Darren Wilson Has Retired

Here is the GJ testimony. Wilson admits he drew the gun because he thought taking another hit would knock him out. He said he felt like he was so weak compared to Brown but he was somehow able to get the gun away from Brown? Doesnt add up.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/11/25/us/darren-wilson-testimony-ferguson-shooting.html
Wrong

Thats not his grand jury testimony. That was the cleaned up version. I provided you the GJ testimony. He changed his story from what he testified to.

"And I see him ducking and as he is ducking, his hands are up and he is coming in my vehicle ... I don't remember seeing him come at me, but I was hit right here in the side of the face with a fist ... i think it was a full-on swing, but not a full shot ... significant amount of contact that was made to my face ... i believe it was his right hand ...He turns like this and now the Cigarillos i see in his left hand ... he reaches back and he says, 'hey man, hold these." I'm assuming to Johnson but I couldn't see Johnson"

"So the only other option I thought I had was my gun. I drew my gun, I turned ... He is standing there. I said, 'get back or I'm going to shoot you.' He immediately grabs my gun and says, 'you are too much of a pussy to shoot me.' ... My gun was basically pointed this way ... but he grabs it with his right one and he twists it and then he digs it down into my hip ... I felt that another one of those punches in my face could knock me out or worse ... I've already taken two to the face and I didn't think I would, the third one could be fatal if he hit me right ... "
http://abc7.com/news/darren-wilsons-grand-jury-testimony/410569/
You are dismissed
 
Wilson did not pull the gun on Brown first.
Forensic evidence proves that Brown tried to get Wilsons gun first. Then Wilson shot him,
Authorities say Michael Brown s blood found on gun inside police car - The Washington Post

What will you say if Eric Holder comes out with the same conclusion?
Explain how you can tell Brown tried to get the Wilsons gun first? Saying forensic evidence is not enough. What kind of evidence appears that says Browns actions were first? Did they pull a print off the gun that was covered by a print from Wilson?

You still did not answer the question of What if Eric Holder comes out with the same conclusion as the Grand Jury?
I will continue to say the same thing in light of the fact there were so many irregularities like allowing Wilson to turn in his own gun. it was a fix. Holder cant make evidence appear. He can only work with what the racist PD provides.

That's standard police procedures after a shooting altercation. They all do it, it does not matter what their skin color is black, brown or white, they all turn in their own guns. They also have evidence if the gun was altered in any way, like wiping off fingerprints.

Their are many false reports out their on the internet. It is up to the person to look for the facts rather than the lies.
Fake News Stories Fuel An Ongoing Fire In Ferguson Video
No thats not standard procedure. Someone takes the gun off you and turns it in. Wilson left the scene and turned in his gun later. You cant let the shooter handle his own chain of evidence Who told you that was standard procedure?

Unorthodox police procedures emerge in grand jury documents - The Washington Post

"When Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson left the scene of the fatal shooting of unarmed teenager Michael Brown, the officer returned to the police station unescorted, washed blood off his hands and placed his recently fired pistol into an evidence bag himself."
Only if Wilson was suspended.would he have to surrender his firearm and badge.
 
so the libs got everything they wanted. 1. riots and looting- check

2. Wilson retired and his life ruined- check

3. In the future cops will be afraid to shoot a black thug- check

4. white conservatives paying to rebuild- check
 
so the libs got everything they wanted. 1. riots and looting- check

2. Wilson retired and his life ruined- check

3. In the future cops will be afraid to shoot a black thug- check

4. white conservatives paying to rebuild- check
The only thing they didn't get is Wilson behind bars or dead.
 
Explain how you can tell Brown tried to get the Wilsons gun first? Saying forensic evidence is not enough. What kind of evidence appears that says Browns actions were first? Did they pull a print off the gun that was covered by a print from Wilson?

You still did not answer the question of What if Eric Holder comes out with the same conclusion as the Grand Jury?
I will continue to say the same thing in light of the fact there were so many irregularities like allowing Wilson to turn in his own gun. it was a fix. Holder cant make evidence appear. He can only work with what the racist PD provides.

That's standard police procedures after a shooting altercation. They all do it, it does not matter what their skin color is black, brown or white, they all turn in their own guns. They also have evidence if the gun was altered in any way, like wiping off fingerprints.

Their are many false reports out their on the internet. It is up to the person to look for the facts rather than the lies.
Fake News Stories Fuel An Ongoing Fire In Ferguson Video
No thats not standard procedure. Someone takes the gun off you and turns it in. Wilson left the scene and turned in his gun later. You cant let the shooter handle his own chain of evidence Who told you that was standard procedure?

Unorthodox police procedures emerge in grand jury documents - The Washington Post

"When Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson left the scene of the fatal shooting of unarmed teenager Michael Brown, the officer returned to the police station unescorted, washed blood off his hands and placed his recently fired pistol into an evidence bag himself."
Only if Wilson was suspended.would he have to surrender his firearm and badge.
No stupid. He firearm was used in a killing. He is the one who shot it. They should have removed his fire arm before he left the scene.
 
You still did not answer the question of What if Eric Holder comes out with the same conclusion as the Grand Jury?
I will continue to say the same thing in light of the fact there were so many irregularities like allowing Wilson to turn in his own gun. it was a fix. Holder cant make evidence appear. He can only work with what the racist PD provides.

That's standard police procedures after a shooting altercation. They all do it, it does not matter what their skin color is black, brown or white, they all turn in their own guns. They also have evidence if the gun was altered in any way, like wiping off fingerprints.

Their are many false reports out their on the internet. It is up to the person to look for the facts rather than the lies.
Fake News Stories Fuel An Ongoing Fire In Ferguson Video
No thats not standard procedure. Someone takes the gun off you and turns it in. Wilson left the scene and turned in his gun later. You cant let the shooter handle his own chain of evidence Who told you that was standard procedure?

Unorthodox police procedures emerge in grand jury documents - The Washington Post

"When Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson left the scene of the fatal shooting of unarmed teenager Michael Brown, the officer returned to the police station unescorted, washed blood off his hands and placed his recently fired pistol into an evidence bag himself."
Only if Wilson was suspended.would he have to surrender his firearm and badge.
No stupid. He firearm was used in a killing. He is the one who shot it. They should have removed his fire arm before he left the scene.
Stfu idiot.
 
You still did not answer the question of What if Eric Holder comes out with the same conclusion as the Grand Jury?
I will continue to say the same thing in light of the fact there were so many irregularities like allowing Wilson to turn in his own gun. it was a fix. Holder cant make evidence appear. He can only work with what the racist PD provides.

That's standard police procedures after a shooting altercation. They all do it, it does not matter what their skin color is black, brown or white, they all turn in their own guns. They also have evidence if the gun was altered in any way, like wiping off fingerprints.

Their are many false reports out their on the internet. It is up to the person to look for the facts rather than the lies.
Fake News Stories Fuel An Ongoing Fire In Ferguson Video
No thats not standard procedure. Someone takes the gun off you and turns it in. Wilson left the scene and turned in his gun later. You cant let the shooter handle his own chain of evidence Who told you that was standard procedure?

Unorthodox police procedures emerge in grand jury documents - The Washington Post

"When Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson left the scene of the fatal shooting of unarmed teenager Michael Brown, the officer returned to the police station unescorted, washed blood off his hands and placed his recently fired pistol into an evidence bag himself."
Only if Wilson was suspended.would he have to surrender his firearm and badge.
No stupid. He firearm was used in a killing. He is the one who shot it. They should have removed his fire arm before he left the scene.
OH you think they should have remove his gun. you aren't saying they removed his gun.
The only time an officer is told to surrender his gun is if he has been suspended. Was it used as evidence in the grand Jury? if it was not it never was surrendered.
 

Forum List

Back
Top