Even the government itself admitted in the 70's there was a conspiracy to kill JFK.

[IlarMeilyr]

Reagan called them an evil empire and told them to "take down this wall." He also armed Russian resistance in Afghnistan. One would think they would have done Reagan.

The cold war was just tension between the US and Russia. I am thinking to keep both sides in a state of constant fear, easier to manage people that way.

presumably security was higher after reagan

that the cold war was just hyped up tension may be testified to by the fact that the government didnt even seem to investigate the possible soviet role in the assassination. But that certainly wasnt the posture of the government.

speaking of reagan,the blind sheople in america who worship that evil bastard as god and consider him the greatest president ever are not aware of facts that he blocked jim garrisons extradition requests to subpeona many key high officials in government when he was governor of california.Thats why like future president ford,like ford,he was also rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup just like Ford did.
They talk about that in that first video I posted and its been talked about in other jfk books as well.

^ more troll shit from the moron troll gibberish spewing monkey-poo flinging simian reject, 9/11 rim job.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I see as usual liar abilty,you show off your pathetic childish obsession you have with me coming on here posting IMMEDIATELY after I post like clockwork.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

I see that 9/11 rim job is still unable to be honest about almost anything.

I haven't even deigned to take notice of it for weeks on end. But when I do mention it, having seen one of its typically shrill idiotic posts, it automatically assumes that I am following it around.

Wait.

Maybe it's another "conspiracy" from 9/11 rim job, the conspiracy fubar of USMB.

 

[daws101]

Why do you assume they would or could?

well if the crapspiracy nut sacks are correct, the super secret Illuminati, masons, right wing ,commie etc..group had everything planned and executed with perfection..so the other bullets and the frag should have been a piece of cake...
in reality did anyone investigate the fragment story or did they just assume it was a bullet?
no chance it could have been a pebble or a chunk of asphalt or concrete?
did any one test for lead in the wound..
or would that be asking too much?

 

[dcraelin]

Reagan called them an evil empire and told them to "take down this wall." He also armed Russian resistance in Afghnistan. One would think they would have done Reagan.

The cold war was just tension between the US and Russia. I am thinking to keep both sides in a state of constant fear, easier to manage people that way.

presumably security was higher after reagan

that the cold war was just hyped up tension may be testified to by the fact that the government didnt even seem to investigate the possible soviet role in the assassination. But that certainly wasnt the posture of the government.

speaking of reagan,the blind sheople in america who worship that evil bastard as god and consider him the greatest president ever are not aware of facts that he blocked jim garrisons extradition requests to subpeona many key high officials in government when he was governor of california.Thats why like future president ford,like ford,he was also rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup just like Ford did.
They talk about that in that first video I posted and its been talked about in other jfk books as well.

would like to see you post video again. I dont see how as Gvoernoer of California he could have done a thing about it.

 

[daws101]

presumably security was higher after reagan

that the cold war was just hyped up tension may be testified to by the fact that the government didnt even seem to investigate the possible soviet role in the assassination. But that certainly wasnt the posture of the government.

speaking of reagan,the blind sheople in america who worship that evil bastard as god and consider him the greatest president ever are not aware of facts that he blocked jim garrisons extradition requests to subpeona many key high officials in government when he was governor of california.Thats why like future president ford,like ford,he was also rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup just like Ford did.
They talk about that in that first video I posted and its been talked about in other jfk books as well.

would like to see you post video again. I dont see how as Gvoernoer of California he could have done a thing about it.

you're gonna make handjob's head explode with that much logic!

 

[dcraelin]

I still think one of the most interesting questions is why if Oswald did kill Kennedy, how can people be so sure it wasn't at the behest of the soviets, sense he spent some time there? How could they have dismissed that so early, or at all?

Perhaps Putin knows something.

The Russians had nothing to gain and nuclear war to risk. I see nothing that the Russian got out of the killing of JFK. Even they had to know we were not going to allow nuclear missiles in Cuba. Although it really didn't matter with submarines with nuclear launch capabilities. At least with Cuba we knew where the missiles were located.

they perhaps thought they were getting a less belligerent president. Remember JFK ran for office on a missile gap. I believe Kennedy was also responsible for the initial escalation of things in Vietnam and some say assassination there, so retribution.

 

[Bfgrn]

I just gave you an alternate scenario. What hit Tague could have been a fragment from any of the shots, except the one that hit Conley. Again, it is pretty clear there were three shots. One missing was the judgment of the HSCA and the Warren commission. So clearly that could have been the one that nicked Tague. I also said we can not know it will forever be a mystery.

WHAT fragment? A BULLET hit the south curb of Main Street near the Triple Underpass and wounded James Tague on the right cheek.

Keep asking the same question and you will still get the same answer. It is not possible to know what hit Tague. Could have been something that hit the curb could have been something else. You don't know, I don't know, the HSCA and the Warren committees didn't know and Tague didn't know. It is not like he suffered a massive injury he had barely a scratch on his face. Are you willing to say it was a bullet tor a fragment that caused such a minor wound? Three shots.

It was a bullet that missed the limousine, struck the curb and a fragment hit Tague in the face. The section of the curb that was struck by a bullet was removed as evidence.

Since photographs of Tague’s wounded cheek and the damaged curb were published immediately after the assassination, the Warren Commission had no choice but to account for the errant shot. Because the physical evidence (the three spent hulls found on the sixth floor) and the duration of time between the first and last shots would not allow lone assassin Oswald a fourth shot, it demanded that all the wounds to the President and Governor Connally were caused by just two bullets.

Enter the Single Bullet Theory. Arlen Specter, a junior Council on the Commission staff, reasoned that since Governor Connally was seated directly in front of the President, it was extremely likely that one bullet could have hit Kennedy from behind, exited through the wound in his throat, and continued on to inflict the Governor’s wounds.

NOW, let's recap...

You are not doing the math...AND you are relying on 'eye or ear witness reports'

If 3 shots were fired and one shot missed the limousine, struck the south curb of Main Street near the Triple Underpass and wounded James Tague on the right cheek...AND...Oswald was the lone shooter, then you are left with only 2 bullets to inflict the wounds to both Governor Connolly and President Kennedy.

BUT...you said:

First shot hit Kennedy in the back and lodges there later to become the "pristine" bullet.

Second shot misses Kennedy and hits Connelly with the bullet fragmentizing..

The third hit Kennedy in the head.

Either way three shot, three from the same person three from Oswald.


NOW what???????

 

[Bfgrn]

well if the crapspiracy nut sacks are correct, the super secret Illuminati, masons, right wing ,commie etc..group had everything planned and executed with perfection..so the other bullets and the frag should have been a piece of cake...
in reality did anyone investigate the fragment story or did they just assume it was a bullet?
no chance it could have been a pebble or a chunk of asphalt or concrete?
did any one test for lead in the wound..
or would that be asking too much?

The Warren Commission reported that the mark on the curb was "spectrographically determined to be essentially lead with a trace of antimony." Despite the impreciseness of words like essentially and trace, it is clear that the mark was not made by a copper-jacketed bullet like the ones allegedly used by Oswald. The Commission points out that it could have been made by a fragment of the bullet’s core, which is lead, but considering that the curb was approximately 260 feet from the limousine at the moment of the fatal head shot, it is hard to imagine a fragment striking the curb with that much force. And since the Commission contends that the bullet entered the back of the President’s head and blew out the right side of his skull, how could a fragment deflect to the left without damaging the left side of his head as well?

And if Oswald did fire that shot, where was he aiming? The trajectory from the sniper’s window to the damaged curb would be well right of his target, fifteen to twenty feet off-line.

 

[candycorn]

I still think one of the most interesting questions is why if Oswald did kill Kennedy, how can people be so sure it wasn't at the behest of the soviets, sense he spent some time there? How could they have dismissed that so early, or at all?

Perhaps Putin knows something.

I don't think the USSR had a hand in it. Perhaps Cuba. Oswald did visit the Cuban embassy in Mexico the month before he killed Kennedy.

The reason the Soviet Union could be ruled out is because certainly if there was going to be some sort of state sanctioned hit on a foreign leader (let alone one with a nuke arsenal), there would be significant chatter before the event. We had agents over there and obviously we were monitoring cables and messages from the USSR.

 

[Bfgrn]

I still think one of the most interesting questions is why if Oswald did kill Kennedy, how can people be so sure it wasn't at the behest of the soviets, sense he spent some time there? How could they have dismissed that so early, or at all?

Perhaps Putin knows something.

I don't think the USSR had a hand in it. Perhaps Cuba. Oswald did visit the Cuban embassy in Mexico the month before he killed Kennedy.

The reason the Soviet Union could be ruled out is because certainly if there was going to be some sort of state sanctioned hit on a foreign leader (let alone one with a nuke arsenal), there would be significant chatter before the event. We had agents over there and obviously we were monitoring cables and messages from the USSR.

Oswald visited both the Cuban and Soviet Embassy in Mexico City. And so did an imposter who claimed to be Oswald.

“A Little Incident in Mexico City”

Between 27 September and 3 October 1963, Oswald had been in Mexico City, where he had contacted the Soviet Embassy and the Cuban Consulate several times by telephone and at least five times in person.

The Soviet and Cuban diplomatic compounds in Mexico City were being thoroughly monitored by the CIA, which possessed tape recordings and transcripts of Oswald’s telephone calls, as well as photographs of Oswald as he went in and out.

Oswald had applied for a visa to allow him to visit Cuba, and had enquired about obtaining a visa to visit the Soviet Union. More ominously, he had met and spoken by telephone to Valeriy Kostikov, a Soviet diplomat who was strongly suspected of being an agent attached to the KGB’s Department 13, which was in charge of assassinations and sabotage.

The obvious implication was that the man accused of assassinating President Kennedy was in some way associated with the Soviet or Cuban regimes. This implication was strengthened when the FBI discovered shortly after the assassination that, two weeks earlier, it had intercepted a letter apparently sent by Oswald to the Soviet Embassy in Washington, in which he claimed that he had met Kostikov in Mexico City.

Oswald in Mexico City: the FBI’s Discovery

The FBI learned on the afternoon of the assassination that it had not been kept fully informed by the CIA of Oswald’s activities in Mexico City. To remedy this, two sets of evidence were sent by the CIA station in Mexico City to the FBI in Dallas, arriving early on the morning of 23 November:

• At least one tape recording of a phone call by a man claiming to be Oswald.

• Several photographs of the only non–Hispanic man to enter the Soviet compound on the date of Oswald’s meeting there with Kostikov.

FBI agents in Dallas made an unexpected and ominous discovery: neither the voice on the recording nor the man in the photographs matched the man who was in custody. Someone had impersonated Oswald in Mexico City.

Oswald’s Assistant or Impostor

Although there was good evidence that Oswald had in fact made at least one visit to the Cuban Consulate and one to the Soviet Embassy, several other encounters provided strong evidence that he had also been impersonated:

• In two telephone calls to the Soviet Embassy, a man claiming to be Lee Harvey Oswald spoke “terrible, hardly recognizable Russian”, according to the CIA’s translator. Oswald himself spoke Russian very well.

• The man who made the incriminating phone call to Kostikov had also phoned from the Cuban Consulate three days earlier, on Saturday 28 September. In this instance, not only was Oswald impersonated but the phone call or the transcript appear to have been fabricated. The Cuban Consulate and the switchboard at the Soviet Embassy were closed on Saturdays. Silvia Durán, an employee at the Cuban Consulate, who was mentioned by name on the transcript, denied that she had taken part in the call on the 28th.

• Silvia Durán and the Cuban Consul General, who had had three encounters with a man who claimed to be Oswald, both recalled that the man they met looked nothing like either the real Oswald or the man in the photographs.

Knowledge of Oswald’s Contacts

Oswald’s apparent contacts with the Soviet and Cuban representatives in Mexico City were reported by the news media, and gave rise to two competing conspiracy theories:

• either the assassination was the result of a communist conspiracy,

• or it was a conspiracy by elements sympathetic to the US state to blame the Soviet or Cuban regimes.

Knowledge of Oswald’s Impersonation

The details of Oswald’s impersonation, on the other hand, were kept secret from the general public. The transcripts and recordings of the telephone calls were tightly controlled by the CIA station in Mexico City, and most of the recordings appear to have been erased within a short time of the assassination.

J. Edgar Hoover, Lyndon Johnson, and other Washington insiders were aware of the impersonation, and of its implications, early on the day after the assassination. It was clear that there was no innocent explanation: either Oswald had had at least one accomplice in Mexico City, or he had been impersonated without his knowledge. Either he was working for the Soviet or Cuban regimes, or he had been manipulated in order to implicate those regimes in Kennedy’s assassination.

 

[dcraelin]

I still think one of the most interesting questions is why if Oswald did kill Kennedy, how can people be so sure it wasn't at the behest of the soviets, sense he spent some time there? How could they have dismissed that so early, or at all?
Perhaps Putin knows something.

I don't think the USSR had a hand in it. Perhaps Cuba. Oswald did visit the Cuban embassy in Mexico the month before he killed Kennedy.
The reason the Soviet Union could be ruled out is because certainly if there was going to be some sort of state sanctioned hit on a foreign leader (let alone one with a nuke arsenal), there would be significant chatter before the event. We had agents over there and obviously we were monitoring cables and messages from the USSR.

I think that the Soviets could have kept the chatter to a minimum if it was a state sanctioned hit. ...Even if you are correct it doesn't explain our governments lack of interest in the subject. This is something that, especially after all these years, they should be sharing with us,...why they did not investigate Soviet ties ...or why they ruled them out without telling us.

Oswald visited both the Cuban and Soviet Embassy in Mexico City. And so did an imposter who claimed to be Oswald.

This could actually be the Soviets needling us a bit....like saying....."we did it...but your not going to be able to prove it......so watch yourself."

 

[LA RAM FAN]

presumably security was higher after reagan

that the cold war was just hyped up tension may be testified to by the fact that the government didnt even seem to investigate the possible soviet role in the assassination. But that certainly wasnt the posture of the government.

speaking of reagan,the blind sheople in america who worship that evil bastard as god and consider him the greatest president ever are not aware of facts that he blocked jim garrisons extradition requests to subpeona many key high officials in government when he was governor of california.Thats why like future president ford,like ford,he was also rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup just like Ford did.
They talk about that in that first video I posted and its been talked about in other jfk books as well.

would like to see you post video again. I dont see how as Gvoernoer of California he could have done a thing about it.

Ronnie was powerfullly connected to some people in very high positions in power in the government.Governors have all kinds of power. surely you must be familiar with Slick willie clintons crimes he committed as governor of arkansas?

the mena arkansas drug scandal that he was involved in with his buddy Bush sr whom he has had a long standing friendship with dating back to at least the early 80's?

every person that was involved in the JFK coverup got handsomly rewarded.Ford as future president of the united states,Ronnie,and his pal and good friend dick nixon of course,Johnson,Bush sr, ALL becoming future president of the united states. then there is arlen spector of course becoming future senator.

 

[daws101]

speaking of reagan,the blind sheople in america who worship that evil bastard as god and consider him the greatest president ever are not aware of facts that he blocked jim garrisons extradition requests to subpeona many key high officials in government when he was governor of california.Thats why like future president ford,like ford,he was also rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup just like Ford did.
They talk about that in that first video I posted and its been talked about in other jfk books as well.

would like to see you post video again. I dont see how as Gvoernoer of California he could have done a thing about it.

Ronnie was powerfullly connected to some people in very high positions in power in the government.Governors have all kinds of power. surely you must be familiar with Slick willie clintons crimes he committed as governor of arkansas?

the mena arkansas drug scandal that he was involved in with his buddy Bush sr whom he has had a long standing friendship with dating back to at least the early 80's?

every person that was involved in the JFK coverup got handsomly rewarded.Ford as future president of the united states,Ronnie,and his pal and good friend dick nixon of course,Johnson,Bush sr, ALL becoming future president of the united states. then there is arlen spector of course becoming future senator.

then you woke up!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I still think one of the most interesting questions is why if Oswald did kill Kennedy, how can people be so sure it wasn't at the behest of the soviets, sense he spent some time there? How could they have dismissed that so early, or at all?
Perhaps Putin knows something.

I don't think the USSR had a hand in it. Perhaps Cuba. Oswald did visit the Cuban embassy in Mexico the month before he killed Kennedy.
The reason the Soviet Union could be ruled out is because certainly if there was going to be some sort of state sanctioned hit on a foreign leader (let alone one with a nuke arsenal), there would be significant chatter before the event. We had agents over there and obviously we were monitoring cables and messages from the USSR.

I think that the Soviets could have kept the chatter to a minimum if it was a state sanctioned hit. ...Even if you are correct it doesn't explain our governments lack of interest in the subject. This is something that, especially after all these years, they should be sharing with us,...why they did not investigate Soviet ties ...or why they ruled them out without telling us.

Oswald visited both the Cuban and Soviet Embassy in Mexico City. And so did an imposter who claimed to be Oswald.

This could actually be the Soviets needling us a bit....like saying....."we did it...but your not going to be able to prove it......so watch yourself."

Its actually quite easy to understand our governments lack of interest in the subject of why they did not investigate soviet ties.you got to remember the warren commission was set up to quiet any talk of conspiracy rumblings that were going on and to quite speculation that the russians could have been behind it.they didnt want americans panicking over the thought of a nuclear war with the russians so johnson convinced earl warren to head the commisssion and to have oswald set up as the lone assassin to quiet any conspiracy talk going around.

you got to remember,this was the height of the cold war and information had gotten out that there were multiple shooters there that day so Johnson got warren to head the commission and to set it up to say that oswald was the lone assassin.that way americans would be at peace with the official version and lies.they did not investigate any ties such as the mob,the cia or anything since the commission was set up to conclude that oswald was the lone assassin.thats why they ruled them out.

one thing thats interesting is Marina Oswald was not your normal typical russian girl.she was the daughter of a russian KGB colonel so you just know she knows more than what she is telling us.Man it would be interesting to know what all she knows about the whole assassination.your right as well in it makes you wonder how much Putin knows because the KGB has got to know a lot about the assassination as well.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

This message is hidden because daws101 is on your ignore list.

#575 (permalink) Today, 01:34 PM

someone farted in here.

 

[candycorn]

I still think one of the most interesting questions is why if Oswald did kill Kennedy, how can people be so sure it wasn't at the behest of the soviets, sense he spent some time there? How could they have dismissed that so early, or at all?
Perhaps Putin knows something.

I don't think the USSR had a hand in it. Perhaps Cuba. Oswald did visit the Cuban embassy in Mexico the month before he killed Kennedy.
The reason the Soviet Union could be ruled out is because certainly if there was going to be some sort of state sanctioned hit on a foreign leader (let alone one with a nuke arsenal), there would be significant chatter before the event. We had agents over there and obviously we were monitoring cables and messages from the USSR.

I think that the Soviets could have kept the chatter to a minimum if it was a state sanctioned hit. ...Even if you are correct it doesn't explain our governments lack of interest in the subject. This is something that, especially after all these years, they should be sharing with us,...why they did not investigate Soviet ties ...or why they ruled them out without telling us.

I see your point but revealing why you know something gained through clandestine means is never a good sign. For example, I know you went to work today. If I said that I know this because you walked by Dunkin Donuts and my informant who was tailing you has her morning coffee there...you're not going to walk by Dunkin Donuts any longer. I can see your point but I can see the point of not wanting to point the opposition in the direction of your source. Let's say you go into Dunkin Donuts and look for my informant. There are 8 women in there. Which one was it? But knowing the spook is at DD is enough to never walk by there again.

 

[creativedreams]

I don't think the USSR had a hand in it. Perhaps Cuba. Oswald did visit the Cuban embassy in Mexico the month before he killed Kennedy.
The reason the Soviet Union could be ruled out is because certainly if there was going to be some sort of state sanctioned hit on a foreign leader (let alone one with a nuke arsenal), there would be significant chatter before the event. We had agents over there and obviously we were monitoring cables and messages from the USSR.

I think that the Soviets could have kept the chatter to a minimum if it was a state sanctioned hit. ...Even if you are correct it doesn't explain our governments lack of interest in the subject. This is something that, especially after all these years, they should be sharing with us,...why they did not investigate Soviet ties ...or why they ruled them out without telling us.

I see your point but revealing why you know something gained through clandestine means is never a good sign. For example, I know you went to work today. If I said that I know this because you walked by Dunkin Donuts and my informant who was tailing you has her morning coffee there...you're not going to walk by Dunkin Donuts any longer. I can see your point but I can see the point of not wanting to point the opposition in the direction of your source. Let's say you go into Dunkin Donuts and look for my informant. There are 8 women in there. Which one was it? But knowing the spook is at DD is enough to never walk by there again.

You are not the same candycorn I remember...what happened to you? You respond so differently...

 

[Freewill]

Reagan called them an evil empire and told them to "take down this wall." He also armed Russian resistance in Afghnistan. One would think they would have done Reagan.

The cold war was just tension between the US and Russia. I am thinking to keep both sides in a state of constant fear, easier to manage people that way.

presumably security was higher after reagan

that the cold war was just hyped up tension may be testified to by the fact that the government didnt even seem to investigate the possible soviet role in the assassination. But that certainly wasnt the posture of the government.

speaking of reagan,the blind sheople in america who worship that evil bastard as god and consider him the greatest president ever are not aware of facts that he blocked jim garrisons extradition requests to subpeona many key high officials in government when he was governor of california.Thats why like future president ford,like ford,he was also rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup just like Ford did.
They talk about that in that first video I posted and its been talked about in other jfk books as well.

Garrison was truly the biggest publicity hound of them all and his "investigation" was nothing less then a big lie. If you critically looked at Garrison you would be laughing about how someone could be so big of narricist.

 

[Freewill]

A simple minded reply that requires total disregard of physical, forensic, ballistic and eye witness evidence, disregard of the testimony of one of the victims of the shooting, his wife, the senior Secret Service Agent in the passenger seat and all laws of physics and science...

Present one at a time and we will discuss. What I posted wasn't nearly as simple minded as what you posted it is the truth. The single bullet, proved to be true. Eye witness accounts are invariably not reliable so we can just throw those out and stick to the physical evidence.

I watched a special where they tried to simulate the single bullet. They did it almost exactly the only thing that did not happen was it didn't lodge in the simulated thigh. The bullet hit everywhere the single bullet hit and came out just as "pristine."

It is always your side that produces posts like yours. No fact just innuendo. I provided facts yet you accuse me of just the opposite.

Oswald killed Tippets and he killed JFK, case should have been closed years ago. The only thing keeping it going is the what iffers.

.hysterical how you fell hook, line and sinker for the lamestream medias trick photograpghy. easy to substitute a pristine bullet on the tv.doesnt happen in real life charlie.thats because you magic bullet theorists ignore facts that there were multitple shooters there that day.you guys have ZERO evidence that oswald was the lone shooter or shot tippet while there are overwhelming facts that there were multiple shooters there that day. the only thing thats closed is your mind. the JFK case is closed in the fact it has been proven the CIA was behind it all.

you guys ignore facts that all the dallas doctors said both the head wound and and throut wound were entrance wounds from the front and witnesses saw a gunman behin the fence firing a rifle as well as ignoring the laws of physics.

you magic bullet theorists go into these discussions only seeing what you WANT to see never watching videos of photos taken that day that prove there were multiple shooters of many bullets seen that day the warren commission did not explain because they could not be traced back to oswalds rifle. you guys always run off everytime from these two videos below are shown because your so much in denial and afraid of the truth and wont talk about them because you know you cant refute the facts these videos prove multiple shooters were there that day.

you magic bullet theorists also always blatantly ignore facts that many people who came forward and gave versions of events different than the governments wound up dying in very myserious deaths not to mention constantly ignoring the fact that according to many witnesses,the warren commission altered their testimonys,a crime itself they should have all gone to jail for.

the country has gone downhill since JFK died that day.He was our last REAL president we had.Not a puppet for the establishment,not willing to do what they told him to do and he paid the price for it. Every single president we have had since then,with the exception of carter,has been more even and corrupt than the previous one. Carter like JFK,also tried to get rid of the CIA in his last year in office.The establishment knew he was on his way out and would not be reelected so thats why they didnt bother trying to assassinate,why bother with just one year left in office.

Here is a computer simulation, believe what you wish:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfSXkfV_mhA]JFK Assassination Magic Bullet Computer Recreation - YouTube[/ame]

The facts are, there were three shots fired as witnessed by the majority of people. There is no evidence of more then three. There were three shell casing in the SBD.

If any of you ever walked Dealey Plaza you would have to know that the grassy knoll would be one of the last places a person would fire from if they wished to avoid detection.

The truth is that those who wish to paint this as anything other then a simple case of a scum bag killing a president almost never present anything to bolster their case. It is always like your post innuendo and insult. I am not saying you don't believe what you are saying but apparently that belief is only because that is what you want to believe, yet you accuse those who actually present evidence as those who just believe.

As I said I have nothing to gain either way. I at first thought it had to be a conspiracy because that is what sells newspapers and what was pushed the most. But an objective look at the evidence points to one man.

Now, did Oswald kill Tippit? There is little doubt:

On November 22, 1963, J.D. Tippit was working beat number 78, his normal patrol area in south Oak Cliff, a residential area of Dallas.[6] At 12:45 p.m., 15 minutes after the President's assassination, Tippit received a radio order to move to the central Oak Cliff area as part of a concentration of police around the center of the city. At 12:54 Tippit radioed that he had moved as directed. By then several messages had been broadcast describing a suspect in the Kennedy assassination[7] as a slender white male, in his early thirties, 5 feet 10 inches (1.78 m) tall, and weighing about 165 pounds (75 kg). Oswald was a slender white male, 24 years old, 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m) tall, and an estimated weight of 150 pounds (68 kg) pounds at autopsy.[8]

According to the Warren Commission, at approximately 1:11–1:14 p.m.,[9] Tippit was driving slowly eastward on East 10th Street when — about 100 feet (30 m) past the intersection of 10th Street and Patton Avenue — he pulled alongside a man who resembled the broadcast description of Lee Harvey Oswald.[10][11] The man walked over to Tippit's car and apparently exchanged words with him through an open vent window.[12] Tippit opened his car door and as he walked toward the front of the car, the man drew a handgun and fired three shots in rapid succession, all three bullets hitting Tippit in the chest. The man then walked up to Tippit's fallen body and fired a fourth shot directly into his right temple, fatally wounding him. Tippit was dead before any help could arrive and Oswald was later arrested after "acting suspiciously" by appearing nervous as police sirens neared him and by ducking into the Texas Theatre without buying a ticket.[13]

The Warren Commission identified twelve people who witnessed the shooting,[14] or its aftermath.[15] Domingo Benavides saw Tippit standing by the left door of his parked police car, and a man standing on the right side of the car. He then heard shots and saw Tippit fall to the ground. Benavides stopped his pickup truck on the opposite side of the street from Tippit's car. He observed the shooter fleeing the scene and removing spent cartridge cases from his gun as he left. Benavides waited in his truck until the gunman disappeared before assisting Tippit. He then reported the shooting to police headquarters, using the radio in Tippit's car.[16] Helen Markham witnessed the shooting and then saw a man with a gun in his hand leave the scene.[17] Markham identified Lee Harvey Oswald as Tippit’s killer in a police lineup she viewed that evening.[18] Barbara Davis and her sister-in-law Virginia Davis heard the shots and saw a man crossing their lawn, shaking his revolver, as if he were emptying it of cartridge cases. Later, the women found two cartridge cases near the crime scene and handed the cases over to police. That evening, Barbara Davis and Virginia Davis were taken to a lineup and both Davises picked out Oswald as the man whom they had seen.[19]

Taxicab driver William Scoggins testified that he saw Tippit's police car pull up alongside a man on the sidewalk as he sat in his taxicab nearby. Scoggins heard three or four shots and then saw Tippit fall to the ground. As Scoggins crouched behind his cab, the man passed within twelve feet of him, pistol in hand, muttering what sounded to him like, "poor dumb cop" or "poor damn cop."[20] The next day, Scoggins viewed a police lineup and identified Oswald as the man whom he had seen with the pistol.[citation needed] But "Scoggins admitted he did not actually witness the shooting and his view of the fleeing killer was obscured because he ducked down behind his cab as the man came by."[21]

The Commission also named several other witnesses[22] who were not at the scene of the murder, but who identified Oswald running between the murder scene and the Texas Theater, where Oswald was subsequently arrested.[23]

Four cartridge cases were found at the scene by eyewitnesses. It was the unanimous testimony of expert witnesses before the Warren Commission that these spent cartridge cases were fired from the revolver in Oswald's possession to the exclusion of all other weapons.[24]

In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations reported: "Based on Oswald's possession of the murder weapon a short time after the murder and the eyewitness identifications of Oswald as the gunman, the committee concluded that Oswald shot and killed Officer Tippit."[25]
J. D. Tippit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remember also that when arrested Oswald, and there can be no doubt it was him, tried to shot an officer with the same gun that killed Tippet.