Please read for comprehension. I'm giving for full protections to a viable fetus, but not to a clump of cells in a test tube.
So now you agree with PoliticalChic s stance on the issue?
It didn't sound that way to me.
*****SMILE*****

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please read for comprehension. I'm giving for full protections to a viable fetus, but not to a clump of cells in a test tube.
Roe v wade isn't science Jackass ....Roe v Wade actually codified viability, which the republicans want thrown out. An embryo at 6 weeks isn't distinguishable as being human.
Only to those who can't comprehend the English language.So now you agree with PoliticalChic s stance on the issue?
Roe v wade isn't science Jackass ....
From the beginning of the third trimester on—the point at which a fetus became viable under the medical technology available in the early 1970s—the Court ruled that a state's interest in protecting prenatal life became so compelling that it could legally prohibit all abortions except where necessary to protect the ...Roe v wade isn't science Jackass ....
Only to those who can't comprehend the English language.
So you hat hatched from an egg? But if you ever were a fetus then, by your own statement, you are not a person.
Sock?
Really Who?Interesting white supremacist used to say the same about blacks...
Viability means being capable of living outside the womb.From the beginning of the third trimester on—the point at which a fetus became viable under the medical technology available in the early 1970s—the Court ruled that a state's interest in protecting prenatal life became so compelling that it could legally prohibit all abortions except where necessary to protect the ...
Roe was based on the science.
I wasn't a person when I was a fetus, no.
point of fact, most fetuses/embryoes/zygotes never become people
If you want a question answered, you would post the question with the request. Just saying "answer the question" is just harassment, since it doesn't say which question.Oh I think I'm comprehending how you deflect and refuse to be honest quite adequately.
Now answer the questions I've asked.
View attachment 535781
Oh I think I'm comprehending how you deflect and refuse to be honest quite adequately.
Now answer the questions I've asked.
*****SMILE*****
![]()
It doesn't matter WHAT the issue is...........the nutjobs and psychopaths are going to use politics, religion, and all other sorts of excuses to get their way.......even if it's murder.
I say the law needs to be a FEDERAL law and made as simply as this........
A woman can get an abortion, and she also gets spayed.
Except for absolute proof of rape.
Then she can go a whoring as often as she wants with no setbacks.
She also gets put on a infant murder registry, which ensures she never is able to get government assistance on anything, ever, as long as she lives.
One simple law to rule all.
Watch how fast these women would shut up and start using condoms and such!!
Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.
The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.
Nobody is questioning it's alive. Bacteria are alive, but I wouldn't give TB protection from using drugs to abort it.Viability means being capable of living outside the womb.
It does not define when life begins nor does it suggest infants ARE NOT alive prior to the stage of viability.
You are intentionally being disingenuous.
If you want a question answered, you would post the question with the request. Just saying "answer the question" is just harassment, since it doesn't say which question.
So now you agree with PoliticalChic s stance on the issue?
Except only a faction of conceived zygotes ever become babies.
In addition to the ones eliminated by surgical abortion, chemical abortion and miscarriage, 2./3rds of fertilized zygotes never attach to the uterine wall. Do we start including little coffins with tampons?
Then the answers are no, no and no.I've only asked you two questions so far.
Now would you kindly answer the questions
Now would you like a peanut? Oh by the way that now makes three questions.
Absolute proof of rape?? LOL. Said the statist.It doesn't matter WHAT the issue is...........the nutjobs and psychopaths are going to use politics, religion, and all other sorts of excuses to get their way.......even if it's murder.
I say the law needs to be a FEDERAL law and made as simply as this........
A woman can get an abortion, and she also gets spayed.
Except for absolute proof of rape.
Then she can go a whoring as often as she wants with no setbacks.
She also gets put on a infant murder registry, which ensures she never is able to get government assistance on anything, ever, as long as she lives.
One simple law to rule all.
Watch how fast these women would shut up and start using condoms and such!!
I guess I have to give you a simple answer, since the last one, didn't sink in.
Politicalchic is running and hiding from me, because we agree of virtually nothing. She posts lies, I object to them.
At conception, it is a zygote. A combination of genes.Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.
The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.