Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

[The Original Tree]

1 John 2:22

21 I have not written to you because you lack knowledge of the truth, but because you have it, and because no lie comes from the truth. 22 Who is the liar, if it is not the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, who denies the Father and the Son. 23 Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father, but whoever confesses the Son has the Father also.

Whatever makes you happy in your little world, you go ahead and believe that. Any other thought or truth would only hurt your feelings.

Was this addresses to me?

Did you read the message quoted and did you post it? Think for once.

Nah, you just don't make sense. Exactly what are your trying to say?

That you have a selective and false memory about what you have posted. Remember, I said you should actually think, for once.

Not sure what you are asking me.

 

[Catman51]

Whatever makes you happy in your little world, you go ahead and believe that. Any other thought or truth would only hurt your feelings.

Was this addresses to me?

Did you read the message quoted and did you post it? Think for once.

Nah, you just don't make sense. Exactly what are your trying to say?

That you have a selective and false memory about what you have posted. Remember, I said you should actually think, for once.

Not sure what you are asking me.

So you display comprehension problems also.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

There is no such thing as "sin". How childish.

 

[GreatestIam]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

There is no such thing as "sin". How childish.

heck your dictionary.

What is childish is not being able to think in an analogical way.

Sin is to theology what crime is to philosophy and if you cannot speak to one without the other in mind, you did not really want to speak to the issue in the first place and should have just hut up and moved on.

Regards
DL

 

[GreatestIam]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

How Adam will "educate himself" knowing what is good and what is bad? Because the tree was of knowledge of good and bad, it was not knowledge of mathematics or astronomy.

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

You better talk in singular and about yourself, because knowledge kills no one. And if knowledge "kills" you, then might be because your deep ignorance.

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

Who told you that Adam and Eve had no other knowledge? Your 4 years old son can use the cell for making calls and can walk naked in the street at the same time. He might not see any inconvenience walking outside that way, but he surely knows to use the TV remote control.

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

In this part you seem to be correct.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

That is a silly interpretation of theirs.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

In the bible sin is defined as disobedience to God, then, how it can be that God have sinned? Your thoughts are showing lack of reading comprehension, you better re-read the bible, with understanding at this time... please.

Or perhaps is such innate ignorance of yours because you prohibited yourself eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge... lol

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

Well, that is your opinion.

Not you neither I were there, so we just discuss about a case that has been closed years ago.

If you have any doubts of the judgement made on Eve, then you can ask for opening the case and provide new evidence or witness.

Thanks for the usual mean spirited Christian reply.

I will just leave it there for all to see just how ignorant and brain dead your ilk are.

Regards
DL

 

[Catman51]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

There is no such thing as "sin". How childish.

Sin, as is religion and philosophy, a man made construct to control others. If you do your so called analysis and come to any other conclusion you are deceiving yourself and have drunk the Kool-Aid..

heck your dictionary.

What is childish is not being able to think in an analogical way.

Sin is to theology what crime is to philosophy and if you cannot speak to one without the other in mind, you did not really want to speak to the issue in the first place and should have just hut up and moved on.

Regards
DL

 

[Catman51]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

How Adam will "educate himself" knowing what is good and what is bad? Because the tree was of knowledge of good and bad, it was not knowledge of mathematics or astronomy.

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

You better talk in singular and about yourself, because knowledge kills no one. And if knowledge "kills" you, then might be because your deep ignorance.

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

Who told you that Adam and Eve had no other knowledge? Your 4 years old son can use the cell for making calls and can walk naked in the street at the same time. He might not see any inconvenience walking outside that way, but he surely knows to use the TV remote control.

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

In this part you seem to be correct.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

That is a silly interpretation of theirs.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

In the bible sin is defined as disobedience to God, then, how it can be that God have sinned? Your thoughts are showing lack of reading comprehension, you better re-read the bible, with understanding at this time... please.

Or perhaps is such innate ignorance of yours because you prohibited yourself eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge... lol

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

Well, that is your opinion.

Not you neither I were there, so we just discuss about a case that has been closed years ago.

If you have any doubts of the judgement made on Eve, then you can ask for opening the case and provide new evidence or witness.

Thanks for the usual mean spirited Christian reply.

I will just leave it there for all to see just how ignorant and brain dead your ilk are.

Regards
DL

More projection of your own limitations onto others in an attempt to raise yourself up. You must be at the bottom to use this tactic.

 

[GreatestIam]

There is a lot of animosity and aggression displayed in these threads. It hardly seems appropriate in the context.

When you have no way of actually doing decent apologetics for a genocidal god, all you get is inquisitions and jihads lovers who would rather kill than try to form decent moral arguments.

Here is the root of the garbage Christian attitude.

**Whenever a man believes that he has the exact truth from God, there is in that man no spirit of compromise. He has not the modesty born of the imperfections of human nature; he has the arrogance of theological certainty and the tyranny born of ignorant assurance. Believing himself to be the slave of God, he imitates his master, and of all tyrants the worst is a slave in power-Robert Green Ingersoll

Regards
DL

 

[GreatestIam]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

You are supposedly a Gnostic Christian, right? I mean that's what you claim, right?

Gnostic Christians believe the material world is evil, so I am really struggling to reconcile your beliefs with your OP.

Maybe you are a subversive trying to subordinate religion, eh?

This guy totally nails you.

I have answered your claim before, but as usual, you do not seem to read what is given you.

Then again, your agenda is to troll. Not learn.

Back on ignore now since you did not touch the O.P.

Regards
DL

 

[GreatestIam]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

I thought god was responsible for everything?

Not to Christians, or so it seems.

They and the bible blame Adam, even while they sing the opposite.

Christians are confused on this issue.

Regards
DL

All religious folks are confused.

All the supernatural god believers, true.

Those religions that put man above god are way more intelligent and are not usually confused.

Confusion, intelligent people can work through with help.

What you are seeing is belligerence and obtuseness.

Theists do not want to know the truth. That is why most have been sold on the idea that a genocidal god can somehow be a good god.

Regards
DL

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sin is to theology what crime is to philosophy

No it isn't. Sin is a magical religious idea. And settle down, I called the idea of "sin" childish, not you.

 

[GreatestIam]

Sin is to theology what crime is to philosophy

No it isn't. Sin is a magical religious idea. And settle down, I called the idea of "sin" childish, not you.

I am old, feisty and cranky and do not know if I was on a roll or not when I answered you.

If it was after my comment to a troll, I may have been touchy. Apologies.

I see both theology and philosophy as seeking the best rules and laws to live by.
Sure, the former often posits some god or other. I see that as the same as philosophers seeking the ideal set of laws.

In the ancient days, theology and philosophy were connected at the hip. Hence the tension between church and state.

Do you know what they called crimes back then and if it was synonymous with sin?

I think crime is a more modern word but could not find the dating on either term.

Regards
DL

 

[Crepitus]

Like

Those religions that put man above god are way more intelligent and are not usually confused.

What?

The only one I am aware of is Buddhism.

 

[ding]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

You are supposedly a Gnostic Christian, right? I mean that's what you claim, right?

Gnostic Christians believe the material world is evil, so I am really struggling to reconcile your beliefs with your OP.

Maybe you are a subversive trying to subordinate religion, eh?

This guy totally nails you.

I have answered your claim before, but as usual, you do not seem to read what is given you.

Then again, your agenda is to troll. Not learn.

Back on ignore now since you did not touch the O.P.

Regards
DL

Your answers, like your OP, doesn't make any sense.

 

[GreatestIam]

Like

Those religions that put man above god are way more intelligent and are not usually confused.

What?

The only one I am aware of is Buddhism.

A good example that is second only to Gnostic Christianity. I see the Phrases in Judaism do so as well.

Their end of Judaism is where Jesus in scriptures asks, have ye forgotten that ye are gods and children of the most high?

The Hindu might also qualify because if you ask them who their god is they will laugh as they have many many gods.

Regards
DL

 

[GreatestIam]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

You are supposedly a Gnostic Christian, right? I mean that's what you claim, right?

Gnostic Christians believe the material world is evil, so I am really struggling to reconcile your beliefs with your OP.

Maybe you are a subversive trying to subordinate religion, eh?

This guy totally nails you.

I have answered your claim before, but as usual, you do not seem to read what is given you.

Then again, your agenda is to troll. Not learn.

Back on ignore now since you did not touch the O.P.

Regards
DL

Your answers, like your OP, doesn't make any sense.

Because you are way above my pay scale.

Regards
DL

 

[ding]

Did sin enter the world through Adam, Satan or Yahweh?

Most, as well as scriptures, say that it was through Adam, even though Christians sing that Adam’s sin was a happy fault and necessary to Yahweh’s plan.

Given the necessity, Adam, from that, may not be the culpable one and his punishment would be unjust.

Satan had already sinned in heaven before being cast into Eden.

It can be truthfully said that she was the first sinner on earth if we ignore Yahweh.

Further, would you say that Eve sinned, given that Satan or the talking serpent deceived her?

That deception would take lies, and that is a sin, and that sin also preceded Adam’s sin.

Many do not see what the serpent says as a lie, which complicates things.

Was the initial sin, regardless of who did it, a happy fault and necessary to god’s plan like Christians sing in their Exultet hymn?

Did Yahweh lie when he told Adam that he would die if he educated himself with the knowledge in the Tree of Knowledge?

Why and how does knowledge kill us?

If it does, should we keep our children as blind to it as Adam and Eve initially were?

The Eden myth can get quite complicated, especially when Christians call it a fall, then say it was necessary so as not to derail Yahweh’s plan.

This last being what the Jews wrote into their myth and which they say is not the Original Sin of the Christian interpretation, but more like the Original virtue that the Jews call it.

The opposite of what Christianity says, if you ignore their happy fault view.

In terms of first sin, I see Yahweh, since sin was necessary to him as the first sinner, followed by Satan, Yahweh’s loyal opposition and teacher of humankind, and then Adam.

Why Eve at the end of Genesis 3 has to then be second class to Adam, --- he shall rule over you, --- would seem like Yahweh punishing the wrong party.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

You are supposedly a Gnostic Christian, right? I mean that's what you claim, right?

Gnostic Christians believe the material world is evil, so I am really struggling to reconcile your beliefs with your OP.

Maybe you are a subversive trying to subordinate religion, eh?

This guy totally nails you.

I have answered your claim before, but as usual, you do not seem to read what is given you.

Then again, your agenda is to troll. Not learn.

Back on ignore now since you did not touch the O.P.

Regards
DL

Your answers, like your OP, doesn't make any sense.

Because you are way above my pay scale.

Regards
DL

You got that straight.

 

[Crepitus]

Like

Those religions that put man above god are way more intelligent and are not usually confused.

What?

The only one I am aware of is Buddhism.

A good example that is second only to Gnostic Christianity. I see the Phrases in Judaism do so as well.

Their end of Judaism is where Jesus in scriptures asks, have ye forgotten that ye are gods and children of the most high?

The Hindu might also qualify because if you ask them who their god is they will laugh as they have many many gods.

Regards
DL

Yeah, none of those put humans above gods.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you know what they called crimes back then and if it was synonymous with sin?

I think there were probably several words and still are. But "sin" is a magical concept defined not by reasoned moral or ethical arguments, but rather by allegedly divine dictation from books from a more ignorant, primitive time.

 

[norwegen]

Like

Those religions that put man above god are way more intelligent and are not usually confused.

What?

The only one I am aware of is Buddhism.

A good example that is second only to Gnostic Christianity. I see the Phrases in Judaism do so as well.

Their end of Judaism is where Jesus in scriptures asks, have ye forgotten that ye are gods and children of the most high?

The Hindu might also qualify because if you ask them who their god is they will laugh as they have many many gods.

Regards
DL

Human beings are not deities. In the divine council, or the upper echelons of the temple hierarchy (i.e., in the heavens), the ruling elite ruled unjustly, favoring the wicked (Ps 82:1-2). Asaph is crying out for God to rise up and subdue these princes (Ps 82:6-7). Jesus addresses the same sorts of people (Jn 10:34).

Claiming authority as voices of God doesn't make them righteous; not when Asaph wrote his psalm and not when John wrote his gospel.