Do members of Team MAGA approve of this?

I don't either.
There was no systemic war crimes from the US side. There were events, but nothing systemic.

The Soviets had them, the Nazis, had them, the Japanese had them.

The Italians aren't worth bothering about.
systemic would mean it was ideological, certainly not true of the US, I was speaking of his internment camps and basing it on what white liberals consider to be war crimes/crimes against humanity today.
 
How about you go fuq yourself? Sniff someone else's ass.

OIP.a0qosIuUOu0w9FPh5f2vPQAAAA
 
systemic would mean it was ideological, certainly not true of the US, I was speaking of his internment camps and basing it on what white liberals consider to be war crimes today.

That wasn't a war crime. That was an unconstitutional clusterfuck based on paranoia and rage. FDR gave into the hysteria on the west coast, he was more of an enabler than an architect.
 

Proposed Iran-U.S. deal would reopen Hormuz strait and lift oil sanctions, Iran state media says​

The U.S. and Iran could reportedly sign a peace deal as soon as Sunday, after Iranian state media said the draft deal included a commitment from the U.S. to lift oil sanctions and a commitment from Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days.

The 14-point document dictates that final negotiations will not begin until the release of half of Iran’s frozen funds, the suspension of Iran’s oil sanctions, and the lifting of the naval blockade, the Mehr News Agency reported.

All American forces would need to withdraw from Iran, and the U.S. and its allies, would need to present reconstruction plans for Iran worth at least $300 billion, according to the report.

A peace deal could be signed in Switzerland as soon as Sunday, Bloomberg reported later on Friday, citing people familiar with the plans. It comes as world leaders gather for the G7 summit, which runs from June 15 to June 17 in Evian, in the French Alps.


Call me crazy, but that doesn't look like 'unconditional surrender' to me.

Trump demands 'unconditional surrender' from Iran as Putin speaks with Iran's president​


Under the proposal Iran is getting half of its frozen assets back plus $300B to fix the damage done to it by the US and Israel. What does the US get FOR THE BILLIONS IT SPENT, THE LIVES LOST, AND THE SOLDIERS INJURED other than an agreement to go back to the status quo of having the Strait open to ships passing through it? You know, the way things were before Don and Bibi got out over their skis.

I'm sure I don't have to remind everyone how critical trump was of the JCPOA, calling it a horrible deal. A deal that also called for the unfreezing of Iranian assets so Iran, in the words of its critics, could fund regional terrorism.

So, how are you guys feeling about this epic failure?

The caveat to this thread being we've reportedly been close to a deal before. 38 times according to Don. So let's not count our chickens..........
I’d prefer unconditional surrender, but I don’t object to this per se
 
That wasn't a war crime. That was an unconstitutional clusterfuck based on paranoia and rage. FDR gave into the hysteria on the west coast, he was more of an enabler than an architect.
ok but that isn't how it works out based on what liberals consider war crimes/crimes against humanity today...ie. it is based on political ideology, let the political opponents of white liberals do to non citizens in this country what FDR did to actual citizens and watch the apoplectic [not to mention apocalyptic] response from white liberals...That is what I was equating berg, and by extension white liberalism, with.
 
15th post
We do every election. People like you are too stupid to vote for them.

You would rather believe liars like Trump.
By your reasoning, along with Obama and his flunkies, I mean successors, a majority of Americans are stupid

But thankfully not as stupid as you think
 
Back
Top Bottom