Exactly what high crime or misdemeanor did President Trump commit?

Is it a removable offense?


History says No.



View attachment 265525
When Articles of I,peachment were passed out of the House Judiciary Committee in 1974, the very first article was,Onstruction of Justice.

Stuff you won't hear on Rush or Fox. You know, historical facts.
Obstruction of an actual crime. There was no crime here.

Obstruction IS AN ACTUAL CRIME.

Mueller in the report talks about all the various not-illegal matters people Obstruct Justice over.
Obstruction is a crime only if there is corrupt intent.
Trump complied with all document requests and told all others to cooperate with Mueller.
Mueller then proceeded to alter statements made, obscure, and omit other facts in his report that changed their intent, to sully the waters, for people such as yourself so you could continue with your false accusations. He took advantage of others lack of knowledge of actual facts to allow you to continue accusing where he himself knew the truth of what was actual and what was omitted, thus why no obstruction was charged. He played a head game with you. That should make you mad.

Trump obstructed justice. And he has not stopped doing so.
Lol
Na, not really
You’re a gullible dumbass
 
What crimes?

Felony obstruction of justice. Felony campaign finance law violation. Violation of the emoluments clause. Felony witness tampering. Felony loan fraud. Felony tax fraud.
Mueller didn't find reason to believe that Trump was guilty of any of those false charges.

Trump's innocent. Grow up and accept it.
 
Mueller didn't find reason to believe that Trump was guilty of any of those false charges.
Yes he did, that's a shameless lie. Go peddle your FOX audition to a fellow Cletus....
Let me ask you. What were the accusations against Trump before the SC was appointed?
Huh? Irrelevant. My accusations arise from information brought to light. If you have a point, just make it.
As I thought.
 
Mueller didn't find reason to believe that Trump was guilty of any of those false charges.
Yes he did, that's a shameless lie. Go peddle your FOX audition to a fellow Cletus....
Let me ask you. What were the accusations against Trump before the SC was appointed?
Huh? Irrelevant. My accusations arise from information brought to light. If you have a point, just make it.
As I thought.
Sure you did. Sure.
 
Yes he did, that's a shameless lie. Go peddle your FOX audition to a fellow Cletus....
No he didn't. Mueller had a duty to specifically state all Trump crimes he had evidence to support.

He specified several accusations, but zero crimes

You can fall on the ground and kick your feet, but when you get up, Trump will stop be your POTUS, and you will still be a unable to change it.
 
Seems some are still confusing impeachment with a legal type of court trial. Impeachment is a political process with some court sounds.
 
No he didn't. Mueller had a duty to specifically state all Trump crimes he had evidence to support.
100% wrong, as laid out in great detail by mueller himself.

Sorry,but you are going to have to peddle your FOX audition to someone else.
 
Having classified documents on a private computer. Destroying evidence under subpoena. OH you said one didn't you, should I go on?

.
Don't forget FOIA laws don't make the hiding or destruction of unclassified government documents optional.

FOIA laws require that government employees be accountable to the people, which is off course why the private server was originally purchased.


Exactly, I said that years ago, and it absolutely proves intent. Anything that happened after was part of an ongoing crime.

.
 
What crimes?

Felony obstruction of justice. Felony campaign finance law violation. Violation of the emoluments clause. Felony witness tampering. Felony loan fraud. Felony tax fraud.


Damn, you really have a vivid imagination. Proof? Evidence?

.
 
Is it a removable offense?


History says No.



View attachment 265525
When Articles of I,peachment were passed out of the House Judiciary Committee in 1974, the very first article was,Onstruction of Justice.

Stuff you won't hear on Rush or Fox. You know, historical facts.
Obstruction of an actual crime. There was no crime here.

Obstruction IS AN ACTUAL CRIME.

Mueller in the report talks about all the various not-illegal matters people Obstruct Justice over.
Obstruction is a crime only if there is corrupt intent.
Trump complied with all document requests and told all others to cooperate with Mueller.
Mueller then proceeded to alter statements made, obscure, and omit other facts in his report that changed their intent, to sully the waters, for people such as yourself so you could continue with your false accusations. He took advantage of others lack of knowledge of actual facts to allow you to continue accusing where he himself knew the truth of what was actual and what was omitted, thus why no obstruction was charged. He played a head game with you. That should make you mad.

Trump obstructed justice. And he has not stopped doing so.
How?
 
Clinton lied about blowjobs, Trump was Obstructing investigations of Russian interference in our election, covered for Russians, fired the FBI director, forced Attorney General out....slightly different subject gravity here.
Not exactly. Slick Willie committed perjury under oath, a felony that cost him his law license. Our President has not committed a single crime.

As I said, Clinton lied about getting blowjobs.

Trump? He flat out refused to be interviewed.

Your assertions about Trump not commiting crime is spurious, Obstruction is Illegal and it's tough to consider what he was doing again and again and again to interfere in ongoing investigations as not a crimnal pattern.
 
Last edited:
In the impeachment process the House of Reps draws up the charges, and so far they have not done so.
Once the charges are created the Senate then hears the evidence and vote. The process is not a court room trial so the Senate at this time holds the cards. The charges the House draws up can be anything the House wants, one of the charges against Johnson was that he yelled at the Congress. There are no High Crimes in the USA, that came from England,


Actually the Constitution give examples of high crimes and it had a meaning at the founding and still does. BTW the Chief Justice presides over the senate TRIAL.

.
The chief justice is involved only if the president is on trial. What was the meaning of "high crimes" at the founding, and what is the meaning of high crimes since the founding?
 
15th post
The chief justice is involved only if the president is on trial. What was the meaning of "high crimes" at the founding, and what is the meaning of high crimes since the founding?
The House has sole authority to define what is an Impeachable offense.
 
Clinton lied about blowjobs, Trump was Obstructing investigations of Russian interference in our election, covered for Russians, fired the FBI director, forced Attorney General out....slightly different subject gravity here.
Not exactly. Slick Willie committed perjury under oath, a felony that cost him his law license. Our President has not committed a single crime.

As I said, Clinton lied about getting blowjobs.

Trump? He flat out refused to be interviewed.

Your assertions about Trump not commiting crime is spurious, Obstruction is Illegal and it's tough to consider what he was doing again and again and again to interfere in ongoing investigations as not a crimnal pattern.
Interviewed why?
 
Damn, you really have a vivid imagination. Proof? Evidence
Ask me again after all have been thoroughly investigated. The cirucmstantial evidence we have is abundant. And we already have enough to know he committed felony obstruction and felony campaign finance violations. And we know he is volating the emoluments clause. We have good reason to bekieve he tampered with witnesses, and good reason to believe he may have commitged both loan and tax fraud.
 
Damn, you really have a vivid imagination. Proof? Evidence
Ask me again after all have been thoroughly investigated. The cirucmstantial evidence we have is abundant. And we already have enough to know he committed felony obstruction and felony campaign finance violations. And we know he is volating the emoluments clause. We have good reason to bekieve he tampered with witnesses, and good reason to believe he may have commitged both loan and tax fraud.
Or not
 
Back
Top Bottom