Grenell Makes Shocking Announcement

[busybee01]

Grenell is a political hack. His purpose as DNI was to turn the US intelligence agencies into a political propaganda organ to elect Trump, not provide information to maintain safety and security if Americans.

He’s fulfilling that purpose here. Just look at how the party faithful lap it up.

And all the Dems are political hacks, or worse. One thing we know for sure, a vote for a Democrat is a vote for Iranian terrorism, chinese undermining of our manufacturing base, and the end of the American middle class.

A vote for Trump is unchecked Russian aggression. No plan for Chinese expansionism. No global leadership to combat Iranian nuclear ambitions. The death of Medicare and Social Security. Enrichment of the elites and fewer benefits for everyone else.

Vote for someone who actually knows what they’re doing, not Trump.

Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.

Fascinating, yes.

Crowdstrike President Shawn Henry ( under oath)
-No concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails -
Henry personally led the remediation and forensics analysis

Swing and a miss.

Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight

Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.

www.crowdstrike.com

Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?

Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.

Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.

To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called bythe Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.”

This conclusion has most recently been supported by the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issuing a report [intelligence.senate.gov] validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community, published on January 6, 2017, that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.

The Senate report states on page 48:

“The Committee found that specific intelligence as well as open source assessments support the assessment that President Putin approved and directed aspects of this influence campaign.”

Furthermore, in his testimony in front of the House Intelligence Committee, Shawn Henry stated the following with regards to CrowdStrike’s degree of confidence that the intrusion activity can be attributed to Russia, cited from page 24:

1. HENRY: We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government. And our analysts that looked at it and that had looked at these types of attacks before, many different types of attacks similar to this in different environments, certain tools that were used, certain methods by which they were moving in the environment,and looking at the types of data that was being targeted, that it was consistent with a nation-state adversary and associated with Russian intelligence.

"We have a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government."

TRANSLATION----they have no proof.

Richard Grenell is about the closest thing the United States has to James Bond. The greatest part is that he’s not a fictional character but a real life patriot. Not only did he serve as U.S. Ambassador to Germany, he put on a second hat as acting Director of National Intelligence, where he acted like he had quite a bit of intelligence. The shocking announcement he made at the Republican Convention Wednesday night is the kind that makes E.F. Hutton listen.

Richard Grenell didn’t pull any punches and used every moment of his time on stage to promote Donald Trump because what he already knows about the Democrats makes him sick to his stomach. “I saw the Democrats’ entire case for Russian collusion and what I saw made me sick to my stomach. The Obama-Biden administration secretly launched a surveillance operation on the Trump campaign and silenced the many brave intelligence officials who spoke up against it.”


Not only that, Grenell informs, Deep State Democrats in Barack Obama’s Federal Bureau of Instigation and Department of Injustice “presented bogus information as facts. They lied to judges. Then they classified anything that undermined their case.” That’s just for starters. “After Donald Trump won the election, when they should have continued the American tradition of helping the president-elect transition into the White House, they tried instead to undercut him even more.”

Joe Biden personally “asked intelligence officials to uncover the hidden information on President Trump’s incoming national security advisor three weeks before the Inauguration.” As Grenell snipes, “that’s the Democrats. Between surveillance, classifications, leaks, and puppet candidates, they never want the American people to know who’s actually calling the shots.” Then there’s President Donald Trump.

One moment, please...

newshourfirst.com

BJ's Pull quote:

Richard Grenell is firmly convinced that the decision on who to vote for as president isn’t even close to a hard choice. With President Donald Trump, he declares, “you always know exactly who is in charge because the answer is you. You’re in charge. Not lobbyists. Not special interests. Not warmongers, or China sympathizers, or globalization fanatics.”

Grenell is a kook. A typical Trump supporter. He has absolutely no credibility. I hope ordinary voters hear what he says. That will doom Republicans at the polls. Americans are actually sane and don't buy into these conspiracy theories.

One thing is clear, the LAST person Putin wanted to be President was TRUMP.

Russia's chief form of income is OIL, so it follows that Bernie Sanders and Green deal supporters would be the ideal partners, reducing US competition, not TRUMP.

TRUMP created a new branch of the US Armed Services called Space Force.

TRUMP sent Real lethal weapons to UKRAINE unlike Obama/Biden.

The Russian Dossier was a hit job by Russia against TRUMP, etc.

As always facts have no affect on them.

Putin wanted Trump
Everything Trump has done is bad for Putin.
Putin wants Trump
Everything that Trump will do will be bad for Putin.
Putin wants Trump.

It's amazing,
Ridiculous but amazing.

Trump has withdrawn from Syria leaving Iran and Russia in charge in Syria. The Russians even got a former US airbase in Syria in the bargain.

Trump wants to withdraw from Germany. Putin supports that.

Trump wants to leave Afghanistan. Russians are already making chummy with the Taliban.

It seems that in the middle east, the occupying foreign troops get screwed, let Russia have the Syria headache. As for the Taliban, they are killing other Afghans and they don't like Russians anymore then Americans.

As for Germany, they are a wealthy country and they need to pay MORE for their own defense.

That allows Russia and Iran to increase their influence in the Middle East which much of the world depends on for oil. Trump has irritated the Iraqi government. Iran and Russia are becoming the dominant force in a strategic region. The Russians are increasing their influence in southeast Asia and Afghanistan could be the next stone to follow as Putin attempts to build a new Soviet Union.

Germany provides a forward base for US forces as it did when Iraq invaded Kuwait. There are a lot of fixed costs that will be incurred whether troops are in the US or Germany.

 

[busybee01]

The Trump administration is not an honest broker. They don’t have a cohesive policy. They don’t lead. They aren’t consistent or reliable.

That's true they are not honest. That is their policy. Like Rob and that Senate seat he tried to auction off or Trump using foreign aid to coerce a foreign state in to a corrupt political act. Leverage and corruption all for the personal gain of the leader of the personality cult.

Rob was an Illinois Democrat

The other thing is still just fantasy.

Birds of a feather.....

Blagojevich was convicted of fraud and conspiracy charges related to his attempts to essentially sell the Senate seat Barack Obama left open when he won the presidential election in 2008. Blagojevich was also convicted of trying to extort a children’s hospital CEO and a racetrack executive for campaign contributions in exchange for policy changes, and of making false statements to the FBI.

It may seem odd that Trump helped out a corrupt Democrat. But Blagojevich had one major thing going for him: After his ouster from the governorship but before his trials, he appeared as a contestant on the Trump-hosted reality show The Celebrity Apprentice.

Trump’s commutation of Rod Blagojevich’s sentence, explained

Why the former Illinois governor is in prison — and why Trump just granted him clemency.

www.vox.com

Leverage is not only Trumpybears business model, but also it's all he understands. It's how he views the world.

Rod was actually railroaded.

The President seems to look kindly on people who have been railroaded, especially those of color.
Some of those folks had a forum to speak to the nation this week.

He was not railroaded. Even Republicans criticized Trump's pardon. Two corrupt bastards.

 

[busybee01]

Richard Grenell is about the closest thing the United States has to James Bond. The greatest part is that he’s not a fictional character but a real life patriot. Not only did he serve as U.S. Ambassador to Germany, he put on a second hat as acting Director of National Intelligence, where he acted like he had quite a bit of intelligence. The shocking announcement he made at the Republican Convention Wednesday night is the kind that makes E.F. Hutton listen.

Richard Grenell didn’t pull any punches and used every moment of his time on stage to promote Donald Trump because what he already knows about the Democrats makes him sick to his stomach. “I saw the Democrats’ entire case for Russian collusion and what I saw made me sick to my stomach. The Obama-Biden administration secretly launched a surveillance operation on the Trump campaign and silenced the many brave intelligence officials who spoke up against it.”


Not only that, Grenell informs, Deep State Democrats in Barack Obama’s Federal Bureau of Instigation and Department of Injustice “presented bogus information as facts. They lied to judges. Then they classified anything that undermined their case.” That’s just for starters. “After Donald Trump won the election, when they should have continued the American tradition of helping the president-elect transition into the White House, they tried instead to undercut him even more.”

Joe Biden personally “asked intelligence officials to uncover the hidden information on President Trump’s incoming national security advisor three weeks before the Inauguration.” As Grenell snipes, “that’s the Democrats. Between surveillance, classifications, leaks, and puppet candidates, they never want the American people to know who’s actually calling the shots.” Then there’s President Donald Trump.

One moment, please...

newshourfirst.com

BJ's Pull quote:

Richard Grenell is firmly convinced that the decision on who to vote for as president isn’t even close to a hard choice. With President Donald Trump, he declares, “you always know exactly who is in charge because the answer is you. You’re in charge. Not lobbyists. Not special interests. Not warmongers, or China sympathizers, or globalization fanatics.”

Richard Grenell is a Repubican with no experience at running one large government agency, much less the 17 which now report to him. What he says or thinks is irrelevant, as it is with all Trump appointees. They'll say what they're told to say or they're out of work.

Poor little canadian commie, Grenell is no longer DNI. Do try to keep up. LMAO

.

The DNI has been politicized by Donald Trump. Despite this, our intelligence agencies agree Russia is trying to swing the election to Trump by using fake information on Biden. The same nonsense that Grenell tried to pass as fact is being spread by the current DNI who is a political hack.

 

[busybee01]

Obama was a political hack. His purpose as outgoing Resident was to turn the US intelligence agencies into a political propaganda organ to damage Trump, not provide information to maintain safety and security for Americans.

A little off-topic, but Obama politicized NASA, even! Wtf?!
He weaponized all the government agencies.
He couldn't get "National Police", so he tried to turn DHS and all the bureaus into it.

Trump has politicized the Post Office, CDC and our Intelligence agencies.

ROFLMFAO, you swallowed all that, didn't ya? Fucking amazing.

.

You apparently cannot swallow the truth.

 

[busybee01]

I laugh -

A commercial written by crowdstrike on their website describing their testimony

versus

Testimony under oath.

Fascinating.

I guess you didn’t read it because the “commercial” included their testimony under oath that you ignored.

Furthermore, it doesn’t even prove your point. We aren’t relying solely on Crowdstrike to attribute the source of the hack. There was no bipartisan intelligence report which contradicted Obama.

RCP is hardly a right wing rag so may I present:

CrowdStrike President Under Oath: No Proof of Russia DNC Hack | RealClearPolitics

CrowdStrike President Under Oath: No Proof of Russia DNC Hack | RealClearPolitics

www.realclearpolitics.com

!

.

Mmm, beg to differ. I’ve seen some very shoddy work come out of RCP.

Picking one sentence out an entire investigation without any additional context in order to reach a conclusion. is about as intellectually dishonest as one could be.

That testimony was given before the Republican controlled HPSCI. Even the Republicans on that committee agreed it was Russia.

RCP has columnists on both sides. Just because it appears on RCP does not give it credibility.

 

[BluesLegend]

Obama has a 60%+ approval rating now. Clearly voters are saying that Obama's Presidency was pretty good compared to Trump. Obamacare is more popular than Trump.

LMAO yes Obama is so popular the American people chose to abandon him and his dumb ass policies handing the White House, House, and Senate to Republicans that's how popular Obama is.

 

[busybee01]

Ha! Obama’s intelligence agencies were criticized for that reason after they put out intelligence indicating Russia was behind DNC hacks and election interference because those things were not true.
Four years later and numerous intelligence reports from Republicans and Democrats verifying that result and the Dem faithful still can’t bring themselves to admit they were wrong

Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.

You won’t because it doesn’t exist.

Show what federal agency examined the DNC servers and came to that conclusion.

.

First show me why that was necessary to reach that conclusion.

Independent eyes, the DNC had a vested interest in making the claim.

.

Crowdstrike doesn’t have a vested interest. And the US law enforcement and intelligence community provided plenty of independent eyes to the hack.

So I still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.

You don't necessarily have to look at the actual server to determine if it was hacked. Trump supporters have to stick to their story even if it is not true. Network managers look for anomalies in data traffic, signatures and other abnormalities to determine if their networks might be under attack by hackers. They do not physically take down servers unless they believe their networks have been hacked.

 

[busybee01]

Obama has a 60%+ approval rating now. Clearly voters are saying that Obama's Presidency was pretty good compared to Trump. Obamacare is more popular than Trump.

LMAO yes Obama is so popular the American people chose to abandon him and his dumb ass policies handing the White House, House, and Senate to Republicans that's how popular Obama is.

Obama's approvals are in the 60s now versus Trump who is in the 40s. Clearly Americans believe Obama's Presidency has been better than Trump's.

 

[BluesLegend]

Obama has a 60%+ approval rating now. Clearly voters are saying that Obama's Presidency was pretty good compared to Trump. Obamacare is more popular than Trump.

LMAO yes Obama is so popular the American people chose to abandon him and his dumb ass policies handing the White House, House, and Senate to Republicans that's how popular Obama is.

Obama's approvals are in the 60s now versus Trump who is in the 40s. Clearly Americans believe Obama's Presidency has been better than Trump's.

Are you a blithering idiot or something? Obama told the American people his legacy was on the line in 2016 yet they rejected him and his policies. Do you hear the American people demanding Obamacare?

 

[bottlecap]

Grenell is a political hack. His purpose as DNI was to turn the US intelligence agencies into a political propaganda organ to elect Trump, not provide information to maintain safety and security if Americans.

He’s fulfilling that purpose here. Just look at how the party faithful lap it up.

And all the Dems are political hacks, or worse. One thing we know for sure, a vote for a Democrat is a vote for Iranian terrorism, chinese undermining of our manufacturing base, and the end of the American middle class.

A vote for Trump is unchecked Russian aggression. No plan for Chinese expansionism. No global leadership to combat Iranian nuclear ambitions. The death of Medicare and Social Security. Enrichment of the elites and fewer benefits for everyone else.

Vote for someone who actually knows what they’re doing, not Trump.

Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.

Fascinating, yes.

Crowdstrike President Shawn Henry ( under oath)
-No concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails -
Henry personally led the remediation and forensics analysis

Swing and a miss.

Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight

Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.

www.crowdstrike.com

Did CrowdStrike have proof that Russia hacked the DNC?

Yes, and this is also supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and independent Congressional reports.

Following a comprehensive investigation that CrowdStrike detailed publicly, the company concluded in May 2016 that two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries breached the DNC network.

To reference, CrowdStrike’s account of their DNC investigation, published on June 14, 2016, “CrowdStrike Services Inc., our Incident Response group, was called bythe Democratic National Committee (DNC), the formal governing body for the US Democratic Party, to respond to a suspected breach. We deployed our IR team and technology and immediately identified two sophisticated adversaries on the network – COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR…. At DNC, COZY BEAR intrusion has been identified going back to summer of 2015, while FANCY BEAR separately breached the network in April 2016.”

This conclusion has most recently been supported by the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issuing a report [intelligence.senate.gov] validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community, published on January 6, 2017, that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.

The Senate report states on page 48:

“The Committee found that specific intelligence as well as open source assessments support the assessment that President Putin approved and directed aspects of this influence campaign.”

Furthermore, in his testimony in front of the House Intelligence Committee, Shawn Henry stated the following with regards to CrowdStrike’s degree of confidence that the intrusion activity can be attributed to Russia, cited from page 24:

1. HENRY: We said that we had a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government. And our analysts that looked at it and that had looked at these types of attacks before, many different types of attacks similar to this in different environments, certain tools that were used, certain methods by which they were moving in the environment,and looking at the types of data that was being targeted, that it was consistent with a nation-state adversary and associated with Russian intelligence.

"We have a high degree of confidence it was the Russian Government."

TRANSLATION----they have no proof.

Richard Grenell is about the closest thing the United States has to James Bond. The greatest part is that he’s not a fictional character but a real life patriot. Not only did he serve as U.S. Ambassador to Germany, he put on a second hat as acting Director of National Intelligence, where he acted like he had quite a bit of intelligence. The shocking announcement he made at the Republican Convention Wednesday night is the kind that makes E.F. Hutton listen.

Richard Grenell didn’t pull any punches and used every moment of his time on stage to promote Donald Trump because what he already knows about the Democrats makes him sick to his stomach. “I saw the Democrats’ entire case for Russian collusion and what I saw made me sick to my stomach. The Obama-Biden administration secretly launched a surveillance operation on the Trump campaign and silenced the many brave intelligence officials who spoke up against it.”


Not only that, Grenell informs, Deep State Democrats in Barack Obama’s Federal Bureau of Instigation and Department of Injustice “presented bogus information as facts. They lied to judges. Then they classified anything that undermined their case.” That’s just for starters. “After Donald Trump won the election, when they should have continued the American tradition of helping the president-elect transition into the White House, they tried instead to undercut him even more.”

Joe Biden personally “asked intelligence officials to uncover the hidden information on President Trump’s incoming national security advisor three weeks before the Inauguration.” As Grenell snipes, “that’s the Democrats. Between surveillance, classifications, leaks, and puppet candidates, they never want the American people to know who’s actually calling the shots.” Then there’s President Donald Trump.

One moment, please...

newshourfirst.com

BJ's Pull quote:

Richard Grenell is firmly convinced that the decision on who to vote for as president isn’t even close to a hard choice. With President Donald Trump, he declares, “you always know exactly who is in charge because the answer is you. You’re in charge. Not lobbyists. Not special interests. Not warmongers, or China sympathizers, or globalization fanatics.”

Grenell is a kook. A typical Trump supporter. He has absolutely no credibility. I hope ordinary voters hear what he says. That will doom Republicans at the polls. Americans are actually sane and don't buy into these conspiracy theories.

One thing is clear, the LAST person Putin wanted to be President was TRUMP.

Russia's chief form of income is OIL, so it follows that Bernie Sanders and Green deal supporters would be the ideal partners, reducing US competition, not TRUMP.

TRUMP created a new branch of the US Armed Services called Space Force.

TRUMP sent Real lethal weapons to UKRAINE unlike Obama/Biden.

The Russian Dossier was a hit job by Russia against TRUMP, etc.

As always facts have no affect on them.

Putin wanted Trump
Everything Trump has done is bad for Putin.
Putin wants Trump
Everything that Trump will do will be bad for Putin.
Putin wants Trump.

It's amazing,
Ridiculous but amazing.

I really don't know if Putin wanted TRUMP or Hillary...BUT is is very clear that Russia would have declared a National Holiday if Bernie Sanders won. TRUMP, on the other hand was a question mark, so it is hard to say if he wanted either of the two candidates.

That is not true. They had a very good handle on Trump. At the least they knew he would divide the country at the very least.

Putin has trump eating out of his hand.

Trump told Putin 'I'm a big fan of yours' and asked him to be the guest of honor at a Miss Universe pageant, in a series of fawning letters

Donald Trump invited Putin to the Miss Universe pageant years ago, adding a handwritten all-caps message promising "THE WORLD'S MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN!"

www.businessinsider.com

You are talking about a time when TRUMP wanted to bring the Miss Universe pageant to Russia. As a businessman who needed to come into a country like Russia, having the leaders ok was a big plus.

Now that TRUMP is President it is a much different relationship.

 

[OKTexas]

Richard Grenell is about the closest thing the United States has to James Bond. The greatest part is that he’s not a fictional character but a real life patriot. Not only did he serve as U.S. Ambassador to Germany, he put on a second hat as acting Director of National Intelligence, where he acted like he had quite a bit of intelligence. The shocking announcement he made at the Republican Convention Wednesday night is the kind that makes E.F. Hutton listen.

Richard Grenell didn’t pull any punches and used every moment of his time on stage to promote Donald Trump because what he already knows about the Democrats makes him sick to his stomach. “I saw the Democrats’ entire case for Russian collusion and what I saw made me sick to my stomach. The Obama-Biden administration secretly launched a surveillance operation on the Trump campaign and silenced the many brave intelligence officials who spoke up against it.”


Not only that, Grenell informs, Deep State Democrats in Barack Obama’s Federal Bureau of Instigation and Department of Injustice “presented bogus information as facts. They lied to judges. Then they classified anything that undermined their case.” That’s just for starters. “After Donald Trump won the election, when they should have continued the American tradition of helping the president-elect transition into the White House, they tried instead to undercut him even more.”

Joe Biden personally “asked intelligence officials to uncover the hidden information on President Trump’s incoming national security advisor three weeks before the Inauguration.” As Grenell snipes, “that’s the Democrats. Between surveillance, classifications, leaks, and puppet candidates, they never want the American people to know who’s actually calling the shots.” Then there’s President Donald Trump.

One moment, please...

newshourfirst.com

BJ's Pull quote:

Richard Grenell is firmly convinced that the decision on who to vote for as president isn’t even close to a hard choice. With President Donald Trump, he declares, “you always know exactly who is in charge because the answer is you. You’re in charge. Not lobbyists. Not special interests. Not warmongers, or China sympathizers, or globalization fanatics.”

Richard Grenell is a Repubican with no experience at running one large government agency, much less the 17 which now report to him. What he says or thinks is irrelevant, as it is with all Trump appointees. They'll say what they're told to say or they're out of work.

Poor little canadian commie, Grenell is no longer DNI. Do try to keep up. LMAO

.

The DNI has been politicized by Donald Trump. Despite this, our intelligence agencies agree Russia is trying to swing the election to Trump by using fake information on Biden. The same nonsense that Grenell tried to pass as fact is being spread by the current DNI who is a political hack.

So now contemporary documents are now nonsense? Who would have thunk. LMAO

.

 

[OKTexas]

I laugh -

A commercial written by crowdstrike on their website describing their testimony

versus

Testimony under oath.

Fascinating.

I guess you didn’t read it because the “commercial” included their testimony under oath that you ignored.

Furthermore, it doesn’t even prove your point. We aren’t relying solely on Crowdstrike to attribute the source of the hack. There was no bipartisan intelligence report which contradicted Obama.

RCP is hardly a right wing rag so may I present:

CrowdStrike President Under Oath: No Proof of Russia DNC Hack | RealClearPolitics

CrowdStrike President Under Oath: No Proof of Russia DNC Hack | RealClearPolitics

www.realclearpolitics.com

!

.

Mmm, beg to differ. I’ve seen some very shoddy work come out of RCP.

Picking one sentence out an entire investigation without any additional context in order to reach a conclusion. is about as intellectually dishonest as one could be.

That testimony was given before the Republican controlled HPSCI. Even the Republicans on that committee agreed it was Russia.

RCP has columnists on both sides. Just because it appears on RCP does not give it credibility.

Yet you haven't provided a credible link to the contrary, go figure. You commies are funny.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Ha! Obama’s intelligence agencies were criticized for that reason after they put out intelligence indicating Russia was behind DNC hacks and election interference because those things were not true.
Four years later and numerous intelligence reports from Republicans and Democrats verifying that result and the Dem faithful still can’t bring themselves to admit they were wrong

Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.

You won’t because it doesn’t exist.

Show what federal agency examined the DNC servers and came to that conclusion.

.

First show me why that was necessary to reach that conclusion.

Independent eyes, the DNC had a vested interest in making the claim.

.

Crowdstrike doesn’t have a vested interest. And the US law enforcement and intelligence community provided plenty of independent eyes to the hack.

So I still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.

You don't necessarily have to look at the actual server to determine if it was hacked. Trump supporters have to stick to their story even if it is not true. Network managers look for anomalies in data traffic, signatures and other abnormalities to determine if their networks might be under attack by hackers. They do not physically take down servers unless they believe their networks have been hacked.

They do not physically take down servers unless they believe their networks have been hacked.

So you're saying that's why the DNC didn't take down their servers and give them to the FBI, because they didn't believe they were hacked? Got it. LMAO

.

 

[OKTexas]

Obama has a 60%+ approval rating now. Clearly voters are saying that Obama's Presidency was pretty good compared to Trump. Obamacare is more popular than Trump.

LMAO yes Obama is so popular the American people chose to abandon him and his dumb ass policies handing the White House, House, and Senate to Republicans that's how popular Obama is.

Obama's approvals are in the 60s now versus Trump who is in the 40s. Clearly Americans believe Obama's Presidency has been better than Trump's.

Nah, they're just happy he's gone and can't fuck up anything else. Couldn't believe the way the mooch claimed to being oppressed while speaking to the DNC, from her 15 million dollar ocean side mansion in one of the whitest communities in the country. Poor baby.

.

 

[colfax_m]

Ha! Obama’s intelligence agencies were criticized for that reason after they put out intelligence indicating Russia was behind DNC hacks and election interference because those things were not true.
Four years later and numerous intelligence reports from Republicans and Democrats verifying that result and the Dem faithful still can’t bring themselves to admit they were wrong

Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.

You won’t because it doesn’t exist.

Show what federal agency examined the DNC servers and came to that conclusion.

.

First show me why that was necessary to reach that conclusion.

Independent eyes, the DNC had a vested interest in making the claim.

.

Crowdstrike doesn’t have a vested interest. And the US law enforcement and intelligence community provided plenty of independent eyes to the hack.

So I still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.

Who employed Crowdstrike?

.

The DNC. So what? The future of Crowdstrike’s business depends on their credibility and they wouldn’t sacrifice their viability as a company in order to appease a single client.

Still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.

 

[colfax_m]

Ha! Obama’s intelligence agencies were criticized for that reason after they put out intelligence indicating Russia was behind DNC hacks and election interference because those things were not true.
Four years later and numerous intelligence reports from Republicans and Democrats verifying that result and the Dem faithful still can’t bring themselves to admit they were wrong

Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.

You won’t because it doesn’t exist.

Show what federal agency examined the DNC servers and came to that conclusion.

.

First show me why that was necessary to reach that conclusion.

Independent eyes, the DNC had a vested interest in making the claim.

.

Crowdstrike doesn’t have a vested interest. And the US law enforcement and intelligence community provided plenty of independent eyes to the hack.

So I still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.

You don't necessarily have to look at the actual server to determine if it was hacked. Trump supporters have to stick to their story even if it is not true. Network managers look for anomalies in data traffic, signatures and other abnormalities to determine if their networks might be under attack by hackers. They do not physically take down servers unless they believe their networks have been hacked.

They do not physically take down servers unless they believe their networks have been hacked.

So you're saying that's why the DNC didn't take down their servers and give them to the FBI, because they didn't believe they were hacked? Got it. LMAO

.

No. They didn’t take down their servers to give to the FBI because they were in the middle of a huge election and destroying their infrastructure for no reason is a dumb idea.

 

[colfax_m]

I laugh -

A commercial written by crowdstrike on their website describing their testimony

versus

Testimony under oath.

Fascinating.

I guess you didn’t read it because the “commercial” included their testimony under oath that you ignored.

Furthermore, it doesn’t even prove your point. We aren’t relying solely on Crowdstrike to attribute the source of the hack. There was no bipartisan intelligence report which contradicted Obama.

RCP is hardly a right wing rag so may I present:

CrowdStrike President Under Oath: No Proof of Russia DNC Hack | RealClearPolitics

CrowdStrike President Under Oath: No Proof of Russia DNC Hack | RealClearPolitics

www.realclearpolitics.com

!

.

Mmm, beg to differ. I’ve seen some very shoddy work come out of RCP.

Picking one sentence out an entire investigation without any additional context in order to reach a conclusion. is about as intellectually dishonest as one could be.

That testimony was given before the Republican controlled HPSCI. Even the Republicans on that committee agreed it was Russia.

Flawed source information leads to flawed conclusions.

.

What source was flawed?

From what I've seen all 4 of them.

.

Name them be describe why they were flawed.

This is all nonsense, by the way. You don’t even have a comprehensive knowledge of their sources of information.

 

[Billiejeens]

Richard Grenell is about the closest thing the United States has to James Bond. The greatest part is that he’s not a fictional character but a real life patriot. Not only did he serve as U.S. Ambassador to Germany, he put on a second hat as acting Director of National Intelligence, where he acted like he had quite a bit of intelligence. The shocking announcement he made at the Republican Convention Wednesday night is the kind that makes E.F. Hutton listen.

Richard Grenell didn’t pull any punches and used every moment of his time on stage to promote Donald Trump because what he already knows about the Democrats makes him sick to his stomach. “I saw the Democrats’ entire case for Russian collusion and what I saw made me sick to my stomach. The Obama-Biden administration secretly launched a surveillance operation on the Trump campaign and silenced the many brave intelligence officials who spoke up against it.”


Not only that, Grenell informs, Deep State Democrats in Barack Obama’s Federal Bureau of Instigation and Department of Injustice “presented bogus information as facts. They lied to judges. Then they classified anything that undermined their case.” That’s just for starters. “After Donald Trump won the election, when they should have continued the American tradition of helping the president-elect transition into the White House, they tried instead to undercut him even more.”

Joe Biden personally “asked intelligence officials to uncover the hidden information on President Trump’s incoming national security advisor three weeks before the Inauguration.” As Grenell snipes, “that’s the Democrats. Between surveillance, classifications, leaks, and puppet candidates, they never want the American people to know who’s actually calling the shots.” Then there’s President Donald Trump.

One moment, please...

newshourfirst.com

BJ's Pull quote:

Richard Grenell is firmly convinced that the decision on who to vote for as president isn’t even close to a hard choice. With President Donald Trump, he declares, “you always know exactly who is in charge because the answer is you. You’re in charge. Not lobbyists. Not special interests. Not warmongers, or China sympathizers, or globalization fanatics.”

Richard Grenell is a Repubican with no experience at running one large government agency, much less the 17 which now report to him. What he says or thinks is irrelevant, as it is with all Trump appointees. They'll say what they're told to say or they're out of work.

Poor little canadian commie, Grenell is no longer DNI. Do try to keep up. LMAO

.

The DNI has been politicized by Donald Trump. Despite this, our intelligence agencies agree Russia is trying to swing the election to Trump by using fake information on Biden. The same nonsense that Grenell tried to pass as fact is being spread by the current DNI who is a political hack.

I laugh
Everyone that doesn't continue your false narrative
Is a hack
Anyone that does is a patriot.
Although all evidence has proven you wrong

How has natural selection not weeded you out?

 

[OKTexas]

Ha! Obama’s intelligence agencies were criticized for that reason after they put out intelligence indicating Russia was behind DNC hacks and election interference because those things were not true.
Four years later and numerous intelligence reports from Republicans and Democrats verifying that result and the Dem faithful still can’t bring themselves to admit they were wrong

Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.

You won’t because it doesn’t exist.

Show what federal agency examined the DNC servers and came to that conclusion.

.

First show me why that was necessary to reach that conclusion.

Independent eyes, the DNC had a vested interest in making the claim.

.

Crowdstrike doesn’t have a vested interest. And the US law enforcement and intelligence community provided plenty of independent eyes to the hack.

So I still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.

Who employed Crowdstrike?

.

The DNC. So what? The future of Crowdstrike’s business depends on their credibility and they wouldn’t sacrifice their viability as a company in order to appease a single client.

Still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.

Yet they put out contradictory information, one to the public and FBI and one to congress. Their legitimacy is already in question.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Ha! Obama’s intelligence agencies were criticized for that reason after they put out intelligence indicating Russia was behind DNC hacks and election interference because those things were not true.
Four years later and numerous intelligence reports from Republicans and Democrats verifying that result and the Dem faithful still can’t bring themselves to admit they were wrong

Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.

You won’t because it doesn’t exist.

Show what federal agency examined the DNC servers and came to that conclusion.

.

First show me why that was necessary to reach that conclusion.

Independent eyes, the DNC had a vested interest in making the claim.

.

Crowdstrike doesn’t have a vested interest. And the US law enforcement and intelligence community provided plenty of independent eyes to the hack.

So I still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.

You don't necessarily have to look at the actual server to determine if it was hacked. Trump supporters have to stick to their story even if it is not true. Network managers look for anomalies in data traffic, signatures and other abnormalities to determine if their networks might be under attack by hackers. They do not physically take down servers unless they believe their networks have been hacked.

They do not physically take down servers unless they believe their networks have been hacked.

So you're saying that's why the DNC didn't take down their servers and give them to the FBI, because they didn't believe they were hacked? Got it. LMAO

.

No. They didn’t take down their servers to give to the FBI because they were in the middle of a huge election and destroying their infrastructure for no reason is a dumb idea.

Excuses, excuses. LMAO

.