Fully Sourced Failed Predictions of Anthropogenic Global Warming Deniers

When your unreliable green energy results in blackouts, it gets really expensive.
What you are calling blackouts are completely predictable, unlike failures in fired power plants, which require enormous amounts of moving parts and high temperatures. Besides, you are once again ignoring the cost of continuing to emit CO2 into the atmosphere. Until you do, there is really no point in any discussion with you on the topic.
 
What you are calling blackouts are completely predictable, unlike failures in fired power plants, which require enormous amounts of moving parts and high temperatures. Besides, you are once again ignoring the cost of continuing to emit CO2 into the atmosphere. Until you do, there is really no point in any discussion with you on the topic.

Blackouts due to unreliable green energy are completely predictable?
Are they a feature of green planning?

Besides, you are once again ignoring the cost of continuing to emit CO2 into the atmosphere.

I agree that we have to spend trillions to reduce atmospheric CO2 by 1 ppm, while
China is increasing it by 10 ppm. Our children are depending on the economic damage
we will cause for no measurable benefit. It's urgent!!!!

Until you do, there is really no point in any discussion with you on the topic.

Until the greens understand the importance of reliable backup, and economics, it is pointless.
 
Blackouts due to unreliable green energy are completely predictable?
Are they a feature of green planning?

Besides, you are once again ignoring the cost of continuing to emit CO2 into the atmosphere.

I agree that we have to spend trillions to reduce atmospheric CO2 by 1 ppm, while
China is increasing it by 10 ppm. Our children are depending on the economic damage
we will cause for no measurable benefit. It's urgent!!!!

Until you do, there is really no point in any discussion with you on the topic.

Until the greens understand the importance of reliable backup, and economics, it is pointless.
Then buh-bye
 
What do you think is fake?
All of it. As fake as global cooling was before this bit of fakery.

This time it might be more dangerous since out daft politicians want to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
 
You envoro-moonbats won't allow any more hydro or nukes....That only leaves intermittent, low efficiency "green" scams, that have marginal -if any- ROI.
What makes you say that? Nuclear is unpopular with a lot of people, but I like it and its great from an AGW standpoint. Fusion will be even better. And hydro is fine as long as you don't flood ten orphanages and a church to use it.
Platitudinous dreck isn't an argument.
That putting off addressing problems increases the cost of dealing with them is not "platitudinous dreck". It's what your parents tried to teach you between the ages of 4 and 18 but apparently failed.
 
All of it. As fake as global cooling was before this bit of fakery.
Do you not believe that the planet is warming?

If you do, do you not believe it is due to increased carbon dioxide?

If you do, do you not believe that humans are responsible for the increased carbon dioxide?
This time it might be more dangerous since out daft politicians want to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
More dangerous than what?
 
Do you not believe that the planet is warming?

If you do, do you not believe it is due to increased carbon dioxide?

If you do, do you not believe that humans are responsible for the increased carbon dioxide?

More dangerous than what?
Carbon dioxide is the foundation of all life.

A reduction of just 25% of atmospheric carbon would result in the end of all life starting with plants, plankton and algae.
I really don't believe there is any appreciable rise in planetary warming. There is a relocation of thermometers.
 
That putting off addressing problems increases the cost of dealing with them is not "platitudinous dreck". It's what your parents tried to teach you between the ages of 4 and 18 but apparently failed.
The increased costs are being caused by the intermittent, unreliable "green" crap that you warmers keep pushing.....So stuff your piety up your ass.
 
The increased costs are being caused by the intermittent, unreliable "green" crap that you warmers keep pushing.....So stuff your piety up your ass.
The cost of dealing with almost any problem grows with time. If the problem is one that gets worse with time - like global warming - that increase is guaranteed. I have expressed no piety, so stuff your bullshit up YOUR ass.
 
The cost of dealing with almost any problem grows with time. If the problem is one that gets worse with time - like global warming - that increase is guaranteed. I have expressed no piety, so stuff your bullshit up YOUR ass.

The cost of dealing with almost any problem grows with time.

What's cheaper, Germany's 20-year-old solar panels, or the ones they install today?

If the problem is one that gets worse with time - like global warming - that increase is guaranteed.

Meh. If we're going to waste $76 trillion to reduce temps in 2100 by 0.1 degrees,
we're better off not fucking up our economy now and instead wasting the money in 2100
with a much larger economy and better tech.
 
The cost of dealing with almost any problem grows with time.

What's cheaper, Germany's 20-year-old solar panels, or the ones they install today?
The 20 year old panels when you properly include the price of the oil they precluded from being bought and burned over that 20 years AND the cost of the damage the CO2 produced would have done. For an economics whiz, Todd, you miss the obvious. Or perhaps you didn't miss it but assumed your ignorant audience would.
If the problem is one that gets worse with time - like global warming - that increase is guaranteed.

Meh.
"Meh"? I guess that means you concede the point.
If we're going to waste $76 trillion to reduce temps in 2100 by 0.1 degrees,
Another big point missed here. That money would be spent not to lower temps by 0.1 degree, but to prevent it from rising 5.
we're better off not fucking up our economy now and instead wasting the money in 2100
with a much larger economy and better tech.
Talk about some fucking pie in the sky.
 
The 20 year old panels when you properly include the price of the oil they precluded from being bought and burned over that 20 years AND the cost of the damage the CO2 produced would have done. For an economics whiz, Todd, you miss the obvious. Or perhaps you didn't miss it but assumed your ignorant audience would.

"Meh"? I guess that means you concede the point.

Another big point missed here. That money would be spent not to lower temps by 0.1 degree, but to prevent it from rising 5.

Talk about some fucking pie in the sky.

The 20 year old panels


They were a lot more expensive and a lot less efficient 20 years ago.

AND the cost of the damage the CO2 produced

Imaginary numbers are very impressive.

That money would be spent not to lower temps by 0.1 degree, but to prevent it from rising 5.

Is your ass all stretched out from the numbers you keep pulling out of it?

Talk about some fucking pie in the sky.

Killing your economy isn't pie in the sky, it's green idiocy.
 
1) Warming will end
2) Warming will end soon
3) Warming has ended
4) There has been no warming
5) Warming will be good for us
6) Just like the QAnon "Storm", the world will soon discover that scientists have been making it all up to simultaneously get rich and destroy human society which will lead to a bloody revolution that will end the global warming hysteria and put Trump back in the White House in charge of the entire planet regardless of any silly "election results".


But who is caring?

Where is it mattering outside the science world?

85928.png
 
The warmers claim the atmosphere is warming and Antarctica is melting.

They have precisely ZERO EVIDENCE of EITHER.... and just those two prove Earth is NOT WARMING....


because if 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is growing, which is the truth of the data and has been for the duration of the Co2 FRAUD...


that explains why the oceans are NOT RISING either...
 

Forum List

Back
Top