GOP Campaign Consultants Panicked About Upcoming Midterms After Roe Decision

[easyt65]

Reaffirming the fact that Thomas is a poor, incompetent, and partisan jurist.

You forgot to mention 'black', lil' racist snowflake.

 

[toobfreak]

For conservatives, abortion has always been about politics, not ‘saving babies.’

For progressives, abortion has always been about politics, not 'saving women.'

 

[Weatherman2020]

Reaffirming the fact that Thomas is a poor, incompetent, and partisan jurist.

Ginsberg said RvW was a bad decision, shitforbrains.

 

[toobfreak]

Reaffirming the fact that Thomas is a poor, incompetent, and partisan jurist.

Racist.

 

[BlackSand]

I don't think you should have to. I would like to know so I can do business elsewhere but bake what you bake.

.

I am not a baker ... Nor do I desire to make a baker bake anything.

I tend to support businesses that are more interested in the quality of their products and customer service,
than they are in what I may think about their political views.

Believe me ... It has made shopping a lot easier over the past few years.
There are companies lining up to tell me they don't want my business, and many more everyday willing to take their place.

.​

 

[pknopp]

Link? Scripture?

Stoning people for an offense was legal, too. You want to bring that back as well?

I'm not the one who uses scriptures that don't even apply any longer to justify my beliefs.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I'm not the one who uses scriptures that don't even apply any longer to justify my beliefs.

It was legal in the Bible.

So you lied.
Again.

 

[pknopp]

So you lied.
Again.

I lied about nothing.

Incest in the Bible - Wikipedia

 

[Weatherman2020]

I lied about nothing.

Incest in the Bible - Wikipedia

I read about a murder in The NY Times. Reporting events doesn’t mean anyone says it should be legal.

 

[Nostra]

Prior to 1967 it would have been.

pknopp said his marriage was illegal. That is a blatant lie from the blatant liar.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“I do not view abortion as a, um, as choice and a right. I think it’s always a tragedy.

Brandon, 2006

1982:
Biden voted to overturn Roe v Wade in 1982 saying women don’t have ‘sole right’ to say what happens to bodies.

‘Abortion’ has always been about politics for the right – a political weapon used to attack opponents and keep the base energized and going to the polls, the Christo-fascist right in particular.

For 50 years Republicans used lies such as ‘killing babies’ in their repertoire of political dishonesty and demagoguery to advance the right’s authoritarian agenda and establish the tyranny of Republican minority rule.

 

[Weatherman2020]

‘Abortion’ has always been about politics for the right – a political weapon used to attack opponents and keep the base energized and going to the polls, the Christo-fascist right in particular.

For 50 years Republicans used lies such as ‘killing babies’ in their repertoire of political dishonesty and demagoguery to advance the right’s authoritarian agenda and establish the tyranny of Republican minority rule.

Yes, I agree. Sparing the lives of innocents has generally been only important to Conservatives.

 

[pknopp]

I read about a murder in The NY Times. Reporting events doesn’t mean anyone says it should be legal.

Of course not but as I note, how does one pick and choose what parts you will support and which you won't?

 

[Weatherman2020]

‘Abortion’ has always been about politics for the right – a political weapon used to attack opponents and keep the base energized and going to the polls, the Christo-fascist right in particular.

For 50 years Republicans used lies such as ‘killing babies’ in their repertoire of political dishonesty and demagoguery to advance the right’s authoritarian agenda and establish the tyranny of Republican minority rule.

Murder a pregnant woman in Leftist California who’s 4 months pregnant.
Two counts of homicide.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Of course not but as I note, how does one pick and choose what parts you will support and which you won't?

Because those of us with an IQ above room temperature can apply discernment to reports of events vs thou shalls and shall nots.

 

[pknopp]

Because those of us with an IQ above room temperature can apply discernment to reports of events vs thou shalls and shall nots.

That's great you can but many use the Bible to justify their actions.

 

[Weatherman2020]

That's great you can but many use the Bible to justify their actions.

Most use atheism to justify their actions.

 

[pknopp]

Most use atheism to justify their actions.

Some do, I am unfamiliar with Atheist scriptures to question their selective beliefs.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Some do, I am unfamiliar with Atheist scriptures to question their selective beliefs.

Bingo.
Atheists just do whatever they make up at the moment of what’s good and evil.

 

[Missourian]

I'm trying to imagine why people would have an issue with that. It was legal in the Bible.

Irrelevant. You concede that it is currently against the law...and that law is currently constitutional.

Because that sir is what you are desperately attempting not to acknowledge.

The law can and constitutionally does set limits on who can marry whom regardless of who love whom.

That is two of your arguments that have failed.

Not that I expect you to admit as much.