Gender Queer and its effect on human sexuality

[Tommy Tainant]

This book seems to be the most banned book in America at the moment. It is cited on every thread about book burning or jailing dangerous librarians.

I must confess that I havent read it. But the Amazon page shows some sample pages and there are several online reviews. It is aimed at teens and young adults. People who might be questioning their gender or sexuality.

It wont be for everybody but I can see that it might help youngsters in better understanding themselves. On that basis it should not be banned. I certainly think that a cartoon book is unlikely to encourage tolk to change their sex.

Another book banned in florida is called "Dave has two Dads" or similar. Again this seems to have educational value. There are kids with two Dads. Should they not be catered for.? Should they not receive reassurance that this is normal

Trying to cancel all mention of alternate lifestyles does a dissrvice to kids. The kids are
notat risk in any way.

Amazon product

The pages shown on this review seem pretty bland and not nearly as graphic as the porn hub videos that the kids are watching on their phones.

But as I say I havent read it. I know that concerned posters on here have studied every word closely. Why is this book so much worse than the graphic pornhub output that is available to all kids?

Similar threads have been hotly debated and I must warn posters to keep their comments clean or risk sanctions.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

No surprise, here, to see who is openly defending a work of child pornography; a book that contains explicit images and textual descriptions of minors engaging in sex acts with each other and with adults, and attempts to normalize such behavior.

 

[Polishprince]

The LGBTQ+ community has chosen an unusual form for their latest recruitment efforts.

Do children actually read the book, and is this work effective enticing young people to engage in this kind of thing?

Do the officials allow this book into the penal institutions- or do inmates have to suitcase it to get it into the joint?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

No surprise, here, to see who is openly defending a work of child pornography; a book that contains explicit images and textual descriptions of minors engaging in sex acts with each other and with adults, and attempts to normalize such behavior.

Its a subject that we should be able to discuss as adults. Have you read the book Bob ? What did you think of it ?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The LGBTQ+ community has chosen an unusual form for their latest recruitment efforts.

Do children actually read the book, and is this work effective enticing young people to engage in this kind of thing?

Do the officials allow this book into the penal institutions- or do inmates have to suitcase it to get it into the joint?

In what way would this book encourage you to change your behaviour ? Did it make you change your behaviour when you read it ?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Anybody else think Tommy might be a member of the UK version of NAMBLA?
He may be the biggest groomer/pedo apologist on the board

Ive reported this post. Maybe you should retract your accusations.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Its a subject that we should be able to discuss as adults. Have you read the book Bob ? What did you think of it ?

Why would you be encouraging me to avail myself of child pornography?

 

[there4eyeM]

We are very far from defining "normal" here.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Why would you be encouraging me to avail myself of child pornography?

So you havent read it either.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Ah, yes -- safe in his last victory because of his friends in high places, he once again taunts people by promoting a book that indoctrinates children through the use of illustrations depicting underaged boys indulging in oral sex.

I should just leave it at that before I am banned once again by a website obviously invested in one side of this argument.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

We are very far from defining "normal" here.

Lots of heat but not much light. As I stated it isn a book for everyone but banning it is a different matter.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Ah, yes -- safe in his last victory because of his friends in high places, he once again taunts people by promoting a book that indoctrinates children through the use of illustrations depicting underaged boys indulging in oral sex.

I should just leave it at that before I am banned once again by a website obviously invested in one side of this argument.

You could discuss the points made in the OP rather than just troll.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

No surprise, here, to see who is openly defending a work of child pornography

He does this safe in the knowledge that the powers that be here are perfectly willing to lie about what he is promoting in order to defend what he is doing.

 

[HeyNorm]

Why would you be encouraging me to avail myself of child pornography?

That is an excellent point.

 

[HeyNorm]

Lots of heat but not much light. As I stated it isn a book for everyone but banning it is a different matter.

If you saw it available on Amazon, it’s not banned.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Gender Queer - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Jenni Frencham, for the School Library Journal in 2019, called the graphic novel a "great resource for those who identify as nonbinary or asexual as well as for those who know someone who identifies that way and wish to better understand"

This seems to back up what I have stated. The only criticism I am seeing is from folk who have not read the book.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

That is an excellent point.

How can you call for it to be banned when you havent read it ?

 

[Seymour Flops]

This book seems to be the most banned book in America at the moment.

Or tied with all the rest of the non-banned books, which is all of them in America.

It is cited on every thread about book burning or jailing dangerous librarians.

Which are no threads, since no one on here advocates book burning or jailing librarians.

I must confess that I havent read it.

Bragging about your ignorance again?

But the Amazon page shows some sample pages and there are several online reviews. It is aimed at teens and young adults. People who might be questioning their gender or sexuality.

It wont be for everybody but I can see that it might help youngsters in better understanding themselves. On that basis it should not be banned. I certainly think that a cartoon book is unlikely to encourage tolk to change their sex.

Read the book, so you know what you're talking about. "Gender Queer" contains realistic and explicit illustrations of a child performing oral sex on another child. There is no reason to spend tax dollars to make that available to children.

Another book banned in florida is called "Dave has two Dads" or similar. Again this seems to have educational value. There are kids with two Dads. Should they not be catered for.? Should they not receive reassurance that this is normal

If the book was "Dave has two Mommies. His Morman Daddy Loves them Both!"

You would not want kids to receive reassurance that this is normal.

Trying to cancel all mention of alternate lifestyles does a dissrvice to kids. The kids are
notat risk in any way.

Amazon product

The pages shown on this review seem pretty bland and not nearly as graphic as the porn hub videos that the kids are watching on their phones.

But as I say I havent read it. I know that concerned posters on here have studied every word closely. Why is this book so much worse than the graphic pornhub output that is available to all kids?

Read it so you don't keep sounding dumb.

In the book available to children in woke libraries, this picture is not censored:

You seriously don't know why parents are not OK with that?

 

[Seymour Flops]

How cn you call for it to be banned when you havent read it ?

How can you call for it to be in children's libraries if you haven't read it?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

"GRAPHIC" novel depicting child sex.

Yes

None of us can even post the pics proving our case here because we would be banned for showing child pornography if we did!!