Gender Queer and its effect on human sexuality

[HeyNorm]

You ne to check out your laws. In the UK there is no law regarding books and age.There is for films.
The book is aimed at teenagers and young adults.Children should not be reading it. Mainly because it would not make any ense to them.

Tammy:

You ever wonder why the book is needed in the first place?

I mean, if homosexuality is naturally occurring, just like heterosexuality is, we straights don’t need an owners manual to figure it out. Why do you?

Interesting!

 

[MisterBeale]

SHOCKING: Images from book ‘Gender Queer,’ which is stocked in school libraries across Iowa​

SHOCKING: Images from book 'Gender Queer,' which is stocked in school libraries across Iowa - The Iowa Standard

Please do not show children these images. These are intended for mature adults so that they understand know exactly what is in “Gender Queer,” a book in schools across Iowa. Scroll down to see the images. If you are not over 18 years old, please close the page. Thank you. You have heard what...

theiowastandard.com

 

[Coyote]

Its just a part of it. Its unlikely tocorrupt them is it ?

At some point you need to draw lines. What is that point?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Why is this book so much worse than the graphic pornhub output that is available to all kids?

As a socially educated liberal you are programed to ask the wrong question(s), I have no clue why the book itself is "worse" [or better for that matter] but unlike your "pornhub"the book isn't just sanctioned by adults but teachers too, pornhub is not [forgive me for being out of the loop if they are also sanctioning the "pornhub" website]...do they sanction the "pornhub" website tommy? would it be upsetting to you if they did?

And unlike socialist countries, in America the taxpayers have every right to challenge taxpayer funded programs...where as the children of socialist countries are really nothing more than wards of the state where the parents are frowned upon for such things.

 

[Blaster]

No surprise, here, to see who is openly defending a work of child pornography; a book that contains explicit images and textual descriptions of minors engaging in sex acts with each other and with adults, and attempts to normalize such behavior.

Chicks with dicks walking around pretending they are real women makes me want to puke. Our society has become morally depraved.

 

[HeyNorm]

Chicks with dicks walking around pretending they are real women makes me want to puke. Our society has become morally depraved.

Yep, if someone says they are an American Indian when they aren’t, that will get you in HUGE TROUBLE, but a dude saying he’s a she is no big deal.

Makes zero sense.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Ive reported this post.

ah, online censorship, book burning for the digital age.

Maybe you should retract your accusations.

TO PARAPHRASE: "why? who is it hurting? your life isn't going to change because of it"...oh yuck, I feel less intelligent just mocking that type of thinking.

 

[Pappadave1]

Lots of heat but not much light. As I stated it isn a book for everyone but banning it is a different matter.

I don't think it's being "banned" everywhere. Just I school libraries where it can be accessed by CHILDREN.

 

[Blaster]

ah, online censorship, book burning for the digital age.

TO PARAPHRASE: "why? who is it hurting? your life isn't going to change because of it"...oh yuck, I feel less intelligent just mocking that type of thinking.

Why is Tommy so vocal about LGBTQ issues? Is there something he's not telling us?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Let's see here - those who want young children exposed to gay sexual imagery is accusing those who do not want that as coming from the same "group" that hates gays and Muslims and who knows what, and an official representative of USMB THANKED him for this.

An I missing anything here, folks?

What's next - claiming those who oppose raping children are coming from the same group that hates puppies and kiddies and apple pie?

Good grief, who falls for this obvious manipulation, anyway?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Why is Tommy so vocal about LGBTQ issues? Is there something he's not telling us?

In this thread, he is telling us that he wants young children exposed to images of underage boys performing fellatio.

In saying that, he makes himself part of a protected class here.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Gender Queer - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Jenni Frencham, for the School Library Journal in 2019, called the graphic novel a "great resource for those who identify as nonbinary or asexual as well as for those who know someone who identifies that way and wish to better understand"

This seems to back up what I have stated. The only criticism I am seeing is from folk who have not read the book.

I love the demand for work from others.

Hey atheists.. disagree with Christianity? Try reading the entire Bible and Catholic cathecism, or all of your critiques are invalid!

Encouraging kids to seek out the confusion of their gender identity causes depression. Suicide, strife for most and goes unreported or even suppressed in the name of defending the ideology… while an occasional “ success story” is lauded and widely reported.

Schools shouldn’t encourage anorexia, and they shouldn’t encourage gender theory

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Why is Tommy so vocal about LGBTQ issues? Is there something he's not telling us?

Meh, he's OK, it's fun for me...he likes to think he can stir the pot, I like that he thinks that.

 

[HeyNorm]

Let's see here - those who want young children exposed to gay sexual imagery is accusing those who do not want that as coming from the same "group" that hates gays and Muslims and who knows what, and an official representative of USMB THANKED him for this.

An I missing anything here, folks?

What's next - claiming those who oppose raping children are coming from the same group that hates puppies and kiddies and apple pie?

Good grief, who falls for this obvious manipulation, anyway?

What’s next?

Infomercials

 

[JustAGuy1]

This book seems to be the most banned book in America at the moment. It is cited on every thread about book burning or jailing dangerous librarians.

I must confess that I havent read it. But the Amazon page shows some sample pages and there are several online reviews. It is aimed at teens and young adults. People who might be questioning their gender or sexuality.

It wont be for everybody but I can see that it might help youngsters in better understanding themselves. On that basis it should not be banned. I certainly think that a cartoon book is unlikely to encourage tolk to change their sex.

Another book banned in florida is called "Dave has two Dads" or similar. Again this seems to have educational value. There are kids with two Dads. Should they not be catered for.? Should they not receive reassurance that this is normal

Trying to cancel all mention of alternate lifestyles does a dissrvice to kids. The kids are
notat risk in any way.

Amazon product

The pages shown on this review seem pretty bland and not nearly as graphic as the porn hub videos that the kids are watching on their phones.

But as I say I havent read it. I know that concerned posters on here have studied every word closely. Why is this book so much worse than the graphic pornhub output that is available to all kids?

Similar threads have been hotly debated and I must warn posters to keep their comments clean or risk sanctions.

Man you are obsessed with homosexuality.

 

[BackAgain]

This book seems to be the most banned book in America at the moment. It is cited on every thread about book burning or jailing dangerous librarians.

I must confess that I havent read it. But the Amazon page shows some sample pages and there are several online reviews. It is aimed at teens and young adults. People who might be questioning their gender or sexuality.

It wont be for everybody but I can see that it might help youngsters in better understanding themselves. On that basis it should not be banned. I certainly think that a cartoon book is unlikely to encourage tolk to change their sex.

Another book banned in florida is called "Dave has two Dads" or similar. Again this seems to have educational value. There are kids with two Dads. Should they not be catered for.? Should they not receive reassurance that this is normal

Trying to cancel all mention of alternate lifestyles does a dissrvice to kids. The kids are
notat risk in any way.

Amazon product

The pages shown on this review seem pretty bland and not nearly as graphic as the porn hub videos that the kids are watching on their phones.

But as I say I havent read it. I know that concerned posters on here have studied every word closely. Why is this book so much worse than the graphic pornhub output that is available to all kids?

Similar threads have been hotly debated and I must warn posters to keep their comments clean or risk sanctions.

Zzzz.

 

[BackAgain]

This thread is actually about Taint’s predilections.

It’s not the worst stupid ass thread he’s ever posted. But, cumulatively, they all suck. There’s no longer any real doubt that Tommie the Taint is a troll.

I once had it on ignore but I periodically clean out that ignore list. I mistakenly gave Taint a second chance. Nothing but drek from that troll turd ever since.

I have relegated it back to the Phantom Zone.

 

[westwall]

Ive reported this post. Maybe you should retract your accusations.

He asked a question. That isn't an accusation. But you are an uneducated idiot so don't know the difference.

 

[hjmick]

How can you call for it to be banned when you havent read it ?

How can you defend it when you haven't read it?


Oh, and I'm still waiting for your links to the proof of your accusations of my racism... good thing I'm not holding my breath...



I see that someone made some accusations about you. Doesn't feel too good, does it? Especially when it's not true. It's a damn shame you don't have the decency to retract your accusations about me the way you requested the same of johngaltshrugged... But maybe such things should not be expected of those who lie about others...

 

[Papageorgio]

This book seems to be the most banned book in America at the moment. It is cited on every thread about book burning or jailing dangerous librarians.

I must confess that I havent read it. But the Amazon page shows some sample pages and there are several online reviews. It is aimed at teens and young adults. People who might be questioning their gender or sexuality.

It wont be for everybody but I can see that it might help youngsters in better understanding themselves. On that basis it should not be banned. I certainly think that a cartoon book is unlikely to encourage tolk to change their sex.

Another book banned in florida is called "Dave has two Dads" or similar. Again this seems to have educational value. There are kids with two Dads. Should they not be catered for.? Should they not receive reassurance that this is normal

Trying to cancel all mention of alternate lifestyles does a dissrvice to kids. The kids are
notat risk in any way.

Amazon product

The pages shown on this review seem pretty bland and not nearly as graphic as the porn hub videos that the kids are watching on their phones.

But as I say I havent read it. I know that concerned posters on here have studied every word closely. Why is this book so much worse than the graphic pornhub output that is available to all kids?

Similar threads have been hotly debated and I must warn posters to keep their comments clean or risk sanctions.

I went online and I can buy it, so it isn’t banned in this country. I wouldn’t read it as it doesn’t deal with anything I am interested in. It seems that you can buy these books online or order them from bookstores, thus I seriously question whether they are banned.