And . . . here is why California will Have a Republican in the Governor's Mansion next Year

[Seymour Flops]

Good format for this issue. One by one, each candidate is asked about the issue of boys in girls sports.

Here is what I heard, but I acknowledge I have a strong bias. You are welcome to listen for yourself:

Steve Hilton (Rep) – Frontrunner Former Brit

Opposes the California law requiring boys to be allowed to be on girls teams and in girls locker rooms. Believes it violates the California Constitution.

Chad Bianco (Rep) – 2nd Runner

Strongly in favor of protecting girls. A coach who understands the difference between male and female athletes. Will never allow an 18 year old man to strip down in front of 14 year old girls in a girls locker room.

Katie Porter (Dem) 3rd runner now that she engineered the ouster of Swalwell

Leads with “governing body rules.” Moves to word salad then says she supports current California law requiring boys in girls sports.

Unknown old white man who wore sneakers to the interview but didn’t get CG. (Dem, I guess)

Trans kids will kill themselves if they can’t play girls sports, so the girls are not what’s important.

Matt Mahan (Dem) Also Ran so far.

Thinks it is “disgusting” to oppose males in girls sports (so most Californians disgust him). Tells his soccer playing daughter “I can imagine a scenario where she ends up in a game and there’s a transgender athlete born a boy who . . . I could imagine that being unfair . . . but I also think that we are allowing ourselves to evolve to a point where blah, blah, blah"

Then he punts to the NCAA (which is the governing body for college sports) as Porter started to.

Xavier Becerra (Dem) Used to be an important guy, now pretty much the bottom of the heap.

Ignorant of the California law. Had to have it read to him. Supports the law, then falls back on “Governing body.”

Antonio Villaraigosa (Dem) Never heard of him. Former Speaker of California Assembly. Looks mobbed up to me.

Says it’s a non-issue because there are only 200 transgender athletes. But – “at the end of the day” males who go through puberty and then transition should not play “other women.” So half right in my opinion.

Unknown Asian looking woman that they forgot the CG for (Dem I guess)

Doesn’t know, wants to learn more. May have stumbled into the interview looking to audition for Wheel of Fortune.

Toney Thurmond (Dem) Only black guy the Dems let in the race this year.

Can’t understand why the Trump administration hates and bullies trans kids. Fully supports males in female sports.

People . . .

Democrats do not get that Americans care about their daughters, nieces, granddaughters and female children of friends and family more than they care about this transgender fad.

It isn't about numbers and it is not just about athletics.. One swinging dick in a locker room full of forty females changing for PE is one too many. Especially, if it is the PE teacher.

Nope. No way. Nix, no, nein, nada.

 

[JoeB131]

Nope, nobody cares about your transphobia.

Here's what's more likely. Swalwell's support will go to either Porter or Steyer.

That will be enough to push either of them into first place, and after that, they'll make short work of the Republican.

 

[1srelluc]

Nope, nobody cares about your transphobia.

Here's what's more likely. Swalwell's support will go to either Porter or Steyer.

That will be enough to push either of them into first place, and after that, they'll make short work of the Republican.

You better hope it's not Porter.

 

[The Duke]

Good format for this issue. One by one, each candidate is asked about the issue of boys in girls sports.

Here is what I heard, but I acknowledge I have a strong bias. You are welcome to listen for yourself:

Steve Hilton (Rep) – Frontrunner Former Brit

Opposes the California law requiring boys to be allowed to be on girls teams and in girls locker rooms. Believes it violates the California Constitution.

Chad Bianco (Rep) – 2nd Runner

Strongly in favor of protecting girls. A coach who understands the difference between male and female athletes. Will never allow an 18 year old man to strip down in front of 14 year old girls in a girls locker room.

Katie Porter (Dem) 3rd runner now that she engineered the ouster of Swalwell

Leads with “governing body rules.” Moves to word salad then says she supports current California law requiring boys in girls sports.

Unknown old white man who wore sneakers to the interview but didn’t get CG. (Dem, I guess)

Trans kids will kill themselves if they can’t play girls sports, so the girls are not what’s important.

Matt Mahan (Dem) Also Ran so far.

Thinks it is “disgusting” to oppose males in girls sports (so most Californians disgust him). Tells his soccer playing daughter “I can imagine a scenario where she ends up in a game and there’s a transgender athlete born a boy who . . . I could imagine that being unfair . . . but I also think that we are allowing ourselves to evolve to a point where blah, blah, blah"

Then he punts to the NCAA (which is the governing body for college sports) as Porter started to.

Xavier Becerra (Dem) Used to be an important guy, now pretty much the bottom of the heap.

Ignorant of the California law. Had to have it read to him. Supports the law, then falls back on “Governing body.”

Antonio Villaraigosa (Dem) Never heard of him. Former Speaker of California Assembly. Looks mobbed up to me.

Says it’s a non-issue because there are only 200 transgender athletes. But – “at the end of the day” males who go through puberty and then transition should not play “other women.” So half right in my opinion.

Unknown Asian looking woman that they forgot the CG for (Dem I guess)

Doesn’t know, wants to learn more. May have stumbled into the interview looking to audition for Wheel of Fortune.

Toney Thurmond (Dem) Only black guy the Dems let in the race this year.

Can’t understand why the Trump administration hates and bullies trans kids. Fully supports males in female sports.

People . . .

Democrats do not get that Americans care about their daughters, nieces, granddaughters and female children of friends and family more than they care about this transgender fad.

It isn't about numbers and it is not just about athletics.. One swinging dick in a locker room full of forty females changing for PE is one too many. Especially, if it is the PE teacher.

Nope. No way. Nix, no, nein, nada.

Now factor in the California vote cheating machine.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Nope, nobody cares about your transphobia.

Here's what's more likely. Swalwell's support will go to either Porter or Steyer.

That will be enough to push either of them into first place, and after that, they'll make short work of the Republican.

Steyer, was he the guy in the sneakers?

 

[JoeB131]

You better hope it's not Porter.

I don't live in CA, so I really don't care who wins, as long as the REpublicans lose.

As I said, though, I think the main beneficiary of Swalwell's demise will be Tom Steyer.

 

[JoeB131]

Steyer, was he the guy in the sneakers?

No, he's the guy with 2.5 BILLION in assets.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Nope, nobody cares about your transphobia.

You will care when Dem voters stay home due to no Democrat on the ticket, and then a GOP governor turns california red.

 

[JoeB131]

You will care when Dem voters stay home due to no Democrat on the ticket, and then a GOP governor turns california red.

Works on the assumption that the less than 30% who are currently voting for one of the two repukes managed to beat out the 70% who will support one of the Democrats.

With Swawell out, that makes Porter and Steyer the most viable candidates (I suspect a number of the single digit candidates will drop out before then.

The more likely scenario is that Steyer and Porter become the top two, shutting out the Republicans.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Works on the assumption that the less than 30% who are currently voting for one of the two repukes managed to beat out the 70% who will support one of the Democrats.

With Swawell out, that makes Porter and Steyer the most viable candidates (I suspect a number of the single digit candidates will drop out before then.

The more likely scenario is that Steyer and Porter become the top two, shutting out the Republicans.

Quite a coincidence, Swalwell being outed just in time to thin the field.

If he had never run against Katie Porter, Dems would have never stopped covering for him. He crossed the wrong leader and now he's headed to prison. Jiang Qing would be proud!

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I don't live in CA

That is certainly a relief.

I have family that lives there.

 

[Lisa558]

Quite a coincidence, Swalwell being outed just in time to thin the field.

If he had never run against Katie Porter, Dems would have never stopped covering for him. He crossed the wrong leader and now he's headed to prison. Jiang Qing would be proud!

The Democrats were shielding a repeat rapist while falsely yelling “rapist!!” at Trump.

 

[JoeB131]

Quite a coincidence, Swalwell being outed just in time to thin the field.

If he had never run against Katie Porter, Dems would have never stopped covering for him. He crossed the wrong leader and now he's headed to prison. Jiang Qing would be proud!

Whatever consequences he's facing, they're his own damned fault.

 

[Hollie]

Steyer, was he the guy in the sneakers?

Steyer is the typical stooge pressing for open borders.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Whatever consequences he's facing, they're his own damned fault.

No doubt.

But I also blame every single Democrat politician, operative, and "journalist" who knew about this and let it happen because of the (D) after his name.

They are his enablers. They cared more about political power than the safety of women and girls.

 

[leftwinger]

//correction. Yesterday I said "boiling potatoes" were poured on his head (on husband, I read that yesterday?) by Porter (now single mother, lauded by leftist media)//

Now I can't find it anymore? Coverup? The leftist dirty media search now comes up (clogging searches) as Boiling hot mashed potatoes on his head. Burning scalp. Is he bald?

My bad. I guess that's less bad? She was a monster, turned little kids into spitting and throwing toys at him yelling bad daddy.

 

[JoeB131]

No doubt.

But I also blame every single Democrat politician, operative, and "journalist" who knew about this and let it happen because of the (D) after his name.

They are his enablers. They cared more about political power than the safety of women and girls.

Then when do you take responsibility for Trump, who has far more accusers than Swalwell did.

I guess Trump isn't a danger anymore because he's old and impotent now.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Then when do you take responsibility for Trump, who has far more accusers than Swalwell did.

I guess Trump isn't a danger anymore because he's old and impotent now.

I give both Swalwell and Trump the benefit of the doubt.

But I recognize the truth that Trump's accusers have been motivated by political ideology and that Swalwell's protectors have been motivated by the same ideology.

Can you acknowledge that truth?

 

[JoeB131]

I give both Swalwell and Trump the benefit of the doubt.

But I recognize the truth that Trump's accusers have been motivated by political ideology and that Swalwell's protectors have been motivated by the same ideology.

Can you acknowledge that truth?

I don't see anyone "protecting" Swalwell. Quite the contrary, it was a thing to behold how quickly people turned on him. His campaign was over in three days.

On the other hand, when the Access Hollywood tape came out, in which Trump bragged about grabbing , the Republicans went to the Ramparts. When Trump's name started popping up in the Epstein Files, you were amazed how quickly the Republicans suddenly lost interest in "justice" for Epstein victims.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I don't see anyone "protecting" Swalwell.

They protected him for years. If you don't see that, it's because you don't want to look.

Only when he got in the way of Katie Porter becoming governor, did the Dems decide to allow their media to report what they have long known.

Quite the contrary, it was a thing to behold how quickly people turned on him. His campaign was over in three days.

Yes, once they were given permission. They already knew the story, they just had not been allowed to tell it.

On the other hand, when the Access Hollywood tape came out, in which Trump bragged about grabbing , the Republicans went to the Ramparts.

Because none of that proves wrongdoing.

For that matter, wrongdoing by Swalwell is not proven. But he made himself look guilty by resigning from political life. Let me know when Trump does that.

When Trump's name started popping up in the Epstein Files, you were amazed how quickly the Republicans suddenly lost interest in "justice" for Epstein victims.

Democrats are much more prominently listed in the Epstein files than Republicans No surprise there.