It’s public record. You will get more from discovering it yourself.Then post the dates, causation and atmospheric composition to make your case for 120ppm and temperature.
You know, like actual climate scientists.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It’s public record. You will get more from discovering it yourself.Then post the dates, causation and atmospheric composition to make your case for 120ppm and temperature.
You know, like actual climate scientists.
so you have data on how warm 120PPM is from climate scientists? post it please.Then post the dates, causation and atmospheric composition to make your case for 120ppm and temperature.
You know, like actual climate scientists.
Can you name some of these papers? The books are essentially irrelevant, but I would like to see a paper in a refereed journal presenting evidence of fraud. Or perhaps a court case of charges being brought against someone for such fraud.Many, many "actual" climate scientists have published papers and books on the fraud of climate change. They are simply dismissed by fearmongering Leftists with a socialist agenda.
Who do you think you are?Can you name some of these papers? The books are essentially irrelevant, but I would like to see a paper in a refereed journal presenting evidence of fraud. Or perhaps a court case of charges being brought against someone for such fraud.
Poster Crick. You?Who do you think you are?
Popeye, with the same rights as you! That must suck for your condescending mindPoster Crick. You?
Why the dodge on something you consider so convincing?It’s public record. You will get more from discovering it yourself.
There’s no dodge at all. I know what the data shows. It will mean more to you if you go and discover it for yourself.Why the dodge on something you consider so convincing?
Your last two posts have been incomprehensible.Popeye, with the same rights as you! That must suck for your condescending mind
Can you name some of these papers? The books are essentially irrelevant, but I would like to see a paper in a refereed journal presenting evidence of fraud. Or perhaps a court case of charges being brought against someone for such fraud.
I’d expect nothing less from you! Condescending is your middle nameYour last two posts have been incomprehensible.
Sure sure, can you post an scientific organization which shares your view of AGW denial?After seeing jc456 go back and forth with you, I clicked on SHOW POST of you because you are on my Ignore List for good reason, viz. your reprehensible dishonesty.
1. I have compiled papers, graphs, and data for around 20 years on the global warming fraud. Twenty years.
I have read books by authorities challenging your AlGorian silliness. The first part of the first page of my notes:
Unstoppable Global Warming
Every 1,500 Years
S. Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery
Rowman & Littlefield
New York
2007
Dedication
This book is dedicated to those thousands of highly qualified research scientists who have documented physical evidence of the 1,500-year climate cycle from over the entire globe. Hundreds of their studies endorse the reality of this cycle.
Too often, they have had to work in the face of hostility from their colleagues in the climate modeling community who are "selling CO2.
The public has remained virtually unaware that the 1,500-year cycle offers the only explanation for the modern warming that is supported by physical evidence.
Prologue
Page xii Today, 150 years into the Modern Warming... The ice cores and seabed sediments tell us of six hundred natural 1,500-year climate cycles over the past one million years.
Modern Climate History
Page xv
1850 to 1940: Warming, especially between 1920 and 1940
1940 to 1975: Cooling trend.
1976 to 1978: Sudden warming spurt
1979 to present: A large disparity...
____________________________________--
THOUSANDS of papers have been published refuting the nonsense you defend so pretentiously, so condescendingly.
THOUSANDS. I cite many hundreds of them here:
theglobalwarmingfraud
Stop your lying. You should be embarrassed, but you Leftists never are. Never.
Name one climate scientistSure sure, can you post an scientific organization which shares your view of AGW denial?
Ya know, since you do so much reading on the subject.
You can read the IPCC report.Name one climate scientist
Have you?You can read the IPCC report.
Why? Nothing with any evidence in itYou can read the IPCC report.
Posts a guy who read lord muckington...Why? Nothing with any evidence in it
Tough post huh? You Couldn’t find evidence eitherPosts a guy who read lord muckington...
Dude the AGW position literally has ALL the facts on it's side.Tough post huh? You Couldn’t find evidence either