Disingenuous Republicans forget American political history

[LordBrownTrout]

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was proposed by a Republican and a Democrat.

In the House there were 62 Democrats who voted against it and 23 Republicans.

In the Senate 17 Democrats voted against it with only 2 Republicans opposing it.

LBJ was one of the most Racist President this Country has seen.

The Racist Democrat Party was an obstacle to this legislation just like it was to the Civil Rights Act.

This thread is a LIE and another example of how the Left is ALWAYS trying to erase their RACIST past and rewrite history.

The majority of democrats and republicans voted for the bill. That's why this disingenuous turd does post the vote totals.

47 democrats voted for it in the senate. 30 republicans did.

TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965

Senate Vote #78 in 1965, in the United States Congress.

www.govtrack.us

221 democrats voted for it in the house. 112 republicans did.
TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- Jul 9, 1965

So as you look at the congressional record, you see that more democrats voted for the bill than republicans.

Disingenuous Republicans forget American political history.

Your dishonesty is hurting you here since Democrats had a STRONG majority in the Senate and a significant majority in the House, in the 1963-65 time frame of course their yes vote total will be higher, but YOU left out the percentage of the yes and no votes, here it is from Wikipedia:


By Party

The original House version:[25]

• Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
• Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)

Cloture in the Senate:[26]

• Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
• Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version:[25]

• Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
• Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:[25]

• Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
• Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)

======

I have known this fact for many years, but YOU didn't know......

You have been schooled!

Yeah, in the mid 1960s Congress was infested with Southern Democrats, staunchly opposed to any civil rights legislation.

Now that you fake Republicans are claiming the civil rights mantle - having taken over the racist opposition to equality before the law from Southern Democrats - do you think pointing to history makes you racist dickheads' fierce opposition to the restoration of the Voting Rights Act, after Roberts torched it, any less slimy and racist? After all, there's barely a single Republican vote to be found for that in both the House and the Senate, while Rightarded States are ramping up their disenfranchisement legislation.

You know, dickhead, it's impolite to assume everyone else is as stupid as you are, and too stupid to see through your brazen hypocrisy on top of that.

The democrats today are even more racist than their brethren in the 1960s.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

Johnson was thanked by riots and violence not seen in s hole cities. He couldn't believe what happened.

Are you saying riots in cities are a negative response to a president's policies?

what policies did he create that created the riots?
Hell Joe Biden has more to do with the protests than you will admit.
What policy of the president created Chop?

Tone deafness

It's more of a response to Bidens actions as a Senator

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

You stupid fucking moron!!! OMG!! THIS IS PRICELESS

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was proposed by a Republican and a Democrat.

In the House there were 62 Democrats who voted against it and 23 Republicans.

In the Senate 17 Democrats voted against it with only 2 Republicans opposing it.

LBJ was one of the most Racist President this Country has seen.

The Racist Democrat Party was an obstacle to this legislation just like it was to the Civil Rights Act.

This thread is a LIE and another example of how the Left is ALWAYS trying to erase their RACIST past and rewrite history.

The majority of democrats and republicans voted for the bill. That's why this disingenuous turd does post the vote totals.

47 democrats voted for it in the senate. 30 republicans did.

TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965

Senate Vote #78 in 1965, in the United States Congress.

www.govtrack.us

221 democrats voted for it in the house. 112 republicans did.
TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- Jul 9, 1965

So as you look at the congressional record, you see that more democrats voted for the bill than republicans.

Disingenuous Republicans forget American political history.

Your dishonesty is hurting you here since Democrats had a STRONG majority in the Senate and a significant majority in the House, in the 1963-65 time frame of course their yes vote total will be higher, but YOU left out the percentage of the yes and no votes, here it is from Wikipedia:


By Party

The original House version:[25]

• Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
• Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)

Cloture in the Senate:[26]

• Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
• Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version:[25]

• Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
• Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:[25]

• Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
• Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)

======

I have known this fact for many years, but YOU didn't know......

You have been schooled!

Yeah, in the mid 1960s Congress was infested with Southern Democrats, staunchly opposed to any civil rights legislation.

Now that you fake Republicans are claiming the civil rights mantle - having taken over the racist opposition to equality before the law from Southern Democrats - do you think pointing to history makes you racist dickheads' fierce opposition to the restoration of the Voting Rights Act, after Roberts torched it, any less slimy and racist? After all, there's barely a single Republican vote to be found for that in both the House and the Senate, while Rightarded States are ramping up their disenfranchisement legislation.

I once suspected you had a smidgen of active intelligence.

I see I was wrong. Where did you get this crap?

 

[John T. Ford]

The democrats today are even more racist than their brethren in the 1960s.

I know ....

And, they are also more well funded.

 

[Nosmo King]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

Johnson was thanked by riots and violence not seen in s hole cities. He couldn't believe what happened.

Are you saying riots in cities are a negative response to a president's policies?

what policies did he create that created the riots?
Hell Joe Biden has more to do with the protests than you will admit.
What policy of the president created Chop?

Tone deafness

It's more of a response to Bidens actions as a Senator

Oh! That's rich! I guess presidents get a pass, unless they're Democrats.

You're a brainwashed boob.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

Johnson was thanked by riots and violence not seen in s hole cities. He couldn't believe what happened.

Are you saying riots in cities are a negative response to a president's policies?

what policies did he create that created the riots?
Hell Joe Biden has more to do with the protests than you will admit.
What policy of the president created Chop?

Tone deafness

It's more of a response to Bidens actions as a Senator

Oh! That's rich! I guess presidents get a pass, unless they're Democrats.

You're a brainwashed boob.

After all the protests are because of laws created that police are supposed to enforce Thanks Joe. So exactly what policy has the president created that caused these riots?

‘Lock the S.O.B.s Up’: Joe Biden and the Era of Mass Incarceration (Published 2019)

He now plays down his role overhauling crime laws with segregationist senators in the ’80s and ’90s. That portrayal today is at odds with his actions and rhetoric back then.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

I wonder when IM2 is going to discover it's 2020 ? ...

Maybe one day you'll stop smoking opium and understand that we are talking about lies republicans here repeat daily in 2020. Now remember that it's 2020 when you tell me how the democratic party is the party of slavery.

You do realize that you would not have been born for it not for slavery. Would 13% of the population give their life if it didn't happen? Maybe 2?

I would have been born in Africa. You are a real dumb ass.

You should just move to South Africa, killing whites is encouraged.

These guys would probably welcome him........................

 

[B. Kidd]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

For 2,000 Alex.
What was one of LBJ's favorite words that he used in private?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why are you posting a video of a racist?

Don't avoid the topic. Republicans did not propose voting rights to congress. .

You dopey, uneducated fuckwit!!!

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia

It was held up in the Senate by guess who? "The ****** Bill...I'll have them ******* voting democrat for the next 200 years.... 'Son, when I appoint a ****** (Thurgood Marshall!!!) to the bench, I want everybody to know he's a ******.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

For 2,000 Alex.
What was one of LBJ's favorite words that he used in private?

Was it "en-eye-double-gee-eh"?

 

[B. Kidd]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

For 2,000 Alex.
What was one of LBJ's favorite words that he used in private?

Was it "en-eye-double-gee-eh"?

Close.
Very, very close.
If this was 'Wheel of Fortune', the judges decided that you win!

 

[WTH_Progs?]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

Neat twist, your way of saying material is in short supply. You ever tire of embracing a victim role OP?

 

[Jets]

The issue was North and South, not Democrats vs Republicans. The majority of each party supported the measure in the North and objected to it in the South.

 

[Rye Catcher]

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was proposed by a Republican and a Democrat.

In the House there were 62 Democrats who voted against it and 23 Republicans.

In the Senate 17 Democrats voted against it with only 2 Republicans opposing it.

LBJ was one of the most Racist President this Country has seen.

The Racist Democrat Party was an obstacle to this legislation just like it was to the Civil Rights Act.

This thread is a LIE and another example of how the Left is ALWAYS trying to erase their RACIST past and rewrite history.

The majority of democrats and republicans voted for the bill. That's why this disingenuous turd does post the vote totals.

47 democrats voted for it in the senate. 30 republicans did.

TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965

Senate Vote #78 in 1965, in the United States Congress.

www.govtrack.us

221 democrats voted for it in the house. 112 republicans did.
TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- Jul 9, 1965

So as you look at the congressional record, you see that more democrats voted for the bill than republicans.

Disingenuous Republicans forget American political history.

Your dishonesty is hurting you here since Democrats had a STRONG majority in the Senate and a significant majority in the House, in the 1963-65 time frame of course their yes vote total will be higher, but YOU left out the percentage of the yes and no votes, here it is from Wikipedia:


By Party

The original House version:[25]

• Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
• Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)

Cloture in the Senate:[26]

• Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
• Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version:[25]

• Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
• Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:[25]

• Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
• Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)

======

I have known this fact for many years, but YOU didn't know......

You have been schooled!

Yeah, in the mid 1960s Congress was infested with Southern Democrats, staunchly opposed to any civil rights legislation.

Now that you fake Republicans are claiming the civil rights mantle - having taken over the racist opposition to equality before the law from Southern Democrats - do you think pointing to history makes you racist dickheads' fierce opposition to the restoration of the Voting Rights Act, after Roberts torched it, any less slimy and racist? After all, there's barely a single Republican vote to be found for that in both the House and the Senate, while Rightarded States are ramping up their disenfranchisement legislation.

You know, dickhead, it's impolite to assume everyone else is as stupid as you are, and too stupid to see through your brazen hypocrisy on top of that.

The democrats today are even more racist than their brethren in the 1960s.

You're either a damn liar or dumb as a box of hammers (likely both).

 

[Olde Europe]

[Voting Rights act - support:] By party and region

The House of Representatives: [Aye - Nay][27]

Southern Democrats: 8–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)

The Senate: [Aye - Nay][27]

Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)​

So, Southern Republicans unanimously opposed the CRA.

Southern Democrats overwhelmingly opposed the CRA.

Northern Democrats supported the CRA at a higher rate than did Northern Republicans.

These days, Republicans mostly think Loving v. Virginia was wrongly decided, as was Lawrence v. Texas, as was Obergefell v. Hodges, the CRA and VRA should never have happened, and the Civil War was won by the wrong side and the losing side of treasonous slavers should be continued to be honored, for that's their treasured heritage.

And then they don the Civil Rights mantle. With that threadbare mantle, and a ton of lipstick, that swine is still a swine.

 

[IM2]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

Neat twist, your way of saying material is in short supply. You ever tire of embracing a victim role OP?

What I tired of are dumb ass whites repeating rush limbaugh bullshit. So you consider the use of the word victimhood the next time you or another inbred starts crying about anti white racism.

 

[B. Kidd]

This is not a republican. And republicans had presidents before this one. But they did nothing.

President Johnson's March 15, 1965 Voting Rights Speech to Congress

Neat twist, your way of saying material is in short supply. You ever tire of embracing a victim role OP?

What I tired of are dumb ass whites repeating rush limbaugh bullshit. So you consider the use of the word victimhood the next time you or another inbred starts crying about anti white racism.

You're shakier than a one-legged Arapahoe!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The issue was North and South, not Democrats vs Republicans. The majority of each party supported the measure in the North and objected to it in the South.

actually the south predominantly democrat kept a Republican off the presidential ballot in 1860

 

[Rye Catcher]

Why are you posting a video of a racist?

Don't avoid the topic. Republicans did not propose voting rights to congress. .

True believers will never think outside the box of ignorance.

Is that your excuse ?

Being a liberal is tantamount to being a scientist, being a faux conservative is exactly like being a sheep.