DOJ Refuses To Comply With House Judiciary Committee Request - 'Willing To Negotiate'

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,076
2,645
Garland refuses to releae information on on-going investigations to the House Judiciary Committee / Oversight Committee.

Instead, the DOT sent the House a letter outlining their defined process in which they would be willing to release only information they chose to.

'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations .'

The DOJ stated there is long-standing (DOJ) policy that allows them to withhold on-going investigation info as well as withhold confirmation of the existence of on-going investigations.


'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations'

Umm, I would not care about proven partisan, weaponized internal policy that says rge DOJ can HIDE information about investigatio s or even HIDE complete investigations from Congress.

That shit needs to end NOW, and Garland and his DOJ,it seems, needs to be educated on tbe definition of 'Oversight', as in COMPLETE OVERSIGHT of the DOJ.

Just like the proven criminal, weaponized FBI, the DOJ is pushing back against any external oversight.

Exactly what the DOJ and FBI need, however, is oversight from an outside entity, not from anyone who was raised, groomed, and elevated from within these proven partisan, weaponized agencies!


 
Garland refuses to releae information on on-going investigations to the House Judiciary Committee / Oversight Committee.

Instead, the DOT sent the House a letter outlining their defined process in which they would be willing to release only information they chose to.

'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations .'

The DOJ stated there is long-standing (DOJ) policy that allows them to withhold on-going investigation info as well as withhold confirmation of the existence of on-going investigations.


'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations'

Umm, I would not care about proven partisan, weaponized internal policy that says rge DOJ can HIDE information about investigatio s or even HIDE complete investigations from Congress.

That shit needs to end NOW, and Garland and his DOJ,it seems, needs to be educated on tbe definition of 'Oversight', as in COMPLETE OVERSIGHT of the DOJ.

Just like the proven criminal, weaponized FBI, the DOJ is pushing back against any external oversight.

Exactly what the DOJ and FBI need, however, is oversight from an outside entity, not from anyone who was raised, groomed, and elevated from within these proven partisan, weaponized agencies!



Sounds like the Trump Administration's DOJ ...
 
True, the DOJ were a bunch of weaponized partisan liberal co-conspiring traitors then, too.

Especially the in Trump DoJ, they had a duty to protect a suspect's privacy ... only a judge can authorize the release of prosecutor's information, and that only if it is relevant to the case at hand, and passes the rules of evidence ... the Mueller Investigation only released information to the public through "charging documents" filed in district court ... there's a principle of law involved and we should all expect all prosecutors to obey, including the top DoJ official ... what's-his-name ...

Ford pardoned Nixon ... it was Republicans who first abused the system in public ... maybe it's Republicans who can fix it ... they control the House, let's see if they even try ...
 
Garland refuses to releae information on on-going investigations to the House Judiciary Committee / Oversight Committee.

Instead, the DOT sent the House a letter outlining their defined process in which they would be willing to release only information they chose to.

'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations .'

The DOJ stated there is long-standing (DOJ) policy that allows them to withhold on-going investigation info as well as withhold confirmation of the existence of on-going investigations.


'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations'

Umm, I would not care about proven partisan, weaponized internal policy that says rge DOJ can HIDE information about investigatio s or even HIDE complete investigations from Congress.

That shit needs to end NOW, and Garland and his DOJ,it seems, needs to be educated on tbe definition of 'Oversight', as in COMPLETE OVERSIGHT of the DOJ.

Just like the proven criminal, weaponized FBI, the DOJ is pushing back against any external oversight.

Exactly what the DOJ and FBI need, however, is oversight from an outside entity, not from anyone who was raised, groomed, and elevated from within these proven partisan, weaponized agencies!


No one is above the law except for the Biden's law departments themselves.
 
Garland refuses to releae information on on-going investigations to the House Judiciary Committee / Oversight Committee.

Instead, the DOT sent the House a letter outlining their defined process in which they would be willing to release only information they chose to.

'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations .'

The DOJ stated there is long-standing (DOJ) policy that allows them to withhold on-going investigation info as well as withhold confirmation of the existence of on-going investigations.


'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations'

Umm, I would not care about proven partisan, weaponized internal policy that says rge DOJ can HIDE information about investigatio s or even HIDE complete investigations from Congress.

That shit needs to end NOW, and Garland and his DOJ,it seems, needs to be educated on tbe definition of 'Oversight', as in COMPLETE OVERSIGHT of the DOJ.

Just like the proven criminal, weaponized FBI, the DOJ is pushing back against any external oversight.

Exactly what the DOJ and FBI need, however, is oversight from an outside entity, not from anyone who was raised, groomed, and elevated from within these proven partisan, weaponized agencies!



You are the one who needs to be educated. The DOJ should not turn over any information on ongoing investigations nor should they confirm or deny. Oversight does not mean that you can interfere in investigations. The term for that is obstruction of justice which is a criminal offense. You may want to engage in criminal acts but the DOJ should not.
 
Garland refuses to releae information on on-going investigations to the House Judiciary Committee / Oversight Committee.

Instead, the DOT sent the House a letter outlining their defined process in which they would be willing to release only information they chose to.

'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations .'

The DOJ stated there is long-standing (DOJ) policy that allows them to withhold on-going investigation info as well as withhold confirmation of the existence of on-going investigations.


'The Justice Department on Friday told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, it would not provide certain information related to its ongoing investigations'

Umm, I would not care about proven partisan, weaponized internal policy that says rge DOJ can HIDE information about investigatio s or even HIDE complete investigations from Congress.

That shit needs to end NOW, and Garland and his DOJ,it seems, needs to be educated on tbe definition of 'Oversight', as in COMPLETE OVERSIGHT of the DOJ.

Just like the proven criminal, weaponized FBI, the DOJ is pushing back against any external oversight.

Exactly what the DOJ and FBI need, however, is oversight from an outside entity, not from anyone who was raised, groomed, and elevated from within these proven partisan, weaponized agencies!


Here's the thing.
Many of those investigations are targeting sitting members of Congress, their financial supporters, and staff.

The intent, of course, is not to "oversee" but to interfere.
 
Here's the thing.
Many of those investigations are targeting sitting members of Congress, their financial supporters, and staff.

You really think Garland is talking about THOSE investigations?

Garland is refusing to share anything on Hunter, Joe, and the partisan weaponized DOJ, FBI, etc...

You can bet on it.
 
You really think Garland is talking about THOSE investigations?

Garland is refusing to share anything on Hunter, Joe, and the partisan weaponized DOJ, FBI, etc...

You can bet on it.
THOSE are the investigations MTG, McCarthy, Hawley and the rest of the traitors care about.

"But Hunter's Dick Pics" is only a distraction.
I see it worked.
 
THOSE are the investigations MTG, McCarthy, Hawley and the rest of the traitors care about.

"But Hunter's Dick Pics" is only a distraction.
I see it worked.
'Dick Picks'?

WTF is wrong with you? Maybe they dostracted YOU...

Among Hunter's crimes for which he is being investigated is acting as a foreign agent for several countries without legally being registeted as one. This involved his influence peddling, laundering Russian Oligarch money, arranging / coordinating meetings and deals that benefitted our enemies and the Biden Family crime syndicate.

Snowflakes like you are some of the biggest treasonous / criminal Democrat sac lickers despite the people you constantly defend repeatedly proving they don't give a damn about you.

You aren't one of them - you never will be.
 
Garland is a Democrat party puppet. He's like the Godfather's consignor.
 
The top law in the country is the DOJ and the FBI, higher than even Congress, which makes them above the law. They can do whatever they want and not be held accountable.
Nope.
The DOJ is an Executive agency.

Didn't you have any civics/U.S. Government classes in school?
I thought it was a requirement.

Here is what you've missed.
Three branches of government.
Executive
Legislative
Judicial
All separate but EQUAL
They serve to check and balance one another

In theory each branch is accountable to the others.

You're welcome.
 
Nope.
The DOJ is an Executive agency.

Didn't you have any civics/U.S. Government classes in school?
I thought it was a requirement.

Here is what you've missed.
Three branches of government.
Executive
Legislative
Judicial
All separate but EQUAL
They serve to check and balance one another

In theory each branch is accountable to the others.

You're welcome.
In theory, yes . With democrats, it's corrupt.
 

Forum List

Back
Top