Democrats Are Stepping In It Again.....But Will They Pay A Heavy Price For This Latest Hoax?

[B. Kidd]

Meh. Another day, another coup

This coup they HAVE to make stick.
Otherwise, they're going down, down, down.

 

[Nosmo King]

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Trump didn't say anything about the election because he knew already that Biden was toast and that the public would demand the Bidens be investigated for their criminal action. Joe will keep his big mouth shut after this.

Trump knew that Biden was toast? Really? That's what you're going with?

 

[Nosmo King]

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Is it okay to ask a foreign leader to dig up dirt on political opponents? It's a 'yes' or 'no' question.

It;s OK if Democrat senators do it apparently. So, yes.

When did that happen in your narrow world of whataboutism?

 

[Mac1958]

If the Dems don't come up with some real meat here, they really should just shut the fuck up and figure out a decent ticket for 2020.

Enough already.

 

[B. Kidd]

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Trump didn't say anything about the election because he knew already that Biden was toast and that the public would demand the Bidens be investigated for their criminal action. Joe will keep his big mouth shut after this.

He should but he won't. He muttered something to Jimmy Kimmel last night using abuse of power and Trump's name in the same phrase.
QUID PRO JOE should already know that abuse of power is the highest bar to try to prove in an impeachment. I'm sure he does.
That's why he took license to publicly brag about his own bribery concerning his son.

 

[B. Kidd]

Do they really think all this nonsense is going to help them in November 2020? It's like the lunatics are running the asylum that is the Democratic Party. Which according to some, is losing members and donors. I wouldn't think the independent voters are too thrilled with what the House Dems are doing, and quite frankly I hope it costs them dearly in the next election.

They are laying the groundwork to lose.
When soft coup 2.0 shakes out, the infallible Pelosi will rue the day when she allowed the 'squat squad's to run things.

 

[K9Buck]

To answer the question in the title thread, no, I don't believe there will be a "heavy" price to pay for the Democrats. Half of America supports the concept of a leftist oligarchy controlling the nation and unlimited corruption by those who run it. They want a socialist, welfare state with a significantly lowered standard of living.

 

[B. Kidd]

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Is it okay to ask a foreign leader to dig up dirt on political opponents? It's a 'yes' or 'no' question.

I don't recall Trump using the phrase 'dig up dirt'.
Does anyone else?

 

[K9Buck]

Is it okay to ask a foreign leader to dig up dirt on political opponents? It's a 'yes' or 'no' question.

Is it ok to ask a foreign leader to look into possible malfeasance by a former government official?

 

[Hossfly]

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Trump didn't say anything about the election because he knew already that Biden was toast and that the public would demand the Bidens be investigated for their criminal action. Joe will keep his big mouth shut after this.

Trump knew that Biden was toast? Really? That's what you're going with?

Joe's lead in the Dem race is gone. He will soon be done.

 

[mudwhistle]

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Is it okay to ask a foreign leader to dig up dirt on political opponents? It's a 'yes' or 'no' question.

I don't recall Trump using the phrase 'dig up dirt'.
Does anyone else?

He never did....most of what they said at the hearing was a fabrication.....and everything they say on the news is more of the same kind of rubbish.

 

[mudwhistle]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

Well, they are leaving tomorrow on a 2 week recess to sell their bullshit to their constituents (and the MSM).

So much for urgency....

So they come back from their 6 week vacation and this is what they hatch?

I bet that they were plotting this BS the whole time.

 

[B. Kidd]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

Well, they are leaving tomorrow on a 2 week recess to sell their bullshit to their constituents (and the MSM).

So much for urgency....

So they come back from their 6 week vacation and this is what they hatch?

I bet that they were plotting this BS the whole time.

Their underwritten insurance policy to depose Trump became a 'go' in July when the Mueller report did not find Russian collusion.

 

[22lcidw]

Over and over and over....You cross this line...You die! They succeeded so many times in the past. Usually on the first try with their fabricated accusations or making something massive out of the trivial. Then cam Trump! He just tells them to "Blow it out their azzes"!

 

[toobfreak]

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Is it okay to ask a foreign leader to dig up dirt on political opponents? It's a 'yes' or 'no' question.

The answer is both Yes and No:

• Yes, it is OK to investigate criminal activity, even when that criminal is the current Democratic Front-runner.
• No, it was NOT OK for Hillary and the DNC to use foreign connections to manufacture a fraudulent dossier against Trump hoping to eliminate him.

OBAMA was up to his big, floppy ears in crime.
HILLARY was a career criminal.
Now the democrats have dug up their latest crook, Biden. It won't fly.

 

[mudwhistle]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

Well, they are leaving tomorrow on a 2 week recess to sell their bullshit to their constituents (and the MSM).

So much for urgency....

So they come back from their 6 week vacation and this is what they hatch?

I bet that they were plotting this BS the whole time.

Their underwritten insurance policy to depose Trump became a 'go' in July when the Mueller report did not find Russian collusion.

There has been at least 5 other fake insurance policies since Mueller blew up in their faces.
The only reason anybody gives a flying fuck about this is because the media covers it and gives it a feeling of legitimacy.
However......as with all of the other hoaxes....this is just more of the same.

 

[rightwinger]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

Trump has dug himself a hole

Hard to get out

 

[rightwinger]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

Trump has dug himself a hole

Hard to get out

 

[toobfreak]

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

JUST CURIOUS:

How is it an impeachable offense and treason again for Trump to want to simply look into how and why Biden and his kid were admittedly dealing billions under the table for personal gain with a foreign government and covering it up,

Yet it is the solemn constitutional duty of the democrats to try everything they can to thwart Trump, from wiretapping him, planting spies, conspiring against him, trying to block his even getting on the ballot and yes, using foreign influence to try to dig up dirt and manufacture charges against him???
​

I'd love for one of you Tards to 'Splain that to me!

 

[toobfreak]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:
"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.
A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

Trump has dug himself a hole
Hard to get out

The Democrats have dug all the holes, enough to give a gopher wet dreams.
Trump has walked away from every one of them laughing.