Wait. So Chicago is not the globe? Texas heat wave may have set record for nation’s hottest winter temp ever recorded

[Toddsterpatriot]

Chicago ranks #33 on the educational rank of cities in the US. Portland, Oregon, #16. You get down past #75 and most are southern cities.

Most & Least Educated Cities in America in 2026

Most & Least Educated Cities in America in 2026

wallethub.com

DURR

 

[Seymour Flops]

If only we listened to scientists, maybe we could have avoided the inevitable that is unavoidable now. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Sciences, and every major university in the world has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

Really?

Exactly how could we have avoided the climate changing?

Please be specific as to what steps we could have taken and exactly how they would have stopped the climate from changing.

 

[percysunshine]

oops.....anti-narrative incoming....

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL116175

 

[Zincwarrior]

I recently read a friend of mine say "The globe isn't warming because it is very cold in the city of Chicago."
Well here's a whole state for ya:

"On Thursday, Texas saw its first triple-digit temps of the year recorded in several towns near the border. In Laredo, the mercury topped out at 103 degrees and broke the record high for the day set in 2024."

It reminds me when it snows a lot in New York while Australia burns in a heat wave. Global warming deniers instead of averaging, mention New York only. Slick they're not.

Texas heat wave may have set record for nation’s hottest winter temp ever recorded

A heat wave that has had South Texas sizzling this week may have broken yet another record.

www.yahoo.com

It finally rained here. We are in a critical drought. This is not good.

 

[Mac-7]

I recently read a friend of mine say "The globe isn't warming because it is very cold in the city of Chicago."
Well here's a whole state for ya:

"On Thursday, Texas saw its first triple-digit temps of the year recorded in several towns near the border. In Laredo, the mercury topped out at 103 degrees and broke the record high for the day set in 2024."

It reminds me when it snows a lot in New York while Australia burns in a heat wave. Global warming deniers instead of averaging, mention New York only. Slick they're not.

Texas heat wave may have set record for nation’s hottest winter temp ever recorded

A heat wave that has had South Texas sizzling this week may have broken yet another record.

www.yahoo.com

I like global warming because I can grow vegetables year round in North Texas

 

[Sunsettommy]

LOL And you deniers are not? Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Sciences, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

As usual you use the stupid consensus angle which doesn't prove anything and the AGW claims have long been exposed as propaganda bullshit as it is well known the effects of CO2 warm forcing declines rapidly after the first 100 ppm, and that the two pillars of the AGW conjecture never showed up after 30+ years of waiting.

No Positive Feedback Loop exists.

There is no Lower Tropospheric "Hot Spot" as the data show one part is cooling slightly and the other less than 1/3 warming in relation to the surface.

LINK

 

[Sunsettommy]

If only we listened to scientists, maybe we could have avoided the inevitable that is unavoidable now. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Sciences, and every major university in the world has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

What a science free response that is.

There is no increased danger as you are LYING as usual.

EMDAT shows a sharp decline in weather related deaths since 1920 and a decline in cold weather-related deaths in recent years.

Meanwhile the planet is joyously responding to the increased lever of atmospheric CO2 levels.

NASA once again,

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds​

Excerpt:

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

LINK

 

[toobfreak]

What a science free response that is.

And no old rock was spared looking under in its creation.

 

[DukeU]

Bullshit. It is you deniers that are trying to wipe out weather records with your lies. Just a couple of years ago, 116 degrees in Portland, Oregon, and 121 degrees in a Lyton, British Columbia. The day after that record was set, the town burned. A record in a single locality in 1913 is hardly as significant as the regional records set that week in June in the Pacific Northwest of the US and Canada.

123 years and counting............

 

[EdwinAMartin]

LOL And you deniers are not? Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Sciences, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

lol they also claim there 150 genders or something. whoopy do; they will fake their 'science' to fit left wing agendas any day of the week, same as most 'journalists' do; they all went to same indoctrination academies.

An example of 'scientific ethics' ...

After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of Medical Ethics

 

[EMH]

As usual you use the stupid consensus angle which doesn't prove anything and the AGW claims have long been exposed as propaganda bullshit as it is well known the effects of CO2 warm forcing declines rapidly after the first 100 ppm, and that the two pillars of the AGW conjecture never showed up after 30+ years of waiting.

No Positive Feedback Loop exists.

There is no Lower Tropospheric "Hot Spot" as the data show one part is cooling slightly and the other less than 1/3 warming in relation to the surface.

View attachment 1228591

LINK

There has never been any warming at all other than Urban Heat Island Effect since CO2 FRAUD started.

satellites and balloons showed no warming with high correlation, then got FUDGED in 2005 with laughable excuses that did not match the fudge job.

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[marvin martian]

I recently read a friend of mine say "The globe isn't warming because it is very cold in the city of Chicago."
Well here's a whole state for ya:

"On Thursday, Texas saw its first triple-digit temps of the year recorded in several towns near the border. In Laredo, the mercury topped out at 103 degrees and broke the record high for the day set in 2024."

It reminds me when it snows a lot in New York while Australia burns in a heat wave. Global warming deniers instead of averaging, mention New York only. Slick they're not.

Texas heat wave may have set record for nation’s hottest winter temp ever recorded

A heat wave that has had South Texas sizzling this week may have broken yet another record.

www.yahoo.com

Texas isn't the globe, either, dipshit.

 

[EMH]

Indeed, Texas resides on a tectonic plate moving SW, away from North Pole. Every year, Texas gets a bit more heat/energy from Sun because of that.

North America had 5+ million tons of ice on it 3 million years ago. When the plate moves away from the nearest pole, it warms and melts that ice.

 

[jc456]

and old socks rolls out of another thread being proven wrong yet again. Kudoos to Toddsterpatriot .

Silenced yet again, with the popular Durr!!!!!

 

[Old Rocks]

oops.....anti-narrative incoming....

View attachment 1228559

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL116175

From that article;

Over the past two decades, Arctic sea ice loss has slowed considerably, with no statistically significant decline in September sea ice area since 2005. This pause is robust across observational data sets, metrics, and seasons. Large-ensemble CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations reveal that such periods with minimal sea ice decline under increasing greenhouse gas emissions are not unusual. Analysis of ensemble members that simulate analogs of the observed pause indicates that the current slowdown could plausibly persist another five to 10 years, although the chances of a faster-than-average decline are increased in the near-future. The modeling evidence suggests that internal variability has substantially offset anthropogenically forced sea ice loss in recent decades. Overall, this observed pause in Arctic sea ice decline is consistent with simulated internal variability superimposed on the long-term trend according to the bulk of the climate modeling evidence.

Plain Language Summary​

Over the last 20 years, the decline of Arctic sea ice has slowed down substantially. Climate models (from CMIP5 and CMIP6) show that pauses in sea ice loss across multiple decades can happen, even as greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise. When we compare the current slowdown to similar pauses in model simulations, we see that it could plausibly continue for another five to 10 years, although the same slowdown makes a faster-than-average sea ice decline more likely in the coming years. Most of the evidence from these climate models suggests that natural climate variations have played a large part in slowing the human-driven loss of sea ice. However, it is not entirely certain whether changes in the human influence on climate (the “forced response”) have also contributed. Overall, while it may sound surprising that Arctic sea ice loss has slowed down even as global temperatures hit record highs, the climate modeling evidence suggests we should expect periods like this to occur somewhat frequently.

 

[EMH]

From that article;

Over the past two decades, Arctic sea ice loss has slowed considerably, with no statistically significant decline in September sea ice area since 2005. This pause is robust across observational data sets, metrics, and seasons. Large-ensemble CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations reveal that such periods with minimal sea ice decline under increasing greenhouse gas emissions are not unusual. Analysis of ensemble members that simulate analogs of the observed pause indicates that the current slowdown could plausibly persist another five to 10 years, although the chances of a faster-than-average decline are increased in the near-future. The modeling evidence suggests that internal variability has substantially offset anthropogenically forced sea ice loss in recent decades. Overall, this observed pause in Arctic sea ice decline is consistent with simulated internal variability superimposed on the long-term trend according to the bulk of the climate modeling evidence.

Plain Language Summary​

Over the last 20 years, the decline of Arctic sea ice has slowed down substantially. Climate models (from CMIP5 and CMIP6) show that pauses in sea ice loss across multiple decades can happen, even as greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise. When we compare the current slowdown to similar pauses in model simulations, we see that it could plausibly continue for another five to 10 years, although the same slowdown makes a faster-than-average sea ice decline more likely in the coming years. Most of the evidence from these climate models suggests that natural climate variations have played a large part in slowing the human-driven loss of sea ice. However, it is not entirely certain whether changes in the human influence on climate (the “forced response”) have also contributed. Overall, while it may sound surprising that Arctic sea ice loss has slowed down even as global temperatures hit record highs, the climate modeling evidence suggests we should expect periods like this to occur somewhat frequently.

Arctic Sea ice is in long term decline because Arctic Ocean is growing, and the further NA and Euro/Asia move away from North Pole, the more and warmer water enters Arctic Ocean.


The "dramatic" sea ice loss in 2005 and 2007 was all over just Gakkel Ridge and the cause was this...



GoogAI

The Arctic Ocean contains active underwater volcanoes, primarily along the Gakkel Ridge, a 1,800-km-long ultraslow-spreading ridge. Key features include the 1.1-million-year-old Gakkel Ridge Caldera, deep-sea explosive eruptions, and the recently discovered Borealis Mud Volcano, which releases methane.



Antarctic Sea is on a long term growth trend, despite efforts by CO2 FRAUD to lie and fudge data...


a "must read" OP here...

Thread 'The credibility of Barack - and hence Kamala and the Democrats : issue Climate Change'

Sep 1, 2024

Barack is clearly a big fan of the Co2 FRAUD.

Prior to 2010 Barack said Climate Change is the greatest threat. Then there was two years of silence...

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

The Silence of US President Obama on Climate Change-A Serious Ethical Lapse?

Editor’s note on the following entry. On the very day that the following entry was posted, President Obama mentioned climate change for the first time in a long time in a speech at the Unive…

ethicsandclimate.org

Then in 2012 once again Climate Change was the greatest threat according to...

• EMH
• Replies: 157
• Forum: Politics

• 

 

[Anomalism]

Surface Air Pressure proves Earth has not warmed at all for the past 60+ years.

Earth climate data, the unFUDGED data, continues to read precisely

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in CANE ACTIVITY
NO OCEAN RISE

You're not even in agreement with the most notable AGW deniers. Have you ever been taken seriously by somebody that knows even a little bit of science?

 

[EMH]

You're not even in agreement with the most notable AGW deniers.

because

1. I'm not paid by CO2 FRAUD to be a "faux skeptic" like Lizden, Marano, etc...

2. I'm actually 100% right



They cannot refute one word I post, and neither can you.

 

[Anomalism]

because

1. I'm not paid by CO2 FRAUD to be a "faux skeptic" like Lizden, Marano, etc...

2. I'm actually 100% right



They cannot refute one word I post, and neither can you.

I think you're mentally ill. I mean that too. I'm not being an asshole.

 

[EMH]

I think you're mentally ill. I mean that too. I'm not being an asshole.

Typical from someone who cannot debate the issue and cannot refute.


If you aren't parroting like me, you are crazy!!!