Democrats Are Stepping In It Again.....But Will They Pay A Heavy Price For This Latest Hoax?

[Bobob]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

It would seem that the Democrats believe now that they have found an infallible means for assuring protection from criminal investigation! What they cannot outright block through stalling and delays (such as with Benghazi and Emailgate) they can shield from by employing actors into elections. Hillary a crook? Run her for office! Biden a crook? Put him on the ballet! Dems think this guarantees now any efforts to investigate Biden's family's criminal behavior can be written off as election tampering! All the while they endlessly tamper with the election! Even better now they hope to seal the deal by making it look official with an impeachment investigation-- -- -- -- what, like the fifth time they've held designs on THAT?

View attachment 281287

And once this too falls flat in both the media, the public opinion and Senate, once Biden becomes the front runner and loses to Trump next year, they'll circle back to claiming, what ~~ ~~ ~~ ELECTION TAMPERING! That Biden only lost because Trump had undue influence and help in muddying the waters from, you guessed it: those invisible Russians! And start an all new special investigation again.

View attachment 281288

You have distorted the facts. Biden's son was not nor is he under investigation. The company he worked for was being investigated,

Sorry, Boob, take your crock and shove it. No one is buying what you are selling. Mudwhistle has already stated the matter very well, so I'll simply quote him:
"Maybe you should try reading the transcripts instead of listening to parodies pushed forward by lying Democrats.
The Ukrainians have been trying to give the FBI the evidence that Biden himself has admitted to....evidence of corruption that not only implicates Biden and his son, but other's.
All Trump is trying to do is get to the bottom of it and the Democrats are trying to keep the truth from coming out.
So they manufacture another Russian Collusion scandal....only this time it involved Ukraine.....but the really strange thing is Mueller knew about this crap over 2 years ago when he started his investigation.....and arrest Paul Manafort over it. Kicked down his doors and rifled through his computers and all of his shit. Threw him in jail over this same scandal."

Biden's going down.
He will never be president of the USA. Maybe Ukraine.

I don't care whether he goes down or up. My post was only to correct the errors.
UPDATE 1-Ukraine agency says allegations against Burisma ...

https://www.reuters.com › usa-trump-whistleblower-ukraine-burisma › upd..

 

[Bobob]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

It would seem that the Democrats believe now that they have found an infallible means for assuring protection from criminal investigation! What they cannot outright block through stalling and delays (such as with Benghazi and Emailgate) they can shield from by employing actors into elections. Hillary a crook? Run her for office! Biden a crook? Put him on the ballet! Dems think this guarantees now any efforts to investigate Biden's family's criminal behavior can be written off as election tampering! All the while they endlessly tamper with the election! Even better now they hope to seal the deal by making it look official with an impeachment investigation-- -- -- -- what, like the fifth time they've held designs on THAT?

View attachment 281287

And once this too falls flat in both the media, the public opinion and Senate, once Biden becomes the front runner and loses to Trump next year, they'll circle back to claiming, what ~~ ~~ ~~ ELECTION TAMPERING! That Biden only lost because Trump had undue influence and help in muddying the waters from, you guessed it: those invisible Russians! And start an all new special investigation again.

View attachment 281288

You have distorted the facts. Biden's son was not nor is he under investigation. The company he worked for was being investigated,
not Biden's son. What Trump did was to withhold aid first to Ukraine in an effort to force the newly elected leader to do Trump's dirty work and then called the new president of Ukraine.
This guy has his hands full as he tries to govern and Trump, as usual, threw a wrench into those efforts with his illegal and bogus claims. He sent Giuliani, who represents only Trump and who is worthless.
Our allies are watching Trump's action of withholding aid to force a country to do what he wants. He could do that to them.
The statement released was doctored and was put into a security account to avoid disclosure. Stop believing what this con-man is foisting on the uninformed supporters.
Oh, and by the way, Biden's son was released from the army for snorting cocaine. How many of Trump's base have snorted cocaine
and have not been caught? Just another of Trump's nonsense.

I'm very informed on this issue....yet you read me fairy-tales created by the media.
Come back when you have some facts.

Unfortunately, you are misinformed.
UPDATE 1-Ukraine agency says allegations against Burisma ...

https://www.reuters.com › usa-trump-whistleblower-ukraine-burisma › upd..


I guess that Reuters is doing the selling. Trump, as usual, is selling his nonsense and his uninformed, uneducated base is buying. A real-life con-man, yes?

 

[Bobob]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

It would seem that the Democrats believe now that they have found an infallible means for assuring protection from criminal investigation! What they cannot outright block through stalling and delays (such as with Benghazi and Emailgate) they can shield from by employing actors into elections. Hillary a crook? Run her for office! Biden a crook? Put him on the ballet! Dems think this guarantees now any efforts to investigate Biden's family's criminal behavior can be written off as election tampering! All the while they endlessly tamper with the election! Even better now they hope to seal the deal by making it look official with an impeachment investigation-- -- -- -- what, like the fifth time they've held designs on THAT?

View attachment 281287

And once this too falls flat in both the media, the public opinion and Senate, once Biden becomes the front runner and loses to Trump next year, they'll circle back to claiming, what ~~ ~~ ~~ ELECTION TAMPERING! That Biden only lost because Trump had undue influence and help in muddying the waters from, you guessed it: those invisible Russians! And start an all new special investigation again.

View attachment 281288

You have distorted the facts. Biden's son was not nor is he under investigation. The company he worked for was being investigated,
not Biden's son. What Trump did was to withhold aid first to Ukraine in an effort to force the newly elected leader to do Trump's dirty work and then called the new president of Ukraine.
This guy has his hands full as he tries to govern and Trump, as usual, threw a wrench into those efforts with his illegal and bogus claims. He sent Giuliani, who represents only Trump and who is worthless.
Our allies are watching Trump's action of withholding aid to force a country to do what he wants. He could do that to them.
The statement released was doctored and was put into a security account to avoid disclosure. Stop believing what this con-man is foisting on the uninformed supporters.
Oh, and by the way, Biden's son was released from the army for snorting cocaine. How many of Trump's base have snorted cocaine
and have not been caught? Just another of Trump's nonsense.

The facts are funny. Oh

 

[rightwinger]

Splain this to me: how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for Trump to use the power of the presidency to extort dirt for his own political gain? How is this not a,toss abuse of power?

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Read the Constitution

Congress has oversight over the President

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

But you don’t mind when it applies to Trump

 

[Camp]

Keywords for our President are now "disgrace and hoax". He is actually both.

 

[The Original Tree]

Splain this to me: how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for Trump to use the power of the presidency to extort dirt for his own political gain? How is this not a,toss abuse of power?

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Read the Constitution

Congress has oversight over the President

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

But you don’t mind when it applies to Trump

Actually they don't have Oversight over The President.

We have three co-equal branches

Their only oversight is to monitor The President's actions with regards to agencies and changes to policies, for which they can pass legislation to alter or stop executive actions that occur within The Executive Branch.

Congressional Oversight of The Executive Branch does not mean they have Full Access to Executive Branch privileged communications, or Constitutional Authority of The President to engage in private conversations with heads of state about trade, aide, and law enforcement matters.

 

[toobfreak]

Splain this to me: how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for Trump to use the power of the presidency to extort dirt for his own political gain? How is this not a,toss abuse of power?

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

Unethical?

Unethical?

Unethical?

Unethical?

Unethical?

Apparently unethical is just OK, fine, and not a crime!

 

[iceberg]

they have not yet.

russia
kavanaugh
now this

how often do people get proven how full of shit they are before others stop stepping in it?

 

[Camp]

What exactly is the hoax about Trump soliciting an illegal campaign contribution from a foreign government?

 

[rightwinger]

Splain this to me: how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for Trump to use the power of the presidency to extort dirt for his own political gain? How is this not a,toss abuse of power?

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Read the Constitution

Congress has oversight over the President

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

But you don’t min

What exactly is the hoax about Trump soliciting an illegal campaign contribution from a foreign government?

What Republicans like to call fake news

Any news they find uncomfortable

 

[The Original Tree]

Keywords for our President are now "disgrace and hoax". He is actually both.

Whatever you say, Mr. Gender Dysphoria.

What's Joe Biden now that he actually Extorted Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his corrupt drug addict son who was taking money from The Ukrainian-Russian Mob, and there was documented action that The Ukraine did exactly what Joe Biden Bragged about and Extorted The Ukraine in to doing?

 

[Camp]

Keywords for our President are now "disgrace and hoax". He is actually both.

Whatever you say, Mr. Gender Dysphoria.

What's Joe Biden now that he actually Extorted Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his corrupt drug addict son who was taking money from The Ukrainian-Russian Mob, and there was documented action that The Ukraine did exactly what Joe Biden Bragged about and Extorted The Ukraine in to doing?

You are just a sucker for Trump defection nonsense. You believe anything that compulsive serial malicious habitual liar tells you.

 

[The Original Tree]

Splain this to me: how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for Trump to use the power of the presidency to extort dirt for his own political gain? How is this not a,toss abuse of power?

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Read the Constitution

Congress has oversight over the President

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

But you don’t min

What exactly is the hoax about Trump soliciting an illegal campaign contribution from a foreign government?

What Republicans like to call fake news

Any news they find uncomfortable

We have a Treaty with The Ukraine for cooperation between our countries in law enforcement and investigative matters.

Joe Biden's Corrupt Drug Addict Son was taking money ($84,000 a month) from The Ukrainian-Russian Mob, and Joe Biden Extorted The Ukraine in to firing The Prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden's relationship with The Ukrainian-Russian Mob, and the money he accepted from them, and The Ukraine did indeed knuckle under to Biden's Extortion.

Joe and Hunter Biden needs to release transcripts of all phone calls, emails and correspondence with The Ukraine now.

Also note, Hillary Clinton also asked The Ukraine to help her defeat Donald Trump during The 2016 election and that needs investigated and we need all communications regarding that.

 

[The Original Tree]

Keywords for our President are now "disgrace and hoax". He is actually both.

Whatever you say, Mr. Gender Dysphoria.

What's Joe Biden now that he actually Extorted Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was investigating his corrupt drug addict son who was taking money from The Ukrainian-Russian Mob, and there was documented action that The Ukraine did exactly what Joe Biden Bragged about and Extorted The Ukraine in to doing?

You are just a sucker for Trump defection nonsense. You believe anything that compulsive serial malicious habitual liar tells you.

Just stating ACTUAL FACTS, and you are running scared and deflecting.

When is Joe Biden going to produce documents, emails, and transcripts of phone calls he had with his son and The Ukraine?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

The time has come for Trump. His days of in your face obstruction is over.

You're not allowed to speak about white people since you've never walked in our shoes.

 

[The Original Tree]

BURISMA btw is directly linked to The Ukrainia - Russian Mob

 

[Nosmo King]

Splain this to me: how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for Trump to use the power of the presidency to extort dirt for his own political gain? How is this not a,toss abuse of power?

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Read the Constitution

Congress has oversight over the President

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

But you don’t mind when it applies to Trump

Actually they don't have Oversight over The President.

We have three co-equal branches

Their only oversight is to monitor The President's actions with regards to agencies and changes to policies, for which they can pass legislation to alter or stop executive actions that occur within The Executive Branch.

Congressional Oversight of The Executive Branch does not mean they have Full Access to Executive Branch privileged communications, or Constitutional Authority of The President to engage in private conversations with heads of state about trade, aide, and law enforcement matters.

How can you defend the constitution wh n you have never read it?

You hide behind the second amanedment without understanding it. You def no a lawless president with ABSOLUTELY NO KNOWLEDGE of the system of checks and balances.

You donyappreciate the concept of co-equal branches of government.

Your education was inadequate to participate in any debate on American governance.

 

[The Original Tree]

Splain this to me: how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for Trump to use the power of the presidency to extort dirt for his own political gain? How is this not a,toss abuse of power?

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Read the Constitution

Congress has oversight over the President

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

But you don’t mind when it applies to Trump

Actually they don't have Oversight over The President.

We have three co-equal branches

Their only oversight is to monitor The President's actions with regards to agencies and changes to policies, for which they can pass legislation to alter or stop executive actions that occur within The Executive Branch.

Congressional Oversight of The Executive Branch does not mean they have Full Access to Executive Branch privileged communications, or Constitutional Authority of The President to engage in private conversations with heads of state about trade, aide, and law enforcement matters.

How can you defend the constitution wh n you have never read it?

You hide behind the second amanedment without understanding it. You def no a lawless president with ABSOLUTELY NO KNOWLEDGE of the system of checks and balances.

You donyappreciate the concept of co-equal branches of government.

Your education was inadequate to participate in any debate on American governance.

I graduated Suma with a 4.0, two Science degrees and a minor in American History.

 

[Nosmo King]

Splain this to me: how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for Trump to use the power of the presidency to extort dirt for his own political gain? How is this not a,toss abuse of power?

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Read the Constitution

Congress has oversight over the President

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

But you don’t mind when it applies to Trump

Actually they don't have Oversight over The President.

We have three co-equal branches

Their only oversight is to monitor The President's actions with regards to agencies and changes to policies, for which they can pass legislation to alter or stop executive actions that occur within The Executive Branch.

Congressional Oversight of The Executive Branch does not mean they have Full Access to Executive Branch privileged communications, or Constitutional Authority of The President to engage in private conversations with heads of state about trade, aide, and law enforcement matters.

How can you defend the constitution wh n you have never read it?

You hide behind the second amanedment without understanding it. You def no a lawless president with ABSOLUTELY NO KNOWLEDGE of the system of checks and balances.

You donyappreciate the concept of co-equal branches of government.

Your education was inadequate to participate in any debate on American governance.

I graduated Suma with a 4.0, two Science degrees and a minor in American History.

Then you should know hat the House of Representatives has a constitutional obligation to serve as a check on amlawless president. They have the authority and the power to investigate and, if necessary, deliver articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial and, if found guilty, the removal of a,president from office.

 

[Cosmos]

One might also ask how is it proper, ethical, LEGAL for the House Judiciary Committee to spend an entire session of Congress to throw dirt on the President in an attempt to unseat him? How is that not an abuse of power?

Read the Constitution

Congress has oversight over the President

Using his official position to pressure another country to gather dirt on an opponent is unethical

But you don’t mind when it applies to Trump

Actually they don't have Oversight over The President.

We have three co-equal branches

Their only oversight is to monitor The President's actions with regards to agencies and changes to policies, for which they can pass legislation to alter or stop executive actions that occur within The Executive Branch.

Congressional Oversight of The Executive Branch does not mean they have Full Access to Executive Branch privileged communications, or Constitutional Authority of The President to engage in private conversations with heads of state about trade, aide, and law enforcement matters.

How can you defend the constitution wh n you have never read it?

You hide behind the second amanedment without understanding it. You def no a lawless president with ABSOLUTELY NO KNOWLEDGE of the system of checks and balances.

You donyappreciate the concept of co-equal branches of government.

Your education was inadequate to participate in any debate on American governance.

I graduated Suma with a 4.0, two Science degrees and a minor in American History.

Then you should know hat the House of Representatives has a constitutional obligation to serve as a check on amlawless president. They have the authority and the power to investigate and, if necessary, deliver articles of impeachment to the Senate for trial and, if found guilty, the removal of a,president from office.

HAHAHAHAHHAHA!! Is that what you think Nadler and Schiff are doing?