Does overturning Roe vs Wade benefit democrats more?

[rightwinger]

Democrats claim that a woman has the right to choose to have an abortion all the way up to nine months. Are you now saying that there is a point where a woman no longer has the right to choose? It would be so easy. But, you can't say it, can you? You claim that a woman has the right to choose to abort a 9 month old fetus and you can't say she doesn't.

If the mothers life is in jeopardy….do you agree to the abortion?

 

[Independentthinker]

If the mothers life is in jeopardy….do you agree to the abortion?

Sure. Do you agree that a woman does not have the right to abort a healthy fetus beyond a certain point?

 

[rightwinger]

Sure. Do you agree that a woman does not have the right to abort a healthy fetus beyond a certain point?

Yes

 

[Frankenstein]

Sure. Do you agree that a woman does not have the right to abort a healthy fetus beyond a certain point?

20 weeks is way to late!

 

[Rigby5]

Then why not write the laws to cover only those situations instead of allowing it right up to birth "for the health of the mother"?

There are infinite possible situations where something may have gone wrong and an abortion become necessary.
You can not "write the laws" to cover everything.
You simply have to recognize that if you are going to trust mother with the rest of the child's life, you have to trust her on whether or not to abort.

 

[Rigby5]

Doesn't actually matter if we hear of them or not because we can force them into a corner where they can't back down from their claim that a woman has the right to choose all the way up to 9 months. They absolutely refuse to deny it.

She does have the only right.
No one else gets any say at all.

 

[Augustine_]

Democrats vastly outspending Republicans on abortion-related advertising

Study suggests progressives believe issue could help mobilise voters in US midterm elections

www.ft.com

Once Roe vs Wade was overturned, the vote then went to states to decide how to manage abortion, if at all.

But instead of electing representatives to make laws, the Left has opted to go directly to the voter via state amendments to codify abortion into the laws of every single state.

To do this, they have outspent their political rivals by 14 times what they have spent. And they are promising a return to Roe vs. Wade.

However, that is a lie. Like in Ohio, the wording will be to allow whatever is needed for the health of the woman. In other words, if the health of the woman, which the term health can be interpreted to be just about anything, will allow for late term abortions if the health of the woman is at stake. So if the woman is depressed about being pregnant, then she can have a late term abortion.

With Roe, at least there were clearly set age restrictions to disallow late term abortions.

This prevents the Left having to fight for late term abortion, something most Americans are appalled at.

The Left truly is evil, but then, the love of money is the root of all evil.

Fighting the billion-dollar abortion industry is no joke.

Maybe this will inspire the right to create resources for women who become pregnant, offering them an alternative to abortion, rather than trying to criminalize them for being pregnant

 

[Rigby5]

Yes

Then you would be wrong.
After 9 months it can still be discovered the fetus has fatal defects, that giving birth would be fatal to the mother, etc.
No one but the mother and her doctor get any say.

 

[Rigby5]

Sure. Do you agree that a woman does not have the right to abort a healthy fetus beyond a certain point?

Wrong.
What if their house burns down and they end up having to live in their car?
That is a perfectly valid reason to abort.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

I find it strange how everything is racist to the lunatic left, but somehow abortion is not. Black Women are less than 10% of the population but are responsible for almost 39% of abortions.

 

[martybegan]

There are infinite possible situations where something may have gone wrong and an abortion become necessary.
You can not "write the laws" to cover everything.
You simply have to recognize that if you are going to trust mother with the rest of the child's life, you have to trust her on whether or not to abort.

Bullshit. Again, if they are soooo rare, why make the laws like they are?

And even in this law the woman has to get a doctor to say her hemmeroids are caused by the pregnancy, which impacts her health, which means the 3rd trimester fetus has to go.

 

[Rigby5]

Sure. Do you agree that a woman does not have the right to abort a healthy fetus beyond a certain point?

Wrong.
Even if the fetus is healthy, there are still many possible reasons to abort, such as the risk threat to the mother.

Here is one such threat, but there are dozens.
{...
Eclampsia is the onset of seizures (convulsions) in a woman with pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that presents with three main features: new onset of high blood pressure, large amounts of protein in the urine or other organ dysfunction, and edema. If left untreated, pre-eclampsia can result in long-term consequences for the mother, namely increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and associated complications. In more severe cases, it may be fatal for both the mother and the fetus.
...}

 

[Rigby5]

I find it strange how everything is racist to the lunatic left, but somehow abortion is not. Black Women are less than 10% of the population but are responsible for almost 39% of abortions.

Those with lower income should have fewer children.
In nature, larger families do better than smaller ones.
But in modern society, it is larger families that are more of an economic burden.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Democrats vastly outspending Republicans on abortion-related advertising

Study suggests progressives believe issue could help mobilise voters in US midterm elections

www.ft.com

Once Roe vs Wade was overturned, the vote then went to states to decide how to manage abortion, if at all.

But instead of electing representatives to make laws, the Left has opted to go directly to the voter via state amendments to codify abortion into the laws of every single state.

To do this, they have outspent their political rivals by 14 times what they have spent. And they are promising a return to Roe vs. Wade.

However, that is a lie. Like in Ohio, the wording will be to allow whatever is needed for the health of the woman. In other words, if the health of the woman, which the term health can be interpreted to be just about anything, will allow for late term abortions if the health of the woman is at stake. So if the woman is depressed about being pregnant, then she can have a late term abortion.

With Roe, at least there were clearly set age restrictions to disallow late term abortions.

This prevents the Left having to fight for late term abortion, something most Americans are appalled at.

The Left truly is evil, but then, the love of money is the root of all evil.

Fighting the billion-dollar abortion industry is no joke.

Does overturning Roe vs Wade benefit democrats more?​

Per usual, the mouth breathers only realize they fucked up after blowing shit up.
Derp…

 

[Rigby5]

Bullshit. Again, if they are soooo rare, why make the laws like they are?

And even in this law the woman has to get a doctor to say her hemmeroids are caused by the pregnancy, which impacts her health, which means the 3rd trimester fetus has to go.

I don't get the point.
How rare something is does not matter.
How serious the risks are does not matter.
You do not have a right to dictate maternal instincts.
If they do not exist for some reason, then no children should likely be born to that person.
You can not create maternal instincts by threats.

 

[martybegan]

I don't get the point.
How rare something is does not matter.
How serious the risks are does not matter.
You do not have a right to dictate maternal instincts.
If they do not exist for some reason, then no children should likely be born to that person.
You can not create maternal instincts by threats.

If the fetus is another life some people think they do, and they vote as well.

Nothing to do with instincts, everything to do with a separate human being being created.

 

[Independentthinker]

Wrong.
Even if the fetus is healthy, there are still many possible reasons to abort, such as the risk threat to the mother.

Here is one such threat, but there are dozens.
{...
Eclampsia is the onset of seizures (convulsions) in a woman with pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that presents with three main features: new onset of high blood pressure, large amounts of protein in the urine or other organ dysfunction, and edema. If left untreated, pre-eclampsia can result in long-term consequences for the mother, namely increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and associated complications. In more severe cases, it may be fatal for both the mother and the fetus.
...}

LOL. You guys say simply that birth itself is a risk to the mother so go ahead and murder a 9 month old fetus.

 

[MinTrut]

Democrats vastly outspending Republicans on abortion-related advertising

Study suggests progressives believe issue could help mobilise voters in US midterm elections

www.ft.com

Once Roe vs Wade was overturned, the vote then went to states to decide how to manage abortion, if at all.

But instead of electing representatives to make laws, the Left has opted to go directly to the voter via state amendments to codify abortion into the laws of every single state.

To do this, they have outspent their political rivals by 14 times what they have spent. And they are promising a return to Roe vs. Wade.

However, that is a lie. Like in Ohio, the wording will be to allow whatever is needed for the health of the woman. In other words, if the health of the woman, which the term health can be interpreted to be just about anything, will allow for late term abortions if the health of the woman is at stake. So if the woman is depressed about being pregnant, then she can have a late term abortion.

With Roe, at least there were clearly set age restrictions to disallow late term abortions.

This prevents the Left having to fight for late term abortion, something most Americans are appalled at.

The Left truly is evil, but then, the love of money is the root of all evil.

Fighting the billion-dollar abortion industry is no joke.

Liberals, not the left.

Liberals despise the left.

But yeah, SCOTUS handed the Democult a HUGE win with that decision.

The political gift that keeps on giving.

 

[whitehall]

I don't know about political parties but the S.C. decision surely benefits the life and liberty of the (rare) unborn kid who escapes the abortionist's knife.

 

[MinTrut]

The bathwater of conservatism thrown out, but the baby saved.

Until the woman can get an out of state abortion that is.