"Continuing Life"....Really???

[Damaged Eagle]

Then the answers are no, no and no.

So now it's more than a cancerous growth.

So what is it?

Have you checked to ensure it's not an endangered species?

After all it might be the last of its kind.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[meaner gene]

Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.

The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.

At conception, it is a zygote. A combination of genes.

Maybe we should look to the Supreme Court looking at abortion as an eviction case. The court has said the government can't stop evictions. That it infringes on the rights of the owner of the property owner.

 

[meaner gene]

Then the answers are no, no and no.

View attachment 535798

So now it's more than a cancerous growth.

What part of "no" don't you understand?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

What part of "no" don't you understand?

I understood that you say it isn't a cancerous growth what part of reading comprehension eludes you?

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[meaner gene]

I understood that you say it isn't a cancerous growth what part of reading comprehension eludes you?

Because that wasn't the question. And since you're playing STOOPID, i'll repeat the question and the answer, which you seem incapable of understanding.

So you're position is that a viable fetus is nothing more than a cancerous tumor?

NO!

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Because that wasn't the question. And since you're playing STOOPID, i'll repeat the question and the answer, which you seem incapable of understanding.



NO!

You didn't answer the question of what it is.

You really do have difficulty staying on track.

If you don't like answering questions you should stay out discussions that you have problematic issues with.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[meaner gene]

You didn't answer the question of what it is.

Please read for comprehension. I'm giving for full protections to a viable fetus, but not to a clump of cells in a test tube.

How many times are you going to ignore my answer?

 

[John T. Ford]

Nobody is questioning it's alive. Bacteria are alive, but I wouldn't give TB protection from using drugs to abort it.

Bacteria doesn't have a heartbeat ......

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

How many times are you going to ignore my answer?

As many music videos on YouTube as there are.

 

[PoliticalChic]

At conception, it is a zygote. A combination of genes.

Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.

The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.


What I said is, as always, exactly correct.

Being an associate of the party of death, you'd want to cloud the issue.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats
The collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.



They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."



Is it true that, to be a Democrat in good standing, one must take a blood oath to worship the Devil????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bacteria doesn't have a heartbeat ......

Democrats appear to lack that organ, as well.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

How many times are you going to ignore my answer?

What clump of cells in a test tube and how did they get there?

Which question would that be?

*****SMILE*****

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.

The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.


What I said is, as always, exactly correct.

Being an associate of the party of death, you'd want to cloud the issue.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists, Democrats
The collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

The Democrats check every one of those boxes.



They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."



Is it true that, to be a Democrat in good standing, one must take a blood oath to worship the Devil????

At the moment of conception, it is a zygote. Nothing else. The rest of your diatribe are characteristics YOU are ascribing to it.
And I find it deeply amusing that you'll defend that zygotes life to the death, but the moment it drops out of the mother, you
couldn't give two shits about it.

You are however, a shining example of EXACTLY why the ideology of conservatism (at least in its present form) is an abject failure.
It isn't rooted in the belief in the Constitution or the rule of law, or economic fundamentals. It's rooted in religious overtones. Specifically, the belief in a supreme
being.

 

[PoliticalChic]

At the moment of conception, it is a zygote. Nothing else. The rest of your diatribe are characteristics YOU are ascribing to it.
And I find it deeply amusing that you'll defend that zygotes life to the death, but the moment it drops out of the mother, you
couldn't give two shits about it.

You are however, a shining example of EXACTLY why the ideology of conservatism (at least in its present form) is an abject failure.
It isn't rooted in the belief in the Constitution or the rule of law, or economic fundamentals. It's rooted in religious overtones. Specifically, the belief in a supreme
being.

No, you dunce.....it is a human being.

Your remedial here:

Shettles, Landrum, M.D., Rorvik, David, Rites of Life: The Scientific Evidence for Life Before Birth, page 36, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1983

“… Conception confers life and makes you one of a kind. Unless you have an identical twin, there is virtually no chance, in the natural course of things, that there will be “another you” – not even if mankind were to persist for billions of years.”





Dr. Jasper Williams, Former President of the National Medical Association (p 74)

“The formation, maturation and meeting of a male and female sex cell are all preliminary to their actual union into a combined cell, or zygote, which definitely marks the beginning of a new individual. The penetration of the ovum by the spermatozoon, and the coming together and pooling of their respective nuclei, constitutes the process of fertilization.”



Ronan O’Rahilly and Fabiola Miller, Human Embryology and Teratology, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2001. p. 8.

“Although life is a continuous process, fertilization… is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new genetically distinct human organism is formed when the chromosomes of the male and female pronuclei blend in the oocyte.”



“[All] organisms, however large and complex they might be as full grown, begin life as a single cell. This is true for the human being, for instance, who begins life as a fertilized ovum.”





"After fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being...[this] is no longer a matter of taste or opinion, it is not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence...." - Dr Jerome LeJeune, Professor of Genetics at the University of Descartes, Paris, discoverer of the chromosome pattern of Down's Syndrome, and Nobel Prize Winner

"An individual human life begins at conception when a sperm cell from the father fuses with an egg cell from the mother, to form a new cell, the zygote, the first embryonic stage. The zygote grows and divides into two daughter cells, each of which grows and divides into two grand-daughter cells, and this cell growth/division process continues on, over and over again. The zygote is the start of a biological continuum that automatically grows and develops, passing gradually and sequentially through the stages we call foetus, baby, child, adult, old person and ending eventually in death. The full genetic instructions to guide the development of the continuum, in interaction with its environment, are present in the zygote. Every stage along the continuum is biologically human and each point along the continuum has the full human properties appropriate to that point." - Dr. William Reville, University College Cork, Ireland



Somehow, you savages feel you have the right to slaughter a human being based on re-defining a term.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

At the moment of conception, it is a zygote. Nothing else. The rest of your diatribe are characteristics YOU are ascribing to it.
And I find it deeply amusing that you'll defend that zygotes life to the death, but the moment it drops out of the mother, you
couldn't give two shits about it.

And yet... You seem to not give two shits about it either.

You are however, a shining example of EXACTLY why the ideology of conservatism (at least in its present form) is an abject failure.
It isn't rooted in the belief in the Constitution or the rule of law, or economic fundamentals. It's rooted in religious overtones. Specifically, the belief in a supreme
being.

The rule of law is nothing more than what human beings believe. It doesn't matter whether it's based on Satanism, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, or even atheism. Once the law is decided upon it challenged and changed. Just because you don't like where the fundamental beliefs come from makes no difference. It is now law.

*****SMILE*****

 

[initforme]

The number of conceptions needs to go down emphatically. The new law will help ensure that. That will eliminate abortion and help the nation.

 

[HenryBHough]

If they wanted to protect the unborn, they would pass a law making it illegal for God to abort a fetus after 6 weeks.

Whatever you're smoking remember your liberal obligation to share it with all of us!

 

[JoeB131]

No, you dunce.....it is a human being.

Your remedial here:

Shettles, Landrum, M.D., Rorvik, David, Rites of Life: The Scientific Evidence for Life Before Birth, page 36, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1983

“… Conception confers life and makes you one of a kind. Unless you have an identical twin, there is virtually no chance, in the natural course of things, that there will be “another you” – not even if mankind were to persist for billions of years.”

Except one third to one half of Zygotes conceived never attach to the uterine wall.

The Implications of Defining When a Woman Is Pregnant

According to both the scientific community and long-standing federal policy, a woman is considered pregnant only when a fertilized egg has implanted in the wall of her uterus; however, state definitions of pregnancy vary widely. The differences may be more than academic. Debates over emergency...

www.guttmacher.org

Those zygotes that end up in a tampon at the end of the month aren't considered people, we don't put little coffins with the Tampax, so we?

10-20% of pregnancies end in miscarriage.

Miscarriage - Symptoms and causes

www.mayoclinic.org

Yet, oddly, we don't investigate every miscarriage as a potential homicide.

This is the problem with those of you who want to give civil rights to Blobby the Fetus... it opens a whole can of legal worms we probably don't want to deal with.

Can a child sue his parents for poor pre-natal diet? Smoking while pregnant? Drinking while pregant.

The thing is, once you've given Blobby full civil rights, he has more rights than the woman he is inside.

 

[Colin norris]

Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.

The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.

That's your opinion, ignorant as it is, but the law decides that. Not God.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There never was any doubt that Democrats, Leftists, lack self-awareness.

And, as you will see......any sense of irony.

"‘Diabolical’ That Supreme Court Didn’t Protect Abortion Like Religious Liberty: MSNBC Legal Analyst​

The Supreme Court rendered a “diabolical” decision by refusing to let women continue to seek abortions “up to at least viability,” especially since the justices previously halted a state law that interfered with believers’ religious liberty, an MSNBC legal analyst said.

She worried that the procedural ruling means the majority of justices “don’t intend to give Roe v. Wade continuing life.”


On Friday’s episode of “Morning Joe,” guest host Willie Geist asked former Obama administration U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan Barbara McQuade about a Texas law that bars abortionists from performing an abortion if they can detect a fetal heartbeat.

In a 5-4 decision offered Thursday, the Supreme Court allowed the law to remain in effect while the case wends its way through the court system — an action McQuade claimed violates the “right” to an abortion, which she considers as sacrosanct as the freedom of religion."

‘Diabolical’ That Supreme Court Didn’t Protect Abortion Like Religious Liberty: MSNBC Legal Analyst | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

It would really be funny...."continuing life" for the bill but not the baby.......if the issue weren't about the "right" to kill another human being.