Gerrymandering makes hypocrisy a political punch line

[jc456]

He undestands it just fine. But, he's sticking with the con game.

I know.

 

[citygator]

You are a snake oil salesman and we aren't buying your snake oil.

Again. Pointless. There is no rational debate with you guys. You had everything you needed in front of you and you chose to dig in and not learn. All the responses have been along your lines which is “sure it looks like you’re right but I don’t believe it because it shatters my world view so instead I’ll call you names!”

 

[AntonToo]

The democrats can't squeeze any more seats if they tried, they are gerrymandered to the max.

Is that something you can support with actual facts or do you just say whatever the hell your bleeding little rightwing heart feels like?

Here is a systematic analysis of gerrymandering across all states:

Redistricting Report Card

Gerrymandering Project

gerrymander.princeton.edu

 

[jc456]

Again. Pointless. There is no rational debate with you guys. You had everything you needed in front of you and you chose to dig in and not learn. All the responses have been along your lines which is “sure it looks like you’re right but I don’t believe it because it shatters my world view so instead I’ll call you names!”

what's funny, is you remain so complicit you can't understand what we're actually telling you. you keep hearing 2+2=5

 

[jc456]

Is that something you can support with actual facts or do you just say whatever the hell your bleeding little rightwing heart feels like?

Here is a systematic analysis of gerrymandering across all states:

Redistricting Report Card

Gerrymandering Project

gerrymander.princeton.edu

well we can. Look up the districts in blue states, it's self explanatory.

 

[citygator]

dude, 2+2=4 I won't go along with your 2+2=5

You haven’t pointed to anything in the bill that is accurately concerning. How could you? You’d have to read it first. Try engaging with ChatGPT on it. It will tell you if you don’t want to read.

 

[Independent thinker]

This is pointless. You can’t read. You’re like a 2 year old who won’t eat your vegetables except instead of vegetables it’s reality.

You're just upset that we don't believe your con. Maybe you're not even trying to con us. Maybe you're just trying to con your own dweebs into believing your con. You don't really care if we believe it or not, just as long as your own side believes your con.

 

[jc456]

You haven’t pointed to anything in the bill that is accurately concerning. How could you? You’d have to read it first. Try engaging with ChatGPT on it. It will tell you if you don’t want to read.

it's a bill introduced by a demofk, that's all anyone needs to know! they aren't above board and are confks.

Let me address this differently. Explain why the demofks would do this knowing their gerrymandering would go away. If you can tell me that, well, you won't.

Demofks are all about power and control and you're saying they would willingly relinquish control and power. LMMFAO

 

[citygator]

You're just upset that we don't believe your con. Maybe you're not even trying to con us. Maybe you're just trying to con your dweebs into believing your con. You don't really care if we believe it or not, just as long as your own side believes your con.

I tried to have a reasonable debate. You guys won’t put any effort into educating yourself on the subject. I mean the bill was just a few pages long. Even ChatGPT could have helped you.

Instead you guys are making up an argument that doesn’t exist. How do you get through life unwilling to learn? Is that how one becomes conservative?

 

[Independent thinker]

well we can. Look up the districts in blue states, it's self explanatory.

They will tell you that Massachusetts isn't gerrymandered.

 

[Independent thinker]

it's a bill introduced by a demofk, that's all anyone needs to know! they aren't above board and are confks.

Let me address this differently. Explain why the demofks would do this knowing their gerrymandering would go away. If you can tell me that, well, you won't.

Demofks are all about power and control and you're saying they would willingly relinquish control and power. LMMFAO

It's not rocket science. Democrats introduce bill that will hurt democrats. Yeah, right.

 

[Blaster]

Gerrymandering is nothing new.

 

[Independent thinker]

I tried to have a reasonable debate. You guys won’t put any effort into educating yourself on the subject. I mean the bill was just a few pages long. Even ChatGPT could have helped you.

Instead you guys are making up an argument that doesn’t exist. How do you get through life unwilling to learn? Is that how one becomes conservative?

LOL. Your reasonable debate is, "I'm right, you're wrong. If you'd just listen to my snake oil pitch, you'll want to buy my snake oil".

 

[jc456]

Gerrymandering is nothing new.

150 years ago

 

[AntonToo]

They will tell you that Massachusetts isn't gerrymandered.

You will tell me that it is and will name a district where Republicans can possibly win in Massachusetts if only that was changed...even though they can barely get 40% of the vote in any district and Trump got only 36% across the state.

....Right?

Redistricting Report Card

Gerrymandering Project

gerrymander.princeton.edu

 

[jc456]

You will tell me that it is and will name a district where Republicans can possibly win in Massachusetts if only that was changed...even though they can barely get 40% of the vote in any district and Trump got only 36% across the state.

....Right?

Redistricting Report Card

Gerrymandering Project

gerrymander.princeton.edu

first tell us how many representatives are GOP?

 

[Independent thinker]

You will tell me that it is and will name a district where Republicans can possibly win in Massachusetts if only it was changed...even though they can barely get 40% of the vote in any district.

Right?

Redistricting Report Card

Gerrymandering Project

gerrymander.princeton.edu

Wow. Did you even listen to yourself? You just proved our point. In a state where there are 40% Republicans, Republicans don't even have one district, not even one and the reason for that is because democrats have thoroughly gerrymandered the state.

 

[AntonToo]

Wow. Did you even listen to yourself? You just proved our point. In a state where there are 40% Republicans, Republicans don't even have one district, not even one and the reason for that is because democrats have thoroughly gerrymandered the state.

Yes dummy, because it takes a lot more than 40% to win any election.

Thats not a districting problem for Republicans in MA, it's the THEY DON'T BUY WHAT WE SELL problem for Republicans.

 

[jc456]

Yes dummy, because it takes a lot more than 40% to win any election.

Thats not a districting problem for Republicans, it's the THEY DON'T BUY WHAT WE SELL problem for Republicans.

holy fk, stupid must be your middle name and idiot your last.

 

[Independent thinker]

Yes dummy, because it takes a lot more than 40% to win any election.

Thats not a districting problem for Republicans, it's the THEY DON'T BUY WHAT WE SELL problem for Republicans.

LOL. You have devolved all the way down to just being comic relief. Even Texas will have democrat districts, even if the re-districting is passed.

You're saying that a state with 40% overall registered Republicans has zero republican representation and you're just fine with that?