Gerrymandering makes hypocrisy a political punch line

[jc456]

LOL. You have devolved all the way down to just being comic relief. Even Texas will have democrat districts, even if the re-districting is passed.

You're saying that a state with 40% overall registered Republicans has zero republican representation and you're just fine with that?

it's exactly what he said.

How many blacks are now represented yet only make up 25% of the population? Gerrymandering?

BTW, Illinois admits it so!

 

[AntonToo]

LOL. You have devolved all the way down to just being comic relief. Even Texas will have democrat districts, even if the re-districting is passed.

You're saying that a state with 40% overall registered Republicans has zero republican representation and you're just fine with that?

You obviously have big comprehension problems mr."Thinker"

I didn't say anything about overall registration in MA, what I said was that Republicans can barely get 40% in ANY of their districts.

Texas in fact has many Democrat leaning, competitive districts and that's EXACTLY WHY REPUBLICANS ARE GERYMANDERING THERE.

Redistricting Report Card

Gerrymandering Project

gerrymander.princeton.edu

 

[Independent thinker]

You obviously have big comprehension problems.

I didn't say anything about overall registration in MA, what I said was that Republicans can barely get 40% in ANY of their districts.

Texas in fact has many competitive districts and that's EXACTLY WHY REPUBLICANS ARE GERYMANDERING THERE.

Redistricting Report Card

Gerrymandering Project

gerrymander.princeton.edu

Comprehension problems? You can't seem to comprehend that the reason Republicans can't win in any of the districts is because the districts have all been gerrymandered.

 

[AntonToo]

Comprehension problems? You can't seem to comprehend that the reason Republicans can't win in any of the districts is because the districts have all been gerrymandered.

Which district dumbass?

Which district Republicans could have won in MA, if only it would be drawn up more correctly in your view - NAME ONE, bullshit peddler.

 

[citygator]

LOL. Your reasonable debate is, "I'm right, you're wrong. If you'd just listen to my snake oil pitch, you'll want to buy my snake oil".

I linked the bill. And cited the parts you needed. Then you gave up and stopped trying.

 

[AntonToo]

I linked the bill. And cited the parts you needed. Then you gave up and stopped trying.

Self proclaimed "Independent thinker" sure does have a very big dislike of any independent thinking that leads to admitting Republicans are doing anything wrong.

 

[Independent thinker]

Which district dumbass?

Which district Republicans could win in MA, if only it would be drawn up more correctly - NAME ONE, bullshit peddler.

The only districts they have are the ones democrats drew up. There are no other districts but the ones democrats drew up. But, you can look at the following map and see that there are areas large enough and close enough to each other that more than one district could be drawn up which would give Republicans representation in the House:

https://www.politico.com/2024-election/results/massachusetts/

 

[kyzr]

Is that something you can support with actual facts or do you just say whatever the hell your bleeding little rightwing heart feels like?
Here is a systematic analysis of gerrymandering across all states:

1. From looking at the gerrymandered blue states like CA, IL, NY, and the NE, there are very few GOP districts to try to turn blue.

2. There are two options available to Republicans to counter the gerrymandered blue states.

a) Re-do the 2020 census without counting illegals, who flooded into blue states thru Biden's illegal open borders. That gave blue states 24 more seats than if illegals were not counted. A new census would face legal challenges. Rapid deportation of illegals before 2030 looks to be a simple solution.

b) Gerrymander red states to minimize blue districts just like the democrats did. Republicans should gain several seats in TX, FL, IN, OK, GA, OH, NE, SC, NC

 

[Independent thinker]

I linked the bill. And cited the parts you needed. Then you gave up and stopped trying.

We have already discussed that at length. You have only proved your point to one person - yourself.

 

[AntonToo]

1. From looking at the gerrymandered blue states like CA, IL, NY, and the NE, there are very few GOP districts to try to turn blue.

2. There are two options available to Republicans to counter the gerrymandered blue states.

a) Re-do the 2020 census without counting illegals, who flooded into blue states thru Biden's illegal open borders. That gave blue states 24 more seats than if illegals were not counted. A new census would face legal challenges. Rapid deportation of illegals before 2030 looks to be a simple solution.

b) Gerrymander red states to minimize blue districts just like the democrats did. Republicans should gain several seats in TX, FL, IN, OK, GA, OH, NE, SC, NC

You are not looking, stop posting bullshit.

If you did you would know that out of all of those there is only one that comes within even a mile of new-Texas-map grade gerrymandering and that's IL.



And I've got one other crazy idea for winning elections:

c. get more of the voters to vote for you.

 

[kyzr]

I've got one other crazy idea for winning elections:

c. Get more of the voters to vote for you.

That's funny coming from a democrat whose party just got smoked in 2024, and whose party is toxic and has a 19% approval.

Blue state gerrymandering minimizes the number of Republicans in the House, so turnabout is fair-play.
Red states need to gerrymander to minimize democrat districts.

 

[Independent thinker]

You are not looking, stop posting bullshit.

If you did you would know that out of all of those there is only one that comes within even a mile of Texas and Florida grade gerrymandering and that's IL.



And I've got one other crazy idea for winning elections:

c. get more of the voters to vote for you.

You mean like Trump did in winning the presidency, retaining the House, winning back the Senate, winning the popular vote and winning all seven swing states?

 

[citygator]

We have already discussed that at length. You have only proved your point to one person - yourself.

The bill makes existing gerrymandered districts and new ones illegal. Its in there. Its stated in clear English. I showed you the language. Typed it. I posted a picture of the actual words too. You've stopped arguing that point now and are just typing random statements like the one here. Its ok. Everyone knows. You now know what the bill said and that it was not what you thought. So instead of admitting you were wrong.. or even posting anypart that shows you are right youve stopped debating and run for the hills. I get it. I wouldnt want to debate me either.

 

[Independent thinker]

The bill makes existing gerrymandered districts and new ones illegal. Its in there. Its stated in clear English. I showed you the language. Typed it. I posted a picture of the actual words too. You've stopped arguing that point now and are just typing random statements like the one here. Its ok. Everyone knows. You now know what the bill said and that it was not what you thought. So instead of admitting you were wrong.. or even posting anypart that shows you are right youve stopped debating and run for the hills. I get it. I wouldnt want to debate me either.

How does it make the gerrymandered districts illegal? Who decides?

 

[AntonToo]

You mean like Trump did in winning the presidency

Umm yes, dummy.

What else did you think I could have possibly meant?

 

[AntonToo]

How does it make the gerrymandered states illegal?

"Thinker" strikes again.

 

[Independent thinker]

Umm yes, dummy.

What else did you think I could have possibly meant?

LOL. So, you admit that Trump beat your shorts off?

 

[AntonToo]

LOL. So, you admit that Trump beat your shorts off?

I of course admit Trump won more votes...because he did.

You seriously don't sound like you are all there.

 

[Independent thinker]

"Thinker" strikes again.

So, you don't have an anwer?

 

[jc456]

"Thinker" strikes again.

so no answers, just your confused looks? got ya