- Nov 10, 2019
- 44,468
- 28,168
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #41
Why don't you quit wasting your fingertips. I was under the impression Bush v Gore was decided December 12, 2000 and Bush did not take office until January 20, 2021. Scalia had been around on the court since 1986, nominated by Ronald Reagan. Kavenaugh confirmed October 6, and did not participate in AZAR, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. v. ALLINA HEALTH SERVICES during the first fall session of the Supreme court, inwhich the government lost and Gorsuch wrote the opinion, as well as two other decisions not related to government or politics. Why do you bring them up? Do you actually look up anything before you post or do you like, "use the force"?A newly appointed supreme court justice owes their appointment to the the president that appointed them, or they would not be there. trumpsucker.I see no ethical conflict with her accepting the nomination. She should recuse on decisions related to the voting related to the unethical person that nominated her, as that would be a conflict. That said. I have no problem with the woman any more than I have had any major problems with the opinions of Kavenaugh, and I was self certain he would be a consistent right wing tool, but have been pleasantly surprised, I think as RGB was also surprised.
Walter Shaub
@waltshaub
Amy Coney Barrett’s qualifications are irrelevant. Her willingness to accept the nomination under these circumstances reveals a disqualifying lack of character.
_____
Walter Shaub.
Don't know him. Never heard of him. But he is one of those Loon-Left-Bloggers whose political inclinations are so absurd, that his psychopathology becomes interesting.
Assholes like this live in a bubble, usually in one of those big bubbles--New York and Washington being prime examples---where they look (metaphorically) West and most certainly South, generally to the Heartland---and can't see anything but scenes from the old movie "Deliverance", and that presumably is their excuse for listening to no one except Assholes just like them---resulting in them making complete fools out of themselves in posts like the above.
Walter Shaub.
A nobody who has gained a wee bit of temporary notoriety by making a complete fool of himself.
He's done one other thing. He's shown just how desperate Assholes like him are to come up with something to criticize this outstanding Jurist, Woman, Human--Amy Coney Barrett.
__________
Why should she recuse herself based on your fictional belief. libtardo?
What about Kavanaugh and Gorsuch? Trump appointed them also. Where is the precedent? Scalia ruled in Bush v. Gore after he was nominated by Bush. Why don't you just shut up and hide your ignorance?