We won the Iran war! Trump's repetitive statements without an actual win occurring!

They launched two missiles at Diego Garcia which is 2,500 miles from Iran. That brings parts of Europe into range. They just successfully used a two stage rocket to put a satellite into orbit. That same technology is what you need for an intercontinental missile. That type of missile brings most of Europe into range. You would think that Europe would want this regime eliminated way more than us but most of Europe is now led by far left idiots that have let so many muslims into their countries that they'd petrified that if they take up arms against Iran that they'll have uprisings at home!
They tried and failed. Their capability to reach Europe successfully are very low. Here is where they had some power to hit:

1781446572479.webp
 
Is he using the stock market moves following his comments to make money from recent investments? Every potentially market moving remarks he makes has to be viewed in that context.

For example.............

Trump spent thousands on TKO stock while promoting White House UFC event​

President Donald Trump purchased between $15,000 and $50,000 worth of stock in TKO Holding Group, the parent company of UFC and WWE, weeks ahead of a White House UFC event he’s promoted for months.
How many Dems are using inside information to make money on their trades? That's probably ok with you.
 
They tried and failed. Their capability to reach Europe successfully are very low. Here is where they had some power to hit:

View attachment 1269049
That's a huge lie now....


Iran launching those missles shows that they have the capibility now to reach as far as Europe.....

Stop lying.
 
Better than the Obama deal? Are you serious? We gave them pallets of cash and lifted sanctions and they gave us a promise that they wouldn't continue their nuclear program which they immediately reneged on! The Obama deal sucked! Don't know how else to put it! It was a deal put together by naive people who thought if they were nice to Iran then Iran would be nice to us!

I think we both agree that what most of the world would like to see is regime change in Iran. I also think we both agree that putting boots on the ground in Iran to accomplish that would be foolhardy. Iran doesn't have a navy...they don't have an airforce. What they do have is an army. A large one. I think Trump has played this beautifully so far. We're not losing American lives. We're not bogged down like Russia in Ukraine. We control the airspace over Iran. We control the water around Iran. The blockade was a stroke of genius. If Iran can't sell it's oil it can't sustain the IRGC. They're running out of money. If the IRGC won't show up and slaughter protesters then this regime will fall. The people remember the 30,000 protesters that the IRGC murdered a few months ago. If there isn't an armed force doing that the people of Iran WILL take to the streets just like when the Shah was overthrown!

The Iran deal from the Obama admin might not have been great, but it was something. After all the times the US and Israel have claimed that Iran is months, or weeks, away from nukes, having SOME kind of deal seems like an improvement over the status quo. That assumes, of course, that all the fear-mongering about Iran getting nukes was based on reality, rather than being just political rhetoric. And there is currently NO deal, NO oversight at all, so yes, I want to see a new deal that is a clear improvement on the old one.

Iran may not have a navy or air force, yet they are still capable of attacking other countries in the region and making shipping through the Strait of Hormuz dangerous, at best.

The families and friends of the 13 DEAD US SERVICE MEMBERS would disagree with your claim that we aren't losing American lives.

The hope that the Iranian people will overthrow the government is fine, but not something to base a war on. And it's easy to say while living in the US; the people of Iran have a much different reality to try to live with.

We do have some common ground, you are right about that. And I appreciate that you've been civil about our disagreements; thank you for that. I don't think this war has been handled well, but I hope we both get to see the sort of change in Iran that we'd like to see.
 
How many Dems are using inside information to make money on their trades? That's probably ok with you.

I'm not trying to speak for berg, but F all the politicians using their positions to make money from insider information. I'd like to see them all out of office if that sort of insider trading is found. But they keep getting elected, so the voting public doesn't seem to care too much.
 
I'm not trying to speak for berg, but F all the politicians using their positions to make money from insider information. I'd like to see them all out of office if that sort of insider trading is found. But they keep getting elected, so the voting public doesn't seem to care too much.
Well, then it shouldn't be some sort of attack against Republican's, or Trump...Who BTW, doesn't control his portfolio....

But, I agree with you, that insider trading is a scurge on our Congress. It isn't one side or the other. However, it is the height of hypocrisy for liberals to use that as a rhetorical weapon against their opponents while they are involved just as, if not more so.....
 
Better than the Obama deal? Are you serious? We gave them pallets of cash and lifted sanctions and they gave us a promise that they wouldn't continue their nuclear program which they immediately reneged on! The Obama deal sucked! Don't know how else to put it! It was a deal put together by naive people who thought if they were nice to Iran then Iran would be nice to us!

I think we both agree that what most of the world would like to see is regime change in Iran. I also think we both agree that putting boots on the ground in Iran to accomplish that would be foolhardy. Iran doesn't have a navy...they don't have an airforce. What they do have is an army. A large one. I think Trump has played this beautifully so far. We're not losing American lives. We're not bogged down like Russia in Ukraine. We control the airspace over Iran. We control the water around Iran. The blockade was a stroke of genius. If Iran can't sell it's oil it can't sustain the IRGC. They're running out of money. If the IRGC won't show up and slaughter protesters then this regime will fall. The people remember the 30,000 protesters that the IRGC murdered a few months ago. If there isn't an armed force doing that the people of Iran WILL take to the streets just like when the Shah was overthrown!
What a load of misinformed biased bullshit

AI Overview

Iran began reducing its compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in May 2019, exactly one year after the United States unilaterally withdrew from the deal and re-imposed sanctions.

Prior to this date, the International Atomic Energy Agency routinely verified that Iran was adhering to the strict limitations of the Obama-era agreement

Iran negated on the deal after Trump canceled it and imposed new sanctions on Iran.

Trump was the culprit that caused Iran to stop the deal. It had been working until then.

Iran Nuclear Agreement and U.S. Exit Updated July 20, 2018
 
Last edited:
I'm not trying to speak for berg, but F all the politicians using their positions to make money from insider information. I'd like to see them all out of office if that sort of insider trading is found. But they keep getting elected, so the voting public doesn't seem to care too much.
BillionairesforTrumpcomp.webp
 
They tried and failed. Their capability to reach Europe successfully are very low. Here is where they had some power to hit:

View attachment 1269049
I hate to point out the painfully OBVIOUS, Lucky but Iran just targeted Diego Garcia with two missiles! That is 2,500 miles from Iran! Would you like to draw a new circle on your map? Duh?
 
I hate to point out the painfully OBVIOUS, Lucky but Iran just targeted Diego Garcia with two missiles! That is 2,500 miles from Iran! Would you like to draw a new circle on your map? Duh?
But they totally failed as those missiles were seen WAY before they got close to Europe and were intercepted with no absolutely no risk of hitting their target.

That missile send was for show and not with the purpose of hitting anything. À con act
 
But they totally failed as those missiles were seen WAY before they got close to Europe and were intercepted with no absolutely no risk of hitting their target.

That missile send was for show and not with the purpose of hitting anything. À con act
Gee, Lucky...let's think of what happens with a near miss but with a missile tipped with a nuclear warhead! I know you're not the brightest but there really isn't such a thing as a near miss with a nuclear bomb! Duh?
 
But they totally failed as those missiles were seen WAY before they got close to Europe and were intercepted with no absolutely no risk of hitting their target.

That missile send was for show and not with the purpose of hitting anything. À con act
So what do you think the IRGC was "showing", Lucky? Come on little buddy...think about it! You can figure it out if you just take your time! (eye roll)
 
Gee, Lucky...let's think of what happens with a near miss but with a missile tipped with a nuclear warhead! I know you're not the brightest but there really isn't such a thing as a near miss with a nuclear bomb! Duh?
Well again, how does that hurt you and me, being in the U.S.? You still have not answered that question, that I asked many posts ago and repeated repeatedly?

You want me to answer you, but you never answer me!
 
You keep posting these two pictures, Lucky. Are you telling me that Robert Kennedy is a Billionaire? Pete Hegseth? Marco Rubio? Sean Duffy? Do you even think before you post?
They are all rich. They are all millionaires, helping themselves
 
15th post
How many Dems are using inside information to make money on their trades? That's probably ok with you.
He is not just "using" insider information - he factually "creates" insider information and the resulting actions on the stock-market.
That's a hell of a difference.
 
Back
Top Bottom