Even the government itself admitted in the 70's there was a conspiracy to kill JFK.

[Freewill]

I don't think the USSR had a hand in it. Perhaps Cuba. Oswald did visit the Cuban embassy in Mexico the month before he killed Kennedy.
The reason the Soviet Union could be ruled out is because certainly if there was going to be some sort of state sanctioned hit on a foreign leader (let alone one with a nuke arsenal), there would be significant chatter before the event. We had agents over there and obviously we were monitoring cables and messages from the USSR.

I think that the Soviets could have kept the chatter to a minimum if it was a state sanctioned hit. ...Even if you are correct it doesn't explain our governments lack of interest in the subject. This is something that, especially after all these years, they should be sharing with us,...why they did not investigate Soviet ties ...or why they ruled them out without telling us.

I see your point but revealing why you know something gained through clandestine means is never a good sign. For example, I know you went to work today. If I said that I know this because you walked by Dunkin Donuts and my informant who was tailing you has her morning coffee there...you're not going to walk by Dunkin Donuts any longer. I can see your point but I can see the point of not wanting to point the opposition in the direction of your source. Let's say you go into Dunkin Donuts and look for my informant. There are 8 women in there. Which one was it? But knowing the spook is at DD is enough to never walk by there again.

Unless you want the person to walk a different way.

 

[Freewill]

well if the crapspiracy nut sacks are correct, the super secret Illuminati, masons, right wing ,commie etc..group had everything planned and executed with perfection..so the other bullets and the frag should have been a piece of cake...
in reality did anyone investigate the fragment story or did they just assume it was a bullet?
no chance it could have been a pebble or a chunk of asphalt or concrete?
did any one test for lead in the wound..
or would that be asking too much?

The wound, in my opinion, was too small, it was barely a scratch.

The Warren Commission and the FBI[edit]

Tague provided his testimony to the Warren Commission on July 28, 1964.[1] He initially stated that he was wounded on his facial cheek by either the second or third shot of the three shots that he remembered hearing. When the Commission counsel pressed him to be more specific, Tague testified that he was wounded by the second shot. When the Commission counsel asked Tague where he sensed was the source of the gun shots, Tague testified the shots originated "from the monument or whatever it was" which was the area of the North Pergola Monument, located on the grassy knoll, several hundred feet west of the Book Depository building.

According to the Warren Commission's final report, forensic tests by the FBI revealed that the chipped bullet mark impact location contained no embedded copper metal residue, indicating that it was not created by "an unmutilated military full metal-jacketed bullet such as the bullet from Governor Connally's stretcher."[2] Tague, in his book Truth Withheld, has pictures of the scar taken on November 23, 1963,[3] and as it sat in the National Archives in 1997.

James Tague - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[dcraelin]

I don't think the USSR had a hand in it. Perhaps Cuba. Oswald did visit the Cuban embassy in Mexico the month before he killed Kennedy.
The reason the Soviet Union could be ruled out is because certainly if there was going to be some sort of state sanctioned hit on a foreign leader (let alone one with a nuke arsenal), there would be significant chatter before the event. We had agents over there and obviously we were monitoring cables and messages from the USSR.

I think that the Soviets could have kept the chatter to a minimum if it was a state sanctioned hit. ...Even if you are correct it doesn't explain our governments lack of interest in the subject. This is something that, especially after all these years, they should be sharing with us,...why they did not investigate Soviet ties ...or why they ruled them out without telling us.

I see your point but revealing why you know something gained through clandestine means is never a good sign. For example, I know you went to work today. If I said that I know this because you walked by Dunkin Donuts and my informant who was tailing you has her morning coffee there...you're not going to walk by Dunkin Donuts any longer. I can see your point but I can see the point of not wanting to point the opposition in the direction of your source. Let's say you go into Dunkin Donuts and look for my informant. There are 8 women in there. Which one was it? But knowing the spook is at DD is enough to never walk by there again.

ah......OK.....now I'm hungry

but the government just could have said....we have clandestine sources that have convinced us this is not the Soviet union.

and what is preventing them from sharing this info now?....after this many years I think it would be harmless.

just read some book reviews from a book "programming a killer" I think by a former soviet block spy who says that the soviets did indeed plan the assassination...but then apparently desperately tried to stop Oswald

 

[candycorn]

I think that the Soviets could have kept the chatter to a minimum if it was a state sanctioned hit. ...Even if you are correct it doesn't explain our governments lack of interest in the subject. This is something that, especially after all these years, they should be sharing with us,...why they did not investigate Soviet ties ...or why they ruled them out without telling us.

I see your point but revealing why you know something gained through clandestine means is never a good sign. For example, I know you went to work today. If I said that I know this because you walked by Dunkin Donuts and my informant who was tailing you has her morning coffee there...you're not going to walk by Dunkin Donuts any longer. I can see your point but I can see the point of not wanting to point the opposition in the direction of your source. Let's say you go into Dunkin Donuts and look for my informant. There are 8 women in there. Which one was it? But knowing the spook is at DD is enough to never walk by there again.

ah......OK.....now I'm hungry

but the government just could have said....we have clandestine sources that have convinced us this is not the Soviet union.

and what is preventing them from sharing this info now?....after this many years I think it would be harmless.

just read some book reviews from a book "programming a killer" I think by a former soviet block spy who says that the soviets did indeed plan the assassination...but then apparently desperately tried to stop Oswald

Those are valid questions.

 

[creativedreams]

Those are valid questions.[/QUOTE]



Guess demolition companies would save billions in research and costs to bring down buildings into their own footprints...through their own vertical support columns on every level...by simply stacking a campfire next to one or two supports......

Building 7 was a block long building that had opposite ends of the block long building fall at the same time...

The top floor hit the ground almost as fast as a bowling ball would have if dropped right beside it...

Even though the top floor had to crush its way all the way down through its vertical support columns that were fastened and welded all the way up....

Not to mention the vertical support columns were tapered to be thicker and stronger as they go down.......

 

[creativedreams]

Sorry above reply was wrong thread.....

 

[daws101]

Those are valid questions.

Guess demolition companies would save billions in research and costs to bring down buildings into their own footprints...through their own vertical support columns on every level...by simply stacking a campfire next to one or two supports......

Building 7 was a block long building that had opposite ends of the block long building fall at the same time...

The top floor hit the ground almost as fast as a bowling ball would have if dropped right beside it...

Even though the top floor had to crush its way all the way down through its vertical support columns that were fastened and welded all the way up....

Not to mention the vertical support columns were tapered to be thicker and stronger as they go down.......[/QUOTE]last time I checked this was a Kennedy assassination thread, not a 911 nut sack conspiracy thread..
not that that matters to you.
like all your butt buddies you'll use any opportunity to spew your bullshit!

 

[creativedreams]

Those are valid questions.

Guess demolition companies would save billions in research and costs to bring down buildings into their own footprints...through their own vertical support columns on every level...by simply stacking a campfire next to one or two supports......

Building 7 was a block long building that had opposite ends of the block long building fall at the same time...

The top floor hit the ground almost as fast as a bowling ball would have if dropped right beside it...

Even though the top floor had to crush its way all the way down through its vertical support columns that were fastened and welded all the way up....

Not to mention the vertical support columns were tapered to be thicker and stronger as they go down.......

If your I.Q. was just a little higher you would see what I see...

 

[daws101]

Those are valid questions.

Guess demolition companies would save billions in research and costs to bring down buildings into their own footprints...through their own vertical support columns on every level...by simply stacking a campfire next to one or two supports......

Building 7 was a block long building that had opposite ends of the block long building fall at the same time...

The top floor hit the ground almost as fast as a bowling ball would have if dropped right beside it...

Even though the top floor had to crush its way all the way down through its vertical support columns that were fastened and welded all the way up....

Not to mention the vertical support columns were tapered to be thicker and stronger as they go down.......

If your I.Q. was just a little higher you would see what I see...

good thing it's exponentially higher ... proving what you see is paranoid delusion..
last time I checked this was a Kennedy assassination thread

 

[creativedreams]

Guess demolition companies would save billions in research and costs to bring down buildings into their own footprints...through their own vertical support columns on every level...by simply stacking a campfire next to one or two supports......

Building 7 was a block long building that had opposite ends of the block long building fall at the same time...

The top floor hit the ground almost as fast as a bowling ball would have if dropped right beside it...

Even though the top floor had to crush its way all the way down through its vertical support columns that were fastened and welded all the way up....

Not to mention the vertical support columns were tapered to be thicker and stronger as they go down.......

If your I.Q. was just a little higher you would see what I see...

good thing ...

Yes it is....having a high I.Q. doesn't make a person immune from the few and far between human mistakes...they are just fewer and farther between

 

[Bfgrn]

The wound, in my opinion, was too small, it was barely a scratch.

The Warren Commission and the FBI[edit]

Tague provided his testimony to the Warren Commission on July 28, 1964.[1] He initially stated that he was wounded on his facial cheek by either the second or third shot of the three shots that he remembered hearing. When the Commission counsel pressed him to be more specific, Tague testified that he was wounded by the second shot. When the Commission counsel asked Tague where he sensed was the source of the gun shots, Tague testified the shots originated "from the monument or whatever it was" which was the area of the North Pergola Monument, located on the grassy knoll, several hundred feet west of the Book Depository building.

According to the Warren Commission's final report, forensic tests by the FBI revealed that the chipped bullet mark impact location contained no embedded copper metal residue, indicating that it was not created by "an unmutilated military full metal-jacketed bullet such as the bullet from Governor Connally's stretcher."[2] Tague, in his book Truth Withheld, has pictures of the scar taken on November 23, 1963,[3] and as it sat in the National Archives in 1997.

James Tague - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First of all, somehow you have a quote attributed to me that was said by someone else.

Yea, the bullet that hit the curb and caused the wound to Tague's cheek was not fired from a 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Carcano. It was not a military full metal-jacketed bullet.

The Warren Commission reported that the mark on the curb was "spectrographically determined to be essentially lead with a trace of antimony." Despite the impreciseness of words like essentially and trace, it is clear that the mark was not made by a copper-jacketed bullet like the ones allegedly used by Oswald. The Commission points out that it could have been made by a fragment of the bullet’s core, which is lead, but considering that the curb was approximately 260 feet from the limousine at the moment of the fatal head shot, it is hard to imagine a fragment striking the curb with that much force. And since the Commission contends that the bullet entered the back of the President’s head and blew out the right side of his skull, how could a fragment deflect to the left without damaging the left side of his head as well?

It was fired from another weapon.

 

[Freewill]

I guess the point is that there were four shots. Someone fired from the direction of the SBD and bullet that wasn't jacketed. They were such a poor shot that they couldn't hit the motorcade they hit a curb. Yet we still have the majority of people testifying that there were 3 shots, Tague included.

The Tague wounding is a mystery for sure. Maybe his wound had nothing to do with the shooting.

 

[Bfgrn]

I guess the point is that there were four shots. Someone fired from the direction of the SBD and bullet that wasn't jacketed. They were such a poor shot that they couldn't hit the motorcade they hit a curb. Yet we still have the majority of people testifying that there were 3 shots, Tague included.

The Tague wounding is a mystery for sure. Maybe his wound had nothing to do with the shooting.

WHAT? Maybe a meteorite struck the curb and left a bullet mark.

 

[Freewill]

I guess the point is that there were four shots. Someone fired from the direction of the SBD and bullet that wasn't jacketed. They were such a poor shot that they couldn't hit the motorcade they hit a curb. Yet we still have the majority of people testifying that there were 3 shots, Tague included.

The Tague wounding is a mystery for sure. Maybe his wound had nothing to do with the shooting.

WHAT? Maybe a meteorite struck the curb and left a bullet mark.

Maybe but not likely.

Maybe it was a fragment that had already lost its jacket.

Maybe it didn't happen that day Tague only thought it did.

Tague was down range and the most likely scenario is that he was hit by the bullet that missed or a fragment of one of the bullets. We shall never know.

What surprises me is that no one ever mentions that the other shooter may have been using a suppressor. That is why only three shoots were heard. But using what we know it is fairly apparent that the shot that killed Kennedy came from the SBD. If there were trained assassins shooting they certainly were not very good shots. For this to be a conspiracy the amount of people who would need to be involved is enormous. The SS, the Parkland doctors, the doctors in Washington the whole of the Warren commission. Too big to say this secret this long.

 

[daws101]

First of all, somehow you have a quote attributed to me that was said by someone else.

Yea, the bullet that hit the curb and caused the wound to Tague's cheek was not fired from a 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Carcano. It was not a military full metal-jacketed bullet.

The Warren Commission reported that the mark on the curb was "spectrographically determined to be essentially lead with a trace of antimony." Despite the impreciseness of words like essentially and trace, it is clear that the mark was not made by a copper-jacketed bullet like the ones allegedly used by Oswald. The Commission points out that it could have been made by a fragment of the bullet’s core, which is lead, but considering that the curb was approximately 260 feet from the limousine at the moment of the fatal head shot, it is hard to imagine a fragment striking the curb with that much force. And since the Commission contends that the bullet entered the back of the President’s head and blew out the right side of his skull, how could a fragment deflect to the left without damaging the left side of his head as well?

It was fired from another weapon.

sorry bfrgn but that's not me that happens sometimes still haven't figured out how!?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

presumably security was higher after reagan

that the cold war was just hyped up tension may be testified to by the fact that the government didnt even seem to investigate the possible soviet role in the assassination. But that certainly wasnt the posture of the government.

speaking of reagan,the blind sheople in america who worship that evil bastard as god and consider him the greatest president ever are not aware of facts that he blocked jim garrisons extradition requests to subpeona many key high officials in government when he was governor of california.Thats why like future president ford,like ford,he was also rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup just like Ford did.
They talk about that in that first video I posted and its been talked about in other jfk books as well.

Garrison was truly the biggest publicity hound of them all and his "investigation" was nothing less then a big lie. If you critically looked at Garrison you would be laughing about how someone could be so big of narricist.

the newest government agent troll to penetrate this site. you ignore the fact that garrison was vindicated years later in the 70's when CIA deputy director richard helms said clay shaw did indeed work for the CIA and that while garrison could not convince the jury that shaw was involved,he DID convince them there was a conspiracy,that second shooter existed.miserable fail troll.

 

[daws101]

speaking of reagan,the blind sheople in america who worship that evil bastard as god and consider him the greatest president ever are not aware of facts that he blocked jim garrisons extradition requests to subpeona many key high officials in government when he was governor of california.Thats why like future president ford,like ford,he was also rewarded the office of the presidency for participating in the coverup just like Ford did.
They talk about that in that first video I posted and its been talked about in other jfk books as well.

Garrison was truly the biggest publicity hound of them all and his "investigation" was nothing less then a big lie. If you critically looked at Garrison you would be laughing about how someone could be so big of narricist.

the newest government agent troll to penetrate this site. you ignore the fact that garrison was vindicated years later in the 70's when CIA deputy director richard helms said clay shaw did indeed work for the CIA and that while garrison could not convince the jury that shaw was involved,he DID convince them there was a conspiracy,that second shooter existed.miserable fail troll.

handjob's delusion that government agent have penetrated this site is as old as it is false....

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Present one at a time and we will discuss. What I posted wasn't nearly as simple minded as what you posted it is the truth. The single bullet, proved to be true. Eye witness accounts are invariably not reliable so we can just throw those out and stick to the physical evidence.

I watched a special where they tried to simulate the single bullet. They did it almost exactly the only thing that did not happen was it didn't lodge in the simulated thigh. The bullet hit everywhere the single bullet hit and came out just as "pristine."

It is always your side that produces posts like yours. No fact just innuendo. I provided facts yet you accuse me of just the opposite.

Oswald killed Tippets and he killed JFK, case should have been closed years ago. The only thing keeping it going is the what iffers.

.hysterical how you fell hook, line and sinker for the lamestream medias trick photograpghy. easy to substitute a pristine bullet on the tv.doesnt happen in real life charlie.thats because you magic bullet theorists ignore facts that there were multitple shooters there that day.you guys have ZERO evidence that oswald was the lone shooter or shot tippet while there are overwhelming facts that there were multiple shooters there that day. the only thing thats closed is your mind. the JFK case is closed in the fact it has been proven the CIA was behind it all.

you guys ignore facts that all the dallas doctors said both the head wound and and throut wound were entrance wounds from the front and witnesses saw a gunman behin the fence firing a rifle as well as ignoring the laws of physics.

you magic bullet theorists go into these discussions only seeing what you WANT to see never watching videos of photos taken that day that prove there were multiple shooters of many bullets seen that day the warren commission did not explain because they could not be traced back to oswalds rifle. you guys always run off everytime from these two videos below are shown because your so much in denial and afraid of the truth and wont talk about them because you know you cant refute the facts these videos prove multiple shooters were there that day.

you magic bullet theorists also always blatantly ignore facts that many people who came forward and gave versions of events different than the governments wound up dying in very myserious deaths not to mention constantly ignoring the fact that according to many witnesses,the warren commission altered their testimonys,a crime itself they should have all gone to jail for.

the country has gone downhill since JFK died that day.He was our last REAL president we had.Not a puppet for the establishment,not willing to do what they told him to do and he paid the price for it. Every single president we have had since then,with the exception of carter,has been more even and corrupt than the previous one. Carter like JFK,also tried to get rid of the CIA in his last year in office.The establishment knew he was on his way out and would not be reelected so thats why they didnt bother trying to assassinate,why bother with just one year left in office.

Here is a computer simulation, believe what you wish:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfSXkfV_mhA]JFK Assassination Magic Bullet Computer Recreation - YouTube[/ame]

The facts are, there were three shots fired as witnessed by the majority of people. There is no evidence of more then three. There were three shell casing in the SBD.

If any of you ever walked Dealey Plaza you would have to know that the grassy knoll would be one of the last places a person would fire from if they wished to avoid detection.

The truth is that those who wish to paint this as anything other then a simple case of a scum bag killing a president almost never present anything to bolster their case. It is always like your post innuendo and insult. I am not saying you don't believe what you are saying but apparently that belief is only because that is what you want to believe, yet you accuse those who actually present evidence as those who just believe.

As I said I have nothing to gain either way. I at first thought it had to be a conspiracy because that is what sells newspapers and what was pushed the most. But an objective look at the evidence points to one man.

Now, did Oswald kill Tippit? There is little doubt:

On November 22, 1963, J.D. Tippit was working beat number 78, his normal patrol area in south Oak Cliff, a residential area of Dallas.[6] At 12:45 p.m., 15 minutes after the President's assassination, Tippit received a radio order to move to the central Oak Cliff area as part of a concentration of police around the center of the city. At 12:54 Tippit radioed that he had moved as directed. By then several messages had been broadcast describing a suspect in the Kennedy assassination[7] as a slender white male, in his early thirties, 5 feet 10 inches (1.78 m) tall, and weighing about 165 pounds (75 kg). Oswald was a slender white male, 24 years old, 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m) tall, and an estimated weight of 150 pounds (68 kg) pounds at autopsy.[8]

According to the Warren Commission, at approximately 1:11–1:14 p.m.,[9] Tippit was driving slowly eastward on East 10th Street when — about 100 feet (30 m) past the intersection of 10th Street and Patton Avenue — he pulled alongside a man who resembled the broadcast description of Lee Harvey Oswald.[10][11] The man walked over to Tippit's car and apparently exchanged words with him through an open vent window.[12] Tippit opened his car door and as he walked toward the front of the car, the man drew a handgun and fired three shots in rapid succession, all three bullets hitting Tippit in the chest. The man then walked up to Tippit's fallen body and fired a fourth shot directly into his right temple, fatally wounding him. Tippit was dead before any help could arrive and Oswald was later arrested after "acting suspiciously" by appearing nervous as police sirens neared him and by ducking into the Texas Theatre without buying a ticket.[13]

The Warren Commission identified twelve people who witnessed the shooting,[14] or its aftermath.[15] Domingo Benavides saw Tippit standing by the left door of his parked police car, and a man standing on the right side of the car. He then heard shots and saw Tippit fall to the ground. Benavides stopped his pickup truck on the opposite side of the street from Tippit's car. He observed the shooter fleeing the scene and removing spent cartridge cases from his gun as he left. Benavides waited in his truck until the gunman disappeared before assisting Tippit. He then reported the shooting to police headquarters, using the radio in Tippit's car.[16] Helen Markham witnessed the shooting and then saw a man with a gun in his hand leave the scene.[17] Markham identified Lee Harvey Oswald as Tippit’s killer in a police lineup she viewed that evening.[18] Barbara Davis and her sister-in-law Virginia Davis heard the shots and saw a man crossing their lawn, shaking his revolver, as if he were emptying it of cartridge cases. Later, the women found two cartridge cases near the crime scene and handed the cases over to police. That evening, Barbara Davis and Virginia Davis were taken to a lineup and both Davises picked out Oswald as the man whom they had seen.[19]

Taxicab driver William Scoggins testified that he saw Tippit's police car pull up alongside a man on the sidewalk as he sat in his taxicab nearby. Scoggins heard three or four shots and then saw Tippit fall to the ground. As Scoggins crouched behind his cab, the man passed within twelve feet of him, pistol in hand, muttering what sounded to him like, "poor dumb cop" or "poor damn cop."[20] The next day, Scoggins viewed a police lineup and identified Oswald as the man whom he had seen with the pistol.[citation needed] But "Scoggins admitted he did not actually witness the shooting and his view of the fleeing killer was obscured because he ducked down behind his cab as the man came by."[21]

The Commission also named several other witnesses[22] who were not at the scene of the murder, but who identified Oswald running between the murder scene and the Texas Theater, where Oswald was subsequently arrested.[23]

Four cartridge cases were found at the scene by eyewitnesses. It was the unanimous testimony of expert witnesses before the Warren Commission that these spent cartridge cases were fired from the revolver in Oswald's possession to the exclusion of all other weapons.[24]

In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations reported: "Based on Oswald's possession of the murder weapon a short time after the murder and the eyewitness identifications of Oswald as the gunman, the committee concluded that Oswald shot and killed Officer Tippit."[25]
J. D. Tippit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remember also that when arrested Oswald, and there can be no doubt it was him, tried to shot an officer with the same gun that killed Tippet.

nice game of dodgeball you play. the bullets found that day at the scene of the tippet murder were not even the same kind that came from the gun that oswald was found to have and the descriptions of the killer they gave did not even match oswald.one witness said she saw two men at the scene of the crime working together and they walked off in separate directions,she wasnt even called before the warren commission. so much for oswald killing tippet. Helen markham,who was the commissions star witness in the tippet shooting,commission lawyer joseph ball even called her a screwball.

thats comedy gold,everytime you magic bullet theorists are cornered by those two videos ,like clockwork,you all revert to that government propaganda piece by the CIA controlled media actually using COMPUTER stimulation for your laughable lies. which again,they dont address ONE SINGLE FACT brought up in those two videos of mine you refuse to watch or any of the facts i mentioned you dodged and refused to talk about. if your going to keep playing dodgeball refusing to talk about all those multile bullets photographaed that day and the facts i mentioned,then you truly are in denial and skipped junior high school science classes and therefore a complete waste of time like dawgshit is since you clearly only see what you WANT to see.

comedy gold from you magic bullet theorists. as always,everytime you are cornered with facts you cant refute,you trolls always turn tail and run away from those videos not talking about the photos taken that day in them of multiple bullets seen and photographed they showed.

Like all trolls,,you dont talk about any of the evidence presented in them,you cover your ears and close your eyes when shown those vidoes refusing to watch them and then change the subject knowing your cornered by those facts and refusing to address the facts I mentioned and using this comedy piece COMPUTER stimulation video in your desperate pitiful attempts to avoid admitting you have been taken to school.

that computer video doesnt address a SINGLE item of anything i mentioned or any of the facts presented in those two videos.miserable fail. comedy gold.

you arent even aware of the fact the lead investigater of the HSCA investigation robert blakey even wrote a book about the investigation concluding the mob was behind it when americans were no longer believeing the lies of the warren commission and knew there was at least a second gunman involved.they invented a new patsy -the mob concluding there was a second shooter behind the picket fence.thanks for demonstrating your ignorance in this case ignoring the facts presented and that you only see what you want to see like all magic bullet theorists.

here is that book that blakey wrote concluding the mob was behind it all.you wont read it of course since your so close minded and in denial as we both know.

[ame]http://www.amazon.com/Plot-President-George-Robert-Blakey/dp/0812909291[/ame]


The Plot to Kill the PresidentHardcover

by

George Robert Blakey(Author)

Individuals are walking the streets of American today who should be and eventually may be indicted for the unrequited murder of President John F. Kennedy. The President was not the victim of a nut gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, alone, but of an organized crime conspiracy. This is the sensational scenario of the book that qualifies as the definitive


dont you ever get tired of imitating dawgshit by getting your ass handed to you on a platter and demonstrating how cluless and ignorant you are like he constantly does here everyday? lol.

 

[daws101]

Here is a computer simulation, believe what you wish:

JFK Assassination Magic Bullet Computer Recreation - YouTube

edited for handjobbery!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The wound, in my opinion, was too small, it was barely a scratch.

The Warren Commission and the FBI[edit]

Tague provided his testimony to the Warren Commission on July 28, 1964.[1] He initially stated that he was wounded on his facial cheek by either the second or third shot of the three shots that he remembered hearing. When the Commission counsel pressed him to be more specific, Tague testified that he was wounded by the second shot. When the Commission counsel asked Tague where he sensed was the source of the gun shots, Tague testified the shots originated "from the monument or whatever it was" which was the area of the North Pergola Monument, located on the grassy knoll, several hundred feet west of the Book Depository building.

According to the Warren Commission's final report, forensic tests by the FBI revealed that the chipped bullet mark impact location contained no embedded copper metal residue, indicating that it was not created by "an unmutilated military full metal-jacketed bullet such as the bullet from Governor Connally's stretcher."[2] Tague, in his book Truth Withheld, has pictures of the scar taken on November 23, 1963,[3] and as it sat in the National Archives in 1997.

James Tague - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

boy you sure are easy to brainwash,thats hysterical you use wikipedia as a source.they have a long history of being untruthful and full of lies.they can type in anything they want to there.