Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It is not.
A straight man equally couldn't marry a man.
A brother may love his sister romantically...but that doesn't mean the law must allow them to marry...and the law DOESN'T allow them to marry.
Bingo.
Atheists just do whatever they make up at the moment of what’s good and evil.
Irrelevant. You concede that it is currently against the law...and that law is currently constitutional.
Because that sir is what you are desperately attempting not to acknowledge.
The law can and constitutionally does set limits on who can marry whom regardless of who love whom.
That is two of your arguments that have failed.
Not that I expect you to admit as much.
All this did was return the issue to the states if you want abortion legal in your state elect pro choice state representatives.
So if you want to marry a horse, the State should just get out of the way, huh?
And don't give me any crap about that being ridiculous....These are the same degenerates who told us "we're not interested in children" for decades.
States do not have the right to impose their religious beliefs on others.
And a white man equally couldn't marry black woman.
No difference at all. One limits it based on race, one on sex.
Irrelevant...we are discussing the law...not my personal feelings.Why would you want to involve yourself in something that does not affect you?
Why would the state involve itself in a woman’s personal decisions?Irrelevant...we are discussing the law...not my personal feelings.
Irrelevant...we are discussing the law...not my personal feelings.
To protect the life of the unborn child.Why would the state involve itself in a woman’s personal decisions?
Deflection.It's not irrelevant. We aren't even having this discussion if not for people getting all upset over something I can not understand.
Do you care about all sorts of things that doesn't actually affect you? Do you believe "we need a law" because something offends you?
That “personal” decision ends the life of another person.Why would the state involve itself in a woman’s personal decisions?
Nope. Not a person until you are bornThat “personal” decision ends the life of another person.
Otherwise known as a fetus or zygoteTo protect the life of the unborn child.
No...it's not.
A white man could marry a white woman but a black man could not.
To be equivalent...a straight men could marry each other but gay men could not.
But they are not equivalent.
Neither a straight man nor a gay man nor a black man nor a Christian man nor an atheistic man could legally marry another man.
There is no equal protection argument that applies.
I understand why you don't wish to see the difference...but that wish doesn't change the fact that in the eyes if the law the two are completely different.
Fetus is literally the Latin word offspring in the womb.Otherwise known as a fetus or zygote
www.etymonline.com
No they are not.No, in your eyes they are completely different, in the eyes of the law they are the same
You are a science denier.Nope. Not a person until you are born
