Nazism Is Taking Over America

[jc456]

You said that the post was completely false. Gutfeld's heritage was one of the claims. So without investigating all of the claims you declared them all false. Congrats, you now have no credibility.

yep, and?

 

[sparky]

This is amazing. I hope they make a difference.

Yes, what the Zionist Jews are doing against the Palestinians in Gaza is the so-called "Final Solution".

Judaism and Zionism are often equated as a synonymous association despite one being a religion , the other a political agenda

Attack the agenda, and you're an anti-semite

What we're watching now is the divide happening , and it's the jews doing it

That speaks volumes

~S~

 

[TruthNotBS]

many died, hahahahahahahahaha, they were removed from their homes, their country, separated put into prison camps and executed, but for you, many died

No that's bullshit, it wasn't like that and there's no evidence for what you said. Jews weren't taken to "prison camps" to be executed. Japanese Americans were also rounded up and forced into concentration camps by the US government. We hardly ever hear about that:

​

 

[Weatherman2020]

Hitler: Poland attacked us.
Democrats: J6 nearly toppled the US government.

 

[jc456]

No that's bullshit, it wasn't like that and there's no evidence for what you said. Jews weren't taken to "prison camps" to be executed. Japanese Americans were also rounded up and forced into concentration camps by the US government. We hardly ever hear about that:

​

Japanese we’re unfairly treated by America. Jews were removed from their homes separated put a trains to prison camps and hundreds of thousands were killed, murdered mistreated tortured. But many died

 

[TruthNotBS]

Japanese we’re unfairly treated by America. Jews were removed from their homes separated put a trains to prison camps and hundreds of thousands were killed, murdered mistreated tortured. But many died

You won't watch the videos, but others will. The Japanese were forced into camps and many of them were told to sell their possessions, including their homes, before being interned in these camps. Your claim that Germany had a program in place to murder Jews is bullshit, and nothing more than anti-German propaganda. Earlier you said that if there is just one element of the story that's incorrect, then everything is wrong. Well, following your own standard, the Jewish holocaust narrative is wrong:

​

I know you're not going to watch any of the above videos, but others will. I don't respond to people like you with the illusion that I'm going to convince them of anything. I know that I will never convince you. I respond to your posts, for the sake of those who are truly seeking the truth about the Jewish holocaust. I'm interested in the truth seekers, not those who don't give a shit how much evidence is presented to them, proving the Jewish narrative about the holocaust wrong. It's a gross exaggeration and unjustified attack on the German people, who also suffered horribly in WWII.

​

 

[jc456]

You won't watch the videos, but others will. The Japanese were forced into camps and many of them were told to sell their possessions, including their homes, before being interned in these camps. Your claim that Germany had a program in place to murder Jews is bullshit, and nothing more than anti-German propaganda. Earlier you said that if there is just one element of the story that's incorrect, then everything is wrong. Well, following your standard then the Holocaust narrative is wrong:

​

I know you're not going to watch any of the above videos, but others will. I don't respond to people like you with the illusion that I'm going to convince them of anything. I know that I will never convince you. I respond to your posts, for the sake of those who are truly seeking the truth about the Jewish holocaust. I'm interested in the truth seekers, not those who don't really give a shit how much evidence is presented to them, proving the Jewish narrative about the holocaust wrong. It's a gross exaggeration and unjustified attack on the German people, who also suffered horribly in WWII.

​

Disinformation demofks

Auschwitz concentration camp - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[TruthNotBS]

Disinformation demofks

I expect you to say that, but others will watch those videos and decide for themselves. There are even Jews in those videos, who agree with what I am saying.

Watch these Jewish rabbis explain why Hitler rounded up all of the Jews and sent them to work camps:

​

You won't watch it, I realize that, but others will. They will watch it.

 

[dudmuck]

You're right, Hitler hated Marxism due to its atheistic materialism. Most of the Marxists in Germany, including practically all of the leadership within the German communist movement were Jews. He had his reasons for hating Marx and Marxism, I don't dispute that. I find value in the Marxist critique of capitalism, and in Hitler's National Socialist ideals as well. Hitler's biggest mistake was not allying himself with Stalin. Invading Soviet Russia was Hitler's biggest mistake. Seven out of ten German soldiers were fighting on the Eastern Front.

Again, I find value in the Marxist critique of capitalism, and in Hitler's more socially conservative, socialist ideals as well. Hitler was a courageous, noble man, who was demonized in the Western world, due to Jewish influence. Jews control everything in the Western world.

yea ok, but Hitler didnt have any socialist ideals. There was a socialist wing of the nazis when it was forming. It was called Strasserism, but Hitler eliminated it in the early 1930's.

and yes, we would all do better to understand Marx's critique of capitalism.

 

[jc456]

yea ok, but Hitler didnt have any socialist ideals. There was a socialist wing of the nazis when it was forming. It was called Strasserism, but Hitler eliminated it in the early 1930's.

and yes, we would all do better to understand Marx's critique of capitalism.

Or not

 

[TruthNotBS]

yea ok, but Hitler didnt have any socialist ideals. There was a socialist wing of the nazis when it was forming. It was called Strasserism, but Hitler eliminated it in the early 1930's.

and yes, we would all do better to understand Marx's critique of capitalism.

1. Name and Early Party Ideology:
   
   • The Nazi Party, fully known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), included "socialist" in its name. Early in its history, the party aimed to attract working-class Germans who were disillusioned with traditional Marxist socialism and capitalism. The 25-point Program of the NSDAP, adopted in 1920, called for the nationalization of industries, welfare expansion, and other social welfare programs.
2. Anti-Capitalist
   
   • Hitler criticized the capitalist systems, which he saw as being manipulated by Jews and not serving the German Volk (people).
3. State Control and Intervention:
   
   • Under Hitler, the German government exercised significant control over the economy, similar to the "central planning" of Marxist socialism.

Fascists in many ways are socialists, and see capitalists as undermining the interests of the nation if not firmly placed under their control. National Socialism, employs capitalism to serve the interests of the nation, that's the priority and emphasis not serving private vested interests. Production, and markets, serve the public good, and if a capitalist gets out of line, they get severely punished, especially if they do something with their business, that hurts the nation.

 

[dudmuck]

1. Name and Early Party Ideology:
   
   • The Nazi Party, fully known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), included "socialist" in its name. Early in its history, the party aimed to attract working-class Germans who were disillusioned with traditional Marxist socialism and capitalism. The 25-point Program of the NSDAP, adopted in 1920, called for the nationalization of industries, welfare expansion, and other social welfare programs.
2. Anti-Capitalist
   
   • Hitler criticized the capitalist systems, which he saw as being manipulated by Jews and not serving the German Volk (people).
3. State Control and Intervention:
   
   • Under Hitler, the German government exercised significant control over the economy, similar to the "central planning" of Marxist socialism.

Fascists in many ways are socialists, and see capitalists as undermining the interests of the nation if not firmly placed under their control. National Socialism, employs capitalism to serve the interests of the nation, that's the priority and emphasis not serving private vested interests. Production, and markets, serve the public good, and if a capitalist gets out of line, they get severely punished, especially if they do something with their business, that hurts the nation.

That date 1920, when they established the party, long before they had any power, they put the word socialist in there to appeal to the working class. The word had different connotations a hundred years ago in Germany than it does here today. You can read the explanation here. The Nazis placed great emphasis on private property and free competition. They were against international capitalism, which they saw as Jewish.

Following the year you mentioned, in the 1920's a left wing group of nazis formed following the Strasser brothers. After Hitler solidified his power in the early 1930s, he wiped out the Strasser socialist views from his party.

 

[jc456]

1. Name and Early Party Ideology:
   
   • The Nazi Party, fully known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), included "socialist" in its name. Early in its history, the party aimed to attract working-class Germans who were disillusioned with traditional Marxist socialism and capitalism. The 25-point Program of the NSDAP, adopted in 1920, called for the nationalization of industries, welfare expansion, and other social welfare programs.
2. Anti-Capitalist
   
   • Hitler criticized the capitalist systems, which he saw as being manipulated by Jews and not serving the German Volk (people).
3. State Control and Intervention:
   
   • Under Hitler, the German government exercised significant control over the economy, similar to the "central planning" of Marxist socialism.

Fascists in many ways are socialists, and see capitalists as undermining the interests of the nation if not firmly placed under their control. National Socialism, employs capitalism to serve the interests of the nation, that's the priority and emphasis not serving private vested interests. Production, and markets, serve the public good, and if a capitalist gets out of line, they get severely punished, especially if they do something with their business, that hurts the nation.

hitler was and is a dictator war mongering devil!

 

[jc456]

yea ok, but Hitler didnt have any socialist ideals. There was a socialist wing of the nazis when it was forming. It was called Strasserism, but Hitler eliminated it in the early 1930's.

and yes, we would all do better to understand Marx's critique of capitalism.

Military use of children in World War II - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

all the college campus children being recruited by demofks today!!!

 

[jc456]

1. Name and Early Party Ideology:
   
   • The Nazi Party, fully known as the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), included "socialist" in its name. Early in its history, the party aimed to attract working-class Germans who were disillusioned with traditional Marxist socialism and capitalism. The 25-point Program of the NSDAP, adopted in 1920, called for the nationalization of industries, welfare expansion, and other social welfare programs.
2. Anti-Capitalist
   
   • Hitler criticized the capitalist systems, which he saw as being manipulated by Jews and not serving the German Volk (people).
3. State Control and Intervention:
   
   • Under Hitler, the German government exercised significant control over the economy, similar to the "central planning" of Marxist socialism.

Fascists in many ways are socialists, and see capitalists as undermining the interests of the nation if not firmly placed under their control. National Socialism, employs capitalism to serve the interests of the nation, that's the priority and emphasis not serving private vested interests. Production, and markets, serve the public good, and if a capitalist gets out of line, they get severely punished, especially if they do something with their business, that hurts the nation.

How the Hitler Youth Turned a Generation of Kids Into Nazis | HISTORY

Hitler’s war against Boy Scouts fueled the Third Reich’s ideology—and its military might.

www.history.com

 

[surada]

You can live with people who’s only agenda is to murder you.

The Zionists have been doing this for 80 years. Why complain now?

 

[surada]

That date 1920, when they established the party, long before they had any power, they put the word socialist in there to appeal to the working class. The word had different connotations a hundred years ago in Germany than it does here today. You can read the explanation here. The Nazis placed great emphasis on private property and free competition. They were against international capitalism, which they saw as Jewish.

Following the year you mentioned, in the 1920's a left wing group of nazis formed following the Strasser brothers. After Hitler solidified his power in the early 1930s, he wiped out the Strasser socialist views from his party.

Hitler used the socialists.. he split with them in 1926.

 

[jc456]

The Zionists have been doing this for 80 years. Why complain now?

you truly hate when people protect themselves don't you?

 

[TruthNotBS]

That date 1920, when they established the party, long before they had any power, they put the word socialist in there to appeal to the working class. The word had different connotations a hundred years ago in Germany than it does here today. You can read the explanation here. The Nazis placed great emphasis on private property and free competition. They were against international capitalism, which they saw as Jewish.

Following the year you mentioned, in the 1920's a left wing group of nazis formed following the Strasser brothers. After Hitler solidified his power in the early 1930s, he wiped out the Strasser socialist views from his party.

As I explained, private property is allowed provided it's under the authority of the government, primarily serving the nation, rather than a capitalist class to the detriment of society. The economic policies of National Socialism, are socialistic, against the plutocratic oligarchy and cronyism, that are endemic to capitalism. The fact that National Socialism, allows private property doesn't take it out of the orb of socialism, it still qualifies due to the way it regulates private industry and property.

If there were National Socialists right now in the US Congress, they would be accused of voting for "socialist legislation" by right-wing conservative Republicans, similar to how they're always accusing AOC and other "progressive" Dems of being "commies". Under Hitlerist National Socialism, the economy is under the control of the state, and the capitalist class is but a steward of the private sector who also profit from it. Even though Hitler didn't adopt the Marxist concept of socioeconomic class struggle, he asserted that the capitalists must primarily serve the community or nation. The "bottom line" of business, isn't private capital accumulation, under Hitlerism, or National Socialism, it's what's good for the nation.

Hitler made a grave mistake invading the USSR. That was his downfall. He should've allied himself with Stalin and fought Western, Jewish-controlled plutocracies together with the USSR.

As far as my stance on politics and economics, I'm a right-wing Nazbol and anti-Semite. Due to my anti-Semiticism, I'm often accused of being a "Hitlerist" Nazi, but I'm not. I don't believe half of the bullshit about Hitler told to me by the Jewish-controlled media, Hollywood, and my Zionist-Jewish-occupied government and modern Western education, but I'm a Nazbol. I agree with some of the fascist elements of German Nazism, but I'm not a Neo-Nazi, flying a flag with a swastika. My flag has a hammer and sickle on it, not a swastika. I have my disagreements with both Hitler and Stalin while agreeing with them on other issues.

Here is a long quote from a very interesting book, titled "Stalin - The Enduring Legacy" by Kerry Bolton:

" In the early days of the Stalinist regime many on the German Right believed that the Soviet Union would transcend Marxism and become a nationalist state, which might form an alliance with Germany against the plutocratic powers. This was a primary position of the German National-Bolsheviks, a faction of the Right. Even the conservative historian Oswald Spengler saw the same possibility. From the Soviet side, Russian diplomats in Berlin were instructed to cultivate ties withmpro-Soviet elements in the Right-wing intelligentsia. After World War II, when the USA had fallen out with its Russian wartime ally and sought German assistance against the USSR in the Cold War, German Rightist war veterans, who had fought against Russia, refused to do so again under American direction. Major-General Otto Remer and the allegedly ‘neo-Nazi’ Socialist Reich Party regarded the USA as more dangerous to the soul and freedom of Germany and Europe than the USSR. In the USA a faction of the Right also regarded the USSR as having transcended Marxism in favour of cultural and political health, recognising that their own country was the real centre of international subversion and revolution.

This book examines how the legacy of Stalin has had a lasting impact upon the world, and why the course Russia took under Stalin continues to be relevant to the present and the future. It is not intended as an apologia for Stalin’s crimes, for the Katyn massacre or the Ukrainian famine, etc. The bandying about of moralistic clichés about ‘crimes against humanity’ is often nothing but strategies to demonise one’s political adversaries by those who are hardly innocent themselves. It is intended rather to realistically assess Stalin’s impact on the present and coming struggles for world power, based on the belief that Russia must and will play a pivotal role in the shaping of a new geopolitical and cultural bloc that again says ‘nyet’ to the ‘rootless cosmopolitans’.

Stalin’s Fight Against International Communism

The notion that Stalin ‘fought communism’ at a glance seems bizarre. However, the contention is neither unique nor new. Early last century the seminal German conservative philosopher-historian Oswald Spengler stated that Communism in Russia would metamorphose into something distinctly Russian which would be quite different from the alien Marxist dogma that had been imposed upon it from outside. Spengler saw Russia as both a danger to Western Civilisation as the leader of a ‘coloured world-revolution’, and conversely as a potential ally of a revived Germany against the plutocracies. Spengler stated of Russia’s potential rejection of Marxism as an alien imposition from the decaying West that, Race, language, popular customs, religion, in their present form… all or any of them can and will be fundamentally transformed. What we see today then is simply the new kind of life which a vast land has conceived and will presently bring forth. It is not definable in words, nor is its bearer aware of it. Those who attempt to define, establish, lay down a program, are confusing life with a phrase, as does the ruling Bolshevism, which is not sufficiently conscious of its own West-European, Rationalistic and cosmopolitan origin.[1]

Even as he wrote, Bolshevism in the USSR was being fundamentally transformed in the ways Spengler foresaw. The ‘rationalistic’ and ‘cosmopolitan’ origins of Bolshevism were soon being openly repudiated and a new course was defined by Zhdanov and other Soviet eminences.

Contemporary with Spengler in Weimer Germany, there arose among the ‘Right’ the ‘National Bolshevik’ faction one of whose primary demands was that Germany align with the Soviet Union against the Western plutocracies. From the Soviet side, possibilities of an alliance with the ‘Right’ were far from discounted and high level Soviet sources cultivated contacts with the pro-Russian factions of the German Right including the National Bolsheviks.[2]

German-Soviet friendship societies included many conservatives. In Arbeitsgemeinschaft zum Studium der Sowjetrussichen Planwirtschaft (Arplan)[3] Conservative-Revolutionaries and National Bolsheviks comprised a third of the membership. Bund Geistige Berufe (BGB)[4] was founded in 1931 and was of particular interest to Soviet Russia, according to Soviet documents, which aimed ‘to attract into the orbit of our influence a range of highly placed intellectuals of rightist orientation’.[5]

The profound changes caused Konstantin Rodzaevsky, leader of the Russian Fascist Union among the White Russian émigrés at Harbin, to soberly reassess the USSR and in 1945 he wrote to Stalin:

Not all at once, but step by step we came to this conclusion. We decided that: Stalinism is exactly what we mistakenly called ‘Russian Fascism’. It is our Russian Fascism cleansed of extremes, illusions, and errors.[6]

In the aftermath of World War II many German war veterans, despite the devastating conflagration between Germany and the USSR, and the rampage of the Red Army across Germany with Allied contrivance, were vociferous opponents of any German alliance with the USA against the USSR. Major General Otto E Remer and the Socialist Reich Party were in the forefront of advocating a ‘neutralist’ line for Germany during the ‘Cold War’, while one of their political advisers, the American Spenglerian philosopher Francis Parker Yockey, saw Russian occupation as less culturally debilitating than the ‘spiritual syphilis’ of Hollywood and New York, and recommended the collaboration of European rightists and neo-Fascists with the USSR against the USA.[7] Others of the American Right, such as the Yockeyan and Spenglerian influenced newspaper Common Sense, saw the USSR from the time of Stalin as the primary power in confronting Marxism, and they regarded New York as the real ‘capitol’ of Marxism.

What might be regarded by many as an ‘eccentric’ element from the Right were not alone in seeing that the USSR had undergone a revolutionary transformation. Many of the Left regarded Stalin’s

Russia as a travesty of Marxism. The most well-known and vehement was of course Leon Trotsky who condemned Stalin for having ‘betrayed the revolution’ and for reversing doctrinaire Marxism. On the other hand, the USA for decades supported Marxists, and especially Trotskyites, in trying to subvert the USSR during the Cold War. The USA, as the columnists at Common Sense continually insisted, was promoting Marxism, while Stalin was fighting it. This dichotomy between Russian National Bolshevism and US sponsored international Marxism was to having lasting consequences for the post-war world up to the present.

Stalin Purges Marxism

The Moscow Trials purging Trotskyites and other veteran Bolsheviks were merely the most obvious manifestations of Stalin’s struggle against alien Marxism. While much has been written condemning the trials as a modern day version of the Salem witch trials, and while the Soviet methods were often less than judicious the basic allegations against the Trotskyites et al were justified. The trials moreover, were open to the public, including western press, diplomats and jurists. There can be no serious doubt that Trotskyites in alliance with other old Bolsheviks such as Zinoviev and Kameneff were complicit in attempting to overthrow the Soviet state under Stalin. That was after all, the raison d’etre of Trotsky et al, and Trotsky’s hubris could not conceal his aims.[8]

The purging of these anti-Stalinist co-conspirators was only a part of the Stalinist fight against the Old Bolsheviks. Stalin’s relations with Lenin had not been cordial, Lenin accusing him of acting like a ‘Great Russian chauvinist’.[9] Indeed, the ‘Great Russians’ were heralded as the well-spring of Stalin’s Russia, and were elevated to master-race like status during and after the ‘Great Patriotic War’ against Germany. Lenin, near death, regarded Stalin’s demeanour as ‘offensive’, and as not showing automatic obedience. Lenin wished for Stalin to be removed as Bolshevik Party General Secretary. "

 

[TruthNotBS]

How the Hitler Youth Turned a Generation of Kids Into Nazis | HISTORY

Hitler’s war against Boy Scouts fueled the Third Reich’s ideology—and its military might.

www.history.com

Jews turn generations of their kids into ZioNazis. Jews are victims of their Jewish religion and culture, made to believe that everyone is out to get them and hence they have to screw the goyim, and dominate them, before the goyim hurt them.

They self-isolate and create a type of smug xenophobic, elitist, narcissistic, nepotistic, extremely ethnocentric cult. Even secular Jews are affected by the religious aspect of their Jewish culture, with its "divine chosenness" attitude, which leads to antisemitism.

There's no antisemitism without semiticism. They create the semiticism, which naturally results in antisemitism. Zionist semiticism, leads to non-Jews hating Jews. I personally don't hate people, but I might hate their culture, and religion. Their ideology, mindset, behavior. That's really what I hate. I hate the Jewish religion and culture, because I see it as anti-Human. If a Jew rejects their Jewishness, I can like them because I don't see them as a Jew anymore. They're now humanized, here with us humans, rather than flying around in the clouds, thinking they're a special, divinely chosen separate species, designed to dominate and rule humanity.

It might be fun for Jews to see themselves that way (perhaps even fruitful when it comes to making money, gaining social status and political power), but it's only cute and fun while you're among your fellow Jews, As soon as the non-Jews get a whiff of that "fun" Jewish "chosenness", elitist, cliquish attitude, they'll naturally start disliking you, even hating you (Distrusting Jews, seeing them as threatening, toxic, contaminating agents in society). That's just human nature.

A cliquish, self-absorbed group of people who seem to be just interested in gaining control of society for their own, selfish ends, not necessarily for the public good or making the world a better place, is naturally going to be disliked, if not hated. The Jews are a group that is constantly appealing to the harms that they've suffered in the past, going back 3000+ years, to justify their bad behavior towards non-Jews. They're perpetually vindictive and out to get everyone before everyone supposedly gets them. Given this, I feel it's my moral obligation to be an antisemite. As a person who values humanism and humanity, I feel I have to hate the Jewish religion and culture. I don't have a choice.