Capstone
Gold Member
- Feb 14, 2012
- 5,502
- 952
- 290
Oh, I would certainly agree that the true motivations behind the Neo/Demo-con agenda have had little or nothing to do with the partisan-based propaganda that's been foisted on the unwashed masses over the years.Neocon has nothing to do with patriotism or humanitarianism. It has to do with picking governments we like. ...
As for "picking the governements [they've] like(d)", I think the question we should be asking ourselves is: WHY have they liked the governments they've picked?! Looking at the results in the region of the world most effected by their policies, it stands to reason that the sort of destablization spoken of 30-odd years ago by Oded Yinon may have been the primary goal all along. After all, hindsight being 20/20, the so-called Yinon Plan now reads more like an overused playbook than anything else. Yes, the agenda has been underpinned by militant Zionism all along.
They've all been controlled by the same Western deep state string-pullers in the interest of a common 'globalist agenda'. There's really no question about that. Moreover, as previously pointed out by someone else in this thread, the differences between the manner in which their respective Administrations danced at the end of those strings were by and large distinctions of partisan form over shared substance.kaz said:...Slick and W were pretty similar. Obama likes Muslim extremist governments. But their methods are shades of gray different at most
We, the voters, have been reduced for voting for the stories we'll be given to justify a series of 'untouchables', meaning the sort of policies, goals, and agendas that have continued unabated throughout multiple Administrations. More succinctly, We the People have been divided and conquered.