DC Grand Jury Info Still Being Withheld From Trump Defense Team and Judge Cannon

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
18,178
34,507
2,290
So yeah, what is they're trying to hide?

Besides this, they have admitted today that they have no evidence that Walt Nauta moved any boxes with classified documents; but claim so what. FFS



Second--and stunningly--Jay Bratt basically admitted they do not have proof that Walt Nauta, charged with conspiring with Trump to conceal classified files from Trump's lawyer then the FBI to impede grand jury investigation, moved boxes that actually contained papers with classified markings.

He also indicated he did not believe DOJ would have to prove that at trial. HUH?

That prompted a heated response by Woodward. "Show us the evidence" he said. If, as Bratt stated, they can't or don't have to prove Nauta moved boxes with records with classified markings "there is no crime."

DOJ making "assumptions" that any boxes Nauta moved contained sought-after evidence.

And get this: All the boxes retrieved during MAL raid are at the corrupt Washington FBI field office. Agents apparently removed the alleged "classified documents" and put some sort of marking as to where the contraband paper was in the box.

Suuuure.


 
So yeah, what is they're trying to hide?

Besides this, they have admitted today that they have no evidence that Walt Nauta moved any boxes with classified documents; but claim so what. FFS


Second--and stunningly--Jay Bratt basically admitted they do not have proof that Walt Nauta, charged with conspiring with Trump to conceal classified files from Trump's lawyer then the FBI to impede grand jury investigation, moved boxes that actually contained papers with classified markings.
He also indicated he did not believe DOJ would have to prove that at trial. HUH?
That prompted a heated response by Woodward. "Show us the evidence" he said. If, as Bratt stated, they can't or don't have to prove Nauta moved boxes with records with classified markings "there is no crime."
DOJ making "assumptions" that any boxes Nauta moved contained sought-after evidence.
And get this: All the boxes retrieved during MAL raid are at the corrupt Washington FBI field office. Agents apparently removed the alleged "classified documents" and put some sort of marking as to where the contraband paper was in the box.
Suuuure.



nothing.

Standard practice with grand juries.
 
The DC Judge determines whether Judge Cannon can access the DCGJ records

Judge Cannon can request the DC Judge

Nothing more.
 
So yeah, what is they're trying to hide?

Besides this, they have admitted today that they have no evidence that Walt Nauta moved any boxes with classified documents; but claim so what. FFS


Second--and stunningly--Jay Bratt basically admitted they do not have proof that Walt Nauta, charged with conspiring with Trump to conceal classified files from Trump's lawyer then the FBI to impede grand jury investigation, moved boxes that actually contained papers with classified markings.
He also indicated he did not believe DOJ would have to prove that at trial. HUH?
That prompted a heated response by Woodward. "Show us the evidence" he said. If, as Bratt stated, they can't or don't have to prove Nauta moved boxes with records with classified markings "there is no crime."
DOJ making "assumptions" that any boxes Nauta moved contained sought-after evidence.
And get this: All the boxes retrieved during MAL raid are at the corrupt Washington FBI field office. Agents apparently removed the alleged "classified documents" and put some sort of marking as to where the contraband paper was in the box.
Suuuure.



Who cares?
 

Forum List

Back
Top