Evangelicals and Trump

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
10,226
Reaction score
577
Points
85
I've already eviscerated you.....(better look that up before you imagine it a compliment, dunce)....why are you back?
Second time: There is no reference to Jesus Christ in the Constitution anywhere. Political Chic is a liar. That is settled.

Post the words “Jesus Christ” taken directly from the US Constitution. Unless you can do that you are the only liar here.

ding perhaps you can split the document up and help her find the words “Jesus Christ” in the Constitution.

If you can’t then you are a liar too.

Birds of a feather.
You sure do like to call people liars a lot. :lol:
.
Here's some short history... your predecessor pieces of shit forerunners attacked Christianity mercilessly and ended up Darwinizing themselves out of existence. That's YOUR fate for doing the same thing.
You sure do like to call people liars a lot.
.
4th century christianity is a lie in of itself ...

you are a liar the same as chick, the religion of antiquity has nothing to do with christianity and was the enlightenment of the 1st century denied in your 4th century book.
No. Gnostic Christianity was a lie. Thank God, that got put down. And YOU are the liar. Socialism is a lie and the spawn of Satan who was the father of lies. You worship the father of lies. :lol:
.
No. Gnostic Christianity was a lie. Thank God, that got put down. And YOU are the liar. Socialism is a lie and the spawn of Satan who was the father of lies. You worship the father of lies.
.
you introduced some other form of christianity - there is no such being as a christ that was the point of the 1st century, humanity as a collective - that makes you both a deceit and a liar.
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
10,226
Reaction score
577
Points
85
Nothing like a good argument from the 4th Century to give context to a discussion about ... “Evangelicals & Trump.”

:th_believecrap:
.
recorded history for some is ...

the christian bible was written in the 4th century -
.
Christianity in the 4th century was dominated in its early stage by Constantine the great and the First Council of Nicaea of 325, which was the beginning of the period of the First seven Ecumenical Councils (325–787), and in its late stage by the Edict of Thessalonica of 380, which made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire.
.
as the religion of the roman empire. an example of their false empowerment -
.
18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
.

the forgeries and fallacies of the 4th century is what empowers already corrupt minds. bing - chick.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
75,316
Reaction score
5,639
Points
1,855
Location
Houston
I've already eviscerated you.....(better look that up before you imagine it a compliment, dunce)....why are you back?
Second time: There is no reference to Jesus Christ in the Constitution anywhere. Political Chic is a liar. That is settled.

Post the words “Jesus Christ” taken directly from the US Constitution. Unless you can do that you are the only liar here.

ding perhaps you can split the document up and help her find the words “Jesus Christ” in the Constitution.

If you can’t then you are a liar too.

Birds of a feather.
You sure do like to call people liars a lot. :lol:
.
Here's some short history... your predecessor pieces of shit forerunners attacked Christianity mercilessly and ended up Darwinizing themselves out of existence. That's YOUR fate for doing the same thing.
You sure do like to call people liars a lot.
.
4th century christianity is a lie in of itself ...

you are a liar the same as chick, the religion of antiquity has nothing to do with christianity and was the enlightenment of the 1st century denied in your 4th century book.
No. Gnostic Christianity was a lie. Thank God, that got put down. And YOU are the liar. Socialism is a lie and the spawn of Satan who was the father of lies. You worship the father of lies. :lol:
.
No. Gnostic Christianity was a lie. Thank God, that got put down. And YOU are the liar. Socialism is a lie and the spawn of Satan who was the father of lies. You worship the father of lies.
.
you introduced some other form of christianity - there is no such being as a christ that was the point of the 1st century, humanity as a collective - that makes you both a deceit and a liar.
The original socialists were Gnostic Christians. Real pieces of shit, just like you. Liberation theology at its finest. They bastardized the teachings of Christ, just like you. They attacked Christianity, just like you. Except they weren't subversive pussies like you. They actually burned churches.
 

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
10,814
Reaction score
1,303
Points
245
the Year of our Lord

one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven

That would be Jesus Christ

JESUS CHRIST is a YEAR????


JESUS H. Christ PC you ARE dumb?


I’m positive whoever wrote that was referencing a calandar year, not your Savior who died on the cross for all your sins. One of which is lying about the CONSTITUTION mentioning the words JESUS CHRIST in the text.

So where is JESUS CHRIST, the alleged Son of God ‘pointed to’ in the ‘text’ of the CONSTITUTION?

you’ve shown me where someone pointed to the year the SEVEN articles were signed.

There is no referece to JESUS CHRIST.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
75,316
Reaction score
5,639
Points
1,855
Location
Houston
the Year of our Lord

one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven

That would be Jesus Christ

JESUS CHRIST is a YEAR????


JESUS H. Christ PC you ARE dumb?


I’m positive whoever wrote that was referencing a calandar year, not your Savior who died on the cross for all your sins. One of which is lying about the CONSTITUTION mentioning the words JESUS CHRIST in the text.

So where is JESUS CHRIST, the alleged Son of God ‘pointed to’ in the ‘text’ of the CONSTITUTION?

you’ve shown me where someone pointed to the year the SEVEN articles were signed.

There is no referece to JESUS CHRIST.
Who do you suppose “the Year of our Lord” was referencing?
 

NotfooledbyW

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
10,814
Reaction score
1,303
Points
245
Who do you suppose “the Year of our Lord” was referencing?
It’s not referencing anyone. It’s referring to the date the seven articles were signed on the ceremonial copy. They didn’t have XEROXING back / they paid a Freemason to do it. He was not religious.

you want to find out why you and PC are idiots? Read the link. The date signed was not on the drafts/texts that were ratified by the delegates.

it’s not part of the Constitution.

PC LIED.

Are you arguing that these four words—"Year of our Lord"—confirms that the Constitution is somehow a Christian document?

read more:

 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
75,316
Reaction score
5,639
Points
1,855
Location
Houston
Who do you suppose “the Year of our Lord” was referencing?
It’s not referencing anyone. It’s referring to the date.

you want to find out why you and PC are idiots? Read this. The date signed was not on the drafts that were ratified by the delegates.

it’s not part of the Constitution.

Are you arguing that these four words—"Year of our Lord"—confirms that the Constitution is somehow a Christian document?

read more:

At this point I can't make any argument because you keep dodging my question.

Which Lord were they talking about exactly?

It's OK, you can say it.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
75,316
Reaction score
5,639
Points
1,855
Location
Houston
It’s not referencing anyone.
Really? They just threw that in for no reason. Hey today is the year of the duck. No real reason or basis for saying that. Sounds kind of stupid. The fact that you can't even bring yourself to admit the truth is why you can't be objective and have a rational discussion.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
75,316
Reaction score
5,639
Points
1,855
Location
Houston
It seems that W is having a hard time acknowledging America's Christian heritage. It would seem to me that having the phrase "the year of the Lord" in the constitution would be an obvious artifact of a Christian heritage. And that admitting that that literally was referencing Jesus Christ as Lord without having to argue that our country was created as a theocracy or the constitution was a Christian document, whatever that means. It was a document that laid out the governance for a nation which was overwhelmingly Christian. So much so that they used the generally accepted convention for writing dates that was used in the overwhelmingly dominant Christian culture which was America.
 

Tom Paine 1949

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Messages
2,021
Reaction score
1,648
Points
1,908
The Constitution’s Article 1 Text does mention pagan “SUNday” and “MOONday”! :eek: But it purposely and intentionally left out any mention of Christ or the Judeo-Christian bible.

I tell you, it’s a godless pagan CONSPIRACY! : )
 
Last edited:

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
70,070
Reaction score
13,918
Points
2,220
Because the secular elite he is carrying water for, is using him to support their anti-Christian bigotry.
Just a reminder Correll that you were asked to provide the source of the above referenced claim about (duped) Reverend Darby’s conclusion that America was not founded as a Christian Nation. I’m confident that you cannot verify how you know a black Christian preacher is nothing other than a duped stooge of white anti-Christian elites, which leads me to conclude that it is very easy for you to lie about a Christian man from the minority black religious community because your advocacy for Christian Nationalism and Supremacy with God in your side leads you to subconsciously believe that your Christian religion is a sufficient shield of the racist motivation to absurdly label Reverend Darby a dupe of Anti-Christian elites as part of your argunent.


Here is a quote by one of your fellow white Christian Nationalists for the record:

The late Jerry Falwell once said, "The idea of separation of church and state was invented by the Devil to keep Christians from running their own country..”

[/URL]



It actually does not hurt my position, even if the majority of Christians disagree with me. THeir opinion does not negate historical facts, such as the massive majority that Christians had at the time of the Founding and for the most of our history.
The correct and proper way to define the nation in which You, me, Jerry Falwell Jr and Reverend Darby is

“Anerica was founded when there was a Protestant Christian majority living on its soil.”

Whats wrong with being factually accurate and precise in your words.

When you say America was founded as a Christian Nation you are saying the white Protestant Christian majority exclusively founded America for the white Christian Protestant majority.

It is wrong and you should know it.



By virtue of you taking exception with the phrase "Christian nation," I think you have. America can be a Christian nation without being a theocracy which is what you are really arguing against.
CONGRATULATIONS to ding: Actually post ed something besides a mindless insult.

See the quote by the late REVEREND Jerry Falwell above. Forgive for not trusting that white Christian Nationalists will not as Falwell makes clear achieve their goal to enable Christians to run their own country.

I do not live in a Christian Nation and I won’t let it happen in my watch by defending the US Constitution in all its secular glory.
Lefties like to pretend it is, to justify their attempts to drive Christians and Christianity from the Public Square.
For the record the Christian share of the US population is in steady decline and it has been for decades and millennials are more solidly secular minded than previous generations.

Which supports my claim.

Also for the record I passionately welcome white Evangelical Christian Nationalists under the absolute spiritual leadership of Bible Holder extraordinaries Donald J Trump to the public square.

We need to see them and debate them in the light of day for what they truly are.
AND you can conflate the vastly more numerous white, Christian, American Nationalists, with that fringe, and thus try to marginalize them, so that you do not have to address their valid concerns or ideas.


Because that is the type of person you are.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
70,070
Reaction score
13,918
Points
2,220
It would be so refreshing to have an honest discussion for once with an advocate for abortion.
.
It would be so refreshing to have an honest discussion for once with an advocate for abortion.
.
- and your purpose for the "discussion" you have not already imposed by your incendiary statements.
To state the obvious; that it is wrong to abort a human life.
To state the obvious; that it is wrong to abort a human life.
but murdering everything else in Garden Earth is ok -
.
View attachment 391463
.
you've not explained how having a vasectomy or using a condom is not the same as an abortion ... fill us in.

That is moronic. Completely moronic.
.
That is moronic. Completely moronic.
but murdering everything else in Garden Earth is ok - you've not explained how having a vasectomy or using a condom is not the same as an abortion ... fill us in.
.
don't be a coward, give it a whirll -
.
View attachment 391758
.
have you your letter from the priest, their permission for your vasectomy ... bing fixed it for himself no different than an abortion.

A sperm is not a human life you fucking moron. A fertilized egg, is. THe sperm by itself, will not grow up and one day have a family of it's own.

The fertilized egg, will. Because it is a human life. A brand new human life, with a lot of growing in front of him or her, but a human never the less.
.

What part of that, is too hard for you to understand?
.
preventative intervention is the same no matter when it occurs - and is the choice made by the individual involved - bing chose abortion for himself while denying the same to others the same as you and your self centric, qualifying motivations intervening against the lives of others you have no legitimacy being involved with.
.
The sperm is not.
you are a joke by using a condom you are preventing a birth. the very purpose of a vasectomy is the prevention of life - your doing nothing more than screaming fire in a packed theatre.

Except it obvious does matter whether the intervention occurs, before the parts come together it is parts that could become something greater if the right chain of events happens,


and later on, it is a human being.
.
Except it obvious does matter whether the intervention occurs, before the parts come together it is parts that could become something greater if the right chain of events happens,
and later on, it is a human being.
.
the line you yourself have drawn is not conciliatory, the intervention is the same result no matter when it occurs - you are nothing more than a disingenuous sociopathic zealot.

at least build and sale your chastity belt you alone have the key for, they will be forever in your debt.

THe line is not one I have drawn, the line is the difference between a human life and not a human life.


YOur denial of this, is you just stonewalling like a troll.
.
THe line is not one I have drawn, the line is the difference between a human life and not a human life.


YOur denial of this, is you just stonewalling like a troll.
.
no, its your making a false issue from the same result - from beginning to end.

you must have no intervention, intercourse but only for the sole purpose you deem as animalistic reproduction whether or not pregnancy is the result for your objection to be valid.

and they will need your approval to make the attempt being certain by your presence no mistakes or loss of fluids occurs.

No, I mustn't. Your words have no weight to them. They are structured as though it is a conclusion with a supporting argument.

But, your claims are empty assertions, with no actual reasons or logic to give them weight.
.
No, I mustn't. Your words have no weight to them. They are structured as though it is a conclusion with a supporting argument.

But, your claims are empty assertions, with no actual reasons or logic to give them weight.
.
you mustn't what - bear witness to their intercourse to preserve whatever may spill from their bedside.

You said I must. I said, NOT.

You went weird, because you cannot support your conclusion. Yet you will hold to it, for reasons you can not, or will not share.
.
You went weird, because you cannot support your conclusion. Yet you will hold to it, for reasons you can not, or will not share.
.
preventative intervention is the same no matter when it occurs - and is the choice made by the individual involved -
the line you yourself have drawn is not conciliatory, the intervention is the same result no matter when it occurs -
no, its your making a false issue from the same result - from beginning to end.
.
my position has been made perfectly clear - your end run is nothing more than sociopathic zealotry.

Yes, your position is clear. It just refuses to recognize that a fertilized egg is different than a sperm cell.

ie, you are delusional.
He's a subversive. He's knows he's making a bullshit argument. But it's the stupidest argument one could make.
.
He's a subversive. He's knows he's making a bullshit argument. But it's the stupidest argument one could make.
Yes, your position is clear. It just refuses to recognize that a fertilized egg is different than a sperm cell.

ie, you are delusional.
.
there is no difference in the end result for any intervention whenever it occurs - bing's vasectomy is the same as an abortion.
.

Your pretense that it is the Christians who are the would be tyrants in our society today, is not fooling anyone. Try again lefty.
.
there is no pretense to recorded history -

View attachment 393049

christianity is a religion of persecution and victimization of the innocent, uninterrupted since the 4th century to the present day - in this country particularly by their vestiture from the beginning in slavery and other brutalities to indigenous and other peoples of meekness made vulnerable to their evil. correll.

1. you keep making that claim. But you do nothing to support it, other than constant repetition. THat is a tacit admission on your part, that you have no real argument.

2. You claim that Christianity is a religious of persecution TODAY, and to support the post a picture from ONE HUNDRED YEARS AGO.... That is you, losing this debate, you anti-Christian bigot.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
70,070
Reaction score
13,918
Points
2,220
America was not founded to be a Christian only nation.
That’s true. Good for you. So why do you support white Protestant Evangelical Christians going around spewing an untrue statement that America was founded as a Christian Nation and is a Christian nation.

I’m not a Christian and I do not live in a Christian Nation. I live a nation where the majority profess to be Christian of one Denomination or another. The majority of them are not clamoring to the world that America was founded as a Christian Nation.

So why are you?

Why are you pushing the lie that "A Christian Nation" translates to "Christian Only Nation"?


Rhetorical Question. We both know why. To justify your anti-Christian bigotry.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
70,070
Reaction score
13,918
Points
2,220
Name one issue where this is important. Because I think that this is not about that, it is about you justifying your anti-Christian bigotry and your racism.
Kindly post specific examples of me expressing anti-Christian bigotry. I’m for pluralism and multiculturalism and that fully applies to Christianity in all forms.


As for me being racist - you are desperate to find coherency but you won’t find it there.

Name one issue today, where whether we believe this nation was founded as a Christian Nation, is important.


You can't. Because it is not. What this is about, is you wanting to marginalize Christians TODAY, because you cannot defend your political positions based on their merits, so you have to invent bullshit reasons to attack the rights of others to engage in political speech.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
70,070
Reaction score
13,918
Points
2,220
It seems that W is having a hard time acknowledging America's Christian heritage. It would seem to me that having the phrase "the year of the Lord" in the constitution would be an obvious artifact of a Christian heritage. And that admitting that that literally was referencing Jesus Christ as Lord without having to argue that our country was created as a theocracy or the constitution was a Christian document, whatever that means. It was a document that laid out the governance for a nation which was overwhelmingly Christian. So much so that they used the generally accepted convention for writing dates that was used in the overwhelmingly dominant Christian culture which was America.

He is playing games with semantics, so that he can try to deny America's Christian Heritage, because he hates it.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
75,316
Reaction score
5,639
Points
1,855
Location
Houston
It would be so refreshing to have an honest discussion for once with an advocate for abortion.
.
It would be so refreshing to have an honest discussion for once with an advocate for abortion.
.
- and your purpose for the "discussion" you have not already imposed by your incendiary statements.
To state the obvious; that it is wrong to abort a human life.
To state the obvious; that it is wrong to abort a human life.
but murdering everything else in Garden Earth is ok -
.
View attachment 391463
.
you've not explained how having a vasectomy or using a condom is not the same as an abortion ... fill us in.

That is moronic. Completely moronic.
.
That is moronic. Completely moronic.
but murdering everything else in Garden Earth is ok - you've not explained how having a vasectomy or using a condom is not the same as an abortion ... fill us in.
.
don't be a coward, give it a whirll -
.
View attachment 391758
.
have you your letter from the priest, their permission for your vasectomy ... bing fixed it for himself no different than an abortion.

A sperm is not a human life you fucking moron. A fertilized egg, is. THe sperm by itself, will not grow up and one day have a family of it's own.

The fertilized egg, will. Because it is a human life. A brand new human life, with a lot of growing in front of him or her, but a human never the less.
.

What part of that, is too hard for you to understand?
.
preventative intervention is the same no matter when it occurs - and is the choice made by the individual involved - bing chose abortion for himself while denying the same to others the same as you and your self centric, qualifying motivations intervening against the lives of others you have no legitimacy being involved with.
.
The sperm is not.
you are a joke by using a condom you are preventing a birth. the very purpose of a vasectomy is the prevention of life - your doing nothing more than screaming fire in a packed theatre.

Except it obvious does matter whether the intervention occurs, before the parts come together it is parts that could become something greater if the right chain of events happens,


and later on, it is a human being.
.
Except it obvious does matter whether the intervention occurs, before the parts come together it is parts that could become something greater if the right chain of events happens,
and later on, it is a human being.
.
the line you yourself have drawn is not conciliatory, the intervention is the same result no matter when it occurs - you are nothing more than a disingenuous sociopathic zealot.

at least build and sale your chastity belt you alone have the key for, they will be forever in your debt.

THe line is not one I have drawn, the line is the difference between a human life and not a human life.


YOur denial of this, is you just stonewalling like a troll.
.
THe line is not one I have drawn, the line is the difference between a human life and not a human life.


YOur denial of this, is you just stonewalling like a troll.
.
no, its your making a false issue from the same result - from beginning to end.

you must have no intervention, intercourse but only for the sole purpose you deem as animalistic reproduction whether or not pregnancy is the result for your objection to be valid.

and they will need your approval to make the attempt being certain by your presence no mistakes or loss of fluids occurs.

No, I mustn't. Your words have no weight to them. They are structured as though it is a conclusion with a supporting argument.

But, your claims are empty assertions, with no actual reasons or logic to give them weight.
.
No, I mustn't. Your words have no weight to them. They are structured as though it is a conclusion with a supporting argument.

But, your claims are empty assertions, with no actual reasons or logic to give them weight.
.
you mustn't what - bear witness to their intercourse to preserve whatever may spill from their bedside.

You said I must. I said, NOT.

You went weird, because you cannot support your conclusion. Yet you will hold to it, for reasons you can not, or will not share.
.
You went weird, because you cannot support your conclusion. Yet you will hold to it, for reasons you can not, or will not share.
.
preventative intervention is the same no matter when it occurs - and is the choice made by the individual involved -
the line you yourself have drawn is not conciliatory, the intervention is the same result no matter when it occurs -
no, its your making a false issue from the same result - from beginning to end.
.
my position has been made perfectly clear - your end run is nothing more than sociopathic zealotry.

Yes, your position is clear. It just refuses to recognize that a fertilized egg is different than a sperm cell.

ie, you are delusional.
He's a subversive. He's knows he's making a bullshit argument. But it's the stupidest argument one could make.
.
He's a subversive. He's knows he's making a bullshit argument. But it's the stupidest argument one could make.
Yes, your position is clear. It just refuses to recognize that a fertilized egg is different than a sperm cell.

ie, you are delusional.
.
there is no difference in the end result for any intervention whenever it occurs - bing's vasectomy is the same as an abortion.
.

Your pretense that it is the Christians who are the would be tyrants in our society today, is not fooling anyone. Try again lefty.
.
there is no pretense to recorded history -

View attachment 393049

christianity is a religion of persecution and victimization of the innocent, uninterrupted since the 4th century to the present day - in this country particularly by their vestiture from the beginning in slavery and other brutalities to indigenous and other peoples of meekness made vulnerable to their evil. correll.

1. you keep making that claim. But you do nothing to support it, other than constant repetition. THat is a tacit admission on your part, that you have no real argument.

2. You claim that Christianity is a religious of persecution TODAY, and to support the post a picture from ONE HUNDRED YEARS AGO.... That is you, losing this debate, you anti-Christian bigot.
Breezewood is on a whole other level.
 

Picaro

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Messages
19,290
Reaction score
4,257
Points
290
Location
Texas
LOL one has to be a completely stupid moron to run around trying to claim Christianity had no bearing on the Constitution or the Federal govt. when most of the colonies were made up of RELIGIOUS DISSENTERS and many states had ESTABLISHED CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS SECTS before AND after ratification in 1789. I say 'nearly' because I don't know if they all had established religions or not, never checked Rhode Island out, or some others, but several did. The last state to strike down its established Congregationalist sect's taxing powers was Massachusetts, in 1833, 44 YEARS after ratification. In fact, the establishment clause itself comes directly from one of the main founding platforms of the Baptist sect; it was invented by Thomas Helwys on 1611, one of the founders. He was burned at the stake for his heresy. None were forced to by the Supreme Court, but changed because of demographics. State support was ended by the 1868, by the support of the totally corrupt Chase Court.
 
Last edited:

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
70,070
Reaction score
13,918
Points
2,220
Nothing like a good argument from the 4th Century to give context to a discussion about ... “Evangelicals & Trump.”

:th_believecrap:

It is all the same thing, an attempt to spin normal political activity as "wrong" because Christians are doing it.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
70,070
Reaction score
13,918
Points
2,220
It would be so refreshing to have an honest discussion for once with an advocate for abortion.
.
It would be so refreshing to have an honest discussion for once with an advocate for abortion.
.
- and your purpose for the "discussion" you have not already imposed by your incendiary statements.
To state the obvious; that it is wrong to abort a human life.
To state the obvious; that it is wrong to abort a human life.
but murdering everything else in Garden Earth is ok -
.
View attachment 391463
.
you've not explained how having a vasectomy or using a condom is not the same as an abortion ... fill us in.

That is moronic. Completely moronic.
.
That is moronic. Completely moronic.
but murdering everything else in Garden Earth is ok - you've not explained how having a vasectomy or using a condom is not the same as an abortion ... fill us in.
.
don't be a coward, give it a whirll -
.
View attachment 391758
.
have you your letter from the priest, their permission for your vasectomy ... bing fixed it for himself no different than an abortion.

A sperm is not a human life you fucking moron. A fertilized egg, is. THe sperm by itself, will not grow up and one day have a family of it's own.

The fertilized egg, will. Because it is a human life. A brand new human life, with a lot of growing in front of him or her, but a human never the less.
.

What part of that, is too hard for you to understand?
.
preventative intervention is the same no matter when it occurs - and is the choice made by the individual involved - bing chose abortion for himself while denying the same to others the same as you and your self centric, qualifying motivations intervening against the lives of others you have no legitimacy being involved with.
.
The sperm is not.
you are a joke by using a condom you are preventing a birth. the very purpose of a vasectomy is the prevention of life - your doing nothing more than screaming fire in a packed theatre.

Except it obvious does matter whether the intervention occurs, before the parts come together it is parts that could become something greater if the right chain of events happens,


and later on, it is a human being.
.
Except it obvious does matter whether the intervention occurs, before the parts come together it is parts that could become something greater if the right chain of events happens,
and later on, it is a human being.
.
the line you yourself have drawn is not conciliatory, the intervention is the same result no matter when it occurs - you are nothing more than a disingenuous sociopathic zealot.

at least build and sale your chastity belt you alone have the key for, they will be forever in your debt.

THe line is not one I have drawn, the line is the difference between a human life and not a human life.


YOur denial of this, is you just stonewalling like a troll.
.
THe line is not one I have drawn, the line is the difference between a human life and not a human life.


YOur denial of this, is you just stonewalling like a troll.
.
no, its your making a false issue from the same result - from beginning to end.

you must have no intervention, intercourse but only for the sole purpose you deem as animalistic reproduction whether or not pregnancy is the result for your objection to be valid.

and they will need your approval to make the attempt being certain by your presence no mistakes or loss of fluids occurs.

No, I mustn't. Your words have no weight to them. They are structured as though it is a conclusion with a supporting argument.

But, your claims are empty assertions, with no actual reasons or logic to give them weight.
.
No, I mustn't. Your words have no weight to them. They are structured as though it is a conclusion with a supporting argument.

But, your claims are empty assertions, with no actual reasons or logic to give them weight.
.
you mustn't what - bear witness to their intercourse to preserve whatever may spill from their bedside.

You said I must. I said, NOT.

You went weird, because you cannot support your conclusion. Yet you will hold to it, for reasons you can not, or will not share.
.
You went weird, because you cannot support your conclusion. Yet you will hold to it, for reasons you can not, or will not share.
.
preventative intervention is the same no matter when it occurs - and is the choice made by the individual involved -
the line you yourself have drawn is not conciliatory, the intervention is the same result no matter when it occurs -
no, its your making a false issue from the same result - from beginning to end.
.
my position has been made perfectly clear - your end run is nothing more than sociopathic zealotry.

Yes, your position is clear. It just refuses to recognize that a fertilized egg is different than a sperm cell.

ie, you are delusional.
He's a subversive. He's knows he's making a bullshit argument. But it's the stupidest argument one could make.
.
He's a subversive. He's knows he's making a bullshit argument. But it's the stupidest argument one could make.
Yes, your position is clear. It just refuses to recognize that a fertilized egg is different than a sperm cell.

ie, you are delusional.
.
there is no difference in the end result for any intervention whenever it occurs - bing's vasectomy is the same as an abortion.
.

Your pretense that it is the Christians who are the would be tyrants in our society today, is not fooling anyone. Try again lefty.
.
there is no pretense to recorded history -

View attachment 393049

christianity is a religion of persecution and victimization of the innocent, uninterrupted since the 4th century to the present day - in this country particularly by their vestiture from the beginning in slavery and other brutalities to indigenous and other peoples of meekness made vulnerable to their evil. correll.

1. you keep making that claim. But you do nothing to support it, other than constant repetition. THat is a tacit admission on your part, that you have no real argument.

2. You claim that Christianity is a religious of persecution TODAY, and to support the post a picture from ONE HUNDRED YEARS AGO.... That is you, losing this debate, you anti-Christian bigot.
Breezewood is on a whole other level.

He is literally pretending that their is no difference between a sperm and a fertilized egg.


He is completely with out a soul.
 

Picaro

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Messages
19,290
Reaction score
4,257
Points
290
Location
Texas
Nothing like a good argument from the 4th Century to give context to a discussion about ... “Evangelicals & Trump.”

:th_believecrap:
.
recorded history for some is ...

the christian bible was written in the 4th century -
.
blah blah blah
.
the forgeries and fallacies of the 4th century is what empowers already corrupt minds. bing - chick.
lol and yet not a single anachronism anywhere in the NT shows up in the texts as being about events in any other time frame than the times it it is supposed to be in, not a single one over how many pages, again? Amazing that some Roman in the 4th Century could pull that off, eh? lol you're a sick man.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top