Trump resolves global warming problem

Jack's off again.
Stop responding then.
It's not like you have anything useful to add.
I gave you a chance and you can't help from making everything personal.
It's clear you have no idea what you are talking about on just about any subject...hence, you're a bullshit artist.
 
It's not like you have anything useful to add.

Poor Jack, once again spinning his wheels because he and his ilk have absolutely lost out and been proven wrong on literally every social, political, and environmental issue out there.
  • Border? Closed.
  • Illegal drug trade? Ended.
  • Fascist democrat partners in crime? Arrested.
  • Climate change? Disproven.
 
Climate change? Disproven.



Global Warming is disprove. Earth is not warming at all.

The climate does change. Jurassic was warmer, wetter, and had much higher surface air pressure, what happens when Earth has little to no land near the poles. Right now Earth has 9 million cubic miles of ice, and inside that ice is more gas than is in the atmosphere now.
 
Global Warming is disprove. Earth is not warming at all.

The climate does change. Jurassic was warmer, wetter, and had much higher surface air pressure, what happens when Earth has little to no land near the poles. Right now Earth has 9 million cubic miles of ice, and inside that ice is more gas than is in the atmosphere now.
Hilarious climate toddler
 
Truth, climate moron science invalid....
Hilarious

You’re such a little climate toddler.

Hey, can you post how CO2 and temperature are unrelated again.
 
Hilarious

You’re such a little climate toddler.

Hey, can you post how CO2 and temperature are unrelated again.


Surface Air Pressure goes up when a planet warms. Earth, Mars, and Pluto demonstrate that each time they orbit. Earth SAP for the past 60 years is flat to down, which proves Earth is not warming and there is no ongoing net ice melt.

The satellite and balloon data, the ACTUAL data before your heroes FUDGED IT in 2005, showed this




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling




Your side has NO ACTUAL DATA showing warming in the atmosphere, NONE.
 
Surface Air Pressure goes up when a planet warms. Earth, Mars, and Pluto demonstrate that each time they orbit. Earth SAP for the past 60 years is flat to down, which proves Earth is not warming and there is no ongoing net ice melt. The satellite and balloon data, the ACTUAL data before your heroes FUDGED IT in 2005, showed this satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling Your side has NO ACTUAL DATA showing warming in the atmosphere, NONE.

Surface Air Pressure goes up when a planet warms. Earth, Mars, and Pluto demonstrate that each time they orbit. Earth SAP for the past 60 years is flat to down, which proves Earth is not warming and there is no ongoing net ice melt.

The satellite and balloon data, the ACTUAL data before your heroes FUDGED IT in 2005, showed this




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling




Your side has NO ACTUAL DATA showing warming in the atmosphere, NONE.

Hilarious climate toddler

I have all of science on my side. You have lord muckington and a debunked article from 21 years ago from the lying media.
 
Neither Greenland nor Antarctica is melting, and at no point has either been melting during CO2 FRAUD. That's 97% of Earth ice growing. Both of those continent specific ice ages will continue to grow ice until the land moves more than 600 miles from the pole. There is 100% correlation of that today, and no refutation.

Asking AI and Google climate questions is a waste of time.
 
'Scientists' predicted an ice-free Arctic by 2013. In reality Arctic ice never went away. It just fluctuates from year to year. It was all a big lie you 'ignorant idiot.'

Sea levels were predicted to rise several feet by 2000. In reality seal levels rise only millimeters per year.

Predictions of Pacific islands disappearing never happened. In fact they gained land.

Predictions of losing 20-50% of species in decades never happened.

Deforestation did not happen but was predicted.

Global famine due to climate change fell flat, in fact global hunger declined dramatically.

You are the ignorant idiot. You can stick Mann's hockey stick where the Sun don't shine.
And you are a liar. Show me an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal backing your lies. You cannot because they don't exist. On just one issue, deforestration;

Deforestation in the Amazon rainforest has led to the loss of over 185 million acres since 1978, with significant impacts on biodiversity, climate, and indigenous communities.

Key​

 
Show me an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal backing your lies.

Peer Received--- code word for approved by the Left. Nothing gets peer reviewed unless it promotes leftwing ideology. Even if conservative peers approve it, it still gets rejected by the wider leftist cult.

But you can always PROVE ME WRONG by showing me a single peer reviewed article anywhere which agrees with a conservative view!

I guess you forget about 15 years ago when someone leaked all the private emails of a bunch of EU climatologists admitting in private that they all fudged the data to make it always come out in support of climate change caused by man.
 
Peer Received--- code word for approved by the Left. Nothing gets peer reviewed unless it promotes leftwing ideology. Even if conservative peers approve it, it still gets rejected by the wider leftist cult.

But you can always PROVE ME WRONG by showing me a single peer reviewed article anywhere which agrees with a conservative view!

I guess you forget about 15 years ago when someone leaked all the private emails of a bunch of EU climatologists admitting in private that they all fudged the data to make it always come out in support of climate change caused by man.
Hide the decline

Mann’s Nature Trick
 
15th post
Deforestation in the Amazon rainforest has led to the loss of over 185 million acres since 1978 ...

So ... the 630 million acres deforested in the Eastern United States is okay because it's done by white people? ... how about the 330 million acres deforested off the east China Plain? ... the deforestation in Northern Europe is an actual metric amount ...

The example you want is the Sahel ... if you don't mind black people ... here, we did deforest and it ruined the climate, terrible droughts and famines I'm sure you remember ... however, now all the reforestation work is paying off and the rains are returning ... which demonstrates cause-and-effect, the scientific gold standard of evidence ...

Those effects are local, not global ... Brazil needs to cast her own dice ... (my apologies to Indiana ...)
 
Deforestation in the Amazon rainforest has led to the loss of over 185 million acres since 1978,
... the 630 million acres deforested in the Eastern United States is okay because it's done by white people?

The real issue with the deforestation of trees to make room for people isn't the loss of trees or the oxygen they supply as much as it is over the loss of unknown species of fauna yet to even be discovered along with incalculable types of plants vital to new drugs and medicines lost never to be utilized. One of them could be a vital cure for a major disease.
 
Yep, we can get back to calling it just weather again and not have idiots throwing hissy fits when it's hot in the summer and cold in the winter.

A while back I was having a discussion with my cousin about how when we were kids in Oregon it was a lot cooler in the summer, and unlike kids today we all played outside. So when I asked her what year she was thinking about, she said 1977. So I went online right in front of her and looked.

The highest day in our city in 1977 was 107, last year it was 105. The coldest day in 1977 was 10, the coldest day in 2025 was 17. The average temperature in 1977 was 65.9, in 2025 it was 56. I pointed those all out to her, and she could not believe it. But I also pointed out that back then, we did not live in houses with air conditioning. And there was much less to do inside, so we spent most of our time outside.

I know in those days when I lived in Boise I thought nothing of riding my bike 5 miles each way to catch a movie in 100+ temperatures. The hottest day there in 1977 was 111, but last year it was only 104.

This is just a part of people trying to look back in their memories, and not actually checking the facts.
 
A while back I was having a discussion with my cousin about how when we were kids in Oregon it was a lot cooler in the summer, and unlike kids today we all played outside. So when I asked her what year she was thinking about, she said 1977. So I went online right in front of her and looked.

The highest day in our city in 1977 was 107, last year it was 105. The coldest day in 1977 was 10, the coldest day in 2025 was 17. The average temperature in 1977 was 65.9, in 2025 it was 56. I pointed those all out to her, and she could not believe it. But I also pointed out that back then, we did not live in houses with air conditioning. And there was much less to do inside, so we spent most of our time outside.

I know in those days when I lived in Boise I thought nothing of riding my bike 5 miles each way to catch a movie in 100+ temperatures. The hottest day there in 1977 was 111, but last year it was only 104.

This is just a part of people trying to look back in their memories, and not actually checking the facts.
Yep, I grew up in CA near SF. The very last thing we wanted to do was stay inside the house. We lived in a suburban neighborhood on the edge of undeveloped land. Our street had sidewalks that went up a hill and just stopped. From there it was our 'Adventure Land' with trees, seasonal creeks, etc. We rode our bikes about the same distance (5 miles) to our town. We made coasters to fly down the hills, had a killer rope swing too.
 
Back
Top Bottom