Trumps New Peace Plan Agreement; It's $298.3 Billion More Than Obama's

Hahahahahaha. True but they know what rape is when they see it, unlike you.
Really? Let's see their report on the UN workers raping women instead of helping them.

They kinda swept that under the rug, huh?
 
Even the Mossad/CIA controlled NY Times reported it, as have numerous other sources. You stick with denial, as Germans denied the Holocaust as it was occurring.
New York Times confirms Israel using dogs to rape
New York times has been anti Jew for quite some time they denied the Holocaust as it was happening you dumb f***...they're a left wing paper for idiots like yourself. The dog raped me 😂😂..... To liwn🤡
 
New York times has been anti Jew for quite some time they denied the Holocaust as it was happening you dumb f***...they're a left wing paper for idiots like yourself. The dog raped me 😂😂..... To liwn🤡
Lol. So dumb. Do you not know who owns them?

They’ve been pro-Zio/Fascist regime as long as you have. Forever!
 
Apparently, you are the only non-zionist on Earth.
Lol. You probably believe that because you live in a bubble of your own making.

I bet you don’t know one prominent Jew who opposes Zionism. Am I right?
 
Lol. So dumb. Do you not know who owns them?

They’ve been pro-Zio/Fascist regime as long as you have. Forever!
They buried the Holocaust as it was happening in their backpages... I prefer not to waste my time with fools like you...the information is for other people

Times reporters may have questioned the credibility of the reports of Jewish extermination, and the reports may have become subsumed by the catastrophic death tolls during the war. They and their editors may have felt that singling out the Jews as a target for extermination may not have had enough relative importance compared to the overall story of the war.

Then there is the impact of Arthur Hays Sulzberger, the CEO, and publisher of the Times. Sulzberger was Jewish. He believed Judaism was a religion and not a race or people – a belief Leff argues impacted his reluctance to emphasize the unique targeting of Jews by Hilter’s regime. Though Sulzberger worked to free some – though not all – of his Jewish relatives living in Europe, his paper never called for a large-scale effort to rescue the Jews enduring the extermination campaign. Could a single newspaper, even one as influential as the Times, have shifted public opinion about the Holocaust sufficiently to impact the government’s response to the Holocaust? We will never know, but the fact remains they chose not to try.

Neither did the United States government. Teaching American History sponsors One Day Seminars on FDR’s response to the Holocaust. Teachers examine primary sources detailing what the U.S. knew about the Nazi campaign against the Jews and why they chose neither to launch a rescue attempt nor bomb the death camps – as some Jewish groups suggested. In one of these seminars, the discussion leader, Dr. David Krugler, asked the teachers to say – if they were comfortable doing so – whether they would have wanted the Allies to bomb the camps had they been a victim. Krugler told us that a Holocaust survivor once attended this seminar. This survivor said he wished the Allies had bombed the camps even if the attack killed him. It would have served as “a moral condemnation of the Nazi’s Final Solution.” That’s the kind of statement too many in the world press were hesitant to put in their newspapers.

Silence in the Storm: The New York Times' Coverage of the Holocaust During WWII - Teaching American History Silence in the Storm: The New York Times' Coverage of the Holocaust During WWII
 
The New York Times reported that part of the deal on the table includes a $300 billion investment fund to help rebuild Iran at the end of the war. The report was published at a time when the Trump administration and Iranian officials are in a standoff over the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global waterway for energy trade, which has prolonged the over three-month-old conflict.


I wonder if it will all be paid in $250 dollar bills on pallets?
Trump's way of thinking:

1780328898965.webp


as such, his $300 raise in costs, which will be paid for by all Americans should not be a big thing, right?
 
15th post
Very small price to pay.

The Greatest Generation is laughing at you, Snowflake.
Liberals are so weak and pathetic which is why our enemies love when they're in power.... They run wild including in our own hemisphere
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom