Gerrymandering makes hypocrisy a political punch line

[citygator]

Pure bullshit.

Link us, oh gator bater.

I already did in another thread.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3750/all-info

 

[citygator]

I wont be hearing back from the idiots above. 100% sure.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

I already did in another thread.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3750/all-info

View attachment 1147717

All that says, in so much DC gibberish, is things will be "considered" - there is no detonation or willing surrender of gerrymandered blue districts.

I am sure, though, we are all incredibly shocked that the Dems didn't want to codify a surrender of power into law and that - as usual - you're absolutely full of shit.

 

[Nostra]

I already did in another thread.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3750/all-info

View attachment 1147717

So Massachusetts, Illinois, Kalifornia etc are all in violation of the Law.

Good post.

 

[Nostra]

I wont be hearing back from the idiots above. 100% sure.

 

[berg80]

I already did in another thread.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3750/all-info

View attachment 1147717

HR-1 included a provision to end partisan gerrymandering along with some other proposals to further democratize elections. Dem's introduced it, Repubs refused to support it.

 

[jc456]

I already did in another thread.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3750/all-info

View attachment 1147717

So all of this is illegally done!

 

[jc456]

HR-1 included a provision to end partisan gerrymandering along with some other proposals to further democratize elections. Dem's introduced it, Repubs refused to support it.

cause of this maybe?

 

[Nostra]

HR-1 included a provision to end partisan gerrymandering along with some other proposals to further democratize elections. Dem's introduced it, Repubs refused to support it.

Because Dimwingers are maxed out on gerrymandering, Simp.


Notice they don’t include fixing their shithole state’s gerrymandering in the bill, just prevent Republicans from fighting back.

 

[jc456]

So what the demofks in here are showing us is how demofks tried to control DC. So they gerrymandered the fk out of states and then introduced a bill to stop anyone from undoing what they did! They are admitting it right here in the last few posts.

 

[Billiejeens]

Precisely.

And that's the best part.

The Dems' conniption fits are not only futile...

They're also counterproductive, since it will only ultimately dissatisfy their own disillusioned base.

Or what's left of it...

Both of them

 

[citygator]

All that says, in so much DC gibberish, is things will be "considered" - there is no detonation or willing surrender of gerrymandered blue districts.

I am sure, though, we are all incredibly shocked that the Dems didn't want to codify a surrender of power into law and that - as usual - you're absolutely full of shit.

It says specifically ANY districts that are drawn with the purpose of favoring a political party or disfavoring a political party is illegal no matter when. Its not some trick. It was a real bill to end gerrymandering.

Here is the relevant section:

Section 4(f)(2) states that the criteria for compliant redistricting apply to any congressional plan that would be, or is, in effect after the date of enactment of the Act, regardless of when that plan was enacted by the State

Section 6(a)(2) contains a special rule: if a State’s existing redistricting plan (one enacted before the Act’s enactment) does not comply with the new requirements, the State must enact a new compliant plan within 45 days after the Act’s enactment.​

If a State fails to enact a compliant plan by the deadline, a U.S. district court (via a three-judge panel) can step in to develop and impose one—including public hearings and metrics-based evaluations​

 

[citygator]

You probably want to catch up Nostradumbass. As you can see above.

 

[Billiejeens]

View attachment 1147712

They know their echo chamber Cultists won't care, or even understand.

 

[jc456]

It says specifically ANY districts that are drawn with the purpose of favoring a political party or disfavoring a political party is illegal no matter when. Its not some trick. It was a real bill to end gerrymandering.

Here is the relevant section:

Section 4(f)(2) states that the criteria for compliant redistricting apply to any congressional plan that would be, or is, in effect after the date of enactment of the Act, regardless of when that plan was enacted by the State
View attachment 1147722

so demofks being partisan for their own sake and success right?

 

[jc456]

You probably want to catch up Nostradumbass. As you can see above.

it seems you missed it, dumb blindass. You've been stued.

 

[Nostra]

It says specifically ANY districts that are drawn with the purpose of favoring a political party or disfavoring a political party is illegal no matter when. Its not some trick. It was a real bill to end gerrymandering.

Here is the relevant section:

Section 4(f)(2) states that the criteria for compliant redistricting apply to any congressional plan that would be, or is, in effect after the date of enactment of the Act, regardless of when that plan was enacted by the State
View attachment 1147722

Thanks for confirming they exempt their already done gerrymandering, dumbass.

You just destroyed your own position.

 

[Nostra]

You probably want to catch up Nostradumbass. As you can see above.

You just owned yourself, Dipsqueeze.

 

[jc456]

You just owned yourself, Dipsqueeze.

Indeed!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Gerrymandering is a spoil of those in power.

Elections have consequences…..isnt that correct?