No, I was looking straight at you, liar. You pulled in here with your trailer of bullshit claiming, and I quote,
("that" in "that's not science" here refers to your own strawman in the previous paragraph, nothing I wrote, since I made no point on the topic, as you just yourself acknowledged above)
But here's the good part:
Which I asked for any evidence for the existence of --- any evidence at all --- which you answered with:
-- which again referred to nothing, since I still made no "assertion"..
which you then followed with:
-- which AGAIN I asked for any evidence for, anywhere.
And you completely utterly failed to find any. Like the sad little loser you are.
Not only that, you actually had the logical temerity to post, after reposting ALL my posts, which clearly showed NONE of the bullshit strawmen you set up:
Get that? See the words in
big?
You're trying to say the fact that I didn't address the topic, itself means I somehow addressed the topic.
How in the fuck does that work?
As I said, you're a sad little man and a lying hack. Be proud.
The fact remains you ignored the OP and attacked the POSTER. A standard MO of all progressive retards who can't think for themselves and come up with an argument of their own. Your flailing attempt to divert attention away from your colossal fail are duly noted little troll.
-- which is exactly what I said I'd been doing and not the bullshit you've been claiming about this "AGW" crap. So here you are admitting you've been lying about that the entire time.
Which is what I've been
saying the entire time.
Dumbass.
so attacking the poster does what for the forum? Oh, shows you as a tool, troll someone who knows nothing about what the topic of a thread is about.
You F A I L toolboy!!!!!
And anything in the OP is most probably the truth since the warmers on here have never been able to produce an experiment that proves the position they believe in. If you sir are part of that side, then you not only F A I L, you are also a L O S E R!!!!!!!
Have a nice day!!!!!
Cheeses Christ on a Cracker, you need me to essplain this to you?
Here's the point of my observations here -- from the beginning.
There is this faction, represented by Kook-boy and Bustball (and others elsewhere) comprised of sophistic denialists whose self-proclaimed role is to put down, at all costs, any theory, idea or person that might in some way suggest any possibility of human responsibility for the environment. To this end of eliminating any hint of suggestion of a chance of a possibility of an idea in that direction, they take this pro-active approach, where Kooks posts a new no-no thread every few daze, replete with shaking tits and little faces rolling around, not in any kind of response but in
initiative. That is, attempting to put down arguments nobody made, pre-emptively.
Now when somebody goes out of their way to declare a negative ("but it's just a FACT that Hitler was left wing"), it's a dead giveaway that there's a positive they're trying to squelch, whether that positive is real or imagined.
It means they're worried about it. When you're not worried about something, you don't have a need to post a thread denying it every other day.
THAT is what I called Kooks out for doing here in his endless denialism. It's nakedly transparent that he's worried that this idea will grow legs, so he's shooting at every spot where any legs might grow (very effectively too-- shaky tits are just poisonous to legs-- /sarc).
Bustball, doing his part in this sophistry army, comes charging in attacking me for exposing that tactic, declaring I've been on this "AGW" side since he came to this site (two years before I even joined), which goes to demonstrate the depth of his own dishonesty. So I challenged him to prove that and he melted down into a spinning top of flailing accusations he still can't prove.
The reality is I take an open position; I don't know if we influence climate or not, which is what I've always said here, which is why Bustball can't come up with anything -- there's nothing to come up with, because he made it up in the quest to Eliminate any opposition -- again pre-emptively (that means "before it starts"). That's my position -- that I don't presume to know or have the capacity to know.
Those who take the position of the Kooks and Bustballs are declaring they already DO know, which I find supremely arrogant, and set out to eliminate any ghost of a chance that anyone anywhere will challenge that arrogance, even if it means blatantly making shit up. Like Bustball did.
And I called him on it, and the next time somebody does that I'll fucking call it out again.
See if you can waddle through that and figure out what the fuck's going on here.
Wake up.
at that question is the toddler answer.
People in here who are a bit clueless need to know how much shit these religious assholes shovel day in and day out on here.
