Watch how easily I demolish you.
She's referring to the phrase âthe Year of our Lordâ which was not in the draft that was voted on but somehow made its way into the final document.
It is in the document that produced our nation.
Now she says itâs in the document. Originally she lied that it was in the text:
âTEXTâ
......as in the
main and meaningful body of the Constitution as distinct from other material such as notes, appendices, footnotes and signatures.
why the revision when pressed?
was founded by orthodox Christians, based on the Judeo-Christian Bible....which was the single most quoted document by the Founders, and points to Jesus Christ in the text of the Constitution.
The Constitution âpoints to Jesus Christ in the text of the Constitutionâ PoliticalChic - a lie to behold.
On top of that PC is a liar even if you want the world to believe that âthe Year of our Lordâ is a reference to Jesus Christ in the text of the Constitution. Thatâs because âthe Year of our Lordâ is not a reference to Jesus Christ, his spirituality, his Deity, his religion his message or anything about him. It is a reference to a day on the Calendar used since Roman times based on the date that Jesus Christ died and in the colloquial way that it was expressed back then.
"On top of that PC is a liar even if you want the world to believe that âthe Year of our Lordâ is a reference to Jesus Christ in the text of the Constitution. Thatâs because âthe Year of our Lordâ is not a reference to Jesus Christ,..."
And....here's another spanking:
"Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth....
Did you catch it? Their work was done
âin the Year of our Lord.â The Christian world dates all of human history in terms of the birth of Christ. âB.C.â means âbefore Christ,â and âA.D.â is the abbreviation for the Latin words âanno Domini,â meaning âyear of our Lord.â
If the Framers were interested in being pluralistic, multi-cultural, and politically correct, they would have refrained from using the B.C./A.D. designation. Or they would have used the religionless designations âC.E.,â Common Era, and âB.C.E.,â Before the Common Era (see âCommon Era,â 2008). In so doing, they would have avoided offending Jews, atheists, agnostics, and humanists.
Or they could have used âA.H.â (
anno hegiraeâwhich means âin the year of the Hijrahâ and refers to Muhammadâs flight from Mecca in A.D. 622), the date used by Muslims as the commencement date for the Islamic calendar. Instead, the Framers chose to utilize the dating method that indicated the worldview they shared. Whatâs more, their reference to âour Lordâ does not refer to a generic deity, nor does it refer even to God the Father. It refers to God the Sonâ
an explicit reference to Jesus Christ. Make no mistake: the
Constitution of the United States contains an explicit reference to Jesus Christânot Allah, Buddha, Muhammad, nor the gods of Hindus or Native Americans!
Letâs get this straight: The
Declaration of Independence contains four allusions to the God of the Bible. The U.S.
Constitution contains allusions to the freedom to practice the Christian religion unimpeded, the significance and priority of Sunday worship, as well as the place of Jesus Christ in history. So, according to the thinking of the ACLU and a host of liberal educators, politicians, and judges,
the Constitution isâunconstitutional! Go figure."
Those who insist that America was not intended to be a âChristian nationâ point to the obvious absence of specific directives regarding Christianity in the federal Constitution. The popular propaganda since the 1960s has been that âthe irreligious Framers did not want the nation to retain any...
www.apologeticspress.org