRAUD cannot refute one word I post. That's why you engage in personal attacks, because you cannot debate the issue.

 

[Anomalism]

I refute them.

You and CO2 FRAUD cannot refute one word I post. That's why you engage in personal attacks, because you cannot debate the issue.

You've refuted nothing. You call it lies and insist your simplistic observations explain the reality of complex systems. You're trying to make reality as simple as you are, and that doesn't really work.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I have debated it across hundreds of responses. Even people on your side of the argument think you're crazy. Lol

7 of the 9 voices in his head agree, he's not crazy.

 

[Sunsettommy]

From that article;

Over the past two decades, Arctic sea ice loss has slowed considerably, with no statistically significant decline in September sea ice area since 2005. This pause is robust across observational data sets, metrics, and seasons. Large-ensemble CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations reveal that such periods with minimal sea ice decline under increasing greenhouse gas emissions are not unusual. Analysis of ensemble members that simulate analogs of the observed pause indicates that the current slowdown could plausibly persist another five to 10 years, although the chances of a faster-than-average decline are increased in the near-future. The modeling evidence suggests that internal variability has substantially offset anthropogenically forced sea ice loss in recent decades. Overall, this observed pause in Arctic sea ice decline is consistent with simulated internal variability superimposed on the long-term trend according to the bulk of the climate modeling evidence.

Plain Language Summary​

Over the last 20 years, the decline of Arctic sea ice has slowed down substantially. Climate models (from CMIP5 and CMIP6) show that pauses in sea ice loss across multiple decades can happen, even as greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise. When we compare the current slowdown to similar pauses in model simulations, we see that it could plausibly continue for another five to 10 years, although the same slowdown makes a faster-than-average sea ice decline more likely in the coming years. Most of the evidence from these climate models suggests that natural climate variations have played a large part in slowing the human-driven loss of sea ice. However, it is not entirely certain whether changes in the human influence on climate (the “forced response”) have also contributed. Overall, while it may sound surprising that Arctic sea ice loss has slowed down even as global temperatures hit record highs, the climate modeling evidence suggests we should expect periods like this to occur somewhat frequently.

That report is trying to save face since back in the first decade warmest/alarmist scientists were predicting no summer ice in the arctic from a range of 1 to 15 years into the future, the end result was 100% prediction failure rate.

LOL