Exactly what high crime or misdemeanor did President Trump commit?

[xyz]

Trump's mattress tag is missing.

because it got peed upon.

 

[OKTexas]

Damn, you really have a vivid imagination. Proof? Evidence

Ask me again after all have been thoroughly investigated. The cirucmstantial evidence we have is abundant. And we already have enough to know he committed felony obstruction and felony campaign finance violations. And we know he is volating the emoluments clause. We have good reason to bekieve he tampered with witnesses, and good reason to believe he may have commitged both loan and tax fraud.

So you got nothing, figures. BTW, spell check is your friend.

.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you got nothing, figures.

Of course, except for the items I just listed. Damn son, are you high? This is like talking to a retarded person.

 

[OKTexas]

So you got nothing, figures.

Of course, except for the items I just listed. Damn son, are you high? This is like talking to a retarded person.

Three DOJ attorneys say you're full of shit on obstruction, their voices are the only ones that matters. Selling goods and services on the open market at market rates are not emoluments. There's zero evidence of any of your other wet dreams, so run along commie, your talking points are boring me.

.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Three DOJ attorneys say you're full of shit on obstruction

And hundreds of former federal prosecutors say i am correct. Hmm..hundreds vs three current members of trumps doj, the institution he has infamously and unethically turned into his defense team...

And, i was asked MY opinion,anyway. Amd the actions laid out in the mueller report are clearly criminal obstruction of justice.

Selling goods and services on the open market at market rates are not emoluments.

Of course they are, when purchased by members of foreign governments,or when government property is leased to trump so that he can personally profit. Ask the Inspector General for the General Services Administration.

And you are just parroting trump's talking point anyway. Sorry, but that madeup definition just got laughed out of court by a federal judge. Pay attention!

There's zero evidence of any of your other wet dreams

No, there is cirmustantial evidence, and the only way to get more evidence is to investigate. But, since you are so confident (for no other reason than your cultism), you won't mind if congress and federal prosecutors invetsigate. Which is good, since they already are, and you have no choice, anyway.

There is circumstantial evidence of loan fraud, as documents and comments on record show that Deutsche bank officials knew trump was falsely inflating his assets.

That leads to circumstantial and anecdotal evidence of tax fraud, as he deflated the values of those same assets for tax purposes. And, as i am sure you know,his top accountant turned state's evidence for immunity. Oops!

And witness tampering is already known.

So, no, you entire crybaby rant is just the drooling of a cultist.

 

[jc456]

Trump's mattress tag is missing.

because it got peed upon.

Why did you do that?

 

[jc456]

So you got nothing, figures.

Of course, except for the items I just listed. Damn son, are you high? This is like talking to a retarded person.

Or not

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you got nothing, figures.

Of course, except for the items I just listed. Damn son, are you high? This is like talking to a retarded person.

Or not

Aww,look! The big boy troll put two words together. Adorable!

 

[jc456]

Three DOJ attorneys say you're full of shit on obstruction

And hundreds of former federal prosecutors say i am correct. Hmm..hundreds vs three current members of trumps doj, the institution he has infamously and unethically turned into his defense team...

And, i was asked MY opinion,anyway. Amd the actions laid out in the mueller report are clearly criminal obstruction of justice.

Selling goods and services on the open market at market rates are not emoluments.

Of course they are, when purchased by members of foreign governments,or when government property is leased to trump so that he can personally profit. Ask the Inspector General for the General Services Administration.

And you are just parroting trump's talking point anyway. Sorry, but that madeup definition just got laughed out of court by a federal judge. Pay attention!

There's zero evidence of any of your other wet dreams

No, there is cirmustantial evidence, and the only way to get more evidence is to investigate. But, since you are so confident (for no other reason than your cultism), you won't mind if congress and federal prosecutors invetsigate. Which is good, since they already are, and you have no choice, anyway.

There is circumstantial evidence of loan fraud, as documents and comments on record show that Deutsche bank officials knew trump was falsely inflating his assets.

That leads to circumstantial and anecdotal evidence of tax fraud, as he deflated the values of those same assets for tax purposes. And, as i am sure you know,his top accountant turned state's evidence for immunity. Oops!

And witness tampering is already known.

So, no, you entire crybaby rant is just the drooling of a cultist.

How do those former prosecutors play in this exactly other than giving an opinion? Like me?

 

[jc456]

So you got nothing, figures.

Of course, except for the items I just listed. Damn son, are you high? This is like talking to a retarded person.

Or not

Aww,look! The big boy troll put two words together. Adorable!

Ah look can’t back up your nonsense shit, pfftt

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How do those former prosecutors play in this exactly other than giving an opinion?

How do the three doj attorneys play into it?

I was asked my opinion. I then was countered with the opinion of 3 doj attorneys. Bringing up hundreds of former federal prosecutors' opinions was my response to that. Pay attention, idiot!

 

[SmokeALib]

Trump's mattress tag is missing.

because it got peed upon.

Hillary slept on Trump's mattress?

 

[jc456]

How do those former prosecutors play in this exactly other than giving an opinion?

How do the three doj attorneys play into it?

I was asked my opinion. I then was countered with the opinion of 3 doj attorneys. Bringing up hundreds of former federal prosecutors' opinions was my response to that. Pay attention, idiot!

They’re the DOJ!

 

[Diver Diva]

As I said, Clinton lied about getting blowjobs.

Trump? He flat out refused to be interviewed.

Clinton lied under oath. That is called perjury, and it's a felony. The subject of the lie is irrelevant.

Our President isn't legally obligated to talk to anyone. But he did submit written answers to the special counsel's questions. He didn't have to do that either, but he did. Our President also didn't have to allow his White House counsel to testify for 30 hours, but he did. Our President also didn't have to submit millions of documents, but he did. Our President could have fired the special counsel at any time, but he didn't.

So where is the obstruction?

 

[AntonToo]

As I said, Clinton lied about getting blowjobs.

Trump? He flat out refused to be interviewed.

Clinton lied under oath. That is called perjury, and it's a felony. The subject of the lie is irrelevant.

You don't seem to understand that Impeachment is equal parts legal and a political process - the subject absolutely matters.

 

[Diver Diva]

You don't seem to understand that Impeachment is equal parts legal and a political process - the subject absolutely matters.

And you don't seem to know what the impeachment clause of the Constitution says. It says "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors". So where is Our President guilty of anything even resembling that?

 

[AntonToo]

Our President isn't legally obligated to talk to anyone. But he did submit written answers to the special counsel's questions.

Strange, Bill Clinton wasn't aware of that option...because it isn't really. President is not immune from investigation and the courts would've certainly forced Trump to comply eventually if Mueller wanted to pursue that course, but it would take a while and Mueller wanted to wrap things things up.

Trump NEVER submitted any answers on Obstruction of Justice - he basically answered what he wanted to answer and even that was carefully ran through his team of lawyers.

 

[AntonToo]

You don't seem to understand that Impeachment is equal parts legal and a political process - the subject absolutely matters.

And you don't seem to know what the impeachment clause of the Constitution says. It says "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors". So where is Our President guilty of anything even resembling that?

Obstruction of Justice is a serious crime - DUH.

You are confusing minimal requirements and Congressional willingness to remove.

Bill Clinton lying under oath about blowjobs gave the congress minal requirement to remove him, but because they did not deem subject matter sufficiently serious they ended up not convicting.

 

[Diver Diva]

President is not immune from investigation and the courts would've certainly forced Trump to comply eventually if Mueller wanted to pursue that course, but it would take a while and Mueller wanted to wrap things things up.

LOL! So you really believe that the reason Mueller didn't try to compel Our President to testify was because it would take too long? Seriously? He didn't seem to mind taking two years to find out what he knew the first day he opened the investigation, that there was no collusion.

No, the reason he didn't pursue it was because he and his attorneys knew it would fail in court.

 

[AntonToo]

President is not immune from investigation and the courts would've certainly forced Trump to comply eventually if Mueller wanted to pursue that course, but it would take a while and Mueller wanted to wrap things things up.

LOL! So you really believe that the reason Mueller didn't try to compel Our President to testify was because it would take too long? Seriously? He didn't seem to mind taking two years to find out what he knew the first day he opened the investigation, that there was no collusion.

No, the reason he didn't pursue it was because he and his attorneys knew it would fail in court.

...it took 2 years WITHOUT going to courts over Constituional powers of the President. It would take 3-4 years if they did go.

You are seriously saying that such big delay for investigation WASN'T a factor?