Pumpkin Row
Platinum Member
- May 26, 2016
- 5,692
- 2,811
- 1,095
Oh, you just described all of Hillary's policies. "Vague" would be the perfect description. It would increase illegal immigration because it shows them that we have leaders worthless enough not to want them out, despite the fact that they broke the law to get here.No you saying Hillary wanting amnesty is vague. What is the specific language of the law? Why would it increase illegal immigration?You also fail to see the strengths of ObamaCare. It's problematic, but fixable republicans even wanted to try. It has provisions in it that matter.I elaborated immediately after that, you just didn't bother to read my post. I also did specify policies. It seems like you literally read the first four words and then replied. If you're going to ask a question, read the answer.No I asked for specific, detailed policy proposals. I want an analysis on at least one of them that says the policy reflects their ignorance of the subject. You simply saying all of them is just lame and disingenuous.Literally all of them. Their general economic stance is the exact opposite of anything that would help small businesses and by extension, the economy. The fact that they refuse to admit that Obamacare is a failure and is imploding goes to show that, as Hillary was still talking about building off of it. The fact that Hillary also was claiming the economy would improve if you taxed business even further, despite history showing that only damages it more also shows that, not to mention Obama's approach to the economy from the very start. There's also the fact that her and the party as a whole want to grant amnesty, which will only encourage yet more illegal immigration, and apparently hate the idea of attempting to discourage it in any way. Sure, deporting them is the hard way, but they advocate doing nothing.Okay and what specific policies of theirs do you think reflects being disqualified?You shouldn't, and to believe such would only cause my respect for you to slip even further into the negatives.
Yet their actions and policies directly contradict what they would have learned. Both are even less qualified than Trump because they either know absolutely nothing about law, economics, government structure, and the constitution, OR they simply don't care.
There's also the fact that Obama promised to uphold the constitution, the proceeded to violate it 64 times, and Hillary made promises to continue violating it. Obama also has done his best to bypass all of the other branches of government numerous times. However, I think they don't care rather than not knowing. Though, that makes them worse.
Oh and Executive orders are what they are. Bush used 3x as many as Obama did.
No, you fail to see it has no strengths and is a financial disaster. It hasn't helped the economy in any way, shape, or form, and has absolutely no positives to speak of.
Oh, cute, another Democrat used more Executive orders. That helps Obama's case how exactly? He still violated the Constitution 64 times, and has done everything he can to bypass the other branches of government to tip the balance of powers.