- Dec 29, 2008
- 36,342
- 19,249
- 1,905
It ensures that no one will ever come to our borders. We may fuck people up in their nation, but war doesnt come to our lands. Its very unfair, but I wouldnt change a damn thing about it. Life isnt fair.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Does the USA need NATO?
- Thread starter rupol2000
- Start date
Elections are not such a simple thing as it seems to the layman. Any change of power is accompanied by behind-the-scenes struggle and political events.
I didn't express myself exactly, but that doesn't matter. Yes, formally Eisenhower left legally. Khrushchev - no.
Ike wasn't overthrown?
- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,487
- 34,751
- 2,605
You’re an imperialist but don’t know it.It ensures that no one will ever come to our borders. We may fuck people up in their nation, but war doesnt come to our lands. Its very unfair, but I wouldnt change a damn thing about it. Life isnt fair.
- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,487
- 34,751
- 2,605
Yeah we’d be fine with Russian troops and nuclear weapons stationed in Mexico and Canada.Putin is not trying to restore the USSR, but he's dead serious about consolidating Russia's sphere of influence which includes the Ukraine, in his mind.
He has been able to push weak US leaders like Obama and Biden, knowing they only have the fortitude and conviction to respond impotently.
- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,487
- 34,751
- 2,605
What can Europe beat the USA at?Putin generally has no real power, in 2012 he left the post of united Russia, and the presidential power in Russia is weak.
The Kremlin is not recreating the USSR but they are playing on the side of Europe and Europe can beat the USA
No we don't, they need us as does almost every other country. Get our troops home, only keep our military bases that make strategic sense.
Why would Canada and Mexico want Russian troops and nukes? Pretty bizarre.Yeah we’d be fine with Russian troops and nuclear weapons stationed in Mexico and Canada.
Turtlesoup
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2020
- 15,903
- 16,731
- 2,288
Nato is a way for the europeans to much off Americans resources for THEIR defense and as industry that make money off of in other ways.Initially, NATO was created as a legal pretext for the occupation of Europe, the presence of the American military there. Europe was extremely limited in its arms buildup and played no independent role. After Eisenhower was overthrown by the left, the situation began to change, Europe began to strengthen and eventually it got out of control of the United States. Now Europe is openly playing against the United States. Therefore, this block does not make any sense. Europeans will be able to use US military forces against US interests. America must either subjugate Europe back (which, of course, the left-wing fagots will not do), or leave NATO.
If the US leaves NATO, it will be immediately clear who is the boss in the world, since the main forces of NATO are still US troops.
Europe will immediately shut up its filthy mouth
imawhosure
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 9,226
- 2,817
- 360
This thread is crazy, lol. Of course we need to stay in NATO. What, do we think we are just going to stand up to Russia and China by ourselves; especially when the number 1 talking point of Leftists is.........we spend to much on defense!
And just a thought, but follow me here-------------> IF China or Russia were to attack any NATO allies, and we were NOT in NATO, we could NOT legally respond, lol. This is one of the main reasons that FDR could NOT respond to German aggression in WWII! He had to wait until Japan attacked Pearl Harbor! By that time, almost all of Europe was already lost.
NATO is an excellent idea as it deters war! Now, if you suggest that the US should impose more of its will upon it, that is a different question entirely.
And just a thought, but follow me here-------------> IF China or Russia were to attack any NATO allies, and we were NOT in NATO, we could NOT legally respond, lol. This is one of the main reasons that FDR could NOT respond to German aggression in WWII! He had to wait until Japan attacked Pearl Harbor! By that time, almost all of Europe was already lost.
NATO is an excellent idea as it deters war! Now, if you suggest that the US should impose more of its will upon it, that is a different question entirely.
- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,487
- 34,751
- 2,605
Think.Why would Canada and Mexico want Russian troops and nukes? Pretty bizarre.
Article 5 of NATO was invoked by a member nation exactly once. By the US after 9/11. The US benefits form NATO.Initially, NATO was created as a legal pretext for the occupation of Europe, the presence of the American military there. Europe was extremely limited in its arms buildup and played no independent role. After Eisenhower was overthrown by the left, the situation began to change, Europe began to strengthen and eventually it got out of control of the United States. Now Europe is openly playing against the United States. Therefore, this block does not make any sense. Europeans will be able to use US military forces against US interests. America must either subjugate Europe back (which, of course, the left-wing fagots will not do), or leave NATO.
If the US leaves NATO, it will be immediately clear who is the boss in the world, since the main forces of NATO are still US troops.
Europe will immediately shut up its filthy mouth
I give up. Enlighten me.Think.
- Nov 26, 2011
- 123,644
- 57,251
- 2,290
Thank you for your opinion, Comrade Putin.Initially, NATO was created as a legal pretext for the occupation of Europe, the presence of the American military there. Europe was extremely limited in its arms buildup and played no independent role. After Eisenhower was overthrown by the left, the situation began to change, Europe began to strengthen and eventually it got out of control of the United States. Now Europe is openly playing against the United States. Therefore, this block does not make any sense. Europeans will be able to use US military forces against US interests. America must either subjugate Europe back (which, of course, the left-wing fagots will not do), or leave NATO.
If the US leaves NATO, it will be immediately clear who is the boss in the world, since the main forces of NATO are still US troops.
Europe will immediately shut up its filthy mouth
- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,487
- 34,751
- 2,605
Sorry. No time.I give up. Enlighten me.
LOL. Cowardice becomes you.Sorry. No time.
- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,487
- 34,751
- 2,605
Thank you.LOL. Cowardice becomes you.
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Absolute ignorance of history is all you have.Foolishness. Putin isn’t trying to reconstitute the USSR, but that is the talking point the war profiteers love to promote.
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
Which bases are those?No we don't, they need us as does almost every other country. Get our troops home, only keep our military bases that make strategic sense.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 223
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 65
- Views
- 632
- Replies
- 103
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 103
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 761
- Views
- 32K
- Replies
- 146
- Views
- 680
- Poll
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 5
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 12
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8085
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-