Even the government itself admitted in the 70's there was a conspiracy to kill JFK.

View Post Today, 02:11 PM
Remove user from ignore listdaws101
This message is hidden because daws101 is on your ignore list.


as usual dawgshit,your handlers are obviously worried all these facts are being posted here the fact they sent you here so quickly to troll.:lmao:
 
View Post Today, 02:11 PM
Remove user from ignore listdaws101
This message is hidden because daws101 is on your ignore list.


as usual dawgshit,your handlers are obviously worried all these facts are being posted here the fact they sent you here so quickly to troll.:lmao:
SURE THEY ARE o QUEEN OF PARANOIA..
 
I think that the Soviets could have kept the chatter to a minimum if it was a state sanctioned hit. ...Even if you are correct it doesn't explain our governments lack of interest in the subject. This is something that, especially after all these years, they should be sharing with us,...why they did not investigate Soviet ties ...or why they ruled them out without telling us.
I see your point but revealing why you know something gained through clandestine means is never a good sign. For example, I know you went to work today. If I said that I know this because you walked by Dunkin Donuts and my informant who was tailing you has her morning coffee there...you're not going to walk by Dunkin Donuts any longer. I can see your point but I can see the point of not wanting to point the opposition in the direction of your source. Let's say you go into Dunkin Donuts and look for my informant. There are 8 women in there. Which one was it? But knowing the spook is at DD is enough to never walk by there again.

ah......OK.....now I'm hungry

but the government just could have said....we have clandestine sources that have convinced us this is not the Soviet union.

and what is preventing them from sharing this info now?....after this many years I think it would be harmless.

just read some book reviews from a book "programming a killer" I think by a former soviet block spy who says that the soviets did indeed plan the assassination...but then apparently desperately tried to stop Oswald

The KGB has some kind of knowledge about the assassination Im sure.But it was mostly a CIA operation,their fingerprints are all over the place. during the end of the HSCA investigation when it was winding down,two CIA men came forward and said-we did it,where do you want to go with this investigation?

the committe of course did not puruse that lead,anything that pointed towards government involvement they ignored since like i said,they had a NEW patsy they invented,the mob.

then you have former CIA operative E Howard Hunt who did covert operations for the CIA for dick nixon when he was vice president under eisenhower,coming forward in 2005 or so giving a taped confession to his son on his deathbed that he was indeed there as part of a CIA operation to kill kennedy after DENYING it for years that he was in dallas that day as well.


take a look.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Remove user from ignore listdaws101
This message is hidden because daws101 is on your ignore list.

View Post Today, 02:31 PM
Remove user from ignore listdaws101
This message is hidden because daws101 is on your ignore list.


two farts in a row from you dawgshit.:9::9:

your handlers are EXTREMELY desperate now.:lmao:
 
Remove user from ignore listdaws101
This message is hidden because daws101 is on your ignore list.

View Post Today, 02:31 PM
Remove user from ignore listdaws101
This message is hidden because daws101 is on your ignore list.


two farts in a row from you dawgshit.:9::9:

your handlers are EXTREMELY desperate now.:lmao:
SURE THEY ARE o QUEEN OF PARANOIA.
 
the newest government agent troll to penetrate this site.

TwilightTinfoil_zps4e1f9957.png
 
I see your point but revealing why you know something gained through clandestine means is never a good sign. For example, I know you went to work today. If I said that I know this because you walked by Dunkin Donuts and my informant who was tailing you has her morning coffee there...you're not going to walk by Dunkin Donuts any longer. I can see your point but I can see the point of not wanting to point the opposition in the direction of your source. Let's say you go into Dunkin Donuts and look for my informant. There are 8 women in there. Which one was it? But knowing the spook is at DD is enough to never walk by there again.
ah......OK.....now I'm hungry
but the government just could have said....we have clandestine sources that have convinced us this is not the Soviet union.
and what is preventing them from sharing this info now?....after this many years I think it would be harmless.
just read some book reviews from a book "programming a killer" I think by a former soviet block spy who says that the soviets did indeed plan the assassination...but then apparently desperately tried to stop Oswald
The KGB has some kind of knowledge about the assassination Im sure.But it was mostly a CIA operation,their fingerprints are all over the place. during the end of the HSCA investigation when it was winding down,two CIA men came forward and said-we did it,where do you want to go with this investigation?
the committe of course did not puruse that lead,anything that pointed towards government involvement they ignored since like i said,they had a NEW patsy they invented,the mob.
then you have former CIA operative E Howard Hunt who did covert operations for the CIA for dick nixon when he was vice president under eisenhower,coming forward in 2005 or so giving a taped confession to his son on his deathbed that he was indeed there as part of a CIA operation to kill kennedy after DENYING it for years that he was in dallas that day as well.
take a look.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96FDflK_Iug]JFK Deathbed confession - Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura trutv - YouTube[/ame]

seems to me their was a book out, none dare call it ?, that actually talked about USSR and USA cooperating at some level.

CIA working with the KGB?....it would be nice to know if Putin knows something.
 
ah......OK.....now I'm hungry
but the government just could have said....we have clandestine sources that have convinced us this is not the Soviet union.
and what is preventing them from sharing this info now?....after this many years I think it would be harmless.
just read some book reviews from a book "programming a killer" I think by a former soviet block spy who says that the soviets did indeed plan the assassination...but then apparently desperately tried to stop Oswald
The KGB has some kind of knowledge about the assassination Im sure.But it was mostly a CIA operation,their fingerprints are all over the place. during the end of the HSCA investigation when it was winding down,two CIA men came forward and said-we did it,where do you want to go with this investigation?
the committe of course did not puruse that lead,anything that pointed towards government involvement they ignored since like i said,they had a NEW patsy they invented,the mob.
then you have former CIA operative E Howard Hunt who did covert operations for the CIA for dick nixon when he was vice president under eisenhower,coming forward in 2005 or so giving a taped confession to his son on his deathbed that he was indeed there as part of a CIA operation to kill kennedy after DENYING it for years that he was in dallas that day as well.
take a look.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96FDflK_Iug]JFK Deathbed confession - Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura trutv - YouTube[/ame]

seems to me their was a book out, none dare call it ?, that actually talked about USSR and USA cooperating at some level.

CIA working with the KGB?....it would be nice to know if Putin knows something.

One would have to be an exotic breed of dumbass to believe there was not only US Governmental involvement but coordination between it and foreign intel agencies.
 
The KGB has some kind of knowledge about the assassination Im sure.But it was mostly a CIA operation,their fingerprints are all over the place. during the end of the HSCA investigation when it was winding down,two CIA men came forward and said-we did it,where do you want to go with this investigation?
the committe of course did not puruse that lead,anything that pointed towards government involvement they ignored since like i said,they had a NEW patsy they invented,the mob.
then you have former CIA operative E Howard Hunt who did covert operations for the CIA for dick nixon when he was vice president under eisenhower,coming forward in 2005 or so giving a taped confession to his son on his deathbed that he was indeed there as part of a CIA operation to kill kennedy after DENYING it for years that he was in dallas that day as well.
take a look.
JFK Deathbed confession - Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura trutv - YouTube

seems to me their was a book out, none dare call it ?, that actually talked about USSR and USA cooperating at some level.

CIA working with the KGB?....it would be nice to know if Putin knows something.

One would have to be an exotic breed of dumbass to believe there was not only US Governmental involvement but coordination between it and foreign intel agencies.


The story the two sons provided, that E. Howard Hunt left a deathbed confession, was investigated in 2007 by the LA Times who concluded that the information provided by the sons was “inconclusive” and that “none of the accounts provides evidence to convincingly validate that their father disclosed anything revelatory.” [11] St. John’s and David’s own family have rejected their claims. E. Howard Hunt’s widow Laura (married since 1977) and their children Austin (who lived with his father) and Hollis rejected the two son’s story saying they had been “coaching” Hunt to say something as his lucidity deteriorated in his final months. Kevan, St. John’s sister, accused her brothers of “elder abuse”, telling the LA Times that the two sons “pressured their father for dramatic scenarios for their own financial gain”. Hunt’s personal lawyer Bill Snyder even said “Howard was just speculating. He had no hard evidence.” [11] A personal statement was uploaded to the internet on behalf of E. Howard Hunt’s family, responding to the claims made by St. John and David. The statement reads [12]:

There is no such thing as E. Howard Hunt’s “Last Confession,” contrary to claims currently being circulated by Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons, Howard St. John and David Hunt… Motivated by an apparent need for notoriety and financial gains, these theories regarding Mr. Hunt’s alleged knowledge of a JFK assassination conspiracy involving the late President Johnson and now dead CIA agents have no basis in fact… In 2005, Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons proposed a book project in conjunction with an individual with film industry connections. Unfortunately, as things developed, it was clear that the project was not about the interesting details of Mr. Hunt’s life. Rather, it was a vehicle to promote further conspiracy-fueled speculations involving rogue CIA agents and LBJ in the Kennedy assassination. Mr. Hunt definitively rejected that project, and he specifically rejected the theories it contained, both to his attorney, William A. Snyder, Jr. and to his youngest son, Austin, who was living at home and finishing his college courses. When that project did not proceed because of the bizarre conspiracy theories initially promoted, the elder brothers’ opportunities for financial gain faded. Their resulting reaction has been to continue to exploit Mr. Hunt, to create conflict and division within the family, to threaten their siblings and worst of all, to further a very selfish and greedy personal agenda.

Sincerely,
The Hunt Estate and the Hunt Family

In February 2007 (a month after his death) E. Howard Hunt’s memoir was published in a book titled American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond. Hunt devotes all of chapter 12 to the assassination which he titles The Assassination of President Kennedy. Hunt says emphatically that he was in no way involved in the assassination, “Let me say clearly that if there was such a scheme, I had nothing to do with it. I was not in Dallas on November 22, 1963; I was not part of a plot to kill the president; and I had no knowledge of the planned assassination. The thought of perpetrating any crime against the president, even though I disagreed with many of his policies, is completely against my innermost convictions, as anyone who truly knows me would attest.” [13] [Emphasis mine] He goes onto say that he thinks it probably was a conspiracy but has no evidence to that effect. He says this and that could have happened but ultimately concludes he doesn’t know (see endnote for Hunt’s comments).
 
seems to me their was a book out, none dare call it ?, that actually talked about USSR and USA cooperating at some level.

CIA working with the KGB?....it would be nice to know if Putin knows something.

One would have to be an exotic breed of dumbass to believe there was not only US Governmental involvement but coordination between it and foreign intel agencies.


The story the two sons provided, that E. Howard Hunt left a deathbed confession, was investigated in 2007 by the LA Times who concluded that the information provided by the sons was “inconclusive” and that “none of the accounts provides evidence to convincingly validate that their father disclosed anything revelatory.” [11] St. John’s and David’s own family have rejected their claims. E. Howard Hunt’s widow Laura (married since 1977) and their children Austin (who lived with his father) and Hollis rejected the two son’s story saying they had been “coaching” Hunt to say something as his lucidity deteriorated in his final months. Kevan, St. John’s sister, accused her brothers of “elder abuse”, telling the LA Times that the two sons “pressured their father for dramatic scenarios for their own financial gain”. Hunt’s personal lawyer Bill Snyder even said “Howard was just speculating. He had no hard evidence.” [11] A personal statement was uploaded to the internet on behalf of E. Howard Hunt’s family, responding to the claims made by St. John and David. The statement reads [12]:

There is no such thing as E. Howard Hunt’s “Last Confession,” contrary to claims currently being circulated by Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons, Howard St. John and David Hunt… Motivated by an apparent need for notoriety and financial gains, these theories regarding Mr. Hunt’s alleged knowledge of a JFK assassination conspiracy involving the late President Johnson and now dead CIA agents have no basis in fact… In 2005, Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons proposed a book project in conjunction with an individual with film industry connections. Unfortunately, as things developed, it was clear that the project was not about the interesting details of Mr. Hunt’s life. Rather, it was a vehicle to promote further conspiracy-fueled speculations involving rogue CIA agents and LBJ in the Kennedy assassination. Mr. Hunt definitively rejected that project, and he specifically rejected the theories it contained, both to his attorney, William A. Snyder, Jr. and to his youngest son, Austin, who was living at home and finishing his college courses. When that project did not proceed because of the bizarre conspiracy theories initially promoted, the elder brothers’ opportunities for financial gain faded. Their resulting reaction has been to continue to exploit Mr. Hunt, to create conflict and division within the family, to threaten their siblings and worst of all, to further a very selfish and greedy personal agenda.

Sincerely,
The Hunt Estate and the Hunt Family

In February 2007 (a month after his death) E. Howard Hunt’s memoir was published in a book titled American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond. Hunt devotes all of chapter 12 to the assassination which he titles The Assassination of President Kennedy. Hunt says emphatically that he was in no way involved in the assassination, “Let me say clearly that if there was such a scheme, I had nothing to do with it. I was not in Dallas on November 22, 1963; I was not part of a plot to kill the president; and I had no knowledge of the planned assassination. The thought of perpetrating any crime against the president, even though I disagreed with many of his policies, is completely against my innermost convictions, as anyone who truly knows me would attest.” [13] [Emphasis mine] He goes onto say that he thinks it probably was a conspiracy but has no evidence to that effect. He says this and that could have happened but ultimately concludes he doesn’t know (see endnote for Hunt’s comments).

still evading facts in those two videos and the facts i presented to you in my first post to you I see changing the subject when your cornered.:lmao:

newest government disinfo agent to appear.all you did is prove my facts to be true.thanks for proving you have reading comprehension problems,that you really do only see what you want to see as you just proved in spades cause you obviously missed the part i mentioned that i alread said that,that he denied it for years before his deathbed confession.as always,miserable fail.:lmao:
 
Last edited:
seems to me their was a book out, none dare call it ?, that actually talked about USSR and USA cooperating at some level.

CIA working with the KGB?....it would be nice to know if Putin knows something.

One would have to be an exotic breed of dumbass to believe there was not only US Governmental involvement but coordination between it and foreign intel agencies.


The story the two sons provided, that E. Howard Hunt left a deathbed confession, was investigated in 2007 by the LA Times who concluded that the information provided by the sons was “inconclusive” and that “none of the accounts provides evidence to convincingly validate that their father disclosed anything revelatory.” [11] St. John’s and David’s own family have rejected their claims. E. Howard Hunt’s widow Laura (married since 1977) and their children Austin (who lived with his father) and Hollis rejected the two son’s story saying they had been “coaching” Hunt to say something as his lucidity deteriorated in his final months. Kevan, St. John’s sister, accused her brothers of “elder abuse”, telling the LA Times that the two sons “pressured their father for dramatic scenarios for their own financial gain”. Hunt’s personal lawyer Bill Snyder even said “Howard was just speculating. He had no hard evidence.” [11] A personal statement was uploaded to the internet on behalf of E. Howard Hunt’s family, responding to the claims made by St. John and David. The statement reads [12]:

There is no such thing as E. Howard Hunt’s “Last Confession,” contrary to claims currently being circulated by Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons, Howard St. John and David Hunt… Motivated by an apparent need for notoriety and financial gains, these theories regarding Mr. Hunt’s alleged knowledge of a JFK assassination conspiracy involving the late President Johnson and now dead CIA agents have no basis in fact… In 2005, Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons proposed a book project in conjunction with an individual with film industry connections. Unfortunately, as things developed, it was clear that the project was not about the interesting details of Mr. Hunt’s life. Rather, it was a vehicle to promote further conspiracy-fueled speculations involving rogue CIA agents and LBJ in the Kennedy assassination. Mr. Hunt definitively rejected that project, and he specifically rejected the theories it contained, both to his attorney, William A. Snyder, Jr. and to his youngest son, Austin, who was living at home and finishing his college courses. When that project did not proceed because of the bizarre conspiracy theories initially promoted, the elder brothers’ opportunities for financial gain faded. Their resulting reaction has been to continue to exploit Mr. Hunt, to create conflict and division within the family, to threaten their siblings and worst of all, to further a very selfish and greedy personal agenda.

Sincerely,
The Hunt Estate and the Hunt Family

In February 2007 (a month after his death) E. Howard Hunt’s memoir was published in a book titled American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond. Hunt devotes all of chapter 12 to the assassination which he titles The Assassination of President Kennedy. Hunt says emphatically that he was in no way involved in the assassination, “Let me say clearly that if there was such a scheme, I had nothing to do with it. I was not in Dallas on November 22, 1963; I was not part of a plot to kill the president; and I had no knowledge of the planned assassination. The thought of perpetrating any crime against the president, even though I disagreed with many of his policies, is completely against my innermost convictions, as anyone who truly knows me would attest.” [13] [Emphasis mine] He goes onto say that he thinks it probably was a conspiracy but has no evidence to that effect. He says this and that could have happened but ultimately concludes he doesn’t know (see endnote for Hunt’s comments).

Jesse Ventura actually has footage of Hunt saying himself he was involved.....not that I believe what he said necessarily ..him being a scum spook and all.

Candycorn!...you seemed so reasonable earlier...now "an exotic breed of dumbass?!!" ... lol...I believe our government has worked with other "intelligence" services....we worked with the USSR in WWII, so why is that so unbelievable? ....wouldnt have to be that the head guys were aware, perhaps just some part of an agency. Stone's movie actually alludes to the possibility in a conversation Garrison has with his staff.
 
ah......OK.....now I'm hungry
but the government just could have said....we have clandestine sources that have convinced us this is not the Soviet union.
and what is preventing them from sharing this info now?....after this many years I think it would be harmless.
just read some book reviews from a book "programming a killer" I think by a former soviet block spy who says that the soviets did indeed plan the assassination...but then apparently desperately tried to stop Oswald
The KGB has some kind of knowledge about the assassination Im sure.But it was mostly a CIA operation,their fingerprints are all over the place. during the end of the HSCA investigation when it was winding down,two CIA men came forward and said-we did it,where do you want to go with this investigation?
the committe of course did not puruse that lead,anything that pointed towards government involvement they ignored since like i said,they had a NEW patsy they invented,the mob.
then you have former CIA operative E Howard Hunt who did covert operations for the CIA for dick nixon when he was vice president under eisenhower,coming forward in 2005 or so giving a taped confession to his son on his deathbed that he was indeed there as part of a CIA operation to kill kennedy after DENYING it for years that he was in dallas that day as well.
take a look.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96FDflK_Iug]JFK Deathbed confession - Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura trutv - YouTube[/ame]

seems to me their was a book out, none dare call it ?, that actually talked about USSR and USA cooperating at some level.

CIA working with the KGB?....it would be nice to know if Putin knows something.

I have not heard of that book.will have to read it.Im sure there is a lot to it because the CIA and KGB do indeed work together so yeah,im sure your right that Putin knows something about it.
In the watergate tapes of Nixon,you hear Dick mention the bay of pigs invasion and that scab Hunt he goes on to say.His aides always wondered why Nixon always had such an obsession over the bay of pigs invasion talking about that on the tape.wondering what did that have to do with watergate. H R Haldemen later in a book he wrote said that the reason Nixon kept referring to the bay of pigs invasion and that scab Hunt being a loose cannonr,what he was REALLY saying when he was saying that whole bay of pigs invasion thing could come up,was that whole jfk assassination thing could come up. thats what those references were really about is what Halderman says in his book.makes perfect sense.
 
Last edited:
One would have to be an exotic breed of dumbass to believe there was not only US Governmental involvement but coordination between it and foreign intel agencies.


The story the two sons provided, that E. Howard Hunt left a deathbed confession, was investigated in 2007 by the LA Times who concluded that the information provided by the sons was “inconclusive” and that “none of the accounts provides evidence to convincingly validate that their father disclosed anything revelatory.” [11] St. John’s and David’s own family have rejected their claims. E. Howard Hunt’s widow Laura (married since 1977) and their children Austin (who lived with his father) and Hollis rejected the two son’s story saying they had been “coaching” Hunt to say something as his lucidity deteriorated in his final months. Kevan, St. John’s sister, accused her brothers of “elder abuse”, telling the LA Times that the two sons “pressured their father for dramatic scenarios for their own financial gain”. Hunt’s personal lawyer Bill Snyder even said “Howard was just speculating. He had no hard evidence.” [11] A personal statement was uploaded to the internet on behalf of E. Howard Hunt’s family, responding to the claims made by St. John and David. The statement reads [12]:

There is no such thing as E. Howard Hunt’s “Last Confession,” contrary to claims currently being circulated by Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons, Howard St. John and David Hunt… Motivated by an apparent need for notoriety and financial gains, these theories regarding Mr. Hunt’s alleged knowledge of a JFK assassination conspiracy involving the late President Johnson and now dead CIA agents have no basis in fact… In 2005, Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons proposed a book project in conjunction with an individual with film industry connections. Unfortunately, as things developed, it was clear that the project was not about the interesting details of Mr. Hunt’s life. Rather, it was a vehicle to promote further conspiracy-fueled speculations involving rogue CIA agents and LBJ in the Kennedy assassination. Mr. Hunt definitively rejected that project, and he specifically rejected the theories it contained, both to his attorney, William A. Snyder, Jr. and to his youngest son, Austin, who was living at home and finishing his college courses. When that project did not proceed because of the bizarre conspiracy theories initially promoted, the elder brothers’ opportunities for financial gain faded. Their resulting reaction has been to continue to exploit Mr. Hunt, to create conflict and division within the family, to threaten their siblings and worst of all, to further a very selfish and greedy personal agenda.

Sincerely,
The Hunt Estate and the Hunt Family

In February 2007 (a month after his death) E. Howard Hunt’s memoir was published in a book titled American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond. Hunt devotes all of chapter 12 to the assassination which he titles The Assassination of President Kennedy. Hunt says emphatically that he was in no way involved in the assassination, “Let me say clearly that if there was such a scheme, I had nothing to do with it. I was not in Dallas on November 22, 1963; I was not part of a plot to kill the president; and I had no knowledge of the planned assassination. The thought of perpetrating any crime against the president, even though I disagreed with many of his policies, is completely against my innermost convictions, as anyone who truly knows me would attest.” [13] [Emphasis mine] He goes onto say that he thinks it probably was a conspiracy but has no evidence to that effect. He says this and that could have happened but ultimately concludes he doesn’t know (see endnote for Hunt’s comments).

Jesse Ventura actually has footage of Hunt saying himself he was involved.....not that I believe what he said necessarily ..him being a scum spook and all.

Candycorn!...you seemed so reasonable earlier...now "an exotic breed of dumbass?!!" ... lol...I believe our government has worked with other "intelligence" services....we worked with the USSR in WWII, so why is that so unbelievable? ....wouldnt have to be that the head guys were aware, perhaps just some part of an agency. Stone's movie actually alludes to the possibility in a conversation Garrison has with his staff.

agent candyass ALWAYS exposes what a retard he is.Everybody that debates him always finds that out that at first,he is reasonable but then when he is cornered,like all trolls, he evades the facts and changes the subject.He defends government corruption to no end no matter how absurd and redicules the government version of events are such as the JFK assassination. best to hit the ignore button.dont reply to him,he is just seeking attention.same as dawgshit.you've heard the old saying-
:trolls:

thats all those two are seeking.dont feed them.

Looks like your the only one on here that has any interest in the truth whatsoever that ever has anything intelliegent to say and is willing to look at both sides.your the only one on here that has been posting lately thats not a troll so looks like all my discussions will have to be with you now since the magic bullet theorists dont have any answers to the facts of multiple bullets fired that day from the photos taken that day seen in those videos that i mentioned at least THREE times and never got addressed.they always go ignored by the lone nut theorists.:cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
The KGB has some kind of knowledge about the assassination Im sure.But it was mostly a CIA operation,their fingerprints are all over the place. during the end of the HSCA investigation when it was winding down,two CIA men came forward and said-we did it,where do you want to go with this investigation?
the committe of course did not puruse that lead,anything that pointed towards government involvement they ignored since like i said,they had a NEW patsy they invented,the mob.
then you have former CIA operative E Howard Hunt who did covert operations for the CIA for dick nixon when he was vice president under eisenhower,coming forward in 2005 or so giving a taped confession to his son on his deathbed that he was indeed there as part of a CIA operation to kill kennedy after DENYING it for years that he was in dallas that day as well.
take a look.
JFK Deathbed confession - Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura trutv - YouTube

seems to me their was a book out, none dare call it ?, that actually talked about USSR and USA cooperating at some level.

CIA working with the KGB?....it would be nice to know if Putin knows something.

I have not heard of that book.will have to read it.Im sure there is a lot to it because the CIA and KGB do indeed work together so yeah,im sure your right that Putin knows something about it.

that wasnt the full title, the "?" was because there is one book called none dare call it conspiracy.....I think, and another called none dare call it treason....I believe, and I dont remember which one talks about USSR and US high level cooperation
 
:cuckoo:
.hysterical how you fell hook, line and sinker for the lamestream medias trick photograpghy.:lmao: easy to substitute a pristine bullet on the tv.doesnt happen in real life charlie.thats because you magic bullet theorists ignore facts that there were multitple shooters there that day.:cuckoo:you guys have ZERO evidence that oswald was the lone shooter or shot tippet while there are overwhelming facts that there were multiple shooters there that day.:cuckoo: the only thing thats closed is your mind. the JFK case is closed in the fact it has been proven the CIA was behind it all.

you guys ignore facts that all the dallas doctors said both the head wound and and throut wound were entrance wounds from the front and witnesses saw a gunman behin the fence firing a rifle as well as ignoring the laws of physics.:cuckoo:

you magic bullet theorists go into these discussions only seeing what you WANT to see never watching videos of photos taken that day that prove there were multiple shooters of many bullets seen that day the warren commission did not explain because they could not be traced back to oswalds rifle. you guys always run off everytime from these two videos below are shown because your so much in denial and afraid of the truth and wont talk about them because you know you cant refute the facts these videos prove multiple shooters were there that day.:cuckoo:

you magic bullet theorists also always blatantly ignore facts that many people who came forward and gave versions of events different than the governments wound up dying in very myserious deaths not to mention constantly ignoring the fact that according to many witnesses,the warren commission altered their testimonys,a crime itself they should have all gone to jail for.:cuckoo:

the country has gone downhill since JFK died that day.He was our last REAL president we had.Not a puppet for the establishment,not willing to do what they told him to do and he paid the price for it. Every single president we have had since then,with the exception of carter,has been more even and corrupt than the previous one. Carter like JFK,also tried to get rid of the CIA in his last year in office.The establishment knew he was on his way out and would not be reelected so thats why they didnt bother trying to assassinate,why bother with just one year left in office.

Here is a computer simulation, believe what you wish:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfSXkfV_mhA]JFK Assassination Magic Bullet Computer Recreation - YouTube[/ame]

The facts are, there were three shots fired as witnessed by the majority of people. There is no evidence of more then three. There were three shell casing in the SBD.

If any of you ever walked Dealey Plaza you would have to know that the grassy knoll would be one of the last places a person would fire from if they wished to avoid detection.

The truth is that those who wish to paint this as anything other then a simple case of a scum bag killing a president almost never present anything to bolster their case. It is always like your post innuendo and insult. I am not saying you don't believe what you are saying but apparently that belief is only because that is what you want to believe, yet you accuse those who actually present evidence as those who just believe.

As I said I have nothing to gain either way. I at first thought it had to be a conspiracy because that is what sells newspapers and what was pushed the most. But an objective look at the evidence points to one man.

Now, did Oswald kill Tippit? There is little doubt:

On November 22, 1963, J.D. Tippit was working beat number 78, his normal patrol area in south Oak Cliff, a residential area of Dallas.[6] At 12:45 p.m., 15 minutes after the President's assassination, Tippit received a radio order to move to the central Oak Cliff area as part of a concentration of police around the center of the city. At 12:54 Tippit radioed that he had moved as directed. By then several messages had been broadcast describing a suspect in the Kennedy assassination[7] as a slender white male, in his early thirties, 5 feet 10 inches (1.78 m) tall, and weighing about 165 pounds (75 kg). Oswald was a slender white male, 24 years old, 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m) tall, and an estimated weight of 150 pounds (68 kg) pounds at autopsy.[8]

According to the Warren Commission, at approximately 1:11–1:14 p.m.,[9] Tippit was driving slowly eastward on East 10th Street when — about 100 feet (30 m) past the intersection of 10th Street and Patton Avenue — he pulled alongside a man who resembled the broadcast description of Lee Harvey Oswald.[10][11] The man walked over to Tippit's car and apparently exchanged words with him through an open vent window.[12] Tippit opened his car door and as he walked toward the front of the car, the man drew a handgun and fired three shots in rapid succession, all three bullets hitting Tippit in the chest. The man then walked up to Tippit's fallen body and fired a fourth shot directly into his right temple, fatally wounding him. Tippit was dead before any help could arrive and Oswald was later arrested after "acting suspiciously" by appearing nervous as police sirens neared him and by ducking into the Texas Theatre without buying a ticket.[13]

The Warren Commission identified twelve people who witnessed the shooting,[14] or its aftermath.[15] Domingo Benavides saw Tippit standing by the left door of his parked police car, and a man standing on the right side of the car. He then heard shots and saw Tippit fall to the ground. Benavides stopped his pickup truck on the opposite side of the street from Tippit's car. He observed the shooter fleeing the scene and removing spent cartridge cases from his gun as he left. Benavides waited in his truck until the gunman disappeared before assisting Tippit. He then reported the shooting to police headquarters, using the radio in Tippit's car.[16] Helen Markham witnessed the shooting and then saw a man with a gun in his hand leave the scene.[17] Markham identified Lee Harvey Oswald as TippitÂ’s killer in a police lineup she viewed that evening.[18] Barbara Davis and her sister-in-law Virginia Davis heard the shots and saw a man crossing their lawn, shaking his revolver, as if he were emptying it of cartridge cases. Later, the women found two cartridge cases near the crime scene and handed the cases over to police. That evening, Barbara Davis and Virginia Davis were taken to a lineup and both Davises picked out Oswald as the man whom they had seen.[19]

Taxicab driver William Scoggins testified that he saw Tippit's police car pull up alongside a man on the sidewalk as he sat in his taxicab nearby. Scoggins heard three or four shots and then saw Tippit fall to the ground. As Scoggins crouched behind his cab, the man passed within twelve feet of him, pistol in hand, muttering what sounded to him like, "poor dumb cop" or "poor damn cop."[20] The next day, Scoggins viewed a police lineup and identified Oswald as the man whom he had seen with the pistol.[citation needed] But "Scoggins admitted he did not actually witness the shooting and his view of the fleeing killer was obscured because he ducked down behind his cab as the man came by."[21]

The Commission also named several other witnesses[22] who were not at the scene of the murder, but who identified Oswald running between the murder scene and the Texas Theater, where Oswald was subsequently arrested.[23]

Four cartridge cases were found at the scene by eyewitnesses. It was the unanimous testimony of expert witnesses before the Warren Commission that these spent cartridge cases were fired from the revolver in Oswald's possession to the exclusion of all other weapons.[24]

In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations reported: "Based on Oswald's possession of the murder weapon a short time after the murder and the eyewitness identifications of Oswald as the gunman, the committee concluded that Oswald shot and killed Officer Tippit."[25]
J. D. Tippit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remember also that when arrested Oswald, and there can be no doubt it was him, tried to shot an officer with the same gun that killed Tippet.

nice game of dodgeball you play.:lmao: the bullets found that day at the scene of the tippet murder were not even the same kind that came from the gun that oswald was found to have and the descriptions of the killer they gave did not even match oswald.one witness said she saw two men at the scene of the crime working together and they walked off in separate directions,she wasnt even called before the warren commission.:cuckoo: so much for oswald killing tippet.:cuckoo: Helen markham,who was the commissions star witness in the tippet shooting,commission lawyer joseph ball even called her a screwball.:lmao:

thats comedy gold,everytime you magic bullet theorists are cornered by those two videos ,like clockwork,you all revert to that government propaganda piece by the CIA controlled media actually using COMPUTER stimulation for your laughable lies. which again,they dont address ONE SINGLE FACT brought up in those two videos of mine you refuse to watch or any of the facts i mentioned you dodged and refused to talk about. if your going to keep playing dodgeball refusing to talk about all those multile bullets photographaed that day and the facts i mentioned,then you truly are in denial and skipped junior high school science classes and therefore a complete waste of time like dawgshit is since you clearly only see what you WANT to see.

comedy gold from you magic bullet theorists. as always,everytime you are cornered with facts you cant refute,you trolls always turn tail and run away from those videos not talking about the photos taken that day in them of multiple bullets seen and photographed they showed.

Like all trolls,,you dont talk about any of the evidence presented in them,you cover your ears and close your eyes when shown those vidoes refusing to watch them and then change the subject knowing your cornered by those facts and refusing to address the facts I mentioned and using this comedy piece COMPUTER stimulation video in your desperate pitiful attempts to avoid admitting you have been taken to school.:lmao:

that computer video doesnt address a SINGLE item of anything i mentioned or any of the facts presented in those two videos.miserable fail.:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao: comedy gold.

you arent even aware of the fact the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation robert blakey even wrote a book about the investigation concluding the mob was behind it when americans were no longer believeing the lies of the warren commission and knew there was at least a second gunman involved.they invented a new patsy -the mob concluding there was a second shooter behind the picket fence.thanks for demonstrating your ignorance in this case ignoring the facts presented and that you only see what you want to see like all magic bullet theorists.:cuckoo::clap2::clap2:

here is that book that blakey wrote concluding the mob was behind it all.you wont read it of course since your so close minded and in denial as we both know.:cuckoo:

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291]The Plot to Kill the President: George Robert Blakey: 9780812909296: Amazon.com: Books[/ame]


The Plot to Kill the PresidentHardcover

by

George Robert Blakey(Author)

Individuals are walking the streets of American today who should be and eventually may be indicted for the unrequited murder of President John F. Kennedy. The President was not the victim of a nut gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, alone, but of an organized crime conspiracy. This is the sensational scenario of the book that qualifies as the definitive


dont you ever get tired of imitating dawgshit by getting your ass handed to you on a platter and demonstrating how cluless and ignorant you are like he constantly does here everyday? lol.

I notice the magic bullet theorists ignored this post,ignoring the FACT that the lead prosecuter in the HSCA investigation,Robert Blakey wrote a book detailing the facts of a conspiracy,that there was a second shooter involved.I noticed the magic bullet theorists true to form,evaded that little pesky fact.:D
 
One would have to be an exotic breed of dumbass to believe there was not only US Governmental involvement but coordination between it and foreign intel agencies.


The story the two sons provided, that E. Howard Hunt left a deathbed confession, was investigated in 2007 by the LA Times who concluded that the information provided by the sons was “inconclusive” and that “none of the accounts provides evidence to convincingly validate that their father disclosed anything revelatory.” [11] St. John’s and David’s own family have rejected their claims. E. Howard Hunt’s widow Laura (married since 1977) and their children Austin (who lived with his father) and Hollis rejected the two son’s story saying they had been “coaching” Hunt to say something as his lucidity deteriorated in his final months. Kevan, St. John’s sister, accused her brothers of “elder abuse”, telling the LA Times that the two sons “pressured their father for dramatic scenarios for their own financial gain”. Hunt’s personal lawyer Bill Snyder even said “Howard was just speculating. He had no hard evidence.” [11] A personal statement was uploaded to the internet on behalf of E. Howard Hunt’s family, responding to the claims made by St. John and David. The statement reads [12]:

There is no such thing as E. Howard Hunt’s “Last Confession,” contrary to claims currently being circulated by Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons, Howard St. John and David Hunt… Motivated by an apparent need for notoriety and financial gains, these theories regarding Mr. Hunt’s alleged knowledge of a JFK assassination conspiracy involving the late President Johnson and now dead CIA agents have no basis in fact… In 2005, Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons proposed a book project in conjunction with an individual with film industry connections. Unfortunately, as things developed, it was clear that the project was not about the interesting details of Mr. Hunt’s life. Rather, it was a vehicle to promote further conspiracy-fueled speculations involving rogue CIA agents and LBJ in the Kennedy assassination. Mr. Hunt definitively rejected that project, and he specifically rejected the theories it contained, both to his attorney, William A. Snyder, Jr. and to his youngest son, Austin, who was living at home and finishing his college courses. When that project did not proceed because of the bizarre conspiracy theories initially promoted, the elder brothers’ opportunities for financial gain faded. Their resulting reaction has been to continue to exploit Mr. Hunt, to create conflict and division within the family, to threaten their siblings and worst of all, to further a very selfish and greedy personal agenda.

Sincerely,
The Hunt Estate and the Hunt Family

In February 2007 (a month after his death) E. Howard Hunt’s memoir was published in a book titled American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond. Hunt devotes all of chapter 12 to the assassination which he titles The Assassination of President Kennedy. Hunt says emphatically that he was in no way involved in the assassination, “Let me say clearly that if there was such a scheme, I had nothing to do with it. I was not in Dallas on November 22, 1963; I was not part of a plot to kill the president; and I had no knowledge of the planned assassination. The thought of perpetrating any crime against the president, even though I disagreed with many of his policies, is completely against my innermost convictions, as anyone who truly knows me would attest.” [13] [Emphasis mine] He goes onto say that he thinks it probably was a conspiracy but has no evidence to that effect. He says this and that could have happened but ultimately concludes he doesn’t know (see endnote for Hunt’s comments).

still evading facts in those two videos and the facts i presented to you in my first post to you I see changing the subject when your cornered.:lmao:

newest government disinfo agent to appear.all you did is prove my facts to be true.thanks for proving you have reading comprehension problems,that you really do only see what you want to see as you just proved in spades cause you obviously missed the part i mentioned that i alread said that,that he denied it for years before his deathbed confession.as always,miserable fail.:lmao:

No, I did not evade anything. This last post is in response to the hunt video. And I do believe I responded to your other posts.
 
One would have to be an exotic breed of dumbass to believe there was not only US Governmental involvement but coordination between it and foreign intel agencies.


The story the two sons provided, that E. Howard Hunt left a deathbed confession, was investigated in 2007 by the LA Times who concluded that the information provided by the sons was “inconclusive” and that “none of the accounts provides evidence to convincingly validate that their father disclosed anything revelatory.” [11] St. John’s and David’s own family have rejected their claims. E. Howard Hunt’s widow Laura (married since 1977) and their children Austin (who lived with his father) and Hollis rejected the two son’s story saying they had been “coaching” Hunt to say something as his lucidity deteriorated in his final months. Kevan, St. John’s sister, accused her brothers of “elder abuse”, telling the LA Times that the two sons “pressured their father for dramatic scenarios for their own financial gain”. Hunt’s personal lawyer Bill Snyder even said “Howard was just speculating. He had no hard evidence.” [11] A personal statement was uploaded to the internet on behalf of E. Howard Hunt’s family, responding to the claims made by St. John and David. The statement reads [12]:

There is no such thing as E. Howard Hunt’s “Last Confession,” contrary to claims currently being circulated by Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons, Howard St. John and David Hunt… Motivated by an apparent need for notoriety and financial gains, these theories regarding Mr. Hunt’s alleged knowledge of a JFK assassination conspiracy involving the late President Johnson and now dead CIA agents have no basis in fact… In 2005, Mr. Hunt’s two elder sons proposed a book project in conjunction with an individual with film industry connections. Unfortunately, as things developed, it was clear that the project was not about the interesting details of Mr. Hunt’s life. Rather, it was a vehicle to promote further conspiracy-fueled speculations involving rogue CIA agents and LBJ in the Kennedy assassination. Mr. Hunt definitively rejected that project, and he specifically rejected the theories it contained, both to his attorney, William A. Snyder, Jr. and to his youngest son, Austin, who was living at home and finishing his college courses. When that project did not proceed because of the bizarre conspiracy theories initially promoted, the elder brothers’ opportunities for financial gain faded. Their resulting reaction has been to continue to exploit Mr. Hunt, to create conflict and division within the family, to threaten their siblings and worst of all, to further a very selfish and greedy personal agenda.

Sincerely,
The Hunt Estate and the Hunt Family

In February 2007 (a month after his death) E. Howard Hunt’s memoir was published in a book titled American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond. Hunt devotes all of chapter 12 to the assassination which he titles The Assassination of President Kennedy. Hunt says emphatically that he was in no way involved in the assassination, “Let me say clearly that if there was such a scheme, I had nothing to do with it. I was not in Dallas on November 22, 1963; I was not part of a plot to kill the president; and I had no knowledge of the planned assassination. The thought of perpetrating any crime against the president, even though I disagreed with many of his policies, is completely against my innermost convictions, as anyone who truly knows me would attest.” [13] [Emphasis mine] He goes onto say that he thinks it probably was a conspiracy but has no evidence to that effect. He says this and that could have happened but ultimately concludes he doesn’t know (see endnote for Hunt’s comments).

Jesse Ventura actually has footage of Hunt saying himself he was involved.....not that I believe what he said necessarily ..him being a scum spook and all.

Candycorn!...you seemed so reasonable earlier...now "an exotic breed of dumbass?!!" ... lol...
Reasonable. So with the CIA director who meets regularly with the President and any number of government officials meeting with the President regularly...you find it reasonable to believe that the CIA would first consult with the Soviets (for some reason--what could they add?) and then pull off an execution in Dallas with a moving vehicle from an elevated position 300 yards away?

Not when JFK left the hotel in Fort Worth that morning, not when JFK was working the rope line at Love Field in Dallas...no...you wait until you get a 300 yard shot at a moving target.

Please explain to me what you think is reasonable about why the CIA would work with the KGB--again the KGB can add nothing in the form of logistics, training, access, intel, etc...--and then they come up with a scheme that is needlessly complicated?

Yeah..you're the one being unreasonable.

I believe our government has worked with other "intelligence" services....we worked with the USSR in WWII, so why is that so unbelievable?

A) Not to kill our president
B) Where was WWII fought? If you're planning an op in your kitchen, would you consult some loser idiot who lives in Kansas City (provided you're not in KC)? What could they add?

....wouldnt have to be that the head guys were aware, perhaps just some part of an agency. Stone's movie actually alludes to the possibility in a conversation Garrison has with his staff.

It is a movie; not an investigation. Again...if the hit had occurred in Russia or Eastern Europe...sure. What expertise does the KGB have for Dallas?

Sorry but the larger the conspiracy, the easier it is to unearth and involving a governmental agency in the planning or carrying out is the worst thing a conspirator could do and if you're talking about the cellular level of one of these agencies...okay but at some point there is an umbilical to the parent agency. Involving a foreign intel agency is batshit crazy. Because whenever, in the future, you know something they don't, they could bring this up an force you to hand over whatever it is.

Fail.
 
:cuckoo:
Here is a computer simulation, believe what you wish:

JFK Assassination Magic Bullet Computer Recreation - YouTube

The facts are, there were three shots fired as witnessed by the majority of people. There is no evidence of more then three. There were three shell casing in the SBD.

If any of you ever walked Dealey Plaza you would have to know that the grassy knoll would be one of the last places a person would fire from if they wished to avoid detection.

The truth is that those who wish to paint this as anything other then a simple case of a scum bag killing a president almost never present anything to bolster their case. It is always like your post innuendo and insult. I am not saying you don't believe what you are saying but apparently that belief is only because that is what you want to believe, yet you accuse those who actually present evidence as those who just believe.

As I said I have nothing to gain either way. I at first thought it had to be a conspiracy because that is what sells newspapers and what was pushed the most. But an objective look at the evidence points to one man.

Now, did Oswald kill Tippit? There is little doubt:

On November 22, 1963, J.D. Tippit was working beat number 78, his normal patrol area in south Oak Cliff, a residential area of Dallas.[6] At 12:45 p.m., 15 minutes after the President's assassination, Tippit received a radio order to move to the central Oak Cliff area as part of a concentration of police around the center of the city. At 12:54 Tippit radioed that he had moved as directed. By then several messages had been broadcast describing a suspect in the Kennedy assassination[7] as a slender white male, in his early thirties, 5 feet 10 inches (1.78 m) tall, and weighing about 165 pounds (75 kg). Oswald was a slender white male, 24 years old, 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m) tall, and an estimated weight of 150 pounds (68 kg) pounds at autopsy.[8]

According to the Warren Commission, at approximately 1:11–1:14 p.m.,[9] Tippit was driving slowly eastward on East 10th Street when — about 100 feet (30 m) past the intersection of 10th Street and Patton Avenue — he pulled alongside a man who resembled the broadcast description of Lee Harvey Oswald.[10][11] The man walked over to Tippit's car and apparently exchanged words with him through an open vent window.[12] Tippit opened his car door and as he walked toward the front of the car, the man drew a handgun and fired three shots in rapid succession, all three bullets hitting Tippit in the chest. The man then walked up to Tippit's fallen body and fired a fourth shot directly into his right temple, fatally wounding him. Tippit was dead before any help could arrive and Oswald was later arrested after "acting suspiciously" by appearing nervous as police sirens neared him and by ducking into the Texas Theatre without buying a ticket.[13]

The Warren Commission identified twelve people who witnessed the shooting,[14] or its aftermath.[15] Domingo Benavides saw Tippit standing by the left door of his parked police car, and a man standing on the right side of the car. He then heard shots and saw Tippit fall to the ground. Benavides stopped his pickup truck on the opposite side of the street from Tippit's car. He observed the shooter fleeing the scene and removing spent cartridge cases from his gun as he left. Benavides waited in his truck until the gunman disappeared before assisting Tippit. He then reported the shooting to police headquarters, using the radio in Tippit's car.[16] Helen Markham witnessed the shooting and then saw a man with a gun in his hand leave the scene.[17] Markham identified Lee Harvey Oswald as TippitÂ’s killer in a police lineup she viewed that evening.[18] Barbara Davis and her sister-in-law Virginia Davis heard the shots and saw a man crossing their lawn, shaking his revolver, as if he were emptying it of cartridge cases. Later, the women found two cartridge cases near the crime scene and handed the cases over to police. That evening, Barbara Davis and Virginia Davis were taken to a lineup and both Davises picked out Oswald as the man whom they had seen.[19]

Taxicab driver William Scoggins testified that he saw Tippit's police car pull up alongside a man on the sidewalk as he sat in his taxicab nearby. Scoggins heard three or four shots and then saw Tippit fall to the ground. As Scoggins crouched behind his cab, the man passed within twelve feet of him, pistol in hand, muttering what sounded to him like, "poor dumb cop" or "poor damn cop."[20] The next day, Scoggins viewed a police lineup and identified Oswald as the man whom he had seen with the pistol.[citation needed] But "Scoggins admitted he did not actually witness the shooting and his view of the fleeing killer was obscured because he ducked down behind his cab as the man came by."[21]

The Commission also named several other witnesses[22] who were not at the scene of the murder, but who identified Oswald running between the murder scene and the Texas Theater, where Oswald was subsequently arrested.[23]

Four cartridge cases were found at the scene by eyewitnesses. It was the unanimous testimony of expert witnesses before the Warren Commission that these spent cartridge cases were fired from the revolver in Oswald's possession to the exclusion of all other weapons.[24]

In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations reported: "Based on Oswald's possession of the murder weapon a short time after the murder and the eyewitness identifications of Oswald as the gunman, the committee concluded that Oswald shot and killed Officer Tippit."[25]
J. D. Tippit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remember also that when arrested Oswald, and there can be no doubt it was him, tried to shot an officer with the same gun that killed Tippet.

nice game of dodgeball you play.:lmao: the bullets found that day at the scene of the tippet murder were not even the same kind that came from the gun that oswald was found to have and the descriptions of the killer they gave did not even match oswald.one witness said she saw two men at the scene of the crime working together and they walked off in separate directions,she wasnt even called before the warren commission.:cuckoo: so much for oswald killing tippet.:cuckoo: Helen markham,who was the commissions star witness in the tippet shooting,commission lawyer joseph ball even called her a screwball.:lmao:

thats comedy gold,everytime you magic bullet theorists are cornered by those two videos ,like clockwork,you all revert to that government propaganda piece by the CIA controlled media actually using COMPUTER stimulation for your laughable lies. which again,they dont address ONE SINGLE FACT brought up in those two videos of mine you refuse to watch or any of the facts i mentioned you dodged and refused to talk about. if your going to keep playing dodgeball refusing to talk about all those multile bullets photographaed that day and the facts i mentioned,then you truly are in denial and skipped junior high school science classes and therefore a complete waste of time like dawgshit is since you clearly only see what you WANT to see.

comedy gold from you magic bullet theorists. as always,everytime you are cornered with facts you cant refute,you trolls always turn tail and run away from those videos not talking about the photos taken that day in them of multiple bullets seen and photographed they showed.

Like all trolls,,you dont talk about any of the evidence presented in them,you cover your ears and close your eyes when shown those vidoes refusing to watch them and then change the subject knowing your cornered by those facts and refusing to address the facts I mentioned and using this comedy piece COMPUTER stimulation video in your desperate pitiful attempts to avoid admitting you have been taken to school.:lmao:

that computer video doesnt address a SINGLE item of anything i mentioned or any of the facts presented in those two videos.miserable fail.:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao: comedy gold.

you arent even aware of the fact the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation robert blakey even wrote a book about the investigation concluding the mob was behind it when americans were no longer believeing the lies of the warren commission and knew there was at least a second gunman involved.they invented a new patsy -the mob concluding there was a second shooter behind the picket fence.thanks for demonstrating your ignorance in this case ignoring the facts presented and that you only see what you want to see like all magic bullet theorists.:cuckoo::clap2::clap2:

here is that book that blakey wrote concluding the mob was behind it all.you wont read it of course since your so close minded and in denial as we both know.:cuckoo:

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291]The Plot to Kill the President: George Robert Blakey: 9780812909296: Amazon.com: Books[/ame]


The Plot to Kill the PresidentHardcover

by

George Robert Blakey(Author)

Individuals are walking the streets of American today who should be and eventually may be indicted for the unrequited murder of President John F. Kennedy. The President was not the victim of a nut gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, alone, but of an organized crime conspiracy. This is the sensational scenario of the book that qualifies as the definitive


dont you ever get tired of imitating dawgshit by getting your ass handed to you on a platter and demonstrating how cluless and ignorant you are like he constantly does here everyday? lol.

I notice the magic bullet theorists ignored this post,ignoring the FACT that the lead prosecuter in the HSCA investigation,Robert Blakey wrote a book detailing the facts of a conspiracy,that there was a second shooter involved.I noticed the magic bullet theorists true to form,evaded that little pesky fact.:D

Ok concerning the shell casings.I provide this with a link. You on the other hand post your opinion, no link no nothing. Here again is what I posted.

Four cartridge cases were found at the scene by eyewitnesses. It was the unanimous testimony of expert witnesses before the Warren Commission that these spent cartridge cases were fired from the revolver in Oswald's possession to the exclusion of all other weapons.[24]

Now it is up to you to post some evidence that this linked statement is not true. Your say so maybe what you believe put it is not proof.
 
Back
Top Bottom