Exactly what high crime or misdemeanor did President Trump commit?

[RealDave]

All of you leftists are calling for our President to be impeached. On what charges? Didn't we just spend $130 million dollars to have a bunch of Hillary cronies investigate our President for two years? And they came up with exactly nothing.

Maybe they should have been investigating Hillary. We already know as a fact she committed multiple felonies.

Like what?

Trump has: Obstructed Justice, Colluded with Russians, illegally profited by using his office, accepted money from foreign governments, Used his office to promote products,

 

[Diver Diva]

Obstruction of Justice is a serious crime - DUH.

So we're back to that again. Ok, so where did Our President obstruct justice? He never invoked executive privilege. He never invoked attorney-client privilege. He never fired anyone, or interfered with the special counsel in any way.

 

[RealDave]

Is Obstruction an Impeachable Offense? History Says Yes

Exactly what was obstructed? Couldn't have been Mueller, he completed his task and no where in his report did he say there was actual interference preventing him from doing so.

.

You don't have to be successful to be guilty of obstruction.

 

[RealDave]

All of you leftists are calling for our President to be impeached. On what charges? Didn't we just spend $130 million dollars to have a bunch of Hillary cronies investigate our President for two years? And they came up with exactly nothing.

Maybe they should have been investigating Hillary. We already know as a fact she committed multiple felonies.

Breach of public trust.

I'm part of the public, I don't think he breached my trust, I like what he's done.

.

My mother had a fried who cheered when Oswald killed Kennedy. I guess she supported Oswald & therefore he is not guilty of murder?

 

[AntonToo]

Obstruction of Justice is a serious crime - DUH.

So we're back to that again. Ok, so where did Our President obstruct justice? He never invoked executive privilege. He never invoked attorney-client privilege. He never fired anyone, or interfered with the special counsel in any way.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with Part II of Mueller's investigation report, which details 11 instances of Obstructive behaviour.

Some highlights of what our POTUS has been up to:


1. Pressured FBI Director (Comey) to squash investigation into Trump's top foreign policy advisor (Flynn). Trump subsequently fired that FBI Director under false pretenses over the Russian interference investigation. The firing triggered assignment of Special Investigator and Flynn eventually pled guilty.

2. He pressured AG (Sessions) to unrecuse from Russia investigation, publicly declare it unfair, and to limit it's scope to only FUTURE election interference.

3. He ordered White House Council (McGhan) to procced with removal of Special Investigator (Mueller), when McGhan refused the order and started packing his stuff, Trump backed off, but ordered McGhan to enter false record of Trump never having ordered removal of Mueller.

4. Trump was tampering with witnesses by pardon dangling Flynn, Manafort and Cohen

Here are the 11 instances of potential obstruction of justice by Trump outlined in the Mueller report

It's true that Trump failed to stop Flynn's investigation and to remove Mueller - but that is irrelevant, the only reason it didn't happen was due to the REFUSAL of his corrupt orders by his subordinates.

 

[OKTexas]

Is Obstruction an Impeachable Offense? History Says Yes

Exactly what was obstructed? Couldn't have been Mueller, he completed his task and no where in his report did he say there was actual interference preventing him from doing so.

.

You don't have to be successful to be guilty of obstruction.

And just blowing off steam or exercising legitimate powers isn't obstruction. Carry on commie.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Obstruction of Justice is a serious crime - DUH.

So we're back to that again. Ok, so where did Our President obstruct justice? He never invoked executive privilege. He never invoked attorney-client privilege. He never fired anyone, or interfered with the special counsel in any way.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with Part II of Mueller's investigation report, which details 11 instances of Obstructive behaviour.

Some highlights of what our POTUS has been up to:


1. Pressured FBI Director (Comey) to squash investigation into Trump's top foreign policy advisor (Flynn). Trump subsequently fired that FBI Director under false pretenses over the Russian interference investigation. The firing triggered assignment of Special Investigator and Flynn eventually pled guilty.

2. He pressured AG (Sessions) to unrecuse from Russia investigation, publicly declare it unfair, and to limit it's scope to only FUTURE election interference.

3. He ordered White House Council (McGhan) to procced with removal of Special Investigator (Mueller), when McGhan refused the order and started packing his stuff, Trump backed off, but ordered McGhan to enter false record of Trump never having ordered removal of Mueller.

4. Trump was tampering with witnesses by pardon dangling Flynn, Manafort and Cohen

Here are the 11 instances of potential obstruction of justice by Trump outlined in the Mueller report

It's true that Trump failed to stop Flynn's investigation and to remove Mueller - but that is irrelevant, the only reason it didn't happen was due to the REFUSAL of his corrupt orders by his subordinates.

From your link:

On Thursday, Barr said there was "substantial evidence to show that the president was frustrated and angered by his sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks."

But "the president took no act that in fact deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation," Barr added. "The evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the president had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation."

.

 

[AntonToo]

Obstruction of Justice is a serious crime - DUH.

So we're back to that again. Ok, so where did Our President obstruct justice? He never invoked executive privilege. He never invoked attorney-client privilege. He never fired anyone, or interfered with the special counsel in any way.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with Part II of Mueller's investigation report, which details 11 instances of Obstructive behaviour.

Some highlights of what our POTUS has been up to:


1. Pressured FBI Director (Comey) to squash investigation into Trump's top foreign policy advisor (Flynn). Trump subsequently fired that FBI Director under false pretenses over the Russian interference investigation. The firing triggered assignment of Special Investigator and Flynn eventually pled guilty.

2. He pressured AG (Sessions) to unrecuse from Russia investigation, publicly declare it unfair, and to limit it's scope to only FUTURE election interference.

3. He ordered White House Council (McGhan) to procced with removal of Special Investigator (Mueller), when McGhan refused the order and started packing his stuff, Trump backed off, but ordered McGhan to enter false record of Trump never having ordered removal of Mueller.

4. Trump was tampering with witnesses by pardon dangling Flynn, Manafort and Cohen

Here are the 11 instances of potential obstruction of justice by Trump outlined in the Mueller report

It's true that Trump failed to stop Flynn's investigation and to remove Mueller - but that is irrelevant, the only reason it didn't happen was due to the REFUSAL of his corrupt orders by his subordinates.

From your link:

On Thursday, Barr said there was "substantial evidence to show that the president was frustrated and angered by his sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks."

But "the president took no act that in fact deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation," Barr added. "The evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the president had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation."

.

When are you going to stop reffering to what Barr says?

He has ZERO CREDIBILITY. The quotes you post are a perfect example of him standing in front of the American public and spinning excuses for his client #1.

"Poor ol' Trumpy was frustrated, so him absuing his office to interfere in the investigations is a-ok!"

Besides that, Barr could not possibly know what Manafort would be willing to testify if there was no pardon for Trump to dangle in front of him.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Obstruction of Justice is a serious crime - DUH.

So we're back to that again. Ok, so where did Our President obstruct justice? He never invoked executive privilege. He never invoked attorney-client privilege. He never fired anyone, or interfered with the special counsel in any way.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with Part II of Mueller's investigation report, which details 11 instances of Obstructive behaviour.

Some highlights of what our POTUS has been up to:


1. Pressured FBI Director (Comey) to squash investigation into Trump's top foreign policy advisor (Flynn). Trump subsequently fired that FBI Director under false pretenses over the Russian interference investigation. The firing triggered assignment of Special Investigator and Flynn eventually pled guilty.

2. He pressured AG (Sessions) to unrecuse from Russia investigation, publicly declare it unfair, and to limit it's scope to only FUTURE election interference.

3. He ordered White House Council (McGhan) to procced with removal of Special Investigator (Mueller), when McGhan refused the order and started packing his stuff, Trump backed off, but ordered McGhan to enter false record of Trump never having ordered removal of Mueller.

4. Trump was tampering with witnesses by pardon dangling Flynn, Manafort and Cohen

Here are the 11 instances of potential obstruction of justice by Trump outlined in the Mueller report

It's true that Trump failed to stop Flynn's investigation and to remove Mueller - but that is irrelevant, the only reason it didn't happen was due to the REFUSAL of his corrupt orders by his subordinates.

From your link:

On Thursday, Barr said there was "substantial evidence to show that the president was frustrated and angered by his sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks."

But "the president took no act that in fact deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation," Barr added. "The evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the president had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation."

.

At best a half-truth, since we don't know what documents might have been asked for and not provided; and, what Mueller might say under oath, as well as all of his staff when under oath.

A cover up is in progress, and the evidence is clear. Here are two examples:

Hope Hicks, former Trump aide, didn't answer 155 questions during testimony. Here are some of them

Trump Tells Former Counsel to Ignore Congressional Subpoena

Other issues include Trump's continued attacks on AG Sessions, and finally getting rid of him to hire the ass kisser Barr who had already told the President in his resume that he would cover said ass.

 

[AntonToo]

Is Obstruction an Impeachable Offense? History Says Yes

Exactly what was obstructed? Couldn't have been Mueller, he completed his task and no where in his report did he say there was actual interference preventing him from doing so.

.

You don't have to be successful to be guilty of obstruction.

And just blowing off steam or exercising legitimate powers isn't obstruction. Carry on commie.

.

Hey Comey, drop the investigation into my advisor!

- Wha? Why you looking at me like that? I'm just blowing off steam.

 

[OKTexas]

Obstruction of Justice is a serious crime - DUH.

So we're back to that again. Ok, so where did Our President obstruct justice? He never invoked executive privilege. He never invoked attorney-client privilege. He never fired anyone, or interfered with the special counsel in any way.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with Part II of Mueller's investigation report, which details 11 instances of Obstructive behaviour.

Some highlights of what our POTUS has been up to:


1. Pressured FBI Director (Comey) to squash investigation into Trump's top foreign policy advisor (Flynn). Trump subsequently fired that FBI Director under false pretenses over the Russian interference investigation. The firing triggered assignment of Special Investigator and Flynn eventually pled guilty.

2. He pressured AG (Sessions) to unrecuse from Russia investigation, publicly declare it unfair, and to limit it's scope to only FUTURE election interference.

3. He ordered White House Council (McGhan) to procced with removal of Special Investigator (Mueller), when McGhan refused the order and started packing his stuff, Trump backed off, but ordered McGhan to enter false record of Trump never having ordered removal of Mueller.

4. Trump was tampering with witnesses by pardon dangling Flynn, Manafort and Cohen

Here are the 11 instances of potential obstruction of justice by Trump outlined in the Mueller report

It's true that Trump failed to stop Flynn's investigation and to remove Mueller - but that is irrelevant, the only reason it didn't happen was due to the REFUSAL of his corrupt orders by his subordinates.

From your link:

On Thursday, Barr said there was "substantial evidence to show that the president was frustrated and angered by his sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks."

But "the president took no act that in fact deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation," Barr added. "The evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the president had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation."

.

When are you going to stop reffering to what Barr says?

He has ZERO CREDIBILITY. The quotes you post are a perfect example of him standing in front of the American public and spinning excuses for his client #1.

"Poor ol' Trumpy was frustrated, so him absuing his office to interfere in the investigations is a-ok!"

Besides that, Barr could not possibly know what Manafort would be willing to testify if there was no pardon for Trump to dangle in front of him.

Wow, you're really good at spewing the commie party line. Too bad you have no proof.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Obstruction of Justice is a serious crime - DUH.

So we're back to that again. Ok, so where did Our President obstruct justice? He never invoked executive privilege. He never invoked attorney-client privilege. He never fired anyone, or interfered with the special counsel in any way.

I suggest you familiarize yourself with Part II of Mueller's investigation report, which details 11 instances of Obstructive behaviour.

Some highlights of what our POTUS has been up to:


1. Pressured FBI Director (Comey) to squash investigation into Trump's top foreign policy advisor (Flynn). Trump subsequently fired that FBI Director under false pretenses over the Russian interference investigation. The firing triggered assignment of Special Investigator and Flynn eventually pled guilty.

2. He pressured AG (Sessions) to unrecuse from Russia investigation, publicly declare it unfair, and to limit it's scope to only FUTURE election interference.

3. He ordered White House Council (McGhan) to procced with removal of Special Investigator (Mueller), when McGhan refused the order and started packing his stuff, Trump backed off, but ordered McGhan to enter false record of Trump never having ordered removal of Mueller.

4. Trump was tampering with witnesses by pardon dangling Flynn, Manafort and Cohen

Here are the 11 instances of potential obstruction of justice by Trump outlined in the Mueller report

It's true that Trump failed to stop Flynn's investigation and to remove Mueller - but that is irrelevant, the only reason it didn't happen was due to the REFUSAL of his corrupt orders by his subordinates.

From your link:

On Thursday, Barr said there was "substantial evidence to show that the president was frustrated and angered by his sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks."

But "the president took no act that in fact deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation," Barr added. "The evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the president had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation."

.

At best a half-truth, since we don't know what documents might have been asked for and not provided; and, what Mueller might say under oath, as well as all of his staff when under oath.

A cover up is in progress, and the evidence is clear. Here are two examples:

Hope Hicks, former Trump aide, didn't answer 155 questions during testimony. Here are some of them

Trump Tells Former Counsel to Ignore Congressional Subpoena

Other issues include Trump's continued attacks on AG Sessions, and finally getting rid of him to hire the ass kisser Barr who had already told the President in his resume that he would cover said ass.

See post #251.

Trump never exercised executive privilege with Mueller, he has every right to do so to **** with congressional abuse of power.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Is Obstruction an Impeachable Offense? History Says Yes

Exactly what was obstructed? Couldn't have been Mueller, he completed his task and no where in his report did he say there was actual interference preventing him from doing so.

.

You don't have to be successful to be guilty of obstruction.

And just blowing off steam or exercising legitimate powers isn't obstruction. Carry on commie.

.

Hey Comey, drop the investigation into my advisor!

- Wha? Why you looking at me like that? I'm just blowing off steam.

Yeah, except that's a ******* lie, Trump never said that. Even if he did he has every authority to direct federal law enforcement activities. Constitutionally their authority is derived from him and him alone. Why do you hate your country?

.

 

[AntonToo]

Is Obstruction an Impeachable Offense? History Says Yes

Exactly what was obstructed? Couldn't have been Mueller, he completed his task and no where in his report did he say there was actual interference preventing him from doing so.

.

You don't have to be successful to be guilty of obstruction.

And just blowing off steam or exercising legitimate powers isn't obstruction. Carry on commie.

.

Hey Comey, drop the investigation into my advisor!

- Wha? Why you looking at me like that? I'm just blowing off steam.

Yeah, except that's a ******* lie, Trump never said that. Even if he did he has every authority to direct federal law enforcement activities. Constitutionally their authority is derived from him and him alone. Why do you hate your country?

.

Comey testified under oath, presented contemporanious notes and also told to his collegues about Trump's behaviour at the time it happened.

Special Investigation states exactly that.

What possible grounds do you have to claim all that is "a ******* lie"? Let me remind you that "I wish it was not so" is not grounds.


Trump does not have authority to corruptly abuse his office to squash investigations into himself and his people. Swampy Trump people need to learn that concept.

 

[OKTexas]

Exactly what was obstructed? Couldn't have been Mueller, he completed his task and no where in his report did he say there was actual interference preventing him from doing so.

.

You don't have to be successful to be guilty of obstruction.

And just blowing off steam or exercising legitimate powers isn't obstruction. Carry on commie.

.

Hey Comey, drop the investigation into my advisor!

- Wha? Why you looking at me like that? I'm just blowing off steam.

Yeah, except that's a ******* lie, Trump never said that. Even if he did he has every authority to direct federal law enforcement activities. Constitutionally their authority is derived from him and him alone. Why do you hate your country?

.

Comey testified under oath, presented contemporanious notes and also told to his collegues about Trump's behaviour at the time it happened.

Special Investigation states exactly that.

What possible grounds do you have to claim all that is "a ******* lie"? Let me remind you that "I wish it was not so" is not grounds.


Trump does not have authority to corruptly abuse his office to squash investigations into himself and his people. Swampy Trump people need to learn that concept.

Comey also testified under oath that Trump didn't order him to do anything. He expressed a hope. Since when are hopes corrupt? BTW the agents that interviewed Flynn didn't think he intentionally lied, despite the perjury trap Comey bragged about. Stop lying about what Trump said.

BTW, As I said before Trump could have told Comey to leave Flynn alone, he had that power. It wouldn't have been corrupt because it had nothing to do with Trump himself.

.

 

[AntonToo]

You don't have to be successful to be guilty of obstruction.

And just blowing off steam or exercising legitimate powers isn't obstruction. Carry on commie.

.

Hey Comey, drop the investigation into my advisor!

- Wha? Why you looking at me like that? I'm just blowing off steam.

Yeah, except that's a ******* lie, Trump never said that. Even if he did he has every authority to direct federal law enforcement activities. Constitutionally their authority is derived from him and him alone. Why do you hate your country?

.

Comey testified under oath, presented contemporanious notes and also told to his collegues about Trump's behaviour at the time it happened.

Special Investigation states exactly that.

What possible grounds do you have to claim all that is "a ******* lie"? Let me remind you that "I wish it was not so" is not grounds.


Trump does not have authority to corruptly abuse his office to squash investigations into himself and his people. Swampy Trump people need to learn that concept.

Comey also testified under oath that Trump didn't order him to do anything. He expressed a hope. Since when are hopes corrupt? BTW the agents that interviewed Flynn didn't think he intentionally lied, despite the perjury trap Comey bragged about. Stop lying about what Trump said.

BTW, As I said before Trump could have told Comey to leave Flynn alone, he had that power. It wouldn't have been corrupt because it had nothing to do with Trump himself.

.

Wrong again, Comey testified that he took Trump's request as a thinly dressed up order.

Thats how Trump speaks, but not-stupid people understand exactly what he wants from them.

Absolutely no doubt here that Trump was trying to influence an officer of the law.

And please stop embarassing yourself with this "two agents said" nonsense after judge has fully reviewed all the materials, including those interviews and Flynn's guilty plea is in. Even Trump long ago said that Flynn lied to VP and FBI.

 

[OKTexas]

And just blowing off steam or exercising legitimate powers isn't obstruction. Carry on commie.

.

Hey Comey, drop the investigation into my advisor!

- Wha? Why you looking at me like that? I'm just blowing off steam.

Yeah, except that's a ******* lie, Trump never said that. Even if he did he has every authority to direct federal law enforcement activities. Constitutionally their authority is derived from him and him alone. Why do you hate your country?

.

Comey testified under oath, presented contemporanious notes and also told to his collegues about Trump's behaviour at the time it happened.

Special Investigation states exactly that.

What possible grounds do you have to claim all that is "a ******* lie"? Let me remind you that "I wish it was not so" is not grounds.


Trump does not have authority to corruptly abuse his office to squash investigations into himself and his people. Swampy Trump people need to learn that concept.

Comey also testified under oath that Trump didn't order him to do anything. He expressed a hope. Since when are hopes corrupt? BTW the agents that interviewed Flynn didn't think he intentionally lied, despite the perjury trap Comey bragged about. Stop lying about what Trump said.

BTW, As I said before Trump could have told Comey to leave Flynn alone, he had that power. It wouldn't have been corrupt because it had nothing to do with Trump himself.

.

Wrong again, Comey testified that he took Trump's request as a thinly dressed up order.

Thats how Trump speaks, but not-stupid people understand exactly what he wants from them.

And please stop embarassing yourself with this "two agents said" nonsense after Judge has fully reviewed all the materials, including those interviews and Flynn's guilty plea is in.

Wow, a legitimate order need not be thinly dressed up, Comey was asked if Trump gave him an order, he said not in those words. Trump is only responsible for what he says, not what some crusader hears. Trump expressed a hope, nothing else. Too bad your TDS blinds you form the thinly dressed up reality. LMAO

.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey Comey, drop the investigation into my advisor!

- Wha? Why you looking at me like that? I'm just blowing off steam.

Yeah, except that's a ******* lie, Trump never said that. Even if he did he has every authority to direct federal law enforcement activities. Constitutionally their authority is derived from him and him alone. Why do you hate your country?

.

Comey testified under oath, presented contemporanious notes and also told to his collegues about Trump's behaviour at the time it happened.

Special Investigation states exactly that.

What possible grounds do you have to claim all that is "a ******* lie"? Let me remind you that "I wish it was not so" is not grounds.


Trump does not have authority to corruptly abuse his office to squash investigations into himself and his people. Swampy Trump people need to learn that concept.

Comey also testified under oath that Trump didn't order him to do anything. He expressed a hope. Since when are hopes corrupt? BTW the agents that interviewed Flynn didn't think he intentionally lied, despite the perjury trap Comey bragged about. Stop lying about what Trump said.

BTW, As I said before Trump could have told Comey to leave Flynn alone, he had that power. It wouldn't have been corrupt because it had nothing to do with Trump himself.

.

Wrong again, Comey testified that he took Trump's request as a thinly dressed up order.

Thats how Trump speaks, but not-stupid people understand exactly what he wants from them.

And please stop embarassing yourself with this "two agents said" nonsense after Judge has fully reviewed all the materials, including those interviews and Flynn's guilty plea is in.

Wow, a legitimate order need not be thinly dressed up,
.

Dummy, Trump dressed it up because IT WASN'T. It was a corrupt request, not to be given directly, but gently asked.

 

[OKTexas]

Yeah, except that's a ******* lie, Trump never said that. Even if he did he has every authority to direct federal law enforcement activities. Constitutionally their authority is derived from him and him alone. Why do you hate your country?

.

Comey testified under oath, presented contemporanious notes and also told to his collegues about Trump's behaviour at the time it happened.

Special Investigation states exactly that.

What possible grounds do you have to claim all that is "a ******* lie"? Let me remind you that "I wish it was not so" is not grounds.


Trump does not have authority to corruptly abuse his office to squash investigations into himself and his people. Swampy Trump people need to learn that concept.

Comey also testified under oath that Trump didn't order him to do anything. He expressed a hope. Since when are hopes corrupt? BTW the agents that interviewed Flynn didn't think he intentionally lied, despite the perjury trap Comey bragged about. Stop lying about what Trump said.

BTW, As I said before Trump could have told Comey to leave Flynn alone, he had that power. It wouldn't have been corrupt because it had nothing to do with Trump himself.

.

Wrong again, Comey testified that he took Trump's request as a thinly dressed up order.

Thats how Trump speaks, but not-stupid people understand exactly what he wants from them.

And please stop embarassing yourself with this "two agents said" nonsense after Judge has fully reviewed all the materials, including those interviews and Flynn's guilty plea is in.

Wow, a legitimate order need not be thinly dressed up,
.

Dummy, Trump dressed it up because IT WASN'T. It was a corrupt request, not to be given directly, but gently asked.

Hey dipstick, a president can use prosecutorial discretion just like any law enforcement officer on a case by case basis. If he didn't want Flynn messed with he could have just said so and it would have been as legitimate as any other issued within the executive branch. You commies only see corruption because that's what you want to see. Of course you had no problem with maobama using prosecutorial discretion, giving a whole class of illegals immunity form deportation even when valid deportation orders existed. Admit it, you're a ******* hypocrite.

.

 

[Muhammed]

Win the election of course


Exactly what high crime or misdemeanor did President Trump commit?

But they were saying he should be impeached BEFORE he even won the primary.