Do you really want me to annihilate you again by talking about your cult's racist history, Mormon Bob?
As usual, you're relentless in trying to portray me and others as racist, while openly, blatantly, unabashedly expressing your own abject racism and other forms of bigotry.
Do something about the beam in yoru own eye before you fuss about the mote that you think you see in mine.
I noticed you abandoned that other thread where I did just that.
I've not abandoned anything.
Your bizarre, sick fetish/obsession with my religion is really not relevant to that thread, to this one, nor any of the other threads in which you keep harping on it.
I'm always amused when someone who has had all the advantages of white privilege talks about "choice". Given your temper tantrums, if you ever had any real hardship in your life, you probably wouldn't last a week without getting into serious trouble. You have real anger management problems...
You have no idea what hardships I've faced, what I've endured, what I've survived, or how much good my
“privilege” has or has not done for me.
The constitution has a right to a well-regulated militia. I am all for well-regulated militias, I was a member of one for years.
The Second Amendment cites the need for a militia as a purpose, but what it asserts is the people's right to keep and bear arms. It is the keeping and bearing of arms that is explicitly affirmed as the right, and the people to whom this right belongs.
If I recall your past claims, you claim to have been a member of the standing army. That is absolutely not the militia referenced in the Second Amendment. A law passed shortly after the Bill of Rights was ratified defines the militia as every able-bodied man between the ages of 17 and 45 years. A later law, in effect to this day, defines two militias—an updated version of the original definition, and separately, the National Guard.
But if you want to dump tons of guns onto the streets and then whine when some of them are used in crime, that gets a little silly. The Gun industry WANTS criminals to have guns. They want them to have guns so you are scared and you want them, too…
Yours is the side that wants to dump subhuman pieces of criminal shit on the street, rather than keep them locked up as they need to be. The resulting fear, violence, and destruction belong to you and your side. And, of course, for obvious reasons, you want actual human beings to be unarmed and helpless, so that we can be easier prey for the subhuman shit whose side you openly take, against that of actual human beings.
I think it is clear enough which side you are on. And from that, it is clear enough what you, yourself, are. The only reason that you would side so strongly with violent, destructive subhuman pieces of shit as you do, would be if you were one.
I call bullshit on any claim on your part not to be exactly that—a violent, destructive, subhuman piece of criminal shit who ought to be kept in prison, and never, ever set loose. An actual human being would side with other actual human beings. Only a subhuman piece of criminal shit would side so strongly with other subhuman pieces of criminal shit.
…you are being played, son!!!
I am not your son. I'm about the same age that I think I recall you having claimed to be.
If he's to be believed, he's about my age, (late fifties) and has never been married. You have to know, just on that basis, that there's something wrong with him, even before you hear his misogynistic sour-grapes excuses for having never married.
Yeah, it was called, "not wanting some ***** to get half my stuff". Funny thing, you can have sex without getting married or belonging to a misogynistic cult where that woman knows her place.
As with racism, you just cannot help waving your misogyny around like some proud banner, even as you falsely accuse others of being mysogynistic.
It's obvious enough why. You're an old, bitter incel, with whom no woman will have anything to do. So you hate women, describing them as bitches out to get half your stuff.