- Moderator
- #481
I am fine with at viability.Fundamental rights? How about the fundamental rights of an unborn child?
Give back to the states to decide.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am fine with at viability.Fundamental rights? How about the fundamental rights of an unborn child?
Give back to the states to decide.
Keep YOUR words in YOUR mouth, moron. Show me where I even intimated that. Typical fucking democrat--when all else fails, just LIE!
Who has forced you to take a vaccination?The whole premise of you baby murderers is “my body my choice”, yet you fully support forcing experimental vaccinations into people. Get bent.
You know and I know, that the male is responsible for the support of that child until adulthood. Please don't be so disingenuous as to suggest that you didn't know that.Ok, essentially it is all on the woman but choice. Typical, supporting forced gestation and a free pass for the male who got her pregnant.
You conveniently left out the part of my post where I called for prison for the doctor that performed the procedure--which makes garbage of your contention that the contract murderer of the post birth murder goes free. Just STFU, you are disingenuous POS that has lost this debate. Of course, anyone who advocates murder is a POS on their face.The punishment you want for a woman paying someone to kill her baby in the womb is forced sterilization.
Please don't lie. There is no double standard other than no one has a say whether the child lives or dies except the woman. (Kind of invalidates your point). If the man has an equal say, then he is subject to the same penalties as I proposed in this scenario. The only double standard that shows in your example is that the murderous mother is given complete say so. It takes two to tango which is completely irrelevant in the case of the murder of the unborn under current law.Hmmm…yet again, a double standard When it comes to women.
Since most women are smarter than you (not hard) you aren’t going to get overwhelming support from women for killing babies. Seems you’re delusional. Then again I don’t care about your mental issues.You're truly delusional if you think accomplishing a goal is going to get more repubs out. What you're going to get is a bunch of women out to vote, many whom probably never voted in their life. Probably also galvanize the young voters as well. But then again I really dont care what you think.
Sad that she thinks it’s funny that these pro-abortion people want the father to have zero say in the decision (my body my choice), yet the first thing they do is demonize the male while ignoring any of his input into this major decision. It took two people to make the child, but only one gets to decide the child’s ultimate fate as far as being born? And the left sees nothing wrong with that....Sure, castrate him too--if he agrees to the abortion. But the last time I checked, the father doesn't have a say in that decision. You can't have it both ways--you enjoy talking out both sides of your mouth.
Once again. Try to read SLOWLY. Lip read if ya must. Here goes. 999 out of 1000 baby murders are for convenience. Shoulda used Condoms. Or just not whored around. Promiscuous behavior can lead to AIDS ,the Clap ,Syphilis , Crabs ,and other scourges.Again, what of a 13 year old CHILD who's raped and gets pregnant?
Would you consider her "promiscuous"? Are you one of those pieces of shit who believe that rape victims are just "asking for it"?
Once again. Try to read SLOWLY. Lip read if ya must. Here goes. 999 out of 1000 baby murders are for convenience. Shoulda used Condoms. Or just not whored around. Promiscuous behavior can lead to AIDS ,the Clap ,Syphilis , Crabs ,and other scourges.
Sad that she thinks it’s funny that these pro-abortion people want the father to have zero say in the decision
You conveniently left out the part of my post where I called for prison for the doctor that performed the procedure--which makes garbage of your contention that the contract murderer of the post birth murder goes free. Just STFU, you are disingenuous POS that has lost this debate. Of course, anyone who advocates murder is a POS on their face.
In many ways, I want the Supreme Court to overturn Roe V Wade.
Not because of my personal beliefs. I believe in choice. I can make that choice for myself only. Not every woman in the nation.
Because it will create such a backlash, republicans won't be able to be elected dog catcher in most places.
There has never been a time in our nation that the majority wanted to outlaw abortion.
The gap between those who want to outlaw it has been growing too.
So while many women will die and be harmed very badly for a while in red states only, it will guarantee that either republicans are thrown out of office for a very long time or they will wake up and stop pandering to a small margin of our nation.
Either way, abortion and women's health care will stop being a political weapon.
It never should have become a political weapon in the first place.
I don't think the Supreme Court has the guts to overturn Roe V Wade. They aren't as stupid as the minority who want it outlawed. They know what the political consequences will be.
Roe v. Wade on the line as Supreme Court takes up Mississippi abortion rights case
The Supreme Court will hear a case from Mississippi that could transform abortion rights in America, overturning Roe v. Wade and allowing stringent new state laws.abcnews.go.com
I'm not refuting what you say, dumbass.
What I'm asking YOU is this: Do YOU think a 13 year old victim of incest be forced to carry pregnancy resulting from that incest to term? It's really a yes or no question.
This has nothing to do with promiscuity...
The conservative justices lack the guts to uphold Roe – that’s the problem.I don't think the Supreme Court has the guts to overturn Roe V Wade.
There’s a world of difference between Democrats and Republicans.How will political "consequences" affect supreme court justices?
Even if what you're saying is true about republicans and reelections, we still have impotent democrats in charge. What's the real difference? We've never been more in need of a third party in this country
For nearly 50 years voters who support privacy rights and choice could vote for Republican candidates for state offices knowing that although those candidates want to ‘ban’ abortion, that wouldn’t happen because of Roe.Because it will create such a backlash, republicans won't be able to be elected dog catcher in most places.
The conservative justices lack the guts to uphold Roe – that’s the problem.