Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She's articulate and knowledgable for her age but unfortunately she still lacks adult critical thinking skills.I'm 15, I voted for nobody.See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.
There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.
15 .. wow .
Eh, she's smarter than you I'll admit. I still don't see how I'm under the table though.Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.I'm 15, I voted for nobody.See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.
There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.
So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?
It's just sad you're getting your ass handed to you by a 15 year old. Admit it, she's run you under a table. You're not even debating your thread anymore.
She's articulate and knowledgable for her age but unfortunately she still lacks adult critical thinking skills.I'm 15, I voted for nobody.See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.
There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.
15 .. wow .
Eh, she's smarter than you I'll admit. I still don't see how I'm under the table though.
I take issue with the bold part of your statementOh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.I'm 15, I voted for nobody.See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.
There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.
So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?
It's just sad you're getting your ass handed to you by a 15 year old. Admit it, she's run you under a table. You're not even debating your thread anymore.
I DID explain at least one of the instances. You wouldn't happen to have listened to Comie's report and/or speeches on the matters, would you? As far as the private server is concerned, he granted immunity and made deals unheard of in the history of the FBI. If you like, I have compiled a list of all of the laws Hillary broke in the usage of her private server.You haven't explained why the 7 republican investigations on the matter didn't find any legal wrong doing on Hillary's part.That's not true at all. You must have taken the media's word for it instead of actually reading the Benghazi report... as they didn't bother reading it, either. It detailed conflicting orders and incompetence in the State Department and highest levels of government. There's also the fact that she refused them extra security, which is a direct cause of the deaths of those Americans. I also recall her blaming a video, despite knowing it wasn't the reason.Deaths? There is no evidence Hillary caused anyone's deaths. Republicans did 7 investigations on Benghazi and they turned up nothing to convict her with. Now why is that?I also supported Limberbutt McCubbins, Gary Johnson, and Evan McMullin. The basic requirement for being better than Hillary was lacking her negative qualities at the very least to the degree she had them. She was literally the worst candidate available, and even the regressive whackjobs, Jill and Bernie, were worlds better than her.Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.I'm 15, I voted for nobody.
There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.
So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?
Yes? Which of those are Federal level crimes or resulted in deaths? How many times did he endanger classified information on a whim?
I take issue with the bold part of your statementOh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.I'm 15, I voted for nobody.See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.
There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.
So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?
It's just sad you're getting your ass handed to you by a 15 year old. Admit it, she's run you under a table. You're not even debating your thread anymore.
Why are you deflecting to her vagueness in policy without explaining why? What specific information in them reflects ignorance? How about Obama? What specifics do you have to offer on him?Tell me, how many did she offer specifics on? I happened to have wasted my time watching every debate and seem to recall the answer being... never. You know, I also recall Obama attempting to violate the Constitution by using Executive Order to grant amnesty to some millions(?) of illegals.Lol if you don't offer any specific examples, you're just rambling. There's nothing compelling about what you're saying if you don't offer objective information to back it upOh, you just described all of Hillary's policies. "Vague" would be the perfect description. It would increase illegal immigration because it shows them that we have leaders worthless enough not to want them out, despite the fact that they broke the law to get here.No you saying Hillary wanting amnesty is vague. What is the specific language of the law? Why would it increase illegal immigration?You also fail to see the strengths of ObamaCare. It's problematic, but fixable republicans even wanted to try. It has provisions in it that matter.I elaborated immediately after that, you just didn't bother to read my post. I also did specify policies. It seems like you literally read the first four words and then replied. If you're going to ask a question, read the answer.No I asked for specific, detailed policy proposals. I want an analysis on at least one of them that says the policy reflects their ignorance of the subject. You simply saying all of them is just lame and disingenuous.
Oh and Executive orders are what they are. Bush used 3x as many as Obama did.
No, you fail to see it has no strengths and is a financial disaster. It hasn't helped the economy in any way, shape, or form, and has absolutely no positives to speak of.
Oh, cute, another Democrat used more Executive orders. That helps Obama's case how exactly? He still violated the Constitution 64 times, and has done everything he can to bypass the other branches of government to tip the balance of powers.
Are you in some sort of hurry? I notice you keep ignoring all but the first sentence of two of my posts. That's rather rude, I'm trying to have a meaningful discussion with you.
See now you're confusing her Benghazi scandal with her email scandal. Those are two different issues.I DID explain at least one of the instances. You wouldn't happen to have listened to Comie's report and/or speeches on the matters, would you? As far as the private server is concerned, he granted immunity and made deals unheard of in the history of the FBI. If you like, I have compiled a list of all of the laws Hillary broke in the usage of her private server.You haven't explained why the 7 republican investigations on the matter didn't find any legal wrong doing on Hillary's part.That's not true at all. You must have taken the media's word for it instead of actually reading the Benghazi report... as they didn't bother reading it, either. It detailed conflicting orders and incompetence in the State Department and highest levels of government. There's also the fact that she refused them extra security, which is a direct cause of the deaths of those Americans. I also recall her blaming a video, despite knowing it wasn't the reason.Deaths? There is no evidence Hillary caused anyone's deaths. Republicans did 7 investigations on Benghazi and they turned up nothing to convict her with. Now why is that?I also supported Limberbutt McCubbins, Gary Johnson, and Evan McMullin. The basic requirement for being better than Hillary was lacking her negative qualities at the very least to the degree she had them. She was literally the worst candidate available, and even the regressive whackjobs, Jill and Bernie, were worlds better than her.Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.
So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?
Yes? Which of those are Federal level crimes or resulted in deaths? How many times did he endanger classified information on a whim?
The fact is that Comie was appointed by Bush, who is all kinds of buddy buddy with the Clinton crime family. Which goes to show that Establishment servants take care of each other... when it benefits them.
Why are you deflecting to her vagueness in policy without explaining why?
See now you're confusing her Benghazi scandal with her email scandal. Those are two different issues.
Um no I asked for specific language in the law that would suggest it's vague.Why are you deflecting to her vagueness in policy without explaining why?
Idiot.
You can't explain something vague. That's what vague means. Grab a dictionary.
Um no I asked for specific language in the law that would suggest it's vague.
I haven't deflected at all. I pointed out that the lack of specifics were due to her lack of specifics, which is a legitimate grievance. If I told you that I'd like to "Walk over yonder hill" while standing in the dead center of three, and my mother asked you where I went, how would you give her specifics as to my whereabouts? If her policies were so specific, why don't you show me her immigration plans? If my lack of specifics is an issue here, then you must have policies to show me.Why are you deflecting to her vagueness in policy without explaining why? What specific information in them reflects ignorance? How about Obama? What specifics do you have to offer on him?Tell me, how many did she offer specifics on? I happened to have wasted my time watching every debate and seem to recall the answer being... never. You know, I also recall Obama attempting to violate the Constitution by using Executive Order to grant amnesty to some millions(?) of illegals.Lol if you don't offer any specific examples, you're just rambling. There's nothing compelling about what you're saying if you don't offer objective information to back it upOh, you just described all of Hillary's policies. "Vague" would be the perfect description. It would increase illegal immigration because it shows them that we have leaders worthless enough not to want them out, despite the fact that they broke the law to get here.No you saying Hillary wanting amnesty is vague. What is the specific language of the law? Why would it increase illegal immigration?You also fail to see the strengths of ObamaCare. It's problematic, but fixable republicans even wanted to try. It has provisions in it that matter.I elaborated immediately after that, you just didn't bother to read my post. I also did specify policies. It seems like you literally read the first four words and then replied. If you're going to ask a question, read the answer.
Oh and Executive orders are what they are. Bush used 3x as many as Obama did.
No, you fail to see it has no strengths and is a financial disaster. It hasn't helped the economy in any way, shape, or form, and has absolutely no positives to speak of.
Oh, cute, another Democrat used more Executive orders. That helps Obama's case how exactly? He still violated the Constitution 64 times, and has done everything he can to bypass the other branches of government to tip the balance of powers.
Are you in some sort of hurry? I notice you keep ignoring all but the first sentence of two of my posts. That's rather rude, I'm trying to have a meaningful discussion with you.
I'm not confusing anything, you mentioned seven FBI investigations, one of which I had already addressed, so I moved on to another. Mostly because you hadn't provided any counterpoint to it.See now you're confusing her Benghazi scandal with her email scandal. Those are two different issues.I DID explain at least one of the instances. You wouldn't happen to have listened to Comie's report and/or speeches on the matters, would you? As far as the private server is concerned, he granted immunity and made deals unheard of in the history of the FBI. If you like, I have compiled a list of all of the laws Hillary broke in the usage of her private server.You haven't explained why the 7 republican investigations on the matter didn't find any legal wrong doing on Hillary's part.That's not true at all. You must have taken the media's word for it instead of actually reading the Benghazi report... as they didn't bother reading it, either. It detailed conflicting orders and incompetence in the State Department and highest levels of government. There's also the fact that she refused them extra security, which is a direct cause of the deaths of those Americans. I also recall her blaming a video, despite knowing it wasn't the reason.Deaths? There is no evidence Hillary caused anyone's deaths. Republicans did 7 investigations on Benghazi and they turned up nothing to convict her with. Now why is that?I also supported Limberbutt McCubbins, Gary Johnson, and Evan McMullin. The basic requirement for being better than Hillary was lacking her negative qualities at the very least to the degree she had them. She was literally the worst candidate available, and even the regressive whackjobs, Jill and Bernie, were worlds better than her.
Yes? Which of those are Federal level crimes or resulted in deaths? How many times did he endanger classified information on a whim?
The fact is that Comie was appointed by Bush, who is all kinds of buddy buddy with the Clinton crime family. Which goes to show that Establishment servants take care of each other... when it benefits them.
She's articulate and knowledgable for her age but unfortunately she still lacks adult critical thinking skills.I'm 15, I voted for nobody.See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.
There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.
15 .. wow .
Her thinking skills are phenomenal. She puts MANY adults to shame.
Literally all of them. Their general economic stance is the exact opposite of anything that would help small businesses and by extension, the economy. The fact that they refuse to admit that Obamacare is a failure and is imploding goes to show that, as Hillary was still talking about building off of it. The fact that Hillary also was claiming the economy would improve if you taxed business even further, despite history showing that only damages it more also shows that, not to mention Obama's approach to the economy from the very start. There's also the fact that her and the party as a whole want to grant amnesty, which will only encourage yet more illegal immigration, and apparently hate the idea of attempting to discourage it in any way. Sure, deporting them is the hard way, but they advocate doing nothing.Okay and what specific policies of theirs do you think reflects being disqualified?You shouldn't, and to believe such would only cause my respect for you to slip even further into the negatives.Hey Rightwingers: why should I believe Trump even has basic understanding of the following issues:
1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Yet their actions and policies directly contradict what they would have learned. Both are even less qualified than Trump because they either know absolutely nothing about law, economics, government structure, and the constitution, OR they simply don't care.Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
There's also the fact that Obama promised to uphold the constitution, the proceeded to violate it 64 times, and Hillary made promises to continue violating it. Obama also has done his best to bypass all of the other branches of government numerous times. However, I think they don't care rather than not knowing. Though, that makes them worse.
Lol okay again let me repeat the main point I have been trying to say. You are giving me generalIzations and broad assumptions about Hillary without being specific. What evidence is their to your claims? What language in her proposals suggest they are vague or ignorant. Without providing these specific details, there's nothing for me to dispute in your argument.I haven't deflected at all. I pointed out that the lack of specifics were due to her lack of specifics, which is a legitimate grievance. If I told you that I'd like to "Walk over yonder hill" while standing in the dead center of three, and my mother asked you where I went, how would you give her specifics as to my whereabouts? If her policies were so specific, why don't you show me her immigration plans? If my lack of specifics is an issue here, then you must have policies to show me.Why are you deflecting to her vagueness in policy without explaining why? What specific information in them reflects ignorance? How about Obama? What specifics do you have to offer on him?Tell me, how many did she offer specifics on? I happened to have wasted my time watching every debate and seem to recall the answer being... never. You know, I also recall Obama attempting to violate the Constitution by using Executive Order to grant amnesty to some millions(?) of illegals.Lol if you don't offer any specific examples, you're just rambling. There's nothing compelling about what you're saying if you don't offer objective information to back it upOh, you just described all of Hillary's policies. "Vague" would be the perfect description. It would increase illegal immigration because it shows them that we have leaders worthless enough not to want them out, despite the fact that they broke the law to get here.No you saying Hillary wanting amnesty is vague. What is the specific language of the law? Why would it increase illegal immigration?You also fail to see the strengths of ObamaCare. It's problematic, but fixable republicans even wanted to try. It has provisions in it that matter.
Oh and Executive orders are what they are. Bush used 3x as many as Obama did.
No, you fail to see it has no strengths and is a financial disaster. It hasn't helped the economy in any way, shape, or form, and has absolutely no positives to speak of.
Oh, cute, another Democrat used more Executive orders. That helps Obama's case how exactly? He still violated the Constitution 64 times, and has done everything he can to bypass the other branches of government to tip the balance of powers.
Are you in some sort of hurry? I notice you keep ignoring all but the first sentence of two of my posts. That's rather rude, I'm trying to have a meaningful discussion with you.
If I'm pointing out the their non-specific policies are an issue and display ignorance, then that would be because the KEY component within them is the main issue. That being amnesty in any form. Whether it's a path to citizenship or instant blanket amnesty, then that would be STILL be allowing said illegals to cut in line, in front of EVERYONE that was already coming here LEGALLY, which would be PUNISHING following the rules of the system.
I'd ALSO like to point out that every time I've made a point, you've ignored it and replied with 1-2 sentences, rather than addressing any specific parts of my post, AND you have yet to DENY or provide a counterpoint to any of it.
Don't you think it's pathetic you can't offer any merits of voting republican?Ok so the reason I should vote republican is...what?Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
Sure I can justify winning, enough Americans finally got tired of your regressive bullshit and kicked your ass. It's on you to figure out why, we owe you no explanations. Just sit back and enjoy the ride.
To make damn sure the hildabitch never appoints a supreme court justice, if you had been paying any attention over the last year and a half you'd know that. Her appointments would do more harm to the country than Trump ever could. She plainly stated she wanted justices that would advance the regressive agenda, never mentioned the Constitution once. I would have voted for a warm bag of dog shit over that bitch.
