Gender Queer and its effect on human sexuality

[DudleySmith]

Why would you be encouraging me to avail myself of child pornography?

Probably the game of taking toddlers dressed up in leather fetish gear to faggot 'Street Fairs' and then 'reporting' journalists who take pictures of the scum and their groomed kids as 'spreading child pornography' and getting the pictures removed from their articles covering their sick crap; that way nobody can actually report on what these vermin are doing. A catch-22 aimed at harassing critics and reporters.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I think that "Slippery Slops" will be your new nickname.

Thirteen year olds are children. I know, I work with them. In some ways eight year olds act more more mature than thirteen year olds, because eight year olds do not have a strong sex drive, however that may sadden some folks.

It is true that some children are more mature than others, and that the line drawn will be arbitrary. 16 is no less arbitraty than 18.

Kids do grow up at different rates. But do you want the book banned for all ages ?

 

[DudleySmith]

None of us can even post the pics proving our case here because we would be banned for showing child pornography if we did!!

Yes. That is a game the scum play to the hilt. If the media ever showed a 'Gay Pride Parade' in all it's 'glory' the entire 'movement' would collapse in a week.

 

[JohnDB]

So basically you see it as cancelling non binary people. Its not about protecting the kids.

Ot very much is protecting children from confusion over hard and fast rules of life and how we ALL need to learn how to live with each other. This crap is not for children whatsoever. We already have issues in schools over this crap.

 

[DudleySmith]

Or tied with all the rest of the non-banned books, which is all of them in America.

Which are no threads, since no one on here advocates book burning or jailing librarians.

Bragging about your ignorance again?

Read the book, so you know what you're talking about. "Gender Queer" contains realistic and explicit illustrations of a child performing oral sex on another child. There is no reason to spend tax dollars to make that available to children.

If the book was "Dave has two Mommies. His Morman Daddy Loves them Both!"

You would not want kids to receive reassurance that this is normal.



Read it so you don't keep sounding dumb.

In the book available to children in woke libraries, this picture is not censored:

View attachment 753668
You seriously don't know why parents are not OK with that?

Tommy's a sick piece of shit, promoting this crap is his way of getting people banned for speaking out against grooming rags like this. Now mods here will come to the fat faggot's rescue, as intended.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

"It's O.K. to Touch Daddy's Penis"

Arriving at school libraries everywhere fall of 2023

Or even to suck on it, as my wife was taught and encouraged from the age of eight.

We are not very far, now, more than forty years later, from the point where nothing will be universally seen as having been wrong with that. Especially in the last five or ten year, we're seeing that line being pushed harder and faster than we ever would have imagined not long before then.

I guess, at least, I know that my father-in-law will not be alone in whatever part of Hell he now inhabits. There are plenty, even among this forum's users and staff, who will be there to keep him company. He won't even be the worst offender there.

 

[DudleySmith]

I think that "Slippery Slops" will be your new nickname.

Thirteen year olds are children. I know, I work with them. In some ways eight year olds act more more mature than thirteen year olds, because eight year olds do not have a strong sex drive, however that may sadden some folks.

It is true that some children are more mature than others, and that the line drawn will be arbitrary. 16 is no less arbitrary than 18.

Tommy's just trolling. He is hoping to get people banned for opposing faggots grooming kids, is all.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Kids do grow up at different rates. But do you want the book banned for all ages ?

Kids grow up at different rates, so that meant we should teach them all about giving blow jobs?

I have a better idea. Instead of sexualizing other people's kids from the earliest ages you can, why don't you leave the kids alone?

It isn't your job to turn other people's children sexual.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Why is Tommy so vocal about LGBTQ issues? Is there something he's not telling us?

Nothing that we don't all already know about him.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Tommy's just trolling. He is hoping to get people banned for opposing faggots grooming kids, is all.

And he is succeeding.

The more that USMB rewards him, the more he will rub everybody's faces in it.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The book is not related to the age of consent. Its a red herring. We are taught the facts of life aged 11 o 12. .

Yes it is. One of the key goals of this sexualizing children movement is to lower the age of consent, and to decriminalize sex with children under that age. Showing a fourteen year old having sex with an adult in a positive light could have no other purpose.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

What’s next?

That was a company founded by Steve Jobs, after he was forced out of Apple Computer. It made a computer system that, in my opinion, was years ahead of its time, but alas, was not well marketed, and did not sell very well.

Eventually, after floundering in various unsuccessful directions, what was left of it was bought up by Apple, and the NeXT operating system was used as the basis for the new operating system being developed for the Macintosh platform.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeXT

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Tommy's a sick piece of shit, promoting this crap is his way of getting people banned for speaking out against grooming rags like this. Now mods here will come to the fat faggot's rescue, as intended.

It is all quite intentional, too.

It is all about engineering the agenda, here, and silencing those who oppose this insane woke fad is all part of the agenda.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Transgenders and gays are a fact.

So are schizophrenics, drug abusers, criminals, and all sorts of other bad elements.

It doesn't mean that, as a society, we should be promoting and encouraging any of that shit.

The right needs to accept that and deal with life as it is. Not how they would like it to be..

“Life as it is. I've lived for over forty years, and I've seen life as it is. Pain! Misery! Cruelty beyond belief! I've heard all the voices of God's noblest creatures, and moans of pain from bundles in the street. I've been a soldier and a slave. I've seen my comrades fall in battle, or die more slowly under the lash in Africa. I've held them at their last moments; These were men who saw life as it is. Yet they died despairing! No Glory! No Brave Last Words! Only their eyes filled with confusion, questioning ‘WHY?’ I do not think they were questioning why they were dying, but why they had ever lived.

When life, itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies?! Perhaps to be too practical is madness! To surrender dreams, this may be madness! To seek for treasure where there is only trash! Too much sanity may be madness! But maddest of all—to see life as it is, and not how it should be!”

—Don Miguel de Cervantes, as fictionally depicted in Man of La Mancha​

Poetic monologues aside, one important characteristic of life as it is, as it cannot be otherwise is that men are not women, and women are not men, and it is immoral and harmful to drag children into depraved sexual perversions. If Don Quixote were real, even he would surely agree with me.

Trans folk are more likely to commit suicide because of the way they are treated in society rather than reading a book that might help them.

They are likely to commit suicide because they are fucked-up in their heads, and fervently attached to delusions that can never be reconciled with hard reality.

Mental illness is what it is; and it is absurd to blame the sane for the suffering of the insane.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

There are two extremes at play. One that wants to erase gay and transgender people from the public sphere by banning books and speech and other that thinks there should be no restrictions on graphic material children are exposed to. I’d like to think there is a sane middle because there are plenty of good books featuring lgbtq characters or issues that aren’t graphic. Of course, they busy trying to ban those as well as anything written from a black point of view.

The problem with trying to find a middle ground between good and evil, between reason and madness, is that you never get any true form of good or reason, but only a version thereof that is badly tainted with evil and madness.

Pushing depraved sexual perversions at young children is just plain wrong. Period.

Any “compromise” between those who oppose this, and those who support it, is a win for the pedophiles, and a big loss for the upcoming generations.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

So basically you see it as cancelling non binary people. Its not about protecting the kids.

There is no such thing as “non-binary people”. That is an insane delusion, pushed by your fucked-up kind.

Every human being is either male or female, and this is determined by objective, observable biological traits.

Attempting to defy this hard fact of nature can only have harmful results; as can brainwashing children into accepting fucked-up lies about the biological difference between male and female.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Yes it is. One of the key goals of this sexualizing children movement is to lower the age of consent, and to decriminalize sex with children under that age. Showing a fourteen year old having sex with an adult in a positive light could have no other purpose.

Here we have a poster quite openly advocating exposing children to gay porn, but guess which posters this forum considers their enemy?!

I would think any sane group of people would want to distance themselves from this shit pronto, instead.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I have a better idea. Instead of sexualizing other people's kids from the earliest ages you can, why don't you leave the kids alone?

Not really an optimal option, of those who want to engage in sexual behavior involving minors, who depend on shit like this to make those minors more vulnerable and compliant.

 

[Flash]

I'm getting tired of Eurotrash trolling every day.

Tommy is off to Ignore.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Not really an optimal option, of those who want to engage in sexual behavior involving minors, who depend on shit like this to make those minors more vulnerable and compliant.

Well, it is certainly all about planting the seeds of sexuality in impressionable children, that's for sure

One time-honored claim offered by those who wish to exploit children is that they posit themselves as wanting to help them.

These claims are as old as the hills.