Hey Rightwingers: why should I believe Trump even has a basic understanding of the following issues:

[Pumpkin Row]

You shouldn't, and to believe such would only cause my respect for you to slip even further into the negatives.
Yet their actions and policies directly contradict what they would have learned. Both are even less qualified than Trump because they either know absolutely nothing about law, economics, government structure, and the constitution, OR they simply don't care.

Okay and what specific policies of theirs do you think reflects being disqualified?

Literally all of them. Their general economic stance is the exact opposite of anything that would help small businesses and by extension, the economy. The fact that they refuse to admit that Obamacare is a failure and is imploding goes to show that, as Hillary was still talking about building off of it. The fact that Hillary also was claiming the economy would improve if you taxed business even further, despite history showing that only damages it more also shows that, not to mention Obama's approach to the economy from the very start. There's also the fact that her and the party as a whole want to grant amnesty, which will only encourage yet more illegal immigration, and apparently hate the idea of attempting to discourage it in any way. Sure, deporting them is the hard way, but they advocate doing nothing.

There's also the fact that Obama promised to uphold the constitution, the proceeded to violate it 64 times, and Hillary made promises to continue violating it. Obama also has done his best to bypass all of the other branches of government numerous times. However, I think they don't care rather than not knowing. Though, that makes them worse.

No I asked for specific, detailed policy proposals. I want an analysis on at least one of them that says the policy reflects their ignorance of the subject. You simply saying all of them is just lame and disingenuous.

I elaborated immediately after that, you just didn't bother to read my post. I also did specify policies. It seems like you literally read the first four words and then replied. If you're going to ask a question, read the answer.

No you saying Hillary wanting amnesty is vague. What is the specific language of the law? Why would it increase illegal immigration?You also fail to see the strengths of ObamaCare. It's problematic, but fixable republicans even wanted to try. It has provisions in it that matter.

Oh and Executive orders are what they are. Bush used 3x as many as Obama did.

Oh, you just described all of Hillary's policies. "Vague" would be the perfect description. It would increase illegal immigration because it shows them that we have leaders worthless enough not to want them out, despite the fact that they broke the law to get here.

No, you fail to see it has no strengths and is a financial disaster. It hasn't helped the economy in any way, shape, or form, and has absolutely no positives to speak of.

Oh, cute, another Democrat used more Executive orders. That helps Obama's case how exactly? He still violated the Constitution 64 times, and has done everything he can to bypass the other branches of government to tip the balance of powers.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.

If the people at the Benghazi consulate being butchered wasn't enough...

There's always the over 25,000 who died in the six month 'military action' conducted in Libya by orders of the current administration and the countless others who died there in it's aftermath.

You're searching without reviewing and only showing your butthurt as you...

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Spare_change]

You shouldn't, and to believe such would only cause my respect for you to slip even further into the negatives.
Yet their actions and policies directly contradict what they would have learned. Both are even less qualified than Trump because they either know absolutely nothing about law, economics, government structure, and the constitution, OR they simply don't care.

Okay and what specific policies of theirs do you think reflects being disqualified?

Literally all of them. Their general economic stance is the exact opposite of anything that would help small businesses and by extension, the economy. The fact that they refuse to admit that Obamacare is a failure and is imploding goes to show that, as Hillary was still talking about building off of it. The fact that Hillary also was claiming the economy would improve if you taxed business even further, despite history showing that only damages it more also shows that, not to mention Obama's approach to the economy from the very start. There's also the fact that her and the party as a whole want to grant amnesty, which will only encourage yet more illegal immigration, and apparently hate the idea of attempting to discourage it in any way. Sure, deporting them is the hard way, but they advocate doing nothing.

There's also the fact that Obama promised to uphold the constitution, the proceeded to violate it 64 times, and Hillary made promises to continue violating it. Obama also has done his best to bypass all of the other branches of government numerous times. However, I think they don't care rather than not knowing. Though, that makes them worse.

No I asked for specific, detailed policy proposals. I want an analysis on at least one of them that says the policy reflects their ignorance of the subject. You simply saying all of them is just lame and disingenuous.

I elaborated immediately after that, you just didn't bother to read my post. I also did specify policies. It seems like you literally read the first four words and then replied. If you're going to ask a question, read the answer.

No you saying Hillary wanting amnesty is vague. What is the specific language of the law? Why would it increase illegal immigration?You also fail to see the strengths of ObamaCare. It's problematic, but fixable if republicans even wanted to try. It has provisions in it that matter.

Oh and Executive orders are what they are. Bush used 3x as many as Obama did.

It's not quantity, it's quality.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.

Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.

Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.

See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.

I'm 15, I voted for nobody.

There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.

Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.

So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?

I also supported Limberbutt McCubbins, Gary Johnson, and Evan McMullin. The basic requirement for being better than Hillary was lacking her negative qualities at the very least to the degree she had them. She was literally the worst candidate available, and even the regressive whackjobs, Jill and Bernie, were worlds better than her.

Yes? Which of those are Federal level crimes or resulted in deaths? How many times did he endanger classified information on a whim?

 

[Billy000]

1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

3) How the US government even works

4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.

Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.

Yeah, I'm guessing his Bachelor of Science degree in economics from Wharton probably doesn't mean anything, huh?

You know, now that you mention it, his 40 years of dealing with the government probably doesn't mean anything either, right?

As for the rest of your OP, it's even lazier than those two. I can't believe you actually took the time to type that up.

Right that education turned out so well for him given his business failures. I mean sure he can hate TPP but that doesn't mean he understands trade. Actual economists think his proposals are ridiculous.

And no, Trump is dumber than a sack of bricks when it comes to public policy. He doesn't even know how many articles are in the constitution.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.

Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.

See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.

I'm 15, I voted for nobody.

There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.

15 .. wow .

She's articulate and knowledgable for her age but unfortunately she still lacks adult critical thinking skills.

Eh, you better hope she continues to take pity on you..

 

[Pumpkin Row]

1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

3) How the US government even works

4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.

Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.

Yeah, I'm guessing his Bachelor of Science degree in economics from Wharton probably doesn't mean anything, huh?

You know, now that you mention it, his 40 years of dealing with the government probably doesn't mean anything either, right?

As for the rest of your OP, it's even lazier than those two. I can't believe you actually took the time to type that up.

Right that education turned out so well for him given his business failures. I mean sure he can hate TPP but that doesn't mean he understands trade. Actual economists think his proposals are ridiculous.

And no, Trump is dumber than a sack of bricks when it comes to public policy. He doesn't even know how many articles are in the constitution.

I wonder how many are Establishment-paid to say that. I heard that one said Bernie's policies would work... which is proof that simply being called an "Economist" is completely meaningless.

 

[Billy000]

Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.

Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.

See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.

I'm 15, I voted for nobody.

There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.

Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.

So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?

I also supported Limberbutt McCubbins, Gary Johnson, and Evan McMullin. The basic requirement for being better than Hillary was lacking her negative qualities at the very least to the degree she had them. She was literally the worst candidate available, and even the regressive whackjobs, Jill and Bernie, were worlds better than her.

Yes? Which of those are Federal level crimes or resulted in deaths? How many times did he endanger classified information on a whim?

Deaths? There is no evidence Hillary caused anyone's deaths. Republicans did 7 investigations on Benghazi and they turned up nothing to convict her with. Now why is that?

 

[OKTexas]

1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

3) How the US government even works

4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.

Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.

Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.

Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.

Sure I can justify winning, enough Americans finally got tired of your regressive bullshit and kicked your ass. It's on you to figure out why, we owe you no explanations. Just sit back and enjoy the ride.

Ok so the reason I should vote republican is...what?

To make damn sure the hildabitch never appoints a supreme court justice, if you had been paying any attention over the last year and a half you'd know that. Her appointments would do more harm to the country than Trump ever could. She plainly stated she wanted justices that would advance the regressive agenda, never mentioned the Constitution once. I would have voted for a warm bag of dog shit over that bitch.

 

[FA_Q2]

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

No, one could not.

The fact that you can spout such asinine rhetoric in the first place really identifies that you do not care about the answers to the other ones. Clearly you have a deep seated misunderstanding of at least this issue to begin with. Why would it behoove anyone to try and explain Trumps qualifications to someone that clearly could not or would not accept than anyway no matter what they were.

 

[Spare_change]

1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

3) How the US government even works

4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.

Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.

Yeah, I'm guessing his Bachelor of Science degree in economics from Wharton probably doesn't mean anything, huh?

You know, now that you mention it, his 40 years of dealing with the government probably doesn't mean anything either, right?

As for the rest of your OP, it's even lazier than those two. I can't believe you actually took the time to type that up.

Right that education turned out so well for him given his business failures. I mean sure he can hate TPP but that doesn't mean he understands trade. Actual economists think his proposals are ridiculous.

And no, Trump is dumber than a sack of bricks when it comes to public policy. He doesn't even know how many articles are in the constitution.

Of course, you have nothing to base your "opinion" on ... you're just looking for something to whine about.

As for his business dealings, I wish I had been so good at it.

Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.

See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.

I'm 15, I voted for nobody.

There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.

Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.

So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?

I also supported Limberbutt McCubbins, Gary Johnson, and Evan McMullin. The basic requirement for being better than Hillary was lacking her negative qualities at the very least to the degree she had them. She was literally the worst candidate available, and even the regressive whackjobs, Jill and Bernie, were worlds better than her.

Yes? Which of those are Federal level crimes or resulted in deaths? How many times did he endanger classified information on a whim?

Deaths? There is no evidence Hillary caused anyone's deaths. Republicans did 7 investigations on Benghazi and they turned up nothing to convict her with. Now why is that?

Pssst ---- they can't convict ANYBODY.

That's not how it works --- they can only forward their information to the Dept of Justice ... and we know how that works. Just ask Jim Comey.

 

[The Great Goose]

1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

3) How the US government even works

4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.

Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.

DO NOT QUESTION THE GODKING!

 

[Billy000]

Okay and what specific policies of theirs do you think reflects being disqualified?

Literally all of them. Their general economic stance is the exact opposite of anything that would help small businesses and by extension, the economy. The fact that they refuse to admit that Obamacare is a failure and is imploding goes to show that, as Hillary was still talking about building off of it. The fact that Hillary also was claiming the economy would improve if you taxed business even further, despite history showing that only damages it more also shows that, not to mention Obama's approach to the economy from the very start. There's also the fact that her and the party as a whole want to grant amnesty, which will only encourage yet more illegal immigration, and apparently hate the idea of attempting to discourage it in any way. Sure, deporting them is the hard way, but they advocate doing nothing.

There's also the fact that Obama promised to uphold the constitution, the proceeded to violate it 64 times, and Hillary made promises to continue violating it. Obama also has done his best to bypass all of the other branches of government numerous times. However, I think they don't care rather than not knowing. Though, that makes them worse.

No I asked for specific, detailed policy proposals. I want an analysis on at least one of them that says the policy reflects their ignorance of the subject. You simply saying all of them is just lame and disingenuous.

I elaborated immediately after that, you just didn't bother to read my post. I also did specify policies. It seems like you literally read the first four words and then replied. If you're going to ask a question, read the answer.

No you saying Hillary wanting amnesty is vague. What is the specific language of the law? Why would it increase illegal immigration?You also fail to see the strengths of ObamaCare. It's problematic, but fixable republicans even wanted to try. It has provisions in it that matter.

Oh and Executive orders are what they are. Bush used 3x as many as Obama did.

Oh, you just described all of Hillary's policies. "Vague" would be the perfect description. It would increase illegal immigration because it shows them that we have leaders worthless enough not to want them out, despite the fact that they broke the law to get here.

No, you fail to see it has no strengths and is a financial disaster. It hasn't helped the economy in any way, shape, or form, and has absolutely no positives to speak of.

Oh, cute, another Democrat used more Executive orders. That helps Obama's case how exactly? He still violated the Constitution 64 times, and has done everything he can to bypass the other branches of government to tip the balance of powers.

Lol if you don't offer any specific examples, you're just rambling. There's nothing compelling about what you're saying if you don't offer objective information to back it up

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.

See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.

I'm 15, I voted for nobody.

There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.

Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.

So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?

I also supported Limberbutt McCubbins, Gary Johnson, and Evan McMullin. The basic requirement for being better than Hillary was lacking her negative qualities at the very least to the degree she had them. She was literally the worst candidate available, and even the regressive whackjobs, Jill and Bernie, were worlds better than her.

Yes? Which of those are Federal level crimes or resulted in deaths? How many times did he endanger classified information on a whim?

Deaths? There is no evidence Hillary caused anyone's deaths. Republicans did 7 investigations on Benghazi and they turned up nothing to convict her with. Now why is that?

That's not true at all. You must have taken the media's word for it instead of actually reading the Benghazi report... as they didn't bother reading it, either. It detailed conflicting orders and incompetence in the State Department and highest levels of government. There's also the fact that she refused them extra security, which is a direct cause of the deaths of those Americans. I also recall her blaming a video, despite knowing it wasn't the reason.

 

[Billy000]

1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

3) How the US government even works

4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.

Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.

Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.

Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.

Sure I can justify winning, enough Americans finally got tired of your regressive bullshit and kicked your ass. It's on you to figure out why, we owe you no explanations. Just sit back and enjoy the ride.

Ok so the reason I should vote republican is...what?

To make damn sure the hildabitch never appoints a supreme court justice, if you had been paying any attention over the last year and a half you'd know that. Her appointments would do more harm to the country than Trump ever could. She plainly stated she wanted justices that would advance the regressive agenda, never mentioned the Constitution once. I would have voted for a warm bag of dog shit over that bitch.

Don't you think it's pathetic you can't offer any merits of voting republican?

 

[cnelsen]

1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

3) How the US government even works

4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.

Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.

Foreign policy: Yes, because leaving the (really really infinitely really) complex Middle East up to the experts--the American Enterprise Institute, New American Century, AIPAC, and the rest of the Israeli amen corner--has worked out so well. We should be so grateful those with a deep deep understanding of that complex Middle East--Doug Feith and Paul Wolfowitz and Tom "Cakewalk" Friedman and Richard Perle and Joe Lieberman--were here to help us navigate those dangerous shoals. Thank goodness they are on our side and guiding our presidents through the disastrous murderous catastrophe that is US Middle East policy. They are obviously way more sophisticated and educated than that inexperienced simpleton, Donald Trump, who is so completely stupid he says we should work WITH Russia to clean up our mess, ISIS, and then just stay the hell out of there. Let Israel run its own genocides. What a stupid fucking buffoon, huh?

 

[Kat]

1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East

2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)

3) How the US government even works

4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.

Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.

Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.

Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.

??? We don't have to justify winning, silly. What's done is done. We aren't the melters in here.

 

[Billy000]

See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.

I'm 15, I voted for nobody.

There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.

Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.

So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?

I also supported Limberbutt McCubbins, Gary Johnson, and Evan McMullin. The basic requirement for being better than Hillary was lacking her negative qualities at the very least to the degree she had them. She was literally the worst candidate available, and even the regressive whackjobs, Jill and Bernie, were worlds better than her.

Yes? Which of those are Federal level crimes or resulted in deaths? How many times did he endanger classified information on a whim?

Deaths? There is no evidence Hillary caused anyone's deaths. Republicans did 7 investigations on Benghazi and they turned up nothing to convict her with. Now why is that?

That's not true at all. You must have taken the media's word for it instead of actually reading the Benghazi report... as they didn't bother reading it, either. It detailed conflicting orders and incompetence in the State Department and highest levels of government. There's also the fact that she refused them extra security, which is a direct cause of the deaths of those Americans. I also recall her blaming a video, despite knowing it wasn't the reason.

You haven't explained why the 7 republican investigations on the matter didn't find any legal wrong doing on Hillary's part.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.

Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.

Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.

See, that's what's pathetic about you voting for Trump. Your only justification for his election is because of Hillary. You aren't even examining Trump and it's dumb.

I'm 15, I voted for nobody.

There are no positives about Trump other than the fact that he's not a massively corrupt policy and pardon-selling Establishment shill who compromised classified information out of either sheer stupidity or carelessness. Hillary is even worse than a candidate with no positives.

Oh really? So you support Trump even though he has no merit? Man that is just sad.

So Trump's alleged sexual assault cases, fraud, tax dodging, and stiffing contractors pale in comparison to Hillary huh?

It's just sad you're getting your ass handed to you by a 15 year old. Admit it, she's run you under a table. You're not even debating your thread anymore.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Literally all of them. Their general economic stance is the exact opposite of anything that would help small businesses and by extension, the economy. The fact that they refuse to admit that Obamacare is a failure and is imploding goes to show that, as Hillary was still talking about building off of it. The fact that Hillary also was claiming the economy would improve if you taxed business even further, despite history showing that only damages it more also shows that, not to mention Obama's approach to the economy from the very start. There's also the fact that her and the party as a whole want to grant amnesty, which will only encourage yet more illegal immigration, and apparently hate the idea of attempting to discourage it in any way. Sure, deporting them is the hard way, but they advocate doing nothing.

There's also the fact that Obama promised to uphold the constitution, the proceeded to violate it 64 times, and Hillary made promises to continue violating it. Obama also has done his best to bypass all of the other branches of government numerous times. However, I think they don't care rather than not knowing. Though, that makes them worse.

No I asked for specific, detailed policy proposals. I want an analysis on at least one of them that says the policy reflects their ignorance of the subject. You simply saying all of them is just lame and disingenuous.

I elaborated immediately after that, you just didn't bother to read my post. I also did specify policies. It seems like you literally read the first four words and then replied. If you're going to ask a question, read the answer.

No you saying Hillary wanting amnesty is vague. What is the specific language of the law? Why would it increase illegal immigration?You also fail to see the strengths of ObamaCare. It's problematic, but fixable republicans even wanted to try. It has provisions in it that matter.

Oh and Executive orders are what they are. Bush used 3x as many as Obama did.

Oh, you just described all of Hillary's policies. "Vague" would be the perfect description. It would increase illegal immigration because it shows them that we have leaders worthless enough not to want them out, despite the fact that they broke the law to get here.

No, you fail to see it has no strengths and is a financial disaster. It hasn't helped the economy in any way, shape, or form, and has absolutely no positives to speak of.

Oh, cute, another Democrat used more Executive orders. That helps Obama's case how exactly? He still violated the Constitution 64 times, and has done everything he can to bypass the other branches of government to tip the balance of powers.

Lol if you don't offer any specific examples, you're just rambling. There's nothing compelling about what you're saying if you don't offer objective information to back it up

Tell me, how many did she offer specifics on? I happened to have wasted my time watching every debate and seem to recall the answer being... never. You know, I also recall Obama attempting to violate the Constitution by using Executive Order to grant amnesty to some millions(?) of illegals.

Are you in some sort of hurry? I notice you keep ignoring all but the first sentence of two of my posts. That's rather rude, I'm trying to have a meaningful discussion with you.