Exactly what high crime or misdemeanor did President Trump commit?

Comey testified under oath, presented contemporanious notes and also told to his collegues about Trump's behaviour at the time it happened.

Special Investigation states exactly that.

What possible grounds do you have to claim all that is "a ******* lie"? Let me remind you that "I wish it was not so" is not grounds.


Trump does not have authority to corruptly abuse his office to squash investigations into himself and his people. Swampy Trump people need to learn that concept.


Comey also testified under oath that Trump didn't order him to do anything. He expressed a hope. Since when are hopes corrupt? BTW the agents that interviewed Flynn didn't think he intentionally lied, despite the perjury trap Comey bragged about. Stop lying about what Trump said.

BTW, As I said before Trump could have told Comey to leave Flynn alone, he had that power. It wouldn't have been corrupt because it had nothing to do with Trump himself.

.

Wrong again, Comey testified that he took Trump's request as a thinly dressed up order.

Thats how Trump speaks, but not-stupid people understand exactly what he wants from them.

And please stop embarassing yourself with this "two agents said" nonsense after Judge has fully reviewed all the materials, including those interviews and Flynn's guilty plea is in.

Wow, a legitimate order need not be thinly dressed up,
.

Dummy, Trump dressed it up because IT WASN'T. It was a corrupt request, not to be given directly, but gently asked.


Hey dipstick, a president can use prosecutorial discretion just like any law enforcement officer on a case by case basis.
.

Hey dipstick what possible "descretion" could Trump possibly have to let go of a man he himself said was GUILTY OF A CRIME?

Trump's motivation was not administration of justice, it was corrupt self-interest. DUH.
 
Comey also testified under oath that Trump didn't order him to do anything. He expressed a hope. Since when are hopes corrupt? BTW the agents that interviewed Flynn didn't think he intentionally lied, despite the perjury trap Comey bragged about. Stop lying about what Trump said.

BTW, As I said before Trump could have told Comey to leave Flynn alone, he had that power. It wouldn't have been corrupt because it had nothing to do with Trump himself.

.

Wrong again, Comey testified that he took Trump's request as a thinly dressed up order.

Thats how Trump speaks, but not-stupid people understand exactly what he wants from them.

And please stop embarassing yourself with this "two agents said" nonsense after Judge has fully reviewed all the materials, including those interviews and Flynn's guilty plea is in.

Wow, a legitimate order need not be thinly dressed up,
.

Dummy, Trump dressed it up because IT WASN'T. It was a corrupt request, not to be given directly, but gently asked.


Hey dipstick, a president can use prosecutorial discretion just like any law enforcement officer on a case by case basis.
.

Hey dipstick what possible "descretion" could Trump possibly have to let go of a man he himself said was GUILTY OF A CRIME?

Trump's motivation was not administration of justice, it was corrupt self-interest. DUH.


Oh bullshit, a man will do many things when his family is threatened. Weismann threatened his son with prosecution for a crime no one has been prosecuted for. You'll notice Tony Podesta still hasn't been prosecuted for his FARA violations.

.
 
When Articles of I,peachment were passed out of the House Judiciary Committee in 1974, the very first article was,Onstruction of Justice.

Stuff you won't hear on Rush or Fox. You know, historical facts.

That's because Nixon was guilty of doing just that. Charge Trump with something he did. That is your error!

Trump is also guilty of obstruction of justice.


Mueller: If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so




8fd77e8c-8139-4b3a-a79b-10e864bd2634.jpg

Guilt?


So are you new to this country and don't know how are judicial system works????

Impeachment is not a judicial proceeding. There is no presumption of innocence.

Of course it is... innocent until proven guilty.


.

It shows how ignorant you are. Congress decides whether Trump is guilty or not There is no presumption of innocence. Congress could impeach Trump based on the Mueller report.
 
When Articles of I,peachment were passed out of the House Judiciary Committee in 1974, the very first article was,Onstruction of Justice.

Stuff you won't hear on Rush or Fox. You know, historical facts.

That's because Nixon was guilty of doing just that. Charge Trump with something he did. That is your error!

Trump is also guilty of obstruction of justice.


Mueller: If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so




8fd77e8c-8139-4b3a-a79b-10e864bd2634.jpg

Guilt?


So are you new to this country and don't know how are judicial system works????

Impeachment is not a judicial proceeding. There is no presumption of innocence.
ahhh, more of the just say it gd damn it, facts don't matter. see there you go!!! way to make shit up.

You are the one making things up.
 
All of you leftists are calling for our President to be impeached. On what charges? Didn't we just spend $130 million dollars to have a bunch of Hillary cronies investigate our President for two years? And they came up with exactly nothing.

Maybe they should have been investigating Hillary. We already know as a fact she committed multiple felonies.
what Hillary cronies.
Andrew Weissman was Mueller's head investigator. He was a Hillary Clinton donor, and even attended her election night party (which turned out to be a funeral, thank God). Of the 17 attorneys on Mueller's team, 10 were Democrat donors.

The DOJ found no evidence any conflicts of interest.
 
All the obstruction of justice stuff is in volume II. Does that help?

I know, you need pictures,right?

wsfsmDNZ9WmmvvWRTKfuq4VJ1Orc8oyCdiMk-pHiTk_C7jq4K4QhkVFyso-xxtG3JnPX_qRAU6fAlK3h97cXb1AYjGs-2paP6BCjt3s1aySbPDeG87CD8r50QM9I5IZC9oZRBeZ5


Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map


And who walked away form this clean, can you say Carter Page. You know, the individual they got the FISA warrant on to start the sham witch hunt.

.

So? You can still obstruct justice if no underlying crime is found. It can be argued that the obstruction worked.


LMAO, due tell. Was the investigation completed or not?

.

Trump obstructed justice. This is not debateable.

Of course you cult members will try to, but what you think doesn't change what is written.


Of course it is, 3 very experienced lawyers already said his actions did not reach the threshold of criminal obstruction. Also all federal law enforcement powers are derived from the president, how can he obstruct himself short of the actual destruction of evidence? Simply exercising Article 2 powers, like firing Comey or threatening to fire anyone else in the executive branch, is not obstruction.

.

It is the Congress that decides that. When the exercise of that power is used to commit another crime such as a coverup then it can be legal. The Congress could impeach Trump for firing Comey as a attempt to obstruct justice.
 
And who walked away form this clean, can you say Carter Page. You know, the individual they got the FISA warrant on to start the sham witch hunt.

.

So? You can still obstruct justice if no underlying crime is found. It can be argued that the obstruction worked.


LMAO, due tell. Was the investigation completed or not?

.

Trump obstructed justice. This is not debateable.

Of course you cult members will try to, but what you think doesn't change what is written.


Of course it is, 3 very experienced lawyers already said his actions did not reach the threshold of criminal obstruction. Also all federal law enforcement powers are derived from the president, how can he obstruct himself short of the actual destruction of evidence? Simply exercising Article 2 powers, like firing Comey or threatening to fire anyone else in the executive branch, is not obstruction.

.

It is the Congress that decides that. When the exercise of that power is used to commit another crime such as a coverup then it can be legal. The Congress could impeach Trump for firing Comey as a attempt to obstruct justice.


Yeah, they could, the senate will never vote to convict when Comey's boss recommended his firing for misconduct. Have you commies forgotten you were demanding Comeys head just months before he was fired? Hypocrite much?

.
 
Clinton lied about blowjobs, Trump was Obstructing investigations of Russian interference in our election, covered for Russians, fired the FBI director, forced Attorney General out....slightly different subject gravity here.
Not exactly. Slick Willie committed perjury under oath, a felony that cost him his law license. Our President has not committed a single crime.

In a impeachment hearing, it is Congress who decides whether a crime has been committed. They can throw a President out because they don't like the way he parts his hair.
 
Yeah, they could, the senate will never vote to convict when Comey's boss recommended his firing for misconduct. Have you commies forgotten you were demanding Comeys head just months before he was fired? Hypocrite much?
.

Comey was an idiot. Trump's biggest issue (other than being dumb as a sack of shit), is that he thinks he can run the US like he owns it. It doesn't belong to him. It's not a corporate entity. If he was bright enough (and he isn't even close) to be a political beast, Comey's time would have come without Trump having to say Jack Shit. But because he gets massively butt hurt even at the slightest criticism, he opens his big fat gob every chance he gets and looks like a petulant child. The neocon whackos who love him so much don't realise the damage they do to themselves in terms of credibility. You know it is possible to hate Hillary (like you all do) and dislike him, too, y'know...
 
Yeah, they could, the senate will never vote to convict when Comey's boss recommended his firing for misconduct. Have you commies forgotten you were demanding Comeys head just months before he was fired? Hypocrite much?
.

Comey was an idiot. Trump's biggest issue (other than being dumb as a sack of shit), is that he thinks he can run the US like he owns it. It doesn't belong to him. It's not a corporate entity. If he was bright enough (and he isn't even close) to be a political beast, Comey's time would have come without Trump having to say Jack Shit. But because he gets massively butt hurt even at the slightest criticism, he opens his big fat gob every chance he gets and looks like a petulant child. The neocon whackos who love him so much don't realise the damage they do to themselves in terms of credibility. You know it is possible to hate Hillary (like you all do) and dislike him, too, y'know...


I didn't vote for Trump in the primary, but I like what he's accomplished so far despite commie interference. It's hard to imagine what could have been accomplished had the lies not derailed his administration. People need to go to jail behind the collusion delusion.

.
 
We already know as a fact she committed multiple felonies.

name one


Having classified documents on a private computer. Destroying evidence under subpoena. OH you said one didn't you, should I go on?

.

Found not guilty.
Next.

By whom?

Hey talk to DD. He/She says Hillary is guilty of multiple felonies.

?


What you just posted is childish

.
 
15th post
That's because Nixon was guilty of doing just that. Charge Trump with something he did. That is your error!

Trump is also guilty of obstruction of justice.


Mueller: If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so




8fd77e8c-8139-4b3a-a79b-10e864bd2634.jpg

Guilt?


So are you new to this country and don't know how are judicial system works????

Impeachment is not a judicial proceeding. There is no presumption of innocence.
ahhh, more of the just say it gd damn it, facts don't matter. see there you go!!! way to make shit up.

You are the one making things up.


No you are..the country was founded on innocent until proven guilty, that's why we also have slander laws.

.
 
Wrong again, Comey testified that he took Trump's request as a thinly dressed up order.

Thats how Trump speaks, but not-stupid people understand exactly what he wants from them.

And please stop embarassing yourself with this "two agents said" nonsense after Judge has fully reviewed all the materials, including those interviews and Flynn's guilty plea is in.

Wow, a legitimate order need not be thinly dressed up,
.

Dummy, Trump dressed it up because IT WASN'T. It was a corrupt request, not to be given directly, but gently asked.


Hey dipstick, a president can use prosecutorial discretion just like any law enforcement officer on a case by case basis.
.

Hey dipstick what possible "descretion" could Trump possibly have to let go of a man he himself said was GUILTY OF A CRIME?

Trump's motivation was not administration of justice, it was corrupt self-interest. DUH.


Oh bullshit, a man will do many things when his family is threatened. Weismann threatened his son with prosecution for a crime no one has been prosecuted for. You'll notice Tony Podesta still hasn't been prosecuted for his FARA violations.

.

Thats a stupid argument.

1. You can’t Obstruct Justice to protect your ANYTHING, including your son.

2. Trump’s son has nothing to do with Trump trying to get Flynn off, which happened well before Mueller’s special investigation was as opened.
 
Wow, a legitimate order need not be thinly dressed up,
.

Dummy, Trump dressed it up because IT WASN'T. It was a corrupt request, not to be given directly, but gently asked.


Hey dipstick, a president can use prosecutorial discretion just like any law enforcement officer on a case by case basis.
.

Hey dipstick what possible "descretion" could Trump possibly have to let go of a man he himself said was GUILTY OF A CRIME?

Trump's motivation was not administration of justice, it was corrupt self-interest. DUH.


Oh bullshit, a man will do many things when his family is threatened. Weismann threatened his son with prosecution for a crime no one has been prosecuted for. You'll notice Tony Podesta still hasn't been prosecuted for his FARA violations.

.

Thats a stupid argument.

1. You can’t Obstruct Justice to protect your ANYTHING, including your son.

2. Trump’s son has nothing to do with Trump trying to get Flynn off.


Excuse me dumbass, we were talking about Flynn, not Trump. Reading is fundamental. LMAO

.
 
Dummy, Trump dressed it up because IT WASN'T. It was a corrupt request, not to be given directly, but gently asked.


Hey dipstick, a president can use prosecutorial discretion just like any law enforcement officer on a case by case basis.
.

Hey dipstick what possible "descretion" could Trump possibly have to let go of a man he himself said was GUILTY OF A CRIME?

Trump's motivation was not administration of justice, it was corrupt self-interest. DUH.


Oh bullshit, a man will do many things when his family is threatened. Weismann threatened his son with prosecution for a crime no one has been prosecuted for. You'll notice Tony Podesta still hasn't been prosecuted for his FARA violations.

.

Thats a stupid argument.

1. You can’t Obstruct Justice to protect your ANYTHING, including your son.

2. Trump’s son has nothing to do with Trump trying to get Flynn off.


Excuse me dumbass, we were talking about Flynn, not Trump. Reading is fundamental. LMAO

.

I misread.

You need to let go of this lunatic Flynn-is-innocent bullshit.

FBI said Flynn lied
Trump said Flynn lied to FBI
Flynn pled guilty to lying to FBI

How ******* retarded can you get to still say that he didn’t?
 
Back
Top Bottom