The OP invited it. WTF is a deep state? Would I be pissed to know the CIA or Homeland Sec is reading my emails .... I'd be mad as hell if Homeland or the CIA read an email from me to a christian aid society in Palestine without a warrant. But since one Hunter "informant" is already outed as a Russian disinformation asset, I would not be at all surprised if the CIA was telling Comer .... get the **** outta natl secruity.
Well, you see it works like this. The Deep State runs the country forever while they set up some patsy for 4 to 8 years such as Biden to take the fall for anything the American people are dissatisfied with. Trump (so it seems) is an enemy of the Deep State but his courage is very rare. When he says "Drain the swamp" and "Make America Great Again" he means to diminish the power of the Deep State/Military-Industrial Complex and give Democracy a chance instead.
***** to the committee if you do not like what they have done or the way they did it. It is certainly not my fault they unknowingly tried to use Russian Trolls or were just to inept with legal accounting forensics to find a connection. Remember, they main Republicans on there are either Republican Lawyers or they used Republican Lawyers, so naturally highly ineffective, even in a committee they control, much less in court actions or referrals, especially referrals not made, as to inept to get the goods.
Not emotional about it at all. But, I certainly do not mind pointing out the futility of people beating their gums over food that is off the table. I openly laugh at the continued attempts to use politically contrived bs proven false or at the very least not supportive to intended action of the partisan making the attempt. I look at it like laugh at it as dumbass kids will be dumbass kids, whining about what they cannot change, as after it's over, it's over.
Not sure what you mean. All the testimony and investigation was done in a Republican controlled committee, in a Republican controlled House, with witnesses and forensic analysis carried out under Republican control and calling. If the Republicans fucked up their attempt to impeach, based on their own witnesses and investigation, they put in the Congressional Record, I do not know what rules you could possibly be talking about. It was your committee, mostly staffed by trumper Republicans. I am pretty sure you are not holding Dems responsible for Republicans being inept.
Trump triggered the deep state, Schumer even acknowledged it:
***** to the committee if you do not like what they have done or the way they did it. It is certainly not my fault they unknowingly tried to use Russian Trolls or were just to inept with legal accounting forensics to find a connection. Remember, they main Republicans on there are either Republican Lawyers or they used Republican Lawyers, so naturally highly ineffective, even in a committee they control, much less in court actions or referrals, especially referrals not made, as to inept to get the goods.
Not emotional about it at all. But, I certainly do not mind pointing out the futility of people beating their gums over food that is off the table. I openly laugh at the continued attempts to use politically contrived bs proven false or at the very least not supportive to intended action of the partisan making the attempt. I look at it like laugh at it as dumbass kids will be dumbass kids, whining about what they cannot change, as after it's over, it's over.
And you don't think the democrats do?
That one won't be over until after he is defeated again in November. Then it will be over.
I'm on topic.You don't think Bill Clinton was on their minds when they went after Trump, do you?
You are lying.Aren't you the guy who recently said, in this very thread, that you read and follow many many news sources across all divides, and basically, nothing gets by you.
I looked for that post and noticed you deleted it......how convenient.........
So where is your link to this "fluff video" you claim exists somewhere?
Here you go:
You are a liar.
You claimed you are on top of the news with access to all kinds of different sources...
the more it talks the less sense it makes.
No more than any since Nixon, and certainly less than Trump.
He still has no chance with the job he's done as president.
The more pertinent question would be: "Are you a bot?"
I see zero evidence of ANY corruption regarding Joe
