Democrats Are Stepping In It Again.....But Will They Pay A Heavy Price For This Latest Hoax?

[mudwhistle]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Meh. Another day, another coup

 

[Augustine_]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html


http://...naI/C2zWONjg4SDLmPUDJGOdEd5/mypJJXJvljJJcI//Z

^

 

[task0778]

Do they really think all this nonsense is going to help them in November 2020? It's like the lunatics are running the asylum that is the Democratic Party. Which according to some, is losing members and donors. I wouldn't think the independent voters are too thrilled with what the House Dems are doing, and quite frankly I hope it costs them dearly in the next election.

 

[mudwhistle]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html


http://...naI/C2zWONjg4SDLmPUDJGOdEd5/mypJJXJvljJJcI//Z

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

 

[LaDairis]

Why not just pass a law???

It is ILLEGAL to TELL THE TRUTH about DEMOCRAT PARTY CORRUPTION.


Hence, to investigate Hunter Biden would then be truly illegal...

 

[toobfreak]

Do they really think all this nonsense is going to help them in November 2020? It's like the lunatics are running the asylum that is the Democratic Party. Which according to some, is losing members and donors. I wouldn't think the independent voters are too thrilled with what the House Dems are doing, and quite frankly I hope it costs them dearly in the next election.

If Trump is in trouble, Biden will not escape | News, Sports, Jobs - Fairmont Sentinel

Bring it on.

 

[Hossfly]

The Dimocraps are espousing the fantasy that Trump's phone call to the Ukrainian President was to interfere in the 2020 election. I read the call was to make the disgraceful cocaine addict Hunter Biden the object of a money laundering scheme.Old Joe's name was brought up only to find out if he strong armed the former President. Nothing was said that would make Old Joe the target other than to see if he broke the law. Nothing was said about the election. Pencil Neck Schiff screwed the pooch again.

 

[toobfreak]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

It would seem that the Democrats believe now that they have found an infallible means for assuring protection from criminal investigation! What they cannot outright block through stalling and delays (such as with Benghazi and Emailgate) they can shield from by employing actors into elections. Hillary a crook? Run her for office! Biden a crook? Put him on the ballet! Dems think this guarantees now any efforts to investigate Biden's family's criminal behavior can be written off as election tampering! All the while they endlessly tamper with the election! Even better now they hope to seal the deal by making it look official with an impeachment investigation-- -- -- -- what, like the fifth time they've held designs on THAT?

And once this too falls flat in both the media, the public opinion and Senate, once Biden becomes the front runner and loses to Trump next year, they'll circle back to claiming, what ~~ ~~ ~~ ELECTION TAMPERING! That Biden only lost because Trump had undue influence and help in muddying the waters from, you guessed it: those invisible Russians! And start an all new special investigation again.

 

[IM2]

The time has come for Trump. His days of in your face obstruction is over.

 

[Nosmo King]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html


http://...naI/C2zWONjg4SDLmPUDJGOdEd5/mypJJXJvljJJcI//Z

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

 

[Hossfly]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html


http://...naI/C2zWONjg4SDLmPUDJGOdEd5/mypJJXJvljJJcI//Z

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

 

[Meathead]

The time has come for Trump. His days of in your face obstruction is over.

Again?! You'll get your reparations money before that happens. LOL

 

[Nosmo King]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html


http://...naI/C2zWONjg4SDLmPUDJGOdEd5/mypJJXJvljJJcI//Z

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

 

[Meathead]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html


http://...naI/C2zWONjg4SDLmPUDJGOdEd5/mypJJXJvljJJcI//Z

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

 

[Nosmo King]

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Is it okay to ask a foreign leader to dig up dirt on political opponents? It's a 'yes' or 'no' question.

 

[Hossfly]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html


http://...naI/C2zWONjg4SDLmPUDJGOdEd5/mypJJXJvljJJcI//Z

^

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Trump didn't say anything about the election because he knew already that Biden was toast and that the public would demand the Bidens be investigated for their criminal action. Joe will keep his big mouth shut after this.

 

[Meathead]

Clearly you're a dimwit.
The only reason Democrats are doing this is because they think the media still has credibility with the public.
Only 15% trusts the media now.
So this hoax will blow up in their faces like all of the other hoaxes.
This is a typical Clinton tactic.....accuse your opponent of the crimes you're about to be charged with or exposed on.

Thenreason they're doing this is because Trump asked a foreign leader to dig up dirt on one of his political opponents.

Should a president extort another leader to do his political dirty work?. This is collusion out in the open.

Amazingly, those who once championed law and order are now championing a president to act lawlessly and never ever be held to account.

The political opponent bullshit is just that: Bullshit.

I have heard from just about every news source that Joe Biden is running for president in 2020 and doing rather well.

Where's the bullshit?

Is it okay to ask a foreign leader to dig up dirt on political opponents? It's a 'yes' or 'no' question.

It;s OK if Democrat senators do it apparently. So, yes.

 

[Dick Foster]

Do they really think all this nonsense is going to help them in November 2020? It's like the lunatics are running the asylum that is the Democratic Party. Which according to some, is losing members and donors. I wouldn't think the independent voters are too thrilled with what the House Dems are doing, and quite frankly I hope it costs them dearly in the next election.

I think it's going to cost them their slim majority in the house, maybe enough seats in the senate to give the republicans a super majority and a landslide so big for the Whitehouse that they won't even get close enogh to sniff it.
It very well may be the end of the democratic party which will be replaced by another saner alternative.
They've clearly gone off the deep end. All of their chips are on the table now and they're holding no cards and hoping to work a bluff but no one's gonna buy it. They've got nothing.

 

[B. Kidd]

Yet again.....all of the faggots in the news are pushing a false story about Trump abusing his authority.....but the facts about the story are being dropped in response quicker than they may have anticipated. Now their only hope is that enough people buy their usual line of Bullshit and ignore the facts involved:

"It seems to me this is going to go one of two ways, and rather quickly:

One would be that the contents of the transcript and the whistleblower complaint are explosive and damning, and it will be just a matter of Democrats getting their ducks in a row before they vote to impeach.

The second would be the one that seems more likely: The transcript doesn’t come anywhere near the outrageous outrage we’re being told it is, and the whistleblower complaint is pretty quickly shown to be lacking credibility. In this scenario, Democrats have got themselves in quite a fix because they already went ahead and launched an impeachment inquiry before seeing either one.

It won’t be long before we know. The transcript will be public today, and it sounds like Congress could have the whistleblower complaint as soon as Friday, along with another little surprise:

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president.​

TRENDING: Herman Reacts To President Trump's Phone Call

The official did not identify the name of the rival candidate. Separately, a senior administration official told Fox News the White House has been working as quickly as it can to release to Congress the whistleblower complaint involving President Trump’s conversations with the leader of Ukraine, as long as it’s legally possible.​

. . .

A senior administration official told Fox News there are a “few words” in the transcript that will raise eyebrows, but it is nowhere near as inflammatory as Democrats have suggested.​

Understand, the inspector general is not a political appointee, so when he finds that the whistleblower was influenced by political bias, that’s not just some Trump lackey hurling a smear. It’s the inspector general’s job to objectively assess complaints like this, as well as the credibility of the person making them.

Assuming the transcript offers nothing beyond those “few words” that “raise eyebrows,” we’ll be left in the days to come with Democrats howling about not having received the full complaint yet, and insisting it must be the product of a coverup.

In the meantime, the administration is doing all the i-dotting and t-crossing that’s necessary to make sure the release of the complaint is handled legally, and soon enough Congress will have what it’s demanding. So what happens if it turns out the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call and only reported things he or she heard secondhand, can’t actually produce any information to back up the claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine giving them military aid?

I don’t think the Democrats will drop impeachment right away because, having rushed into it so furiously in the past few days, it would be humiliating for them to do so – especially after the way the Mueller investigation blew up in their faces. Instead, they’ll proceed with their oh-so-serious inquiries, calling witnesses, demanding documents and complaining constantly that they aren’t getting enough cooperation.

Remember, one of the most disruptive powers a House majority has is the power to endlessly investigate pretty much whatever they want. In somber and serious tones they assert that this, that or whatever is of urgently great importance to the nation, and that they must do their duty and get to the bottom of it."

Links

After Condemning Trump's Ukraine Call, New Report Exposes Mitt's Ties to Hunter's Company

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nes_torches_vaunted_whistleblower_report.html

Well, they are leaving tomorrow on a 2 week recess to sell their bullshit to their constituents (and the MSM).

So much for urgency....