Dem Governor Appoints Male Transvestite to Lead Committee on Women

And the bottom line still remains that a transgender person does not TRULY become the opposite gender just because they think they feel like it (what man really knows what a woman feels like?), because of what I pointed out. If a straight man becomes a woman, he becomes a homosexual woman. To say otherwise it to admit it's not real.
The bottom line is that you have some bizarre and ill informed ideas about gender and sexuality that reflects your own insecurities and doubts . You can't just accept people for who and what they are because they threaten your preconceived ideas about what they should be
 
Correction. You deal with your alt- reality born of fear and ignorance . You see "complicated " as convoluted because you lack the intellectual capacity to grasp the intricacies of gender identity and are blinded but your own fears and insecurities.

Nope, I see fetishists and leftards trying to do the old "1984 Party" concept of collective reality.
 
The bottom line is that you have some bizarre and ill informed ideas about gender and sexuality that reflects your own insecurities and doubts . You can't just accept people for who and what they are because they threaten your preconceived ideas about what they should be
Can a man truly become a woman in every way such that he is no longer identified as a trans woman, but just a woman? I have seen nothing from you that even addresses the consequences of the belief. Like I said, if a man completely becomes a woman, his sexual orientation has changed as well. To simultaneously claim that he is completely and totally a woman but that his orientation has not changed is a contradiction.

If he was a straight man and now is in every way a woman, he is a lesbian. You have not dealt with that. Instead, you are trying to make it about me, and that has never worked.
 
If you place a potato in the microwave and press pizza, when it comes out it is still a potato.
If someone literally and totally becomes the opposite gender, there would be no need to put "trans" in front of anything to do with them. He would not be a trans woman, he would be a woman, full stop.

One final note, we keep hearing that a man can "feel like a woman". How does he know how a woman feels? He has no context in which to decide that. All he really knows is he feels like something is wrong in his own body.
 
So is a male transvestite a male or a female? It's all so confusing
 
Can a man truly become a woman in every way such that he is no longer identified as a trans woman, but just a woman? I have seen nothing from you that even addresses the consequences of the belief. Like I said, if a man completely becomes a woman, his sexual orientation has changed as well. To simultaneously claim that he is completely and totally a woman but that his orientation has not changed is a contradiction.

If he was a straight man and now is in every way a woman, he is a lesbian. You have not dealt with that. Instead, you are trying to make it about me, and that has never worked.
Got news for you. It is about you. You have a pathological obsession with putting a label on people to denote their sexuality and gender identity. And you do it so that you can toot your own horn and stupidly claim that sexual orientation can be changed. . What seems to be lost on you is the fact we are talking about human beings who are what they are and do what they do and it is not for you-or anyone else -to decide what they should be called.
 
Got news for you. It is about you. You have a pathological obsession with putting a label on people to denote their sexuality and gender identity. And you do it so that you can toot your own horn and stupidly claim that sexual orientation can be changed. . What seems to be lost on you is the fact we are talking about human beings who are what they are and do what they do and it is not for you-or anyone else -to decide what they should be called.

So why can they force me to pretend something they are not?
 
Got news for you. It is about you. You have a pathological obsession with putting a label on people to denote their sexuality and gender identity. And you do it so that you can toot your own horn and stupidly claim that sexual orientation can be changed. . What seems to be lost on you is the fact we are talking about human beings who are what they are and do what they do and it is not for you-or anyone else -to decide what they should be called.
Actually, it is for us to decide what we are going to call someone. No one has bothered to even explain how:

1. A man or a woman knows how the opposite gender actually feels, how they think. They can't, they can only mimic what THEY believe the opposite gender feels and thinks.
2. A man or a woman literally becomes completely and totally the opposite gender when all they did was claim to be and altered their appearance.
3. If a person LITERALLY and COMPLETELY becomes the opposite gender, that their sexual preference does not switch between homo and heterosexual. Is that orientation mysteriously prevented from changing, thus rendering the claim that they actually became something they are not null and void? Think, someone claims to be a woman, totally and completely. They like other women. Are they a lesbian? Apparently not if they are a complete woman, but used to be a man, but didn't switch preferences, but can't be distinguished in any way from other women. Do you not see the contradiction in what you are claiming?
4. If a person LITERALLY and COMPLETELY becomes the opposite gender, why do they cling to the title "trans"? Should they not drop it and just claim to be the gender they want to be?
 
Actually, it is for us to decide what we are going to call someone. No one has bothered to even explain how:

1. A man or a woman knows how the opposite gender actually feels, how they think. They can't, they can only mimic what THEY believe the opposite gender feels and thinks.
2. A man or a woman literally becomes completely and totally the opposite gender when all they did was claim to be and altered their appearance.
3. If a person LITERALLY and COMPLETELY becomes the opposite gender, that their sexual preference does not switch between homo and heterosexual. Is that orientation mysteriously prevented from changing, thus rendering the claim that they actually became something they are not null and void? Think, someone claims to be a woman, totally and completely. They like other women. Are they a lesbian? Apparently not if they are a complete woman, but used to be a man, but didn't switch preferences, but can't be distinguished in any way from other women. Do you not see the contradiction in what you are claiming?
4. If a person LITERALLY and COMPLETELY becomes the opposite gender, why do they cling to the title "trans"? Should they not drop it and just claim to be the gender they want to be?
Holy shit on a shingle, Dude!! That is quite an unhinged rant ! Have you considered anger management? You might want to talk to someone to help you figure out why you’re so triggered by this topic. I appears that your problem , in part , is that you believe that being trans is a simple matter of a person pretending to be- or imagining themselves to be the opposite gender. The fact is that it is far more complex than that and not everyone is clearly male or female biologically. Likewise, there is more to sexual orientation that being either straight or gay. However, you seem to be highly threatened by the fact that not everything or every body is what they seem to be and thus not easily labeled. Your ridged and concrete thought process doesn’t allow you to easily deal with these nuances and thus you bug out when confronted with such complexities . Ooops, Sorry. There I go making it about you again
 
Holy shit on a shingle, Dude!! That is quite an unhinged rant ! Have you considered anger management? You might want to talk to someone to help you figure out why you’re so triggered by this topic. I appears that your problem , in part , is that you believe that being trans is a simple matter of a person pretending to be- or imagining themselves to be the opposite gender. The fact is that it is far more complex than that and not everyone is clearly male or female biologically.
Unless you can prove that the majority of those transitioning fall into that category, it's irrelevant. There are a very small number of people globally that are such.
Likewise, there is more to sexual orientation that being either straight or gay.
I'm talking about straight vs gay. What's in between is irrelevant. You haven't answered the question, is a heterosexual man who becomes a woman straight or a lesbian? Is a gay man who becomes a woman straight or a lesbian?
However, you seem to be highly threatened by the fact that not everything or every body is what they seem to be and thus not easily labeled. Your ridged and concrete thought process doesn’t allow you to easily deal with these nuances and thus you bug out when confronted with such complexities . Ooops, Sorry. There I go making it about you again
That's exactly what you're trying to do. Now, would you care to address what I've brought up?

1. How can a man or a woman really know how the opposite gender feels? Answer, they can't.
2. IF you insist that there is no difference between a trans woman and a bio woman, why can we not affix the correct labels straight vs lesbian without you flipping out and saying 'Nuh-uh'?
3. IF you insist that there is no difference between a trans woman and a bio woman, why are you still using the label trans? Would it not make more sense to just drop it and call them a woman? To hold to the label trans is to differentiate.
 
I'm talking about straight vs gay. What's in between is irrelevant. You haven't answered the question, is a heterosexual man who becomes a woman straight or a lesbian? Is a gay man who becomes a woman straight or a lesbian?
No , you're obsession with labels is irrelevant . People are who they are and it is not for you to decide how they define themselves . And your are still =dishonestly-using this issue regarding trans people to suggest that a cisgender persons sexual orientation can change, Is there something wrong with you? Never mind.
 
Unless you can prove that the majority of those transitioning fall into that category, it's irrelevant. There are a very small number of people globally that are such.

I'm talking about straight vs gay. What's in between is irrelevant. You haven't answered the question, is a heterosexual man who becomes a woman straight or a lesbian? Is a gay man who becomes a woman straight or a lesbian?

That's exactly what you're trying to do. Now, would you care to address what I've brought up?

1. How can a man or a woman really know how the opposite gender feels? Answer, they can't.
2. IF you insist that there is no difference between a trans woman and a bio woman, why can we not affix the correct labels straight vs lesbian without you flipping out and saying 'Nuh-uh'?
3. IF you insist that there is no difference between a trans woman and a bio woman, why are you still using the label trans? Would it not make more sense to just drop it and call them a woman? To hold to the label trans is to differentiate.
I am not using labels . You are. Get over it , I stand by my assessment of you , Get help
 
15th post
And you haven't addressed the issues I've brought up.
You mean your made up bullshit issue that a man who is attracted to women, and then transitions to being a woman and still is attracted to women has changed their sexual orientation ? Do you mean the issue where you then used that codswallop to imply that sexual orientation is not immutable ? I most certainly did address that and called it out as the logical fallacy that it is.
 
You mean your made up bullshit issue that a man who is attracted to women, and then transitions to being a woman and still is attracted to women has changed their sexual orientation ? Do you mean the issue where you then used that codswallop to imply that sexual orientation is not immutable ? I most certainly did address that and called it out as the logical fallacy that it is.
Does a man who transitions to a woman literally and completely become a woman in every way? Let's start there. I have prefaced my points with that condition.
 
Does a man who transitions to a woman literally and completely become a woman in every way? Let's start there. I have prefaced my points with that condition.
First of all, to be clear, it’s a stupid question. The answer is obvious. No she does not completely become a woman in every way. She will not have a uterus or ovaries, although she may have the hormones and some genetic markers of a cis gender women, Keep in mind that not all cisgender women have all of the same working parts. , but they are still women

What is also obvious is why you’re doing this. It’s a pathetic and pathological ploy to diminish disparage and diminish the trans women as not real women. For the record, I never said that trans women are just like Cis women- you made that shit up. I said that trans women are real women. Not the same thing, although I doubt that you will be able to grasp that subtly. They are real in that they Identify as, and live as women and have the right to recognized as women by others.

I have to say again, there is something seriously wrong with anyone who obsesses about the gender identity or sexuality of others and cannot just accept for who and what they are. You really need to examine what you are so freaked out about trans people

I have about HADIT with you bullshit
 
IMG_2463.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom