- Thread starter
- #21
If that test tube contains an embryo, yes.
Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.
The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that test tube contains an embryo, yes.
So you hat hatched from an egg? But if you ever were a fetus then, by your own statement, you are not a person.Fetuses still aren't people.
Fetuses still aren't people.
So you hat hatched from an egg? But if you ever were a fetus then, by your own statement, you are not a person.
Sock?
So, this little dance you idiots do has nothing to do with sanctity of life it is all about control of humans and what they do to fit your ideology, be sure to cut school funding for kids yet again to show how much you value them and don't forget to starve them by cutting them from welfare.
They want to go against the Founding Fathers on the issue by making draconian laws for children in the womb they pretend to care about....Republcans want to give more rights to the unborn, than once they're born. Republicans want all kinds of protections for the unborn until birth, but once a baby enters the world, republicans don't want to lift a finger to help it actually grow up.
Yes they do since they have the ability. Just like your God killed untold amounts of children in the womb and those out of the womb yet you adorate and worship this murderous God.Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.
The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.
If that test tube contains an embryo, yes.
Once conception occurs, we have an organism with a unique DNA code that proves it a human being.
The convenience of one of the two parents does not give a right to kill that offspring.
Fetuses still aren't people.
When do the constitutional rights of "people" attach to a fetus, or to an infant, or to a child.So you hat hatched from an egg? But if you ever were a fetus then, by your own statement, you are not a person.
Sock?
Science would recognize viability.`````````````````````
Only according to the Party of Science.
Fetuses are people according to normal thinking people who ACTUALLY understand Science.
God performs more abortions (spontaneous abortions / miscarriages) than man.Yes they do since they have the ability. Just like your God killed untold amounts of children in the womb and those out of the womb yet you adorate and worship this murderous God.
If they wanted to protect the unborn, they would pass a law making it illegal for God to abort a fetus after 6 weeks.God performs more abortions (spontaneous abortions / miscarriages) than man.
Real science does recognize viability dumbass ......Science would recognize viability.
Fetuses still aren't people.
Science would recognize viability.
Roe v Wade actually codified viability, which the republicans want thrown out. An embryo at 6 weeks isn't distinguishable as being human.Real science does recognize viability dumbass ......
As did the US Supreme Court in Scott v Sanford, opinion by chief justice Tanney.Interesting white supremacist used to say the same about blacks...
Interesting way of defining what is a human being.
Should a test tube filed with the human genome have the same protections as a viable fetus?
Interesting way of defining what is a human being.
Should a test tube filed with the human genome have the same protections as a viable fetus?
Please read for comprehension. I'm giving for full protections to a viable fetus, but not to a clump of cells in a test tube.So you're position is that a viable fetus is nothing more than a cancerous tumor?